Re: [Sid] Nouveau: only one monitor after 6.6.15 to 6.7.9 upgrade

upgrade from 6.6.x to 6.7.x: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/385 I've seen recently other bugs with old NVidias, plus another I filed: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/214 These are making me suspect support for these oldies is disintegrating as kernel

Re: [Sid] Nouveau: only one monitor after 6.6.15 to 6.7.9 upgrade

On 4/3/24 21:39, Greg wrote: Hi there, I have two HP Z30i connected to Nvidia GeForce GTX 670. After last upgrade I'm able to use only one monitor. When running linux-image-6.7.9: # dmesg | grep nouveau | cut -b 16- nouveau :01:00.0: vgaarb: deactivate vga console nouveau :01

Re: Debian Trixie: xorg with fb instead of intel or nouveau driver

nly radeon, amdgpu, i915, xe & nouveau. > no need to keep fbdev, vesa, intel > and nouveau x-server driver packages on the system (as well as ati, amd, > radeon...)? No real need, unless something breaks WRT using the modesetting that can be worked around by using another. For th

Re: Debian Trixie: xorg with fb instead of intel or nouveau driver

On 2/24/25 22:25, Felix Miata wrote: Chris Jölly composed on 2025-02-24 21:52 (UTC+0100): modestting is the X display driver required by either the in use Intel 530 GPU or the inactive NVidia GPU. Ok, so modesetting is the X display driver, not how I expected the intel or nouveau driver

Re: Debian Trixie: xorg with fb instead of intel or nouveau driver

On Thu Feb 27, 2025 at 2:23 PM GMT, Greg wrote: On 2025-02-27, Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Tue Feb 25, 2025 at 1:38 PM GMT, Greg wrote: Did I read somewhere that the maintainer of the nouveau driver resigned due to the toxic atmosphere among the kernel developers, or did I dream that? The

Re: Debian Trixie: xorg with fb instead of intel or nouveau driver

On 2025-02-27, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Tue Feb 25, 2025 at 1:38 PM GMT, Greg wrote: >> Did I read somewhere that the maintainer of the nouveau driver >> resigned due to the toxic atmosphere among the kernel developers, or >> did I dream that? > > The lead of t

Re: Debian Trixie: xorg with fb instead of intel or nouveau driver

On Tue Feb 25, 2025 at 1:38 PM GMT, Greg wrote: Did I read somewhere that the maintainer of the nouveau driver resigned due to the toxic atmosphere among the kernel developers, or did I dream that? The lead of the Asahi project (providing support for Apple-silicon Macs) recently resigned

Re: Debian Trixie: xorg with fb instead of intel or nouveau driver

On 2025-02-24, Greg Wooledge wrote: > >> Shouldnt one of intel or nouveau drivers get loaded? > > No, because it's using modeset (for the Intel device at least). > Did I read somewhere that the maintainer of the nouveau driver resigned due to the toxic atmosphere among th

Re: Debian Trixie: xorg with fb instead of intel or nouveau driver

y your Intel 530 GPU. >   Device-2: NVIDIA GM107GLM [Quadro M1000M] vendor: Lenovo driver: nouveau nouveau is the kernel module (hardware driver) required by your NVidia GPU. >   Display: x11 server: X.Org v: 21.1.15 with: Xwayland v: 24.1.5 driver: X: >     loaded: modesetting modest

Re: Debian Trixie: xorg with fb instead of intel or nouveau driver

0 chip-ID: 8086:191b class-ID: 0300 >   Device-2: NVIDIA GM107GLM [Quadro M1000M] vendor: Lenovo driver: nouveau >     v: kernel non-free: 550/565.xx+ status: current (as of 2025-01; > Shouldnt one of intel or nouveau drivers get loaded? No, because it's using modeset (

Debian Trixie: xorg with fb instead of intel or nouveau driver

: 8086:191b class-ID: 0300   Device-2: NVIDIA GM107GLM [Quadro M1000M] vendor: Lenovo driver: nouveau     v: kernel non-free: 550/565.xx+ status: current (as of 2025-01;     EOL~2026-12-xx) arch: Maxwell code: GMxxx process: TSMC 28nm     built: 2014-2019 pcie: gen: 1 speed: 2.5 GT/s lanes: 16 link-max

Re: firmware failed to load nouveau/nv98_fuc084

kamaraju kusumanchi writes: > My machine is rebooting randomly. To find out what is going on, I > looked at dmesg and found these errors. How can I fix them? If you > need extra information, please let me know which command I need to run > and I will provide its output. There may be hints as to

Re: How to report a bug on nouveau/testing

top, signal-desktop, VS Code / Codium, Biwarden Directory > Connector, discord, etc, all are failing with the same symptoms : on > app startup, the window is displayed blank, then crash. I'm having issues with nouveau in other distro, just in case it helps you to go on meanwhile

Re: firmware failed to load nouveau/nv98_fuc084

ebian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) > Graphics: > Device-1: NVIDIA G98 [Quadro NVS 295] driver: nouveau v: kernel arch: Tesla >pcie: speed: 5 GT/s lanes: 16 ports: active: DP-2 empty: DP-1 >bus-ID: 02:00.0 chip-ID: 10de:06fd temp: 72.0 C > Display: x11 server: X.Org v:

Re: firmware failed to load nouveau/nv98_fuc084

information, please let me know which command I need to run > > and I will provide its output. > > > > rajulocal@hogwarts /var/log % sudo dmesg| grep -i failed > > [ 4568.756357] nouveau :02:00.0: msvld: init failed, -19 > > [ 4570.638966] nouveau :02:0

Re: firmware failed to load nouveau/nv98_fuc084

e its output. > > rajulocal@hogwarts /var/log % sudo dmesg| grep -i failed > [ 4568.756357] nouveau :02:00.0: msvld: init failed, -19 > [ 4570.638966] nouveau :02:00.0: firmware: failed to load > nouveau/nv98_fuc084 (-2) > [ 4570.639457] nouveau :02:00.0: firmware: failed

Re: firmware failed to load nouveau/nv98_fuc084

provide its output. > rajulocal@hogwarts /var/log % sudo dmesg| grep -i failed > [ 4568.756357] nouveau :02:00.0: msvld: init failed, -19 > [ 4570.638966] nouveau :02:00.0: firmware: failed to load > nouveau/nv98_fuc084 (-2) > [ 4570.639457] nouveau :02:00.0: firmwar

Re: firmware failed to load nouveau/nv98_fuc084

On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 11:46 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 11:00 PM kamaraju kusumanchi > wrote: > > > > Do I have the correct driver packages installed? Do I have the correct > > firmware installed? Do I need any non-free packages to fix the errors? > > To answer the last

Re: firmware failed to load nouveau/nv98_fuc084

ill provide its output. > > rajulocal@hogwarts /var/log % sudo dmesg| grep -i failed > [ 4568.756357] nouveau :02:00.0: msvld: init failed, -19 > [ 4570.638966] nouveau :02:00.0: firmware: failed to load > nouveau/nv98_fuc084 (-2) > [ 4570.639457] nouveau :02:00.0: f

firmware failed to load nouveau/nv98_fuc084

[ 4568.756357] nouveau :02:00.0: msvld: init failed, -19 [ 4570.638966] nouveau :02:00.0: firmware: failed to load nouveau/nv98_fuc084 (-2) [ 4570.639457] nouveau :02:00.0: firmware: failed to load nouveau/nv98_fuc084 (-2) [ 4570.639462] nouveau :02:00.0: Direct firmware load for nouveau

How to report a bug on nouveau/testing

3 qay kernel: RIP: 0010:nvkm_gr_units+0x9/0x30 [nouveau] qay kernel: Code: 74 06 ff e0 cc 66 90 cc 31 c0 c3 cc cc cc cc 66 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 66 0f 1f 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 <48> 8b 07 48 8b 40 58 48 85 c0 74 06 ff e0 cc 66 90 cc 31 c0 c3 cc qay kernel: RSP: 0018:a

Re: glmark2 (was: nouveau OK for GTX 970?)

George at Clug composed on 2024-08-09 12:47 (UTC+1000): > Felix Miata wrote: >> George at Clug composed on 2024-08-08 09:12 (UTC-0400): >> > Wayland does not score well on glmark2, does anyone know why. >> # inxi -S >> System: >>   Host: hp945 Kernel: 6.7.12-amd64 arch: x86_64 bits: 64 >>   Con

Re: glmark2 (was: nouveau OK for GTX 970?)

On Friday, 09-08-2024 at 01:49 Felix Miata wrote: > George at Clug composed on 2024-08-08 09:12 (UTC-0400): > > > Wayland does not score well on glmark2, does anyone know why. > # inxi -S > System: >   Host: hp945 Kernel: 6.7.12-amd64 arch: x86_64 bits: 64 >   Console: pty pts/0 Distro: Debian GNU

Re: glmark2 (was: nouveau OK for GTX 970?)

George at Clug composed on 2024-08-08 09:12 (UTC-0400): > Wayland does not score well on glmark2, does anyone know why. # inxi -S System: Host: hp945 Kernel: 6.7.12-amd64 arch: x86_64 bits: 64 Console: pty pts/0 Distro: Debian GNU/Linux trixie/sid # aptitude search lmark v glmark2

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

On Thursday, 08-08-2024 at 12:52 Felix Miata wrote: > George at Clug composed on 2024-08-08 12:02 (UTC+1000): > > > glmark2-wayland is a benchmark for OpenGL 2.0. > > This package intended only for the wayland platform. GL version. > > > glmark2 Score: 5184, i7-3770, Radeon RX 6600 > > > If

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

George at Clug composed on 2024-08-08 12:02 (UTC+1000): > glmark2-wayland is a benchmark for OpenGL 2.0. > This package intended only for the wayland platform. GL version. > glmark2 Score: 5184, i7-3770, Radeon RX 6600 > If anyone can comment whether this is good or not, please do. I don't hav

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

On 07/08/2024 23:19, e...@gmx.us wrote: On 8/6/24 21:20, Jeffrey Walton wrote: $ sudo lspci | grep -i vga 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GM204 [GeForce GTX 970] (rev a1) The following command reports vendor ID and product ID pair lspci -nn | grep -i vga Using it you

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

s packaged with Linux). > > If Debian and NVidia decide not to keep the driver available with newer > releases, you're stuck with nouveau. > > I ran glmark2 on my primary desktop, with NVidia Quadro K2200 and the > 535 driver. The score was 4455. Then I ran it on another deskt

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

for the driver at NVidia says I need the 340 driver -- which has not been available since Debian 10. So that computer is running nouveau. The glmark2 score is 29. An NVidia driver (if it could be installed in Debian 12.5) would apparently be about 150 times faster. Yeah, I think that given th

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

available with newer releases, you're stuck with nouveau. I ran glmark2 on my primary desktop, with NVidia Quadro K2200 and the 535 driver. The score was 4455. Then I ran it on another desktop with GeForce GT 630. nvidia-detect says it's "not supported by any driver version up to 53

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

On Thursday, 08-08-2024 at 02:51 e...@gmx.us wrote: > On 8/6/24 20:02, George at Clug wrote: > > > > > > On Wednesday, 07-08-2024 at 03:11 Eben King wrote: > >> Hi, I got a new-to-me EVGA Nvidia GTX 970. I understand the Nouveau > >> driver handles th

X problems on Debian sid system with nouveau

] PREEMPT SMP PTI Aug 07 21:25:14 glaurung kernel: CPU: 2 PID: 2063 Comm: openttd Tainted: G DOE 6.9.10-amd64 #1 Debian 6.9.10-1 Aug 07 21:25:14 glaurung kernel: RIP: 0010:nvkm_gr_units+0x9/0x30 [nouveau] I downgraded the kernel and the libdrm-nouveau2 package to versions I know were

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

On 8/6/24 20:02, George at Clug wrote: On Wednesday, 07-08-2024 at 03:11 Eben King wrote: Hi, I got a new-to-me EVGA Nvidia GTX 970. I understand the Nouveau driver handles this card. Is this correct? With Debian Bookworm, I had Nvidia GTX 970 and Nvidia GTX 960 cards working on Nouveau

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

On 8/7/24 00:33, Felix Miata wrote: eben composed on 2024-08-06 17:16 (UTC-0400): Felix Miata wrote: eben composed on 2024-08-06 16:29 (UTC-0400): Sven Joachim wrote: You could run "sudo dmesg| grep -E '(drm|nouveau)'" and show us the results. [0.80

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

bus info: pci@:01:00.0 logical name: /dev/fb0 version: a1 width: 64 bits clock: 33MHz capabilities: pm msi pciexpress vga_controller bus_master cap_list rom fb configuration: depth=32 driver=

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

entire command output, if not the entirety of journal and dmesg, then provide the upload URLs. NP. Pastebin acct has been created. I have an old NVidia booted here now. This is what using nouveau looks like at the kernel: # lsmod | egrep 'veau|vid' | sort All right, gimme a bit. -- The

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

eben composed on 2024-08-06 17:16 (UTC-0400): > Felix Miata wrote: >> eben composed on 2024-08-06 16:29 (UTC-0400): >>> Sven Joachim wrote: >> >>>> You could run "sudo dmesg| grep -E '(drm|nouveau)'" and show us the >>>> res

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 9:05 PM wrote: > > On 8/6/24 16:39, Felix Miata wrote: > > e...@gmx.us composed on 2024-08-06 16:29 (UTC-0400): > > > >> Sven Joachim wrote: > > > >>> You could run "sudo dmesg| grep -E '(drm|nouveau)'" and s

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

On Wednesday, 07-08-2024 at 03:11 Eben King wrote: > Hi, I got a new-to-me EVGA Nvidia GTX 970. I understand the Nouveau driver > handles this card. Is this correct? With Debian Bookworm, I had Nvidia GTX 970 and Nvidia GTX 960 cards working on Nouveau, depending on what "workin

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

On 8/6/24 17:16, e...@gmx.us wrote: On 8/6/24 16:39, Felix Miata wrote: e...@gmx.us composed on 2024-08-06 16:29 (UTC-0400): Sven Joachim wrote: You could run "sudo dmesg| grep -E '(drm|nouveau)'" and show us the results. [    0.801515] ACPI: bus type drm_connector

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

On 8/6/24 16:39, Felix Miata wrote: e...@gmx.us composed on 2024-08-06 16:29 (UTC-0400): Sven Joachim wrote: You could run "sudo dmesg| grep -E '(drm|nouveau)'" and show us the results. [0.801515] ACPI: bus type drm_connector registered ... He meant run the

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

e...@gmx.us composed on 2024-08-06 16:29 (UTC-0400): > Sven Joachim wrote: >> You could run "sudo dmesg| grep -E '(drm|nouveau)'" >> and show us the results. > > [0.801515] ACPI: bus type drm_connector registered > [1.163819] i915 :

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

package firmware-misc-nonfree, in Weird. That package appears to be installed, as are libdrm-nouveau2 and xserver-xorg-video-nouveau, says Synaptic. Could they be dormant and need to be activated to work? If your monitor does not run in its native resolution, something has gone wrong before

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

On 2024-08-06 14:56 -0400, e...@gmx.us wrote: > On 8/6/24 14:43, Sven Joachim wrote: >> On 2024-08-06 13:11 -0400, Eben King wrote: >> >>> Hi, I got a new-to-me EVGA Nvidia GTX 970. I understand the Nouveau driver >>> handles this card. Is this correct? >

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

On Tue, 2024-08-06 at 14:56 -0400, e...@gmx.us wrote: > Also Grub gets a different video mode, maybe 24x80 instead of so tiny > as to > > > be nearly illegible. You can change the grub fonts. I think the default is unicode.pf2, which is usually too small to read on anything but VGA. I found DejaVu

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

iver from the search page. I installed 535 for my GM107L (K2200) without any problems. Run nvidia- detect and see which one it recommends. On Tue, 2024-08-06 at 20:43 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2024-08-06 13:11 -0400, Eben King wrote: > > > Hi, I got a new-to-me EVGA Nvidia GTX 97

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

On 8/6/24 14:43, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2024-08-06 13:11 -0400, Eben King wrote: Hi, I got a new-to-me EVGA Nvidia GTX 970. I understand the Nouveau driver handles this card. Is this correct? Some features are missing, e.g. there is no accelerated video decoding. Running a desktop should

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

On 8/6/24 14:19, Felix Miata wrote: Eben King composed on 2024-08-06 13:11 (UTC-0400): Hi, I got a new-to-me EVGA Nvidia GTX 970. I understand the Nouveau driver handles this card. Is this correct? Technically, no, because you wrote "the No..." The nouveau kernel module does prov

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

On 2024-08-06 13:11 -0400, Eben King wrote: > Hi, I got a new-to-me EVGA Nvidia GTX 970. I understand the Nouveau driver > handles this card. Is this correct? Some features are missing, e.g. there is no accelerated video decoding. Running a desktop should not be a problem though. >

Re: nouveau OK for GTX 970?

Eben King composed on 2024-08-06 13:11 (UTC-0400): > Hi, I got a new-to-me EVGA Nvidia GTX 970. I understand the Nouveau driver > handles this card. Is this correct? Technically, no, because you wrote "the No..." The nouveau kernel module does provide kernel drm services, in

nouveau OK for GTX 970?

Hi, I got a new-to-me EVGA Nvidia GTX 970. I understand the Nouveau driver handles this card. Is this correct? If so, do I just install the packages, install the card, tell the BIOS to use it, power off, move the monitors, and that's it? With the card connected, I can log in from console

Avoid APT::Default-Release (was: Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size)

On 04/08/2024 06:24, Van Snyder wrote: Then, to avoid sucking anything more from unstable, I added /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/my-default containing APT::Default-Release "stable"; It prevents installing security updates

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

; Without NVidia's graphics accelerator, using software rendering > > with > > nouveau is painfully slow. Sometimes even the mouse cursor is > > frozen. > > Well, with an old machine (~ 10 years old), nouveau was indeed > painfully slow (e.g. when moving a window o

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On 2024-08-02 14:55:31 +0200, Franco Martelli wrote: > Sorry but have you read that bug report (#1076561)? Some users has posted > solutions to make smaller the initrd file: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076561#10 > and > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On 2024-08-01 12:12:31 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > On Thu, 2024-08-01 at 15:26 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Should I switch to the proprietary nvidia driver on these machines? > > Without NVidia's graphics accelerator, using software rendering with > nouveau is painful

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On 01/08/24 at 17:46, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2024-08-01 10:23:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 15:26 (UTC+0200): -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 69879473 2024-07-19 02:11:58 initrd.img-6.7.12-amd64 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 112644015 2024-08-01 13:01:40 initrd.img-6.9

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On Thu, 2024-08-01 at 15:26 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I have several Debian/unstable machines, all with a Nvidia card. > > On one of them, due to a bug in nouveau in the past, I use the > proprietary nvidia driver: libnvidia-legacy-390xx-* packages. > And the initrd siz

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On 2024-08-01 11:32:10 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 17:18 (UTC+0200): > > > On 2024-08-01 10:23:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > > >> the bug fix should trim initrd size considerably before > >> too long. > > > What do you mean? > > After package containing b

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 17:18 (UTC+0200): > On 2024-08-01 10:23:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: >> the bug fix should trim initrd size considerably before >> too long. > What do you mean? After package containing bug fix is installed, newly generated initrds will be considerably sma

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On 2024-08-01 10:23:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 15:26 (UTC+0200): > > > I have several Debian/unstable machines, all with a Nvidia card. > > > On one of them, due to a bug in nouveau in the past, I use the > > proprietary nvid

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 15:26 (UTC+0200): > I have several Debian/unstable machines, all with a Nvidia card. > On one of them, due to a bug in nouveau in the past, I use the > proprietary nvidia driver: libnvidia-legacy-390xx-* packages. > And the initrd size is reason

nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

I have several Debian/unstable machines, all with a Nvidia card. On one of them, due to a bug in nouveau in the past, I use the proprietary nvidia driver: libnvidia-legacy-390xx-* packages. And the initrd size is reasonable: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 66937544 2024-07-30 11:27:32 initrd.img-6.9.12

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 23:24 +0200, Hans wrote: > I believe I got a solution. However, you may not be happy with it, > but maybe it will work. Thanks to Hans for the detailed list, which I was not able to use successfully. I had probably either broken something first, or didn't follow the instructi

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs

Van Snyder composed on 2024-07-04 13:24 (UTC-0700): > The solution did indeed allow to install the driver. But it removed > at least KDE, and now it won't enter run level 5. I added > nouveau.modeset=0 to the "linux" line in grub.cfg, but it's still > running

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

actualise the package lists. Hope, this helps. Best Hans > at least KDE, and now it won't enter run level 5. I added > nouveau.modeset=0 to the "linux" line in grub.cfg, but it's still > running the nouveau driver, or at least that's what inxi -G reports: >

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

allow to install the driver. But it removed > at least KDE, and now it won't enter run level 5. I added > nouveau.modeset=0 to the "linux" line in grub.cfg, but it's still > running the nouveau driver, or at least that's what inxi -G reports: > Hi, For the

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

level 5. I added nouveau.modeset=0 to the "linux" line in grub.cfg, but it's still running the nouveau driver, or at least that's what inxi -G reports: # inxi -G Graphics: Device-1: NVIDIA G86M [GeForce 8400M GS] driver: N/A Device-2: OmniVision OV2640 Webcam driver: uvcvideo type: U

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

Tried again, somehow there was no subject sent with my last mail. So, well, I believe I got a solution. However, not everyone might be happy with it, but maybe it will work. I am running the kernel 6.7.12+bpo-amd64 on my system. This is a backport kernel, but it might also work with other

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

t make a mess, without a > graphic accelerator.  > > Same here. 2 x Nvidia machines here - neither using Nvidia proprietary drivers both using nouveau - difference being that these are running GNOME. I got given one Nvidia card - one's a 1050, one's a 1060 from memory. All the very best, as ever, Andy (amaca...@debian.org)

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

Hi van Snyder, I believe I got a solution. However, you may not be happy with it, but maybe it will work. I am running the kernel 6.7.12+bpo-amd64 on my system. This is a backport kernel, but it might also work with other kernels, too. You also need to install the build environment, the eas

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs

response that I got from the dragonflyBSD mailing list, was "Get Stuffed - we will not have drivers for NVIDIA - we are not here to provide a usable operating system!" Ubuntu Linux was the only non-MS operating system, that had the nouveau driver, for the NVIDIA Optimum. So, I switc

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 08:03 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > Resolve never to buy Nvidia again :) 1) On my brother's antique Dell Vostro 1700 laptop, the NVidia G68M (GeForce 8400M GS) is soldered to the motherboard. 2)I'm running NVidia in two desktops because my erstwhile SA gave them to me wh

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 02:16:20AM -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Van Snyder composed on 2024-06-07 13:29 (UTC-0700): > > > The messages I found said "Support for it ended in 2019. Use nouveau." > This is support from Nvidia, with official Nvidia proprietary drivers >

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

Van Snyder composed on 2024-06-07 13:29 (UTC-0700): > Has anybody been able to install the NVidia 340.108 video driver in > Debian 12? > The messages I found said "Support for it ended in 2019. Use nouveau." It should have said more. Some of what it should have included

Re: [Sid] Nouveau: only one monitor after 6.6.15 to 6.7.9 upgrade

On 2024-04-03 21:39 +0200, Greg wrote: > I have two HP Z30i connected to Nvidia GeForce GTX 670. After last > upgrade I'm able to use only one monitor. > > When running linux-image-6.7.9: > > # dmesg | grep nouveau | cut -b 16- > nouveau :01:00.0: vgaarb: deactivate

[Sid] Nouveau: only one monitor after 6.6.15 to 6.7.9 upgrade

Hi there, I have two HP Z30i connected to Nvidia GeForce GTX 670. After last upgrade I'm able to use only one monitor. When running linux-image-6.7.9: # dmesg | grep nouveau | cut -b 16- nouveau :01:00.0: vgaarb: deactivate vga console nouveau :01:00.0: NVIDIA GK104 (0e4

Custom kernel 6.1.55 almost unusable cause nouveau

table with nouveau driver, I don't know why. I attach two files, the kernel log and the .config used for compile the 6.1.55 kernel version. The log file is very large, I suggest to filter it with "grep -v" command in order to avoid duplicate entries. I notice that in the kernel co

Re: X: how to *really* switch from nouveau to modesetting?

is almost assuredly no bug anywhere at all affecting you. If with modesetting it's gone, but with xserver-xorg-video-nouveau installed and in use it remains, then it would be good to report a nouveau DDX bug, though the problem could be DRI or Mesa. Unreported bugs can go a very long ti

Re: X: how to *really* switch from nouveau to modesetting?

D. R. Evans composed on 2023-09-12 11:12 (UTC-0600): > Felix Miata wrote: > From the rest of your post, it sounds like everything is as it should be, > except that I should probably remove the /etc/X11/xorg.conf file. And I could > also re-install the xserver-xorg-video-nou

Re: X: how to *really* switch from nouveau to modesetting?

Felix Miata wrote on 9/11/23 19:57: You did it. You made the switch. But see below. (There are multiple components to GPU support in Linux.) (There is no "the" nouveau "driver". Graphics support is in the hands of multiple software components, several of which in

Re: X: how to *really* switch from nouveau to modesetting?

You did it. You made the switch. But see below. (There are multiple components to GPU support in Linux.) (There is no "the" nouveau "driver". Graphics support is in the hands of multiple software components, several of which incorporate the string "nouveau" in

X: how to *really* switch from nouveau to modesetting?

Felix suggested removing the nouveau driver and using "modesetting" as the driver. I have removed the nouveau driver -- or at least I thought I did -- by executing: apt-get remove xserver-xorg-video-nouveau which moved the packages: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau xserver-xorg-

Re: Nvidia 390 driver no longer available for Bookworm; nouveau constantly freezes. Solutions?

to be the Nvidia 390 series. When Bookworm came out, I was running Bullseye with this driver and never really had any graphical issues that I can remember. Upon upgrading to Bullseye, I eventually found out this driver was no longer available and I was stuck with nouveau. I was recommended the

Nvidia 390 driver no longer available for Bookworm; nouveau constantly freezes. Solutions?

I was running Bullseye with this driver and never really had any graphical issues that I can remember. Upon upgrading to Bullseye, I eventually found out this driver was no longer available and I was stuck with nouveau. I was recommended the tesla 470 driver during the upgrade, but I never got it to

Re: package libxnvctrl0 installed by xfce, but nouveau is installed

> > a file lib/nvidia.cc that uses libxnvctrl0: [...] > > Hence the dependency. > > Thanks for the hints ! > What's strange is that in the sensors plugin GUI, the "sensor type" > concerning my GPU is called "nouveau-2000". I suppose that the pl

Re: package libxnvctrl0 installed by xfce, but nouveau is installed

, >    &gpuname)) { > g_assert (gpuname != NULL); > feature->devicename = gpuname;  /* "it is the caller's responsibility to free ..." */ > } > > Hence the dependency. Thanks for the hints

Re: package libxnvctrl0 installed by xfce, but nouveau is installed

On 2023-04-04 18:27:59 +0200, zithro wrote: > Unfortunately, "libxnvctrl0" is a dependency for "xfce4-sensors-plugin" : > > apt show xfce4-sensors-plugin > Depends: libxnvctrl0 > > So marking the packages provides the exact same output as above. > > Should I report a bug in the "xfce4-sensors-pl

Re: Re: package libxnvctrl0 installed by xfce, but nouveau is installed

Thanks, I'll report the bug in BTS then

Re: package libxnvctrl0 installed by xfce, but nouveau is installed

On 04 Apr 2023 16:56, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:18 AM zithro wrote: I have a bug with the nouveau driver shown in dmesg, so I looked up for solutions. On freedesktop.org, they say to remove everything concerning nvidia first, and only installing/using "nouveau"

Re: package libxnvctrl0 installed by xfce, but nouveau is installed

On 2023-04-04 15:00:11 +0200, zithro wrote: > I have a bug with the nouveau driver shown in dmesg, so I looked up for > solutions. > On freedesktop.org, they say to remove everything concerning nvidia first, > and only installing/using "nouveau" packages. > On my sy

Re: package libxnvctrl0 installed by xfce, but nouveau is installed

On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:18 AM zithro wrote: > > I have a bug with the nouveau driver shown in dmesg, so I looked up for > solutions. > On freedesktop.org, they say to remove everything concerning nvidia > first, and only installing/using "nouveau" packages. > On my

package libxnvctrl0 installed by xfce, but nouveau is installed

Hello, I have a bug with the nouveau driver shown in dmesg, so I looked up for solutions. On freedesktop.org, they say to remove everything concerning nvidia first, and only installing/using "nouveau" packages. On my system, I found the package "libxnvctrl0" (by nvidia) whi

Re: ID problem: "the nouveau driver"

Felix Miata wrote: > debian-u...@howorth.org.uk composed on 2023-03-24 11:02 (UTC): > > > Felix Miata wrote: > > >> > >> > > > "You are not logged in or you do not have per

Re: ID problem: "the nouveau driver"

one or more of its own modules for each brand of GPU. For AMD, there is amdgpu for current and recent GPUs/APUs/IGPs, and radeon for older. For Intel there is gma500 for many SOC configurations, and i915 for the rest. For NVidia there is only nouveau. These kernel modules provide Kernel ModeSetting (

Re: ID problem: "the nouveau driver"

Felix Miata wrote: > "You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page." ?? why should I need an account to see this page?

Re: ID problem: "the nouveau driver"

Vincent Lefevre composed on 2023-03-24 03:57 (UTC+0100): > On 2023-03-23 13:38:05 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: >> It could be the exhibition of ignorance represented by the above >> quote leads triagers and developers to ignore many problem reports. >> There is no such thing a

Re: ID problem: "the nouveau driver" (was: nvidia package wrong documentation?)

On 2023-03-23 13:38:05 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > It could be the exhibition of ignorance represented by the above > quote leads triagers and developers to ignore many problem reports. > There is no such thing as "the nouveau driver" in Debian: This is not true. From old Xorg

Re: ID problem: "the nouveau driver" (was: nvidia package wrong documentation?)

Vincent Lefevre composed on 2023-03-23 14:48 (UTC+0100): > On 2023-03-22 10:50:30 +0100, Hans wrote: >> Oh, before someone tells: I do NOT want to use nouveau! > Though I would prefer free software, nouveau is not usable for me, > in particular with my laptop. Remembe

Re: Nouveau Is (was: Nvidia + Plasma + Keyboard)

On 8/4/22 10:41, Felix Miata wrote: This is valuable info Felix, thank you. Andrew M.A. Cater composed on 2022-08-04 10:20 (UTC): ... nouveau is a good and supported way forward. NouveauS are. It's deleterious to omit the fact that there are two separate functionality FOSS Nouveaus, o

Re: Nouveau Is (was: Nvidia + Plasma + Keyboard)

Andrew M.A. Cater composed on 2022-08-04 10:20 (UTC): ... > nouveau is a good and supported way forward. NouveauS are. It's deleterious to omit the fact that there are two separate functionality FOSS Nouveaus, one of which, the Nouveau X display driver (DDX: Device Dependent

  1   2   3   4   5   >