I want to thank you again, you pointed me in the right direction, I
found a typo with the version exactly as you pointed to, and now its
happily compiling.
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:40:47 -0400,
Darac Marjal wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> [1.1 ]
>
> On 25/04/2021 20:23, John Covici wrote:
> > Hi. In the make
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:40:47 -0400,
Darac Marjal wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> [1.1 ]
Thanksfor your quick response, answers in line.
>
> On 25/04/2021 20:23, John Covici wrote:
> > Hi. In the make bzImage step of compiling linux-source-4.19 I get the
> > following error:
> >
> > CC arch/x86/hype
On 25/04/2021 20:23, John Covici wrote:
> Hi. In the make bzImage step of compiling linux-source-4.19 I get the
> following error:
>
> CC arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.o
> arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c: In function ‘hyperv_init’:
> arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c:338:52: error: expected expression bef
Hi. In the make bzImage step of compiling linux-source-4.19 I get the
following error:
CC arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.o
arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c: In function ‘hyperv_init’:
arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c:338:52: error: expected expression before
‘,’ token
guest_id = generate_guest_id(0,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:52 AM, Davide Anchisi wrote:
> I do have libpoppler-qt5-1:
> dpkg -l libpoppler-qt5-1
> ii libpoppler-qt5-1:amd6 0.26.5-2+deb8u1
> and libpoppler-qt5.so.1: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpoppler-qt5.so.1
>
> The command to build the package. I first went with:
> a
I do have libpoppler-qt5-1:
dpkg -l libpoppler-qt5-1
ii libpoppler-qt5-1:amd6 0.26.5-2+deb8u1
and libpoppler-qt5.so.1: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpoppler-qt5.so.1
The command to build the package. I first went with:
apt-get -b source libpoppler64=0.48.0-2
but also tried:
dpkg-build
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 4:52 AM, Davide Anchisi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to compile "libpoppler" in Debian Jessie (amd64) from testing
> sources:
> apt-get -b source libpoppler64=0.48.0-2
> I resolved the build dependencies:
> apt-get build-dep libpoppler64=0.48.0-2
>
> The build begin
Hi,
I am trying to compile "libpoppler" in Debian Jessie (amd64) from testing
sources:
apt-get -b source libpoppler64=0.48.0-2
I resolved the build dependencies:
apt-get build-dep libpoppler64=0.48.0-2
The build begins, but stops with an error:
make[1]: entering directory
"/home/davide/d
I spoke too soon, someone in the ubuntu forums had the same problem,
installed libssl-dev and it worked.
Sorry to trouble y'all.
Curt-
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Curt Howland wrote:
> So, there I was, doing a compile of the new kernel, 4.3
>
> I get the following interesting error:
>
> ===
So, there I was, doing a compile of the new kernel, 4.3
I get the following interesting error:
===
scripts/extract-cert.c:21:25: fatal error: openssl/bio.h: No such file
or directory
#include
^
compilation terminated.
===
I'm accustomed to getting compile time
Amax wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:50:10 +0200, Bernard wrote:
<- snip -->
The initrd.img that I have on my working system, as well as those
initrd.img that 'mkinitrd' generates when requested, are not compressed
files. Filenames are : initrd.img-2.6.20-16-386 for instance. No .gz
b
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:50:10 +0200, Bernard wrote:
<- snip -->
> The initrd.img that I have on my working system, as well as those
> initrd.img that 'mkinitrd' generates when requested, are not compressed
> files. Filenames are : initrd.img-2.6.20-16-386 for instance. No .gz
> behind. I s
On Fri, Aug 28 2009, Celejar wrote:
> Assuming that you're building kernel packages with kernel-package, you
> may be being hit by this:
>
> "The image postinst no longer runs the initramfs creation commands.
> Instead, there are example scripts provided that will perform the task.
> These script
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:07:45 +0800
Niu Kun wrote:
> bdebreil 写道:
...
> > Now, with Lenny, I haven't so far been able to go any further in
> > recompiling usable kernels. 2.6.30.4 did compile without errors, but
> > then I found that I had no 'mkinitrd' on my new system. How am I to
> > generate
bdebreil 写道:
Hi to Everyone,
With my old SARGE system, as stated here last week, I was unable to boot
newly compiled kernels, most likely because of the faulty initrd.img
that I got using 'mkinitrd'. For this reason, I decided to install
Lenny.
Now, with Lenny, I haven't so far been able to go
Hi to Everyone,
With my old SARGE system, as stated here last week, I was unable to boot
newly compiled kernels, most likely because of the faulty initrd.img
that I got using 'mkinitrd'. For this reason, I decided to install
Lenny.
Now, with Lenny, I haven't so far been able to go any further in
Bernard wrote:
>>
>>You really could use the recent 2.6.30.4. There were different problems
>>with 2.6.20 to 2.6.30. I find 2.6.30.4 the best I've had since 2.6.20.
>>
>>
> I tried 2.6.30.4. Same result as with 2.6.26.2 : compiles without
> errors, but crashes on boot.
>
so you are missing som
Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
Bernard wrote:
Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
Bernard wrote:
Compiling md in the kernel is the right approach to boot from raided root
without initrd. You can try this just skipping (deleteing the line in grub
temporary)
I just tried that. Raid compiled int
Bernard wrote:
> Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
>
>>Bernard wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Compiling md in the kernel is the right approach to boot from raided root
>>without initrd. You can try this just skipping (deleteing the line in grub
>>temporary)
>>
>>
> I just tried that. Raid compiled into the kernel
Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
Bernard wrote:
Compiling md in the kernel is the right approach to boot from raided root
without initrd. You can try this just skipping (deleteing the line in grub
temporary)
I just tried that. Raid compiled into the kernel instead of modules. No
initrd. Still cra
Bernard wrote:
>
> 2.6.30.4 does compile all right, so does 2.6.26, but 2.6.20 does not.
you find out why in the archives
> Problem is that I still can't boot those I compiled, i.e. 2.6.26. because
> the initrd.img is buggy. I did find something, still it is not enough to
> get the process to w
Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
Sorry forgot to write
Yes there is problem compiling the 2.6.20 with recent gcc
The problem is the compiler. If you are compiling just grab the last
version from kernel.org.
2.6.30.4 seems to be working fine
Just to be objective the
> From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Emanoil Kotsev
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 1:55 PM
>
> Bernard wrote:
>
> > Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
> >
> >>Bernard wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >>
> >>why not just compile it on your notebook (or copy a compiled kernel)
> ?!
> >>
> >>you
Bernard wrote:
> Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
>
>>Bernard wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>why not just compile it on your notebook (or copy a compiled kernel) ?!
>>
>>you also can just disable the loading of the sound modules to make it more
>>simple.
>>
>>
>
> Things would be easy if all sound support
Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
try compiling the necessary modules _in_ the kernel.
This is the way it has been done.
So, I re-tried compiling after de-activating raid0 in the config,
leaving only raid1... to the same end result.
In the config it should be [*] not [M] if booting fro
Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
do you have a not raid boot partition, where you can put the initrd image?
My boot partition is not raid, or, at least, even though it is mirrored,
it remains in ext2fs, while the rest is in LVM2. So, the initrd image
that I am trying is available at start,
Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
Bernard wrote:
why not just compile it on your notebook (or copy a compiled kernel) ?!
you also can just disable the loading of the sound modules to make it more
simple.
Things would be easy if all sound support were in modules. But some
functions are part
Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
> Sorry forgot to write
>
> Yes there is problem compiling the 2.6.20 with recent gcc
>
> The problem is the compiler. If you are compiling just grab the last
> version from kernel.org.
>
> 2.6.30.4 seems to be working fine
>
Just to be object
Sorry forgot to write
Yes there is problem compiling the 2.6.20 with recent gcc
The problem is the compiler. If you are compiling just grab the last version
from kernel.org.
2.6.30.4 seems to be working fine
>>
>> So, upon my failures to recompile kernel 2.6.20-16-386, I tried
&g
Bernard wrote:
> Hi to Everyone,
>
> I need to re-compile my kernel so that it does not include sound support
> inside. I am running Debian 3.1 (Sarge). My system is on RAID1. My /boot
> partition is from /dev/sda1 (mirror on /dev/sdb1) installed on /dev/md0
> (ext3), while my '/' partition is fr
Hi to Everyone,
I need to re-compile my kernel so that it does not include sound support
inside. I am running Debian 3.1 (Sarge). My system is on RAID1. My /boot
partition is from /dev/sda1 (mirror on /dev/sdb1) installed on /dev/md0
(ext3), while my '/' partition is from /dev/sda2 and /dev/sd
Divick Kishore:
>
> General SMART Values:
> Offline data collection status: (0x00) Offline data collection activity
> was never started.
> Auto Offline Data Collection: Disabled.
> Self-test execution status: (
Divick Kishore:
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Jochen Schulz >
>> wrote:
>
>> Your problem is most probably unrelated to your building a kernel. Take
>> a look into /var/log/syslog and/or dmesg output. You will probably find
>> messages about hard disk errors. Post them here if you have tro
Hi,
>> Posting the output of 'smartctl -a /dev/hda' (from smartmontools, insert
>> your hard drive device name) might help as well.
>>
The output from smatctl is fairly cryptic for me, posting it below:
sudo smartctl -a /dev/hdc1
smartctl
Hi,
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Jochen Schulz >
> wrote:
> Your problem is most probably unrelated to your building a kernel. Take
> a look into /var/log/syslog and/or dmesg output. You will probably find
> messages about hard disk errors. Post them here if you have trouble
> interpreting
Divick Kishore:
>
> make-kpkg clean
>
> I get error that file system is read only. Somehow just before running
> this command, the file system wasn´t readonly but after running this,
> my file system has become read only.
Your problem is most probably unrelated to your building a kernel. Take
a
Hi,
I am trying to compile Linux kernel 2.6.29-1 as described here
http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html,
section 4.4, i.e. I copy the /boot/config-2.6.26-1-686 to untarred
linux kernel directory as .config and after doing make menuconfig,
when I try to do
make-kpkg cle
Thomas Preud'homme escribió:
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 16:02:37 Adrian Chapela wrote:
I downloaded the sources from www.kernel.org. But my problem starts with
2.6.28. I can compile this version but now it is impossible. Then I
downloaded 2.6.28.5 and it is the same. This morning I have been
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:02:37 +0100, "Adrian Chapela"
said:
> Thomas Preud'homme escribió:
> > On Tuesday 17 February 2009 12:31:45 Adrian Chapela wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I am compiling Linux Kernel 2.6.28.5.
> >>
> >
> > Where did you get the sources ? I first thought it could b
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 16:02:37 Adrian Chapela wrote:
>
> I downloaded the sources from www.kernel.org. But my problem starts with
> 2.6.28. I can compile this version but now it is impossible. Then I
> downloaded 2.6.28.5 and it is the same. This morning I have been
> changing some packages f
Thomas Preud'homme escribió:
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 12:31:45 Adrian Chapela wrote:
Hello,
I am compiling Linux Kernel 2.6.28.5.
Where did you get the sources ? I first thought it could be the lack of blob
firmware but as it is a problem of compilation and not linkage it must be
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 12:31:45 Adrian Chapela wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am compiling Linux Kernel 2.6.28.5.
Where did you get the sources ? I first thought it could be the lack of blob
firmware but as it is a problem of compilation and not linkage it must be
something else. Perhaps two module
Hello,
I am compiling Linux Kernel 2.6.28.5. The sources are a new clean
sources. I downloaded and then I cofigured the kernel. After all I
compiled in Debian Way:
make-kpkg --initrd kernel_image
After a while it sends me the next output:
CC [M] drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.o
drivers/ch
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 04:32:42AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:19:00AM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
> > Please do not quote 200+ lines of an email to add a mere two
> > line reply.
>
> +1
And while we're at it, please avoid a 'me-to' type of answer that adds
no furt
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:19:00AM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
> Please do not quote 200+ lines of an email to add a mere two
> line reply.
+1
--
Chris.
==
I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god
than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other
poss
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:11:08 +0100
"Jesus arteche" wrote:
> Im compiling Filedrawers, I got intall all teh dependencies, the machine is
> i386 with ubuntu.
As already mentioned, Ubuntu isn't Debian. There are some differences,
that make a difference.
> But after Configure i made "make clean"
On Thursday 18 December 2008 00:11:08 Jesus arteche wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Im compiling Filedrawers, I got intall all teh dependencies, the machine is
> i386 with ubuntu.
Ubuntu != debian I am certain those guys have their own mailinglist
someplace...
//E.Sundin
signature.asc
Description: This is
On Thu Dec 18, 2008 at 01:08:52 +0100, Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
> may be the mysql -dev version you have installed, check what the
> requirement/compatibility is
Please do not quote 200+ lines of an email to add a mere two
line reply.
Steve
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@
Jesus arteche wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Im compiling Filedrawers, I got intall all teh dependencies, the machine
> is i386 with ubuntu. But after Configure i made "make clean" and
> "make"...and i got this error:
>
>
>
> rm -f
> php/config.php
>
> echo '>
> php/config.php
>
> echo '# php config file
Hey,
Im compiling Filedrawers, I got intall all teh dependencies, the machine is
i386 with ubuntu. But after Configure i made "make clean" and "make"...and i
got this error:
rm -f
php/config.php
echo '>
php/config.php
echo '# php config file generated by Makefile.' >>
php/config.php
echo "\$s
Jesus arteche wrote:
> hey,
>
> I'm compiling a mod for apache ...and i discover that it is designed jus
> for x86 not for amd64...and i get this error :
>
> relocation R_X86_64_32S against `a local symbol' can not be used when
> making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> mod_waklog.o: could
hey,
I'm compiling a mod for apache ...and i discover that it is designed jus for
x86 not for amd64...and i get this error :
relocation R_X86_64_32S against `a local symbol' can not be used when
making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
mod_waklog.o: could not read symbols: Bad value
collect2
On 09/28/2008 02:49 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
I did check the settings in .config. Both BLK_DEV_IDE and
BLK_DEV_IDEDISK are set to "y." As for the ATA/SATA settings, they were
not set, but my disk is an older one and should not care, but I tried
setting them and trying again, and I got the
On Sep 28, 2008, at 2:23 AM, debian-user-digest-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
From: "Mumia W.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: September 28, 2008 12:28:43 AM PDT
To: Debian User List
Subject: Re: Problem compiling 2.6.26 kernel
On 09/27/2008 10:42 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
I have used
Alex Samad wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 02:28:43AM -0500, Mumia W.. wrote:
On 09/27/2008 10:42 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
I have used Debian for many years and I have always used the
kernel-package program that is included with Debian to compile new
kernels. I have an older Athlon PC that h
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 02:28:43AM -0500, Mumia W.. wrote:
> On 09/27/2008 10:42 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
>> I have used Debian for many years and I have always used the
>> kernel-package program that is included with Debian to compile new
>> kernels. I have an older Athlon PC that has the Rei
On 09/27/2008 10:42 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
I have used Debian for many years and I have always used the
kernel-package program that is included with Debian to compile new
kernels. I have an older Athlon PC that has the Reiserfs 3.6 on it.
After I do the "make-kpkg --revision= ## kernel-ima
I have used Debian for many years and I have always used the kernel-
package program that is included with Debian to compile new kernels.
I have an older Athlon PC that has the Reiserfs 3.6 on it. After I
do the "make-kpkg --revision= ## kernel-image" and then use "dpkg -i"
to install the
"Joost Witteveen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On 16/04/2008, John Salmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>
>>
>> > On 2008-04-15 20:39 +0200, John Salmon wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'm running Debian Etch on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/16/08 20:06, s. keeling wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Thanks all for bottom-posting! But why isn't anyone snipping out
>> the same, repeating, unnecessary text?
>>
>> On 04/16/08 10:10, H.S. wrote:
>>> John Salmon wrote:
S
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Thanks all for bottom-posting! But why isn't anyone snipping out
> the same, repeating, unnecessary text?
>
> On 04/16/08 10:10, H.S. wrote:
> > John Salmon wrote:
> >> Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >>
> >>> On 20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks all for bottom-posting! But why isn't anyone snipping out
the same, repeating, unnecessary text?
On 04/16/08 10:10, H.S. wrote:
> John Salmon wrote:
>> Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>
>>> On 2008-04-15
John Salmon wrote:
Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2008-04-15 20:39 +0200, John Salmon wrote:
I'm running Debian Etch on a PC. When I try to compile the following
(called test.c);
#include
#include
int main()
{
double
val = 1.55;
prin
John Salmon wrote:
> That solved the linking problem. Now, after a successful compilation, when
> I run 'test' I gen no output. ???
>
It works for me.
$cat using_sin.c
#include
#include
int main()
{
double val = 1.55;
printf("sine: %g\n", sin(val));
return 0;
}
$gcc using_sin.
On 16/04/2008, John Salmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>
> > On 2008-04-15 20:39 +0200, John Salmon wrote:
> >
> >> I'm running Debian Etch on a PC. When I try to compile the following
> >> (called test.c);
> >>
> >> #includ
Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On 2008-04-15 20:39 +0200, John Salmon wrote:
>
>> I'm running Debian Etch on a PC. When I try to compile the following
>> (called test.c);
>>
>> #include
>> #include
>>
>> int main()
>> {
>> double
>> val = 1.55;
2008/4/15, John Salmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm running Debian Etch on a PC. When I try to compile the following
> (called test.c);
>
> #include
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
> double
> val = 1.55;
>
> printf("sine: %g\n", sin(val));
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> using the co
On 2008-04-15 20:39 +0200, John Salmon wrote:
> I'm running Debian Etch on a PC. When I try to compile the following
> (called test.c);
>
> #include
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
> double
> val = 1.55;
>
> printf("sine: %g\n", sin(val));
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> using the comma
I'm running Debian Etch on a PC. When I try to compile the following
(called test.c);
#include
#include
int main()
{
double
val = 1.55;
printf("sine: %g\n", sin(val));
return 0;
}
using the command line
gcc -Wall -o test test.c
I get
/tmp/cciDV02m.o: In function `main
On Saturday 01 December 2007 23:46, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hi Michelle
All your replies come dated Saturday up to now, the next two are dated Sunday
8 AM and 12 noon.
What's the trouble?
Thierry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
Am 2007-11-25 08:21:57, schrieb Lowell Thomas:
> On November 21, 2007 "Michael Marsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The various gcc compilers are packaged separately. You probably want
> > to install the package "g++".
>
>
> Thanks for the tip. apt-get install g++ did the job.
For the next t
On November 21, 2007 "Michael Marsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The various gcc compilers are packaged separately. You probably want
> to install the package "g++".
Thanks for the tip. apt-get install g++ did the job.
Lowell Thomas
www.coasttocoastresearch.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Nov 21, 2007 10:44 AM, Lowell Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just recently installed Debian 4.0r1. It is my first experience with
> Debian or GNU/Linux. I've been building and running C programs just fine
> with gcc. However, I'm unable to compile C++ programs. The command g++
> returns "
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/21/07 09:44, Lowell Thomas wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just recently installed Debian 4.0r1. It is my first experience with
> Debian or GNU/Linux. I’ve been building and running C programs just fine
> with gcc. However, I’m unable to compile C++ prog
Hi All,
I just recently installed Debian 4.0r1. It is my first experience with
Debian or GNU/Linux. Ive been building and running C programs just fine
with gcc. However, Im unable to compile C++ programs. The command g++
returns program not found and
gcc main.cpp
returns the error
gcc: error t
Hello everybody. I am trying to install anbd on a PIII cluster, and for
that I have to compile the module that they provide. But unfortunately,
I am not being capable of compile this module agaist the
kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-686-smp. make menuconfig works nicely, but when I
try to make or make modul
I'm using 3.1 stable. I've uninstalled the bluez modules and components.
Here's what happens when I try and compile the affix modules:
#apt-get install affix-headers affix-source affix-common
#cd /usr/src
#tar xvfz affix.tar.gz
#cd linux
#fakeroot make-kpkg --append-to-version=-mppe --added-modu
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 14:35 +0200, Ronald Castillo wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I've been trying to compile the new Firefox 1.0.6 on my Sarge system,
[snip]
> Anyone knows how can I get past through this, or where could I find a
> precompiled package for Sarge?
It's possible/probable that the 1.0.6 securi
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 02:35:47PM +0200, Ronald Castillo wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I've been trying to compile the new Firefox 1.0.6 on my Sarge system,
> but I end up having the following error messages:
Any particular reasoen you feel the need to compile it yourself? It is
already in Sid for i386 a
Hello.
I've been trying to compile the new Firefox 1.0.6 on my Sarge system,
but I end up having the following error messages:
--
./../dist/include/xpcom -I../../../dist/include/string
-I../../../dist/include/pref -I../../../dist/include/uconv
-I..
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:19 pm, Andrea Vettorello wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:20:35 +1300, Andrew Walbran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> > I have recently started using Debian GNU / Linux, and have found that I
> > am unable to compile anything with GCC. Compiling even a trivial program
> > g
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 9:18 pm, Rem wrote:
> Hi;
>
> Is your computer overclocked ?
No. It is running at 350MHz as it is designed to. Also, gcc works fine on my
Fedora Core 1 installation on the same computer so I very much doubt that
this is a hardware problem.
>
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:20:35 +130
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:20:35 +1300, Andrew Walbran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> I have recently started using Debian GNU / Linux, and have found that I am
> unable to compile anything with GCC. Compiling even a trivial program gives a
> number of 'undefined reference' errors:
>
> $ cat test.c
Hi
I have recently started using Debian GNU / Linux, and have found that I am
unable to compile anything with GCC. Compiling even a trivial program gives a
number of 'undefined reference' errors:
$ cat test.c
int main() {
return 0;
}
$ gcc test.c
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to
[EMAIL P
On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 11:35, Bruno Boettcher wrote:
> Hello
>
> ghostscript mailing list seems utterly dead, or my problem terribly
> stupid...
>
> i am still trying to get the aculaser C4100 (Epson) running, and since
> default debian ghostscripts don't support it directly i tryed to compile
> a
Hello
ghostscript mailing list seems utterly dead, or my problem terribly
stupid...
i am still trying to get the aculaser C4100 (Epson) running, and since
default debian ghostscripts don't support it directly i tryed to compile
a ghostscript myself...
unfortunately it stops with the error:
./obj
I have been trying to install rekall for the past 2 weeks. I cannot seem to be able to
find a debian package for rekall, so I tried compiling it from source.
Below are the last few lines from ./configure --disable-mt
checking for Qt... libraries /usr/lib, headers /usr/include/qt3
checking if Qt
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 10:00:48AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >In the file included from ksym.c:50:
> >/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.18/include/asm/checksum.h:72:30: missing
> >termintating " character
>
> If you are using gcc 3.3, which you are if you ran dist-upgrade, it
> *will* complain of
Thomas H. George wrote:
My system is testing fully up-to-date. I just ran apt-get update and
apt-get dist-upgrade which installed kernel-source-2.4.18..
My current kernel was built from kernel-source-2.4.22 but I have been
experiencing irratic behavior - specifically many
p80211/knetdev_hard-s
My system is testing fully up-to-date. I just ran apt-get update and
apt-get dist-upgrade which installed kernel-source-2.4.18..
My current kernel was built from kernel-source-2.4.22 but I have been
experiencing irratic behavior - specifically many
p80211/knetdev_hard-start_xinit: messages o
I tried to compile a new kernel with
CC=gcc-2.95 make-kpkg --added_patches=lowlatency,preempt
--append-to-version=.rk1103
but got the following:-
In file included from ide-cd.c:318:
ide-cd.h:440: error: long, short, signed or unsigned used invalidly for
`slot_tablelen'
make[4]: *** [ide-cd.o] Err
Hi,
Colin Watson wrote:
> > /bin/sh ../libtool --silent --mode=link --tag=CXX g++ -Wnon-virtual-dtor
> > -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -pedantic -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings
> > -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -DNDEBUG
> > -DNO_DEBUG -O2 -fno-exceptions -fno
Hello. I was trying to compile the instable versión of KDE (3.1.3) on my
Sarge system. For that, I had to install GCC 2.95, as with gcc 3.3 I got
some "sanity check problems". Since kdebase depends on kdelibs and that one
depends on arts, I compiled arts and kdelibs without problems, but when I
go
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 03:02:16PM +0200, Ronald Castillo wrote:
> Hello. I was trying to compile the instable versi?n of KDE (3.1.3) on my
> Sarge system. For that, I had to install GCC 2.95, as with gcc 3.3 I got
> some "sanity check problems". Since kdebase depends on kdelibs and that one
> dep
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 02:05:59 +1100
Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 10:37:01PM +0100, Wim De Smet wrote:
> > could it be that this is specific to my kernel or is it a configuration problem
>with my current locales?
> > I hope this is not too specific, I could mail to
Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-13 21:05:46 +]:
> I see. But in that case the error message does seem rather misleading.
> Why does it complain about not being able to make directories if it is
> not trying to make them? (I haven't examined the internals of rpm).
Since it is not a me
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:31:18 -0700, Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-12 21:57:35 +]:
>> > rpm is trying to mkdir /usr/src/rpm/SOURCES, of course
Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-12 21:57:35 +]:
> > rpm is trying to mkdir /usr/src/rpm/SOURCES, of course this fails if
> > /usr/src/rpm does not exist. It's dumb code and a bad error message.
Actually it does not try to make the directories. It just fails if
the directories are no
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 14:37:58 -0500, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Faheem Mitha wrote:
>> No. Am I supposed to create it? Isn't this something that should be
>> done automatically, by a postinst script of whatever? If I am supposed
>> to create it, I think it should be documented.
>
> The
Faheem Mitha wrote:
> No. Am I supposed to create it? Isn't this something that should be
> done automatically, by a postinst script of whatever? If I am supposed
> to create it, I think it should be documented.
The directory is supposed to be included in the package but was left out
by mistake. I
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
