On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 02:05:59 +1100 Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 10:37:01PM +0100, Wim De Smet wrote: > > could it be that this is specific to my kernel or is it a configuration problem >with my current locales? > > I hope this is not too specific, I could mail to the gcc people but I haven't had >this problem under other > > systems so I figured it might be a misconfiguration somewhere? > > I've no idea how to actually fix this, but I would recommend getting the > gcc-3.2 source package from sid and building that, so you don't clutter > up /usr/; plus, it's know to be buildable. > > -rob > Aha. Should've known that one :) I found out what the problem is. The glibc version (2.2.4 or something I think) had a bug that didn't allow this gcc version to be built. So I basically upgraded glibc a couple of notches, then upgraded gcc to 3.0.4, then upgraded glibc again and then went for gcc 3.2, after which I upgraded glibc to the latest version. I like building my own packages, but I agree, this one was a bit of a hassle. greets, Wim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
