Kevin Mark wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:30:05PM +0200, Roel Schroeven wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oh well. I guess I'll just read the list on the website from now
on. maybe there's some nerdware out there somewhere that supports
using a mailer to post and using a browser to read, and ke
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:30:05PM +0200, Roel Schroeven wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >oh well. I guess I'll just read the list on the website from now
> >on. maybe there's some nerdware out there somewhere that supports
> >using a mailer to post and using a browser to read, and keeps
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oh well. I guess I'll just read the list on the website from now
on. maybe there's some nerdware out there somewhere that supports
using a mailer to post and using a browser to read, and keeps
everything synchronized and can extract headers for the "reply"
function and...
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I guess now it's my turn in the rape room; I haven't gotten anything
> from the list after August 15. (I see my subsequent post has showed
> up there, though.)
I'll wager that this is some of the damage we'll all see more of -
ISPs blocking high-vol
I guess now it's my turn in the rape room; I haven't gotten anything
from the list after August 15. (I see my subsequent post has showed
up there, though.)
Ordinarily, I would indulge a paranoid conspiracy theory to the
effect that I'd been thrown off the list, but since there are others
complain
5 matches
Mail list logo
