On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:11:14AM -0500, Shashank Bhide wrote:
>
>
> How do I upgrade from Potato to woody?
>
> What do I need to change in the sources.list file?
The official part of my sources.list file looks like this:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian woody main contr
How do I upgrade from Potato to woody?
What do I need to change in the sources.list file?
My sources.list file looks something like this:
# Uncomment if you want the apt-get source function to work
#deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
#deb-src http://non
Hello Shashank!
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 17:40, Shashank Bhide wrote:
> How do I upgrade from Potato to woody?
>
> What do I need to change in the sources.list file?
See
http://www.de.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html
for rather detailed hints on
o a system and had
several problems while doing so. I am actually assigned the task of
upgrading two of the production servers from potato to woody, and which
is why I wanted to install the old stable. I am a complete newbie to
debian and would like to learn as much as I can while doing the testi
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 17:18, Shashank Bhide wrote:
> Hi all,
> I was able to install Debian 2.2.26 on my system (Potato). I could not get
> my network card to work once the system started up. I used all the drivers
> 1-4 but apparently the drivers for my network card were not loaded. While
> boo
Hello
Shashank Bhide (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I was able to install Debian 2.2.26 on my system (Potato). I could not
> get my network card to work once the system started up. I used all the
> drivers 1-4 but apparently the drivers for my network card were not
> loaded. While booting up, the
am actually assigned the task of
upgrading two of the production servers from potato to woody, and which
is why I wanted to install the old stable. I am a complete newbie to
debian and would like to learn as much as I can while doing the testing.
How does apt-get affect mysql databases and
Hello all,
I was earlier trying to get potato installed on to a system and had
several problems while doing so. I am actually assigned the task of
upgrading two of the production servers from potato to woody, and which is
why I wanted to install the old stable. I am a complete newbie to
>
> First question: can I force the configure stage of mc ('Setting up
> mc-common (4.5.55-1.2)') to run again, so that I can get the new file?
do u want this ... dpkg-reconfigure mc
>
> I have never got this to work before, but I had hoped it would this
> time, plus I thought it would be n
I have a couple of problems upgrading from potato to woody, using a
14-CD official set (7 binary, 7 source). I followed the instructions at
this address: http://www.debian.org/releases/woody/i386/release-notes/as
recommended in the installation manual.
I first went with the recommended
Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I currently have Potato installed, and a stack of
> Woody CD's, how do I upgrade from Potato to Woody?
>
> Do I have to just install over Potato?
>
> Or, does apt-get or dpkg allow a more graceful upgrade
> in some automatic
If I currently have Potato installed, and a stack of
Woody CD's, how do I upgrade from Potato to Woody?
Do I have to just install over Potato?
Or, does apt-get or dpkg allow a more graceful upgrade
in some automatic fashion?
If there's an upgrade method, will it goof up things
l
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:32:03PM -0600, Elizabeth Barham wrote:
> will writes:
> > seeing lots of this during an "apt-get dist-upgrade" from potato
> > to woddy today:
> >
> >
> >
> > Setting up libxslt1 (1.0.16-0.1) ...
> > ldconfig: /usr/oracle/lib/libvbj30ssl.so is not a shared
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:14:37PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> seeing lots of this during an "apt-get dist-upgrade" from potato
> to woddy today:
>
>
>
> Setting up libxslt1 (1.0.16-0.1) ...
> ldconfig: /usr/oracle/lib/libvbj30ssl.so is not a shared object
> file (Type:
will writes:
> seeing lots of this during an "apt-get dist-upgrade" from potato
> to woddy today:
>
>
>
> Setting up libxslt1 (1.0.16-0.1) ...
> ldconfig: /usr/oracle/lib/libvbj30ssl.so is not a shared object
> file (Type: 768).
>
>
> Setting up libreadline4 (4.2
seeing lots of this during an "apt-get dist-upgrade" from potato
to woddy today:
Setting up libxslt1 (1.0.16-0.1) ...
ldconfig: /usr/oracle/lib/libvbj30ssl.so is not a shared object
file (Type: 768).
Setting up libreadline4 (4.2a-5) ...
ldconfig:
Felipe MartÃnez Hermo said:
> If that's enough why debian recommends upgrading using dselect?
>
> I tried to upgrade my system using dselect+apt and I had to reinstall the
> whole system to get my system running again.
not sure, I have to admit I don't think i've ever read any of
the debian docu
thanks. I'm trying it right now.
nate wrote:
tjm3 said:
Hello. I'm about to upgrade my system from potato to woody
and was wondering what is the latest recommendation for the
upgrade sequence. I know this has been posted before, but
I haven't come across one lately. Just lo
tjm3 said:
> Hello. I'm about to upgrade my system from potato to woody
> and was wondering what is the latest recommendation for the
> upgrade sequence. I know this has been posted before, but
> I haven't come across one lately. Just looking to get it
> right the first
Hello. I'm about to upgrade my system from potato to woody
and was wondering what is the latest recommendation for the
upgrade sequence. I know this has been posted before, but
I haven't come across one lately. Just looking to get it
right the first time. I think it was to upgrade ap
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 03:07:00PM -0700, nate wrote:
> D.U. said:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:26:09AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > If I comment out eepro from /etc/modules, my box boots up under the 2.4
> > kernels and I can log in. An odd thing I just noticed is there are no
> > mod
nate wrote:
D.U. said:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:26:09AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I comment out eepro from /etc/modules, my box boots up under the 2.4
kernels and I can log in. An odd thing I just noticed is there are no
modules loaded at all. However, I can insmod eepro if I
giv
D.U. said:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:26:09AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If I comment out eepro from /etc/modules, my box boots up under the 2.4
> kernels and I can log in. An odd thing I just noticed is there are no
> modules loaded at all. However, I can insmod eepro if I
> give it the
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:26:09AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > The release notes didn't say there were any problems going
> > from 2.2 to 2.4. What did I forget to do?
>
> If you modified /etc/lilo.conf to add the new kernel, did you remember to
> type "lilo" before rebooting? Not doin
D.U. said:
> I searched but didn't find anything in google...
>
> I upgraded a box to 3.0 and that part went fine. But then I
> upgraded to the standard 2.4.18 kernel image deb (from a 2.2
> kernel.
did you add the initrd option to lilo.conf? the 2.4 kernel (at
least the default one) has a real bi
> The release notes didn't say there were any problems going
> from 2.2 to 2.4. What did I forget to do?
If you modified /etc/lilo.conf to add the new kernel, did you remember to
type "lilo" before rebooting? Not doing this will lock it up for sure.
The bootdisk-HOWTO tells you what various LIL
I searched but didn't find anything in google...
I upgraded a box to 3.0 and that part went fine. But then I
upgraded to the standard 2.4.18 kernel image deb (from a 2.2
kernel.
I installed the matching initrd package too. At first I tried
the k6 kernel, and I tried the 2.4bf kernel and got the
On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 14:33, Robert James Kaes wrote:
> Hello,
> I just wanted to thank everyone for all the information you supplied. I
> completed the upgrade last night without a problem. I don't think the
> users even noticed. Debian is just wonderful. :)
> -- Robert
>
> --
>
Hello,
I just wanted to thank everyone for all the information you supplied. I
completed the upgrade last night without a problem. I don't think the
users even noticed. Debian is just wonderful. :)
-- Robert
--
--
R
Robert James Kaes wrote:
> Hello,
> Are there any problems with upgrading a machine from potato to woody while
> it's live (in other words, not in single user level.) The machine in
> question is a production machine that I don't not want to have down for
> any long
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 11:40, Robert James Kaes wrote:
> Hello,
> Are there any problems with upgrading a machine from potato to woody while
> it's live
> If there is no problem doing this (upgrading the distro while in run-level
> 3), is there a recommended order? I&#x
Hello,
Are there any problems with upgrading a machine from potato to woody while
it's live (in other words, not in single user level.) The machine in
question is a production machine that I don't not want to have down for
any longer than required.
If there is no problem doing this
I've upgraded potato to woody on five computers (two of them were
complete reinstalls) and on all of them KDE dies a slow death. I
notice the problem mostly with Konqueror. For example, after using KDE
and Konqueror for some time (1-20 minutes) I'll click on a Konqueror
menu, the
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, H C Pumphrey wrote:
[Upgrading potato to Woody via CD does this:]
> > and after getting to some 50% it displayed:
> > E: Internal Error, Could not configure a pre-depend
Typically, after deciding I was stumped and posting this message, I
decided to have ano
Hi All,
I asked this in Debian-CD and no-one seemed to know, so I thought I'd ask
the wider commmunity and see if anyone else had seen the same thing.
A month or so ago, Marcin Wolinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've tried to upgrade a Potato system to Woody using the 3.0pre6
> version of D
> In your XF86Config, is the subsection listed inside a section? On my
> system it is listed inside Section "Module".
>
> --
> Seneca
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for your note above.
In my XF86Config I don't have a Module section, as suggested above. In fact,
the line indicated by the error mess
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 05:55:44PM -0500, Eric Brooks wrote:
> I got the error shown below on moving from potato to woody. I have done
> an apt-get udpate and apt-get dist-upgrade so I assume I'm running an
> X-windows version in synch with the xf86config utility that I ran to
Debian friends,
I got the error shown below on moving from potato to woody. I have done
an apt-get udpate and apt-get dist-upgrade so I assume I'm running an
X-windows version in synch with the xf86config utility that I ran to produce
the XF86Config file. Does anyone have any insight on wh
, I can use neither dselect:
> (snip)
> > nor apt-get
> (snip)
> > dpkg still works and I can use the network .-)
> >
> > Has anyone any idea?
>
> Have you tried manually installing the "apt" and/or "apt-utils" package
> from Woody? I see
ther dselect:
(snip)
> nor apt-get
(snip)
> dpkg still works and I can use the network .-)
>
> Has anyone any idea?
Have you tried manually installing the "apt" and/or "apt-utils" package
from Woody? I seem to recall seeing this as a recommended step prior to
): apt-get update
E: Method ftp has died unexpectedly!
E: Tried to dequeue a fetching object
dpkg still works and I can use the network .-)
Has anyone any idea?
Thanks for any help!
Lukas
- Forwarded message from Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Subject: Re: Upgrade Potato to Wood
Hi,
I upgraded from potato to woody today following the release notes and
this is what I found. The potato system was development tools and X and
that's about it.
The install went fine and post install I followed the directions exactly
and found the following:
1. dpkg --conf
ve
> a simple X11 system with KDE (potato) and default settings. The
> list of 262 packages to install are available at
> http://vLSM.org/etc/sangam.vlsm.org.20020430.gz
>
>
FYI, the recommended upgrade procedure includes a step you've omitted
below:
> 1. Test #1 (up
ackages to install are available at
http://vLSM.org/etc/sangam.vlsm.org.20020430.gz
1. Test #1 (upgrade)
Method:
- change "potato" to "woody" in /etc/apt/sources.list
- run apt-get update
- run apt-get dist-upgrade
- fine tuning using dselect
Result:
I tried an upgrade from potato 2.2r3 to woody and all seemed to go
well except that after connecting to my ISP with ppp via phone dialup
I can't resolve any names. This use to work fine under potato. I can
ping the numerical addresses fine, but for example a ping to
debian.org fails. I did a rout
Hi,
I got the following errors after upg. and configuring:
Setting up findutils (4.1.7-2) Can't locate
File/Basename.pm in @INC (@INC contains: usrlocal/lib/perl/5.6.1
usrlocal/share/perl/5.6.1 usrlib/perl5 usrshare/perl5
usrlib/perl/5.6.1 usrshare/perl/5.6.1
usr/local/lib/site_perl/powerp
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 05:37:20AM +0400, FFF wrote:
> After I dl the necessary files to upg and dselect start installing and
> configuring I got the following errors:
>
> Setting up findutils (4.1.7-2)
> Can't locate File/Basename.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
> usrlocal/lib/perl/5.6.1 usrlocal/sha
Hi,
After I dl the necessary files to upg and dselect start installing and
configuring I got the following errors:
Setting up findutils (4.1.7-2)
Can't locate File/Basename.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
usrlocal/lib/perl/5.6.1 usrlocal/share/perl/5.6.1
usrlib/perl5 usrshare/perl5
usrlib/perl/5
Jerome Acks Jr wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 04:31:09PM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
>
>> Hi, I followed a suggestion from this list to update dpkg and apt
>> first during the upgrade. For the most part this worked great. A
>> couple of small things.
>>
>> Unless I pushed the wrong button
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 04:31:09PM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
> Hi,
> I followed a suggestion from this list to update dpkg and apt first
> during the upgrade. For the most part this worked great. A couple of
> small things.
>
> Unless I pushed the wrong button and refused a new kernel, 2.2.2
Hi,
I followed a suggestion from this list to update dpkg and apt first
during the upgrade. For the most part this worked great. A couple of
small things.
Unless I pushed the wrong button and refused a new kernel, 2.2.20 was
not installed during the dist-upgrade.
When installing a few more
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 07:19:44PM -0700, user list wrote:
> So I'm in some very deep trouble. I upgraded Xfree86 to the 4.1 level in
> potato without making a debian package. Then, when I tried to install xine
> from the testing tree I hosed the system. I have now done a complete
> system upgrade
So I'm in some very deep trouble. I upgraded Xfree86 to the 4.1 level in
potato without making a debian package. Then, when I tried to install xine
from the testing tree I hosed the system. I have now done a complete
system upgrade to testing and everything works except X11 (a big exception).
When
"Greg C. Madden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Second: For obvious reasons, xserver-svga is upgraded, but
> xserver-xfree86 is not installed. This is expected and easy to
> deal with.
Mh, my upgrade was a nightmare. After using dselect, apt-get and dpkg
to excess I finally
* will trillich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020227 05:20]:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 03:09:55PM +1100, Matthew Dalton wrote:
> > The only packages that gave me any grief were the KDE ones, as expected.
> > The newer packages had the files rearranged between the different
> > packages, so apt-get was unabl
Matthew Dalton wrote:
>The only packages that gave me any grief were the KDE ones, as expected.
>The newer packages had the files rearranged between the different
>packages, so apt-get was unable to install packages because they were
>attempting to overwrite files from other installed packages. I t
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 03:09:55PM +1100, Matthew Dalton wrote:
> I also dist-upgraded my machine from Potato to Woody about two weeks
> ago. However, my machine is a desktop system with heaps of apps
> installed. My experiences were pretty awesome considering what I was up
> aga
hat a blanket dist-upgrade from stable to testing is not as
> | seamless as you suggest, but it has been awhile since I looked at this
> | issue.
>
> It (dist-upgrade) Worked For Me last week. Admittedly it was a router
> type system with not much on it (only 167MB used).
I also d
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 03:49:50PM -0900, Greg C. Madden wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 07:58, Ed Lawson wrote:
>
> This was posted by Dwarf on the devel list. Slighty edited for brevity.
> http://www.polaris.net/~dwarf/
>
>
> snip
> 2. Before doing the upgrade, but after an 'apt-get update', fi
On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 07:58, Ed Lawson wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 08:58:35AM -0600, David Bell wrote:
> >
> >|
> >| Change all references to 'stable' in /etc/apt/sources.list to 'testing'
> >| and run apt-get update && apt-get -u dist-upgrade. You're now running
> >| Woody. :)
> >
> Hmm
At 12:32 PM 02/26/02 -0500, dman wrote:
>| Hmmm. Isn't it better to first change the sources list, then upgrade
>| Perl, then upgrade apt, dpkg, etc, and then do a dist-upgrade? Seems I
>| have read that a blanket dist-upgrade from stable to testing is not as
>| seamless as you suggest, but it
At 11:58 AM 2/26/02, Ed Lawson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 08:58:35AM -0600, David Bell wrote:
|
| Change all references to 'stable' in /etc/apt/sources.list to 'testing'
| and run apt-get update && apt-get -u dist-upgrade. You're now running
| Woody. :)
Hmmm. Isn't it better to first chang
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:58:41AM -0500, Ed Lawson wrote:
|
| >On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 08:58:35AM -0600, David Bell wrote:
| >
| >|
| >| Change all references to 'stable' in /etc/apt/sources.list to 'testing'
| >| and run apt-get update && apt-get -u dist-upgrade. You're now running
| >| Woody.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 08:58:35AM -0600, David Bell wrote:
|
| Change all references to 'stable' in /etc/apt/sources.list to 'testing'
| and run apt-get update && apt-get -u dist-upgrade. You're now running
| Woody. :)
Hmmm. Isn't it better to first change the sources list, then upgrade
Pe
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 08:58:35AM -0600, David Bell wrote:
| On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 08:44, Liam Black wrote:
| > I'm currently running potato 2.2.19, and looking to upgrade to Woody. Is
| > there a simplistic way to do this with apt / dpkg? I'm a newbie, and have
| > been spending my time learnin
Absolutely. :)
Change all references to 'stable' in /etc/apt/sources.list to 'testing'
and run apt-get update && apt-get -u dist-upgrade. You're now running
Woody. :)
On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 08:44, Liam Black wrote:
> I'm currently running potato 2.2.19, and looking to upgrade to Woody. Is
> there
I'm currently running potato 2.2.19, and looking to upgrade to Woody. Is
there a simplistic way to do this with apt / dpkg? I'm a newbie, and have
been spending my time learning about the desktop much moreso than tackling
the meat of the system... but that's what I'm attempting to do, now.
So if a
Thank you Osamu Aoki for your go-woody script. Without it I would never
have upgraded to woody until it became the stable release. It took 48
hours over a ppp connection - with nobody to hit a return key at times
because I was away at work - but it worked.
Thanks dman for your helpful posts - when
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 11:13:04AM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
>>
>> Is it possible to create a upgrade-woody package that depends on
>> dpkg and apt and any other prerequisites that loads them and
>> then as a post process starts apt-get(the new version) to do the
>> a
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 11:13:04AM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
| Thought I'd post my experiences here with my Potato to Woody
| upgrade.
Given the recent number of posts discussing potato->woody, I think
I'll post my (recent) experience as well. Presumably most of the
posts w
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 11:13:04AM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
> Thought I'd post my experiences here with my Potato to Woody upgrade.
> Being a idiot, I haven't followed this list for awhile and didn't read
> the release notes until after the upgrade but I
Hi,
Thought I'd post my experiences here with my Potato to Woody upgrade.
Being a idiot, I haven't followed this list for awhile and didn't read
the release notes until after the upgrade but I think the results may be
interesting nonetheless. Unfortunately I didn't use the
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 01:01:30AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 12:38:47AM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > I want to upgrade my system from Potato to Woody. I am confused by the
> > instructions. In particular, the instructions about the changes that I
>
Comments are in line.
At 03:38 AM 2/10/02, Paul E Condon wrote:
I want to upgrade my system from Potato to Woody. I am confused by the
instructions. In particular, the instructions about the changes that I
need to make to /etc/apt/sources.list
The six non-comment lines in my current sources
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 12:38:47AM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I want to upgrade my system from Potato to Woody. I am confused by the
> instructions. In particular, the instructions about the changes that I
> need to make to /etc/apt/sources.list
What is jigdo? I do not see that p
I want to upgrade my system from Potato to Woody. I am confused by the
instructions. In particular, the instructions about the changes that I
need to make to /etc/apt/sources.list
The six non-comment lines in my current sources are:
deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 r5 _Potato_ - Official i386
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 11:48:13PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just wanted to know, as a "normal" user (as in, not completely
> new, but no guru either), how hard would it be to move to woody, or
> sid?
>
> Is it not that difficult? giving the fact that i have a fair knowledge of
> "mov
ct that i have a fair knowledge of
> "moving" around in console, editing files, do some tweaking, etc...
Moving from potato to woody is not too difficult. Sid is broken sometimes
due to bugs but to upgrade to it is just as "easy".
If you installed Debian yourself and kno
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 11:48:13PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to know, as a "normal" user (as in, not completely
> new, but no guru either), how hard would it be to move to woody, or
> sid?
>
> Is it not that difficult? giving the fact that i have a fair knowledge o
Hi,
I just wanted to know, as a "normal" user (as in, not completely
new, but no guru either), how hard would it be to move to woody, or
sid?
Is it not that difficult? giving the fact that i have a fair knowledge of
"moving" around in console, editing files, do some tweaking, etc...
Thanks!
Paul E Condon wrote:
I have a Debian Potato. I would like to use Balsa 1.2.3, which is
available as
part of Debian Woody. I have read in many places that an upgrade
from potato to
woody is easy, but I must be missing something.
apt-get dist-upgrade
is not enough. What am I missing?
Paul
> I have a Debian Potato. I would like to use Balsa 1.2.3, which is
> available as
> part of Debian Woody. I have read in many places that an upgrade
> from potato to
> woody is easy, but I must be missing something.
>
> apt-get dist-upgrade
>
> is not enough. Wh
I attempted to dist-upgrade from potato to Woody, and I got the
following message:
THe following essential packages will be removed:
sysvinit util-linux (due to sysvinit)
This should NOT be done .
How does one proceed from here?
Thanks.
--
Sebastian Canagaratna
Department of Chemistry
Uh-oh:
OK, I did it! I have screwed my potato for a broken woody!
The "upgrade" took hours due to updating (all?) kde packages.
And then kaboom: the X11 did not work (and neither xf86setup).
Thus -cmiiw-, I follow the MickeySoft approach, i.e.
reinstall from scratch: it took me about 3 hours.
Que
On 2001.09.05 13:33 Vittorio wrote:
> First question:
> What are the main differences between the two distros?
Woody will become stable in then next months. Now it is the
distri for testing the newer software till it will be real
stable.
Sid is much more unstable. This is the distri for testing
While I'm quite satisfied with my potato 2.2r3 on my laptop, at home
on my celeron desktop I need to install something a bit 'ahead' of
potato (already installed on the desktop!) because I need support for
USB scanner, for that damned i810 motherboard and the Gimp 1.2 and so
on.
I was thinking of
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 11:30:00PM -0400, James Lindenschmidt wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm trying to upgrade my potato box to woody so I can run KDE 2.2. I'd also
> like to upgrade to Xfree86 4.x. I tried using apt-get, but I'm getting an
> error message and having trouble tracking it down.
>
>
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:25:49PM -0700, tluxt wrote:
| > The correct solution to this is to
| >
| > apt-get install libdb2
| >
| > since that package provides libdb.so.3.
|
| 1. Are you _sure_ installing the libdb2 package ___that W/testing
| currently points to___ will solve this p
Thanks dman for you response on this issue. ... But, ...
(I'm in the process of learning about this now - would you please
help me out?)
--- dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:38:07AM -0400, Brian Schramm wrote:
> | I changed the references in my apt/sources.list to po
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:38:07AM -0400, Brian Schramm wrote:
| I changed the references in my apt/sources.list to point to woody.
|
| I then did a
| apt-get update
| apt-get install apt-utils debconf
| apt-get dist-upgrade
|
| When I did the apt-get install apt-utils debconf it told me to type
OK. I just read a message about the same problem that I am having. I
looked at the lib directory and found out that the sym link was pointing
to a file not there. So, I changed that. It let me get past the point of
it complaining about the perl library but now I at a missing file.
/usr/bin/dkp
I changed the references in my apt/sources.list to point to woody.
I then did a
apt-get update
apt-get install apt-utils debconf
apt-get dist-upgrade
When I did the apt-get install apt-utils debconf it told me to type Yes,
do as I say! to upgrade the pearl system. I did that and now I keep
gett
I just got the same setup to work on my computer without upgrading to
woody, have you thought about that. Just follow the steps below.
0) Compile and install the 2.2.19 kernel
1) Download the binary packages of X from xfree86.org and install
2) Download kde 2.2. Compile and install. Follow the dire
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 11:30:00PM -0400 or thereabouts, James Lindenschmidt
wrote:
> liborbit-dev: Conflicts: orbit (< 0.4.3-2) but 1:0.5.8-ximian.1 is to be
Take the ximian lines out of sources.list, and I would recommend
removing all the ximian stuff before the upgrade. Also your
sources.l
Greetings,
I'm trying to upgrade my potato box to woody so I can run KDE 2.2. I'd also
like to upgrade to Xfree86 4.x. I tried using apt-get, but I'm getting an
error message and having trouble tracking it down.
I added these sites to my /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debi
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 02:26:58AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Please, if I'm in the wrong address, may you point to the
> good one?
In the future, please direct questions like this to the debian-user
mailing list.
> I have a big problem in upgrading x
reason somewhere... now my curiosity is peaked.
- Steve
-Original Message-
From: Michael Heldebrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 4:08 PM
To: Stephen Nosal
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: dist upgrade potato to woody 2.2 to 2.4 kernel
I'm inter
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 03:10:28PM -0400, Stephen Nosal wrote:
> Mike -
>
> so the initrd showed up in the kernel-image package along with instructions.
>
> Perhaps I should try this again and see if I'm missing something. Otherwise,
> I guess I'll just have to compile my own...
Hmm. Looking
PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 2:11 PM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: dist upgrade potato to woody 2.2 to 2.4 kernel
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 12:49:09PM -0400, Stephen Nosal wrote:
> > so, is it possible that the standard build requires a ra
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 02:09:51PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 11:50:39AM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > In this case, the difference is whether you're installing a debian
> > kernel-image or compiling your own. The kernel images require an
> > initrd. When you c
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
