Re: Open Office under testing

2002-12-22 Thread Dale Hair
On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 21:14, Deryk Barker wrote: > Thus spake Dale Hair ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 14:35, Deryk Barker wrote: > > > As a P.S. to my previous exchange: unfortunately the package I found > > > at various mirrors requires later version of certain libraries > > >

Re: Open Office under testing

2002-12-22 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 07:14:18PM -0800, Deryk Barker wrote: | Thanks, but this doesn't work either! | I'm starting to tear my hair out over this: I *must* have OO running | on my new machine before I can hand the old one over to my wife as | promised... Want to try "unstable"? It's really qu

Re: Open Office under testing

2002-12-22 Thread Deryk Barker
Thus spake Deryk Barker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): ... > OK, when I try to run the setup fails: firstly it complained that it > couldn't find setup - and indeed it wasn't there, but setup.bin > was. So I hardlinked setup to setup.bin, ditto the other.bin files in > the directory. > > Now when I try it

Re: Open Office under testing

2002-12-22 Thread Deryk Barker
Thus spake Dale Hair ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 14:35, Deryk Barker wrote: > > As a P.S. to my previous exchange: unfortunately the package I found > > at various mirrors requires later version of certain libraries > > (e.g. libstdc++5) than are currently in testing... > > > > A

Re: Open Office under testing

2002-12-22 Thread Dale Hair
On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 14:35, Deryk Barker wrote: > As a P.S. to my previous exchange: unfortunately the package I found > at various mirrors requires later version of certain libraries > (e.g. libstdc++5) than are currently in testing... > > Ah well, it's back to the 1.0 tarball. > -- You might

Re: Open Office under testing

2002-12-22 Thread Deryk Barker
Thus spake Deryk Barker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > As a P.S. to my previous exchange: unfortunately the package I found > at various mirrors requires later version of certain libraries > (e.g. libstdc++5) than are currently in testing... > > Ah well, it's back to the 1.0 tarball. Unfortunately, afte

Open Office under testing

2002-12-22 Thread Deryk Barker
As a P.S. to my previous exchange: unfortunately the package I found at various mirrors requires later version of certain libraries (e.g. libstdc++5) than are currently in testing... Ah well, it's back to the 1.0 tarball. -- |Deryk Barker, Computer Science Dept. | Music does not have to be unders