Re: debug systemd restart networking problem

On 3/26/2022 2:15 PM, Jeremy Ardley wrote: I have been doing various changes to my network but have now got to the stage where I have errors running systemd restart networking systemctl status networking ● networking.service - Raise network interfaces Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/n

debug systemd restart networking problem

I have been doing various changes to my network but have now got to the stage where I have errors running systemd restart networking systemctl status networking ● networking.service - Raise network interfaces Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/networking.service; enabled; vendor preset:

Re: IPv4 networking problem after dist-upgrade

Hi again! On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:02:40PM +0200, Oleg wrote: > > ip link show > > $ > ip l sh > ... > 2: eth0: mtu 1492 qdisc pfifo_fast master > direct0 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 > link/ether 54:04:a6:a0:77:de brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 3: direct0: mtu 1492 qdisc noque

Re: IPv4 networking problem after dist-upgrade

Hey Dan, On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 10:23:40AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > Can you tell us about networking on the host, please? sure, I can. > ip link show $ > ip l sh ... 2: eth0: mtu 1492 qdisc pfifo_fast master direct0 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 link/ether 54:04:a6:a0:7

Re: IPv4 networking problem after dist-upgrade

Oleg wrote: > I've updated my server to bullseye a couple of days ago and since then I'm > unable to get IPv4 networking to work properly again. IPv6 still seems to work > like charm. I can also connect to the hosted VMs (KVM via libvirt) on the > server over IPv4 without problems. However, when I

IPv4 networking problem after dist-upgrade

Hi there, I've updated my server to bullseye a couple of days ago and since then I'm unable to get IPv4 networking to work properly again. IPv6 still seems to work like charm. I can also connect to the hosted VMs (KVM via libvirt) on the server over IPv4 without problems. However, when I try to ad

Identify Slow Networking Problem

Dear all, first time poster here. Can someone help me identify a networking problem in a Debian Linux server. The server is behind a corporate NAT and although can be reached without a problem it serves webpages very slowly. Downloading files from the server can be as slow as 7kbps when there

Re: Networking problem on Shuttle XS35GTV2

On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:32:44 +, Camaleón wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:32:07 +, Ramon Hofer wrote: > >> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:44:05 +, Camaleón wrote: > >>> Mmm, if your problem is a missing kernel module (jme.ko), the file is >>> located here: >>> >>> /lib/modules/2.6.32-5-686/k

Re: Networking problem on Shuttle XS35GTV2

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:32:44PM +, Camaleón wrote: > > Okay, it is important to use the right syntax for the CD to be properly > recognized. You should never try and manually enter the CDROM into your sources.list, always use apt-cdrom. Although, the installer usually handles that for you

Re: Networking problem on Shuttle XS35GTV2

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:32:07 +, Ramon Hofer wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:44:05 +, Camaleón wrote: >> Mmm, if your problem is a missing kernel module (jme.ko), the file is >> located here: >> >> /lib/modules/2.6.32-5-686/kernel/drivers/net/jme.ko >> >> Which is available in the first

Re: Networking problem on Shuttle XS35GTV2

Pascal Hambourg wrote: > Keith McKenzie a écrit : > > Ramon Hofer wrote: > >> What am I doing wrong? Personally I would install a different network card for the installation and then get through the install part. Then after the system is running I would install the new drivers when the onboard ne

Re: Networking problem on Shuttle XS35GTV2

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:44:05 +, Camaleón wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:34:44 +, Ramon Hofer wrote: > >> I have described my problem a while ago and now I got a solution to my >> Ubuntu bug report: >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/880316 See posts 5 >> and 6 >>

Re: Networking problem on Shuttle XS35GTV2

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:31:19 +, Keith McKenzie wrote: > On 28/02/12 15:34, Ramon Hofer wrote: >> So I tried to do the way post 6 describes. I have installed >> debian-6.0.4- i386-CD-1.iso after putting it on a usb stick with >> unetbootin. Then I tried to install gcc but it can't find the >> i

Re: Networking problem on Shuttle XS35GTV2

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:28:18 +, Keith McKenzie wrote: > On 28/02/12 15:34, Ramon Hofer wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I have described my problem a while ago and now I got a solution to my >> Ubuntu bug report: >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/880316 See posts 5 >> and 6 >> >

Re: Networking problem on Shuttle XS35GTV2

Hello, Keith McKenzie a écrit : > On 28/02/12 16:03, Ramon Hofer wrote: >> >> http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-initrd.html >> >> Chapter 6.4 Examining the initrd contents tells me to: >> mount -t cramfs /boot/initrd.img-2.6.12-1-686 /mnt/initrd -o loop >> >> So I took my gunzipped file

Re: Networking problem on Shuttle XS35GTV2

On 28/02/12 16:03, Ramon Hofer wrote: I was looking for the initrd.gz in the installation medium. I found two: /install.386/gtk/initrd.gz and /install.386/initrd.gz They aren't the same. Why are there two versions of them? Is it ok to take this one: /install.386/initrd.gz? /install.386/g

Re: Networking problem on Shuttle XS35GTV2

On 28/02/12 15:34, Ramon Hofer wrote: So I tried to do the way post 6 describes. I have installed debian-6.0.4- i386-CD-1.iso after putting it on a usb stick with unetbootin. Then I tried to install gcc but it can't find the installation medium anymore. So I mounted the created usb stick to /medi

Re: Networking problem on Shuttle XS35GTV2

On 28/02/12 15:34, Ramon Hofer wrote: Hi all I have described my problem a while ago and now I got a solution to my Ubuntu bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/880316 See posts 5 and 6 Post 5 sounds great but I can't find how to unpack the initrd.gz. Can you help me

Re: Networking problem on Shuttle XS35GTV2

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:34:44 +, Ramon Hofer wrote: > I have described my problem a while ago and now I got a solution to my > Ubuntu bug report: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/880316 See posts 5 > and 6 > > Post 5 sounds great but I can't find how to unpack the init

Re: Networking problem on Shuttle XS35GTV2

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:40:46 +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2012 schrieb Ramon Hofer: >> I have described my problem a while ago and now I got a solution to my >> Ubuntu bug report: >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/880316 See posts 5 >> and 6 >>

Re: Networking problem on Shuttle XS35GTV2

Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2012 schrieb Ramon Hofer: > Hi all > > I have described my problem a while ago and now I got a solution to my > Ubuntu bug report: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/880316 > See posts 5 and 6 > > Post 5 sounds great but I can't find how to unpack t

Networking problem on Shuttle XS35GTV2

Hi all I have described my problem a while ago and now I got a solution to my Ubuntu bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/880316 See posts 5 and 6 Post 5 sounds great but I can't find how to unpack the initrd.gz. Can you help me with that? So I tried to do the way

Re: Networking problem

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 09:22:17PM +0700, freeburn wrote: > Now we want to use a machine which will be connected with the smpp > server and also connected with the office network for accessing our > remote content server(where our website is hosted). I have tried to use > two ethernate cards. but

Re: Networking problem

Am 10.12.2009 um 15:22:17 schrieb freeburn: > I'm describing the scenario. plz help me with this. > > In our office we have set up a private network. a central dhcp server > assigns private Ip's to all the Desktops. Now recently we are developing > an automated sms application. so we have made a

Networking problem

I'm describing the scenario. plz help me with this. In our office we have set up a private network. a central dhcp server assigns private Ip's to all the Desktops. Now recently we are developing an automated sms application. so we have made a wired connection with a local operators smpp server. th

Re: KVM - multiple guest networking problem with birdge+tap setup - solved.

Kernel, by default, filters bridge traffic based on /proc/net/bridge/xxx files. You need to set the contents of one or more files to 0. I only had to set the contents of /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables file to 0 (echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables) and everything

KVM - multiple guest networking problem with birdge+tap setup.

Hi, I am trying to setup two guest windows XP on host linux amd64. Every thing except inter-kvm network works. I have started the two kvm machines with different macaddr to ensure there is no hwaddr conflict. However, kvm assigns tap1 a hw address that is same as br0's hw address. Here is my

Networking problem

Hi folks, I have 6 dumUs on Xen running Debian Etch including dum0. Their hostnames are; dum0 - xen0.satimis.com dumU1 - xen1.satimis.com dumU2 - xen2.satimis.com dumU3 - xen3.satimis.com IP - 192.168.0.113 etc. xen3.satimis.com is a mail server. It can send mails but unable receive mails be

Re: Networking problem (SOLVED)

On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 16:40 -0700, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote: > Im sorry, i looked closely at the packages and i see > now that theres a new version of the driver package to > go with the new kernel. I would have expected that > there would be some kind of automatic update, or some > way of letti

Re: Networking problem (SOLVED)

>>What is your Wi-Fi chip? Maybe you don't have the >>driver module >>installed for the newer kernel version. > >Its an Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG. From my dmesg in >the 2.6.18-4 kernel: > >--- >ipw3945: Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 3945 Network Connection >driver for Linux, 1.1.2dmpr >ipw3945: Copyright(

Re: Re: start networking problem

Thanks to all for your help. My /etc/network/interfaces was ok, just added the line modprobe tulip to /etc/modules and rebooted and all is well now. Marty -- Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 Free Database Search App: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml Web In

Re: start networking problem

Marty Landman wrote: Newbie question here. I'm running Potato on an old box and it's nice and stable providing a web environment on my LAN. However the way I get networking going is to run the following commands after a reboot: modprobe tulip ifconfig eth0 inet up 192.168.0.222 \ netmask 255

Re: start networking problem

On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 01:49:57PM -0400, Marty Landman wrote: > How can I avoid having to go through this? Easy. Go to /etc/network/interfaces (which is a file) and put your data there like this: # This file describes the network interfaces available on your # system # and how to activate them.

start networking problem

Newbie question here. I'm running Potato on an old box and it's nice and stable providing a web environment on my LAN. However the way I get networking going is to run the following commands after a reboot: modprobe tulip ifconfig eth0 inet up 192.168.0.222 \ netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 1

Re: networking problem

L.V.Gandhi wrote: My laptop is served by dhcp router. my hostname lvgdell600m. lvgdell600m:~# cat /etc/hostname lvgdell600m my /etc/hosts is lvgdell600m:~# cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost lvgdell600m 192.168.1.51mohan 192.168.1.52lvgdell600m 192.168

networking problem

My laptop is served by dhcp router. my hostname lvgdell600m. lvgdell600m:~# cat /etc/hostname lvgdell600m my /etc/hosts is lvgdell600m:~# cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost lvgdell600m 192.168.1.51mohan 192.168.1.52lvgdell600m 192.168.1.53lvgdell600m

Re: Networking Problem - yup

On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote: > > Thanks for the reply, I was wondering what a good way of subnetting my networks > would be.. What would be be advisable for someone with a DMZ and a LAN, and > another LAN inside the first LAN "better" or "good way" will depend on who you ask i

Re: Networking Problem - yup

On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote: > Matt Perry wrote: > > > On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote: > > > > > >>eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:05:1C:13:5C:8D > >> inet addr:10.1.1.1 Bcast:10.1.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > >> UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1

Re: Networking Problem - yup

Jonathan Barnes wrote: Alvin Oga wrote: yup ... your mask 255.255.255.0 says use only the last octet .. 10.0.0.x is NOT in the same network as 10.1.1.x it's doing what you told it ... maybe not what you want if you want to use 10.0.0.2 ... don't... "0" is best used for network name use 10.1.

Re: Networking Problem - yup

Alvin Oga wrote: yup ... your mask 255.255.255.0 says use only the last octet .. 10.0.0.x is NOT in the same network as 10.1.1.x it's doing what you told it ... maybe not what you want if you want to use 10.0.0.2 ... don't... "0" is best used for network name use 10.1.1.2 and your trouble

Re: Networking Problem

Matt Perry wrote: On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote: eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:05:1C:13:5C:8D inet addr:10.1.1.1 Bcast:10.1.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 That's odd. The line above should contain "RUNNING" but it do

Re: Networking Problem

On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote: > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:05:1C:13:5C:8D > inet addr:10.1.1.1 Bcast:10.1.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 That's odd. The line above should contain "RUNNING" but it doesn't. Ca

Re: Networking Problem

Matt Perry wrote: On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth1 0.0.0

Re: Networking Problem

On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote: > >>>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface > >>>10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 > >>>10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth1 > >>>0.0

Re: Networking Problem

Jonathan Barnes wrote: Matt Perry wrote: On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote: I cant see anything wrong with my routing table either: Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0

Re: Networking Problem

Matt Perry wrote: On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote: I cant see anything wrong with my routing table either: Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 10

Re: Networking Problem

Paul Gear wrote: Jonathan Barnes wrote: John Summerfield wrote: I _thought_ you might be Australian. Yes I am :) We're everywhere! (It's Sunday arvo - time to break my Linux box for this week.) Nah. Your both bananabenders. Not that we don't bend a few. _I_ have a few spares

Re: Networking Problem

Jonathan Barnes wrote: > John Summerfield wrote: > >> I _thought_ you might be Australian. > > > Yes I am :) We're everywhere! (It's Sunday arvo - time to break my Linux box for this week.) -- Paul -- Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fi

Re: Networking Problem

John Summerfield wrote: I _thought_ you might be Australian. Yes I am :) I don't know just that your tools are on Windows: boot Linux (Knoppix is fine) if you can. From there, traceroute x.com ping -R -c4 x.org and see where routing breaks. Also, on Debbie (the Debian box) sysctl -a | grep ip_ H

Re: Networking Problem

Jonathan Barnes wrote: Hi, I'm having a very strange networking problem that has my linux buddies and I stumped. I'll draw a basic mud map because it makes it ALOT easier to understand my situation as I have two gateways due to shared housing. I _thought_ you might be Australian. [Br

Re: Networking Problem

On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote: > I cant see anything wrong with my routing table either: > > Kernel IP routing table > > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface > > 10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 > > 10

Re: Networking Problem

Matt Perry wrote: On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote: my Debian Box. eg: The Firewall can ping my Debian Box, but my Debian Box can't ping the firewall. It's sounds like IP forwarding isn't working. Take down the interface that uses 10.1.1.1 and then try to ping the firewall. What happen

Re: Networking Problem

On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote: > my Debian Box. eg: The Firewall can ping my Debian Box, but my Debian > Box can't ping the firewall. It's sounds like IP forwarding isn't working. Take down the interface that uses 10.1.1.1 and then try to ping the firewall. What happens? What is th

Networking Problem

Hi, I'm having a very strange networking problem that has my linux buddies and I stumped. I'll draw a basic mud map because it makes it ALOT easier to understand my situation as I have two gateways due to shared housing. [Bridged ADSL Modem] | [Firewall] (220.244.217.*

networking problem

Hi people, I have a networking problem on several machines running woody and sarge all with the same hardware: Abit BP-6 dual celeron motherboard w. celeron 466 processors Intel etherexpress pro 100 ethernet cards All machines run Linux kernel 2.4.25 Problem: networking ceases to funcion and

Re: networking problem with 2.6.4 kernel [was: Re: 2.6.4 kernel install wants to remove current kernel]

on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 09:53:38PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:26:33PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > | on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:08:28PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated: > | > What version of the dhcp-client package do you have installed? > | > | 2.0pl5-

Re: networking problem with 2.6.4 kernel [was: Re: 2.6.4 kernel install wants to remove current kernel]

On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:26:33PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: | on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:08:28PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated: | > On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 12:19:06PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: | > | on Fri, 09 Apr 2004 03:42:06PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated: | > [...] | >

Re: networking problem with 2.6.4 kernel [was: Re: 2.6.4 kernel install wants to remove current kernel]

Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 02:11:24PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > | on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 02:02:06PM -0400, J F insinuated: > | > I don't have a specific answer to your problem, > | > but using aptitude seems to ease upgrade problems. > | > Also, having testing, unstab

Re: networking problem with 2.6.4 kernel [was: Re: 2.6.4 kernel install wants to remove current kernel]

on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:08:28PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 12:19:06PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > | on Fri, 09 Apr 2004 03:42:06PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated: > [...] > | > I haven't noticed any changes in networking, but that might be > | > d

using apt/aptitude (was: Re: networking problem with 2.6.4 kernel [was: Re: 2.6.4 kernel install wants to remove current kernel])

On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 02:11:24PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: | [back on-list] | | on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 02:02:06PM -0400, J F insinuated: | > I don't have a specific answer to your problem, | > but using aptitude seems to ease upgrade problems. | > Also, having testing, unstable, and stable all i

Re: networking problem with 2.6.4 kernel [was: Re: 2.6.4 kernel install wants to remove current kernel]

On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 12:19:06PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: | on Fri, 09 Apr 2004 03:42:06PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated: [...] | > I haven't noticed any changes in networking, but that might be | > dependent on the hardware and what modules I already had configured | > to be loade

Re: networking problem with 2.6.4 kernel [was: Re: 2.6.4 kernel install wants to remove current kernel]

[back on-list] on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 02:02:06PM -0400, J F insinuated: > I don't have a specific answer to your problem, > but using aptitude seems to ease upgrade problems. > Also, having testing, unstable, and stable all in > /etc/apt/sources.list seems to get aptitude > to converge on a working s

networking problem with 2.6.4 kernel [was: Re: 2.6.4 kernel install wants to remove current kernel]

on Fri, 09 Apr 2004 03:42:06PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 02:41:54PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > | on Fri, 09 Apr 2004 01:47:26PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated: > | > On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 12:32:10PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > [...] > | >

Re: networking problem encountered while installing "Woody"

--- Aurélien_Campéas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You have a problem with dhcp here. Are you sure you want it ? It > seems > like the dhcp client doesn't find a dhcp server... > I mean, why not pick up some private ip adress (like 192.168.0.2) and > rewrite your eth0 entry in /etc/network/interfa

Re: networking problem encountered while installing "Woody"

Le lun 22/03/2004 à 09:22, Renhao Zhang a écrit : > Aurlien, > Thank you for your prompt and insightful reply. I'll > get a move on learning to compiling my own kernel. Wait a minute... ! > # The first network card - this entry was created > during the Debian installation > # (network, broadc

Re: networking problem encountered while installing "Woody"

Aurélien, Thank you for your prompt and insightful reply. I'll get a move on learning to compiling my own kernel. Hopefully, that'll get the networking functioning. In the mean time, I'd still like to learn exactly how my setup isn't working and what I am fixing. The following is the info you a

Re: networking problem (perhaps with Autonegotiate?)

I haven't had the dubious pleasure of having any association with an ME Network. However, if other versions of Windows are anything to go by my recollection is that Connection Sharing sets up the gateway as 192.168.0.1 with the other machines usually getting their IP from the gateway via dhcp.

Re: networking problem (perhaps with Autonegotiate?)

> all i'm doing to try to connect is putting the DNS in > the /etc/resolv.conf and then typing: > > ifconfig eth0 192.168.10.90 netmask 255.255.255.0 > (actually every time i type this two more lines like Seems like you forgot to create a default route. If you do a plain 'ifconfig' you wil see th

networking problem (perhaps with Autonegotiate?)

Hi, my neighbour has offered to put me on his home network which is connected to the outside world by broadband but when we try my web browser seems to hang (i.e. seems to be trying to look up, say, google but never finds it nor gives up). his (windows ME) network uses 10base2 connections, and my

Re: simple networking problem - bringing up eth0 correctly

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 01:29:57AM -0800, Dale Welch wrote: > interfaces: > auto eth0 > iface eth0 inet static > address 192.168.1.51 > network 192.168.1.0 > gateway 192.168.1.254 Try this. # /etc/network/interfaces -- configuration file f

Re: simple networking problem - bringing up eth0 correctly

To explain better: > if i manually do the following commands i can get out on my network >ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.50 netmask 255.255.255.0 up >route add default gw 192.168.1.254 i need to have that configured automatically during start-up and i need my dns to work. just found my dns proble

Re: simple networking problem - bringing up eth0 correctly

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 12:44:05AM -0800, Dale Welch wrote: > if i manually do the following commands i can get out on my network >ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.50 netmask 255.255.255.0 up >route add default gw 192.168.1.254 Edit /etc/network/interf

simple networking problem - bringing up eth0 correctly

I need to automate setting up my network and i seem to be missing something... using debian Linux Version 2.4.18-bf2.4-xfs if i manually do the following commands i can get out on my network ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.50 netmask 255.255.255.0 up route add default gw 192.168.1.254 i also

Re: networking problem and philosophy

On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 13:25, David Z Maze wrote: > Hmm. Is there anything informative in /etc/network/interfaces (the > "normal" place for network settings under Debian)? You also might try > running your DHCP client by hand, and seeing if that works. Also, > check that your kernel configuratio

Re: networking problem and philosophy

On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 13:25, David Z Maze wrote: > > Bret Comstock Waldow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm trying to get Debian going on my Thinkpad T21, and synchronize with > > my Sony Clie PDA. > > (This works fine for me, but I always build my own kernel. I've had > better luck using

Re: networking problem and philosophy

Bret Comstock Waldow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm trying to get Debian going on my Thinkpad T21, and synchronize with > my Sony Clie PDA. (This works fine for me, but I always build my own kernel. I've had better luck using coldsync than pilot-link, and the first sync always fails.) > I'm

networking problem and philosophy

Hi, I'm trying to get Debian going on my Thinkpad T21, and synchronize with my Sony Clie PDA. I installed Woody using packages via ftp, so it's up to date. During the install, one of the choices is to use 'netenv' to configure the network. I don't know any better - I'm new to Debian - so I let

networking problem and philosophy

I'm trying to get Debian going on my Thinkpad T21, and synchronize with my Sony Clie PDA. I installed Woody using packages via ftp, so it's up to date. During the install, one of the choices is to use 'netenv' to configure the network. I don't know any better - I'm new to Debian - so I let it.

Re: [despammed] Re: odd networking problem

Alright, after playing around some more.. I have discovered that non-Debian distros work as the workstation. Linux BBC (bootable business card) worked fine, as did Mandrake. BBC used kernel 2.4.5-xfs.. any ideas what might be wrong? Monday, October 7, 2002, 12:39:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (debia

Re: Re[2]: [despammed] Re: odd networking problem

El(On) Tue, 08 Oct 2002 15:21:06 -0400 Ed McMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió(wrote): > >> Argh. Now I'm just more confused. OK, tethereal picks up the pings > >> leaving the machine. So, that means there must be some kind of queue > >> or rate limiter blocking it as the router never receives

Re: [despammed] Re: odd networking problem

Ed McMan, 2002-Oct-08 15:21 -0400: > > > Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 12:00:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (debian-user) >wrote: > > Jeff> Ed McMan, 2002-Oct-07 20:37 -0400: > >> Argh. Now I'm just more confused. OK, tethereal picks up the pings > >> leaving the machine. So, that means there must be

Re[2]: [despammed] Re: odd networking problem

Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 12:00:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (debian-user) wrote: Jeff> Ed McMan, 2002-Oct-07 20:37 -0400: >> Argh. Now I'm just more confused. OK, tethereal picks up the pings >> leaving the machine. So, that means there must be some kind of queue >> or rate limiter blocking it

Re: [despammed] Re: odd networking problem

Ed McMan, 2002-Oct-07 20:37 -0400: > Argh. Now I'm just more confused. OK, tethereal picks up the pings > leaving the machine. So, that means there must be some kind of queue > or rate limiter blocking it as the router never receives it. That, or > the switch is evil and blocks frames coming f

Re: [despammed] Re: odd networking problem

This one time, at band camp, Ed McMan said: > There is no rate limiting that I am aware of. I am using pmfirewall. > All other hosts work fine (including this one when in Windows!). > > Now, this host can access the Lan without problem. I can SSH and scp > all I want without problem. However,

Re[2]: [despammed] Re: odd networking problem

Monday, October 7, 2002, 8:53:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (debian-user) wrote: Stephen> This one time, at band camp, Ed McMan said: >> Argh. Now I'm just more confused. OK, tethereal picks up the pings >> leaving the machine. So, that means there must be some kind of queue >> or rate limiter b

Re: [despammed] Re: odd networking problem

This one time, at band camp, Ed McMan said: > Stephen>> tcpdump/etheral on the box in question at the same time as on the router > Stephen>> - is the box sending packets that the router never sees? > Ed> I didn't try that. I'm going to try that now. > Stephen>> pinging hosts on the internal net

Re[3]: [despammed] Re: odd networking problem

Monday, October 7, 2002, 7:46:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (debian-user) wrote: Stephen>> Firewall on the box in question? Sounds like something is rate-limiting Stephen>> the pings, and if the box just stops sending them, it's probably the box Stephen>> itself, rather than anything past it. Ed> No

Re[2]: [despammed] Re: odd networking problem

Monday, October 7, 2002, 3:48:39 PM, Stephen Gran (Stephen) wrote: Stephen> This one time, at band camp, Ed McMan said: >> Monday, October 7, 2002, 12:39:40 PM, you wrote: >> >> Jeff> Ed McMan, 2002-Oct-06 19:22 -0400: >> Jeff> >> >> Here is the weird part. This computer works fine using the

Re: [despammed] Re: odd networking problem

This one time, at band camp, Ed McMan said: > > > Monday, October 7, 2002, 12:39:40 PM, you wrote: > > Jeff> Ed McMan, 2002-Oct-06 19:22 -0400: > Jeff> > >> > >> Here is the weird part. This computer works fine using the same > >> configuration in Windows. All the other computers work fine

Re: [despammed] Re: odd networking problem

Ed McMan, 2002-Oct-07 15:25 -0400: > > > Monday, October 7, 2002, 12:39:40 PM, you wrote: > > Jeff> Ed McMan, 2002-Oct-06 19:22 -0400: > Jeff> > >> > >> Here is the weird part. This computer works fine using the same > >> configuration in Windows. All the other computers work fine too. I >

Re: [despammed] Re: odd networking problem

Monday, October 7, 2002, 12:39:40 PM, you wrote: Jeff> Ed McMan, 2002-Oct-06 19:22 -0400: Jeff> >> >> Here is the weird part. This computer works fine using the same >> configuration in Windows. All the other computers work fine too. I >> have been trying to figure out what the problem is,

Re: odd networking problem

Ed McMan, 2002-Oct-06 19:22 -0400: > > Here is the weird part. This computer works fine using the same > configuration in Windows. All the other computers work fine too. I > have been trying to figure out what the problem is, so I did some > packet sniffing with ethereal on the router. > > I

odd networking problem

I am having a very odd network problem, and I can't figure out the problem. Here is a description of my network: (cable modem) - (linux box as router running debian of course ;)) - switch (misc workstations) The router machine is running fine. I just recently installed Debian on a workstation

Re: networking problem during install

on Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 06:39:44PM -0700, Bob Galloway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Well, I finally got the box to network. As god as my witness, I have > no idea why this worked, but it worked: I swapped the NetGear card out > of the box, replaced it with the LinkSys card, and tried one more ti

Re: networking problem during install

Well, I finally got the box to network. As god as my witness, I have no idea why this worked, but it worked: I swapped the NetGear card out of the box, replaced it with the LinkSys card, and tried one more time. Funny, it works now. I'm still scratching my head wondering why it didn't work th

Re: networking problem during install

on Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 12:56:22AM -0700, Bob Galloway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 04:55:15PM -0700, Brandon High wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 01:04:51PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > Another thought: PCI bus problems? > > > > > > Have you tried an alternate

Re: networking problem during install

On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 04:55:15PM -0700, Brandon High wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 01:04:51PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > Another thought: PCI bus problems? > > > > Have you tried an alternate card in the box? If everthing outside the > > box works, the card(s) work, and the CPU isn't

Re: networking problem during install

On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 01:04:51PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: > Another thought: PCI bus problems? > > Have you tried an alternate card in the box? If everthing outside the > box works, the card(s) work, and the CPU isn't misbehaving, I'd suspect > a mobo/bus problem. No idea how to diagnose

Re: networking problem during install

on Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:33:06PM -0700, Bob Galloway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Howdy, deb folk! > > I'm trying to turn an old AT&T Globalyst P90 box into a firewall > running Debian. Installation via NFS would be much easier if I could > get networking to work! Too bad I can't seem to get

Re: networking problem during install

On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:51:21AM -0400, James D Strandboge wrote: > Forgive me I this is redundant, but is your ethernet card set to auto > negotiate > its speed? Sometimes this can be a problem if you are on a 10BaseT network > and > the card goes to 100Baset. I'm using 10BaseT. When I swap

  1   2   >