On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 11:56:15AM -0500, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 09:44:44AM -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
> > In case it helps... the mail has magically resumed coming to me.
Same here, though I can't yet tell if things are fully up to speed.
But at least it's moving! :) ya
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 09:44:44AM -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
> In case it helps... the mail has magically resumed coming to me.
I believe we've fixed it now, as long as you don't have a gmail
address.
Cheers,
Pasc (with his listmaster hat on)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
In case it helps... the mail has magically resumed coming to me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian Pack wrote:
I'm pretty sure I'm still a list member because my posts aren't being
rejected out-of-hand. So we haven't had a mass ejection from the list.
I'm not sure, but I think anyone can send to the list, even if they are
not a list member.
--
"Codito ergo sum"
Roel Schroeven
--
To UNSUB
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 19:27, Brian Pack wrote:
> Ok... so it looks like going through the web archive is working, but who
> the hell knows if anybody is going to read it.
>
> So rather than helping to fix the problem, some have chosen to killfile
> the topic. And now the people who are at least
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Above's an attempt to use what I just read about in this thread. We'll
see how it works, yes?
Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:27:56 -0400
> > Brian Pack <[EM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:18:49 -0400
> Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:17:28PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> > THREADS! Use the threads! Stop making new threads abou
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:27:56 -0400
Brian Pack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok... so it looks like going through the web archive is working, but who
> the hell knows if anybody is going to read it.
>
> So rather than helping to fix the problem, some have chosen to killfile
> the topic.
Stuff lik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:17:28PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>> THREADS! Use the threads! Stop making new threads about this!
>
> They aren't receiving the messages, Paul. It makes it harder for
> them to
Ok... so it looks like going through the web archive is working, but who
the hell knows if anybody is going to read it.
So rather than helping to fix the problem, some have chosen to killfile
the topic. And now the people who are at least making an effort.
Mr. Metzler may not see this. Suits me f
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:18:49 -0400
Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:17:28PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> > THREADS! Use the threads! Stop making new threads about this!
>
> They aren't receiving the messages, Paul. It makes it harder for
> them to follow th
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:17:28 -0700
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Pack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It's not an ISP problem. Too many ppl from too many ISPs are reporting
>> the same thing for it to have anything to do with individual ISPs. The
>> messages aren't *getting* to the
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:17:28PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> THREADS! Use the threads! Stop making new threads about this!
They aren't receiving the messages, Paul. It makes it harder for
them to follow threads.
I've gotten every message, FWIW.
--
Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Pack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's not an ISP problem. Too many ppl from too many ISPs are reporting
> the same thing for it to have anything to do with individual ISPs. The
> messages aren't *getting* to the ISP.
THREADS! Use the threads
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:56:30PM -0400, Brian Pack wrote:
> It's not an ISP problem. Too many ppl from too many ISPs are reporting
> the same thing for it to have anything to do with individual ISPs. The
> messages aren't *getting* to the ISP.
>
> I'm pretty sure I'm still a list member because
It's not an ISP problem. Too many ppl from too many ISPs are reporting
the same thing for it to have anything to do with individual ISPs. The
messages aren't *getting* to the ISP.
I'm pretty sure I'm still a list member because my posts aren't being
rejected out-of-hand. So we haven't had a mass e
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:26:53PM -0400, Brian Pack wrote:
> My posts on the usenet mirror aren't making the web archive, So I'm
> chiming in here.
>
> From what I've seen, it's multiple ISPs with the problem. I haven't
> received any list mail since Saturday night, when the usual load is
> hundr
My posts on the usenet mirror aren't making the web archive, So I'm
chiming in here.
From what I've seen, it's multiple ISPs with the problem. I haven't
received any list mail since Saturday night, when the usual load is
hundreds per day. The usenet mirror is not showing it's usual load.
I haven'
Hey guys,
I'm writing this, but I won't be able to see I did. I'm not getting any
mail at all from debian-user. Have any idea why this might be?
cc me please,
--
-t
19 matches
Mail list logo
