On 10/22/09, Javier Barroso wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Israel Garcia wrote:
>> I need to calculate the throughput of the ethernet interface of my
>> dom0. Any tool? script?
> You can use tcpstat
Hi Javier,
Fine, I'll take a look to tcpstat..thanks..
Do you know is there is a way
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Israel Garcia wrote:
> I need to calculate the throughput of the ethernet interface of my
> dom0. Any tool? script?
You can use tcpstat
I think it rocks (like debian)!
Regards,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
I need to calculate the throughput of the ethernet interface of my
dom0. Any tool? script?
thanks in advance.
--
Regards;
Israel Garcia
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 06:05:50PM -0400, H.S. wrote:
> I installed bandwidthd. The router machine I mentioned earlier is an old
> Pentium III and I am worried about the disk space the graphs will take
> up as time goes by. Any idea how this works out?
one possibility is to use a self-made cron
NN_il_Confusionario wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:43:30PM -0400, H.S. wrote:
Which tool is best installed on a little machine running as a router to
keep track of the network throughput? I am primarily interested in
keeping track of the network usage on a monthly basis so that I know how
On 04/17/2008 11:43 AM, H.S. wrote:
Hello,
Which tool is best installed on a little machine running as a router to
keep track of the network throughput? I am primarily interested in
keeping track of the network usage on a monthly basis so that I know how
much I have used from my ISP.
Munin
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:43:30PM -0400, H.S. wrote:
> Which tool is best installed on a little machine running as a router to
> keep track of the network throughput? I am primarily interested in
> keeping track of the network usage on a monthly basis so that I know how
> much I ha
Hello,
Which tool is best installed on a little machine running as a router to
keep track of the network throughput? I am primarily interested in
keeping track of the network usage on a monthly basis so that I know how
much I have used from my ISP.
Currently I have ntop installed. However
Mart van de Wege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So does anyone know of a nice CardBus NIC that plays well with Debian? I
> did get a 3Com 575 with this machine as well, but couldn't get it to work
> on the first go
My 3c575 (specifically, 3CCFE575BT) works perfectly. ISTR some
problems with it an
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:08:35 -0400
Mike Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mart van de Wege wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > A minor question, possibly OT: for some reason I'm getting a very low
> > network throughput between my laptop and my desktop mach
Mart van de Wege wrote:
> Folks,
>
> A minor question, possibly OT: for some reason I'm getting a very low
> network throughput between my laptop and my desktop machine. I just ran a
> test with netpipe-tcp, and the maximum speed is some 15Mbps. As I have a
> 3Com 905C i
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:21:27 -0400
"Michael B. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 07:04:16PM +0200, Mart van de Wege wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > A minor question, possibly OT: for some reason I'm getting a very low
> > net
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 07:04:16PM +0200, Mart van de Wege wrote:
> Folks,
>
> A minor question, possibly OT: for some reason I'm getting a very low
> network throughput between my laptop and my desktop machine. I just ran a
> test with netpipe-tcp, and the maximum speed is so
Folks,
A minor question, possibly OT: for some reason I'm getting a very low
network throughput between my laptop and my desktop machine. I just ran a
test with netpipe-tcp, and the maximum speed is some 15Mbps. As I have a
3Com 905C in the desktop box and a 3Com 574 PCMCIA card on the l
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 03:35:59PM +0100, Philipp Schulte wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 03:24:49PM +0100, Sebastiaan wrote:
>
> > Just curious: when you write an article in which you use MegaBytes and
> > MegaBits a lot, how do you distinguish between them?
>
> Somewhere I have read that i
Perhaps we should close this discussion. I found a page about SI
prescriptions at:
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
but I have never read any document using that convention. It says:
1 mebibyte = 1 MiB = 2^20 B (=byte)
Bit is always written out.
Greetz,
Sebastiaan
On Fri, 5 Jan 20
At Fri, 5 Jan 2001 15:24:49 +0100 (MET) , Sebastiaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Philipp Schulte wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:44:34AM +0100, Michal F. Hanula wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:25:10AM +0100, Sebastiaan wrote:
>> > > On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Phili
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 03:24:49PM +0100, Sebastiaan wrote:
> Just curious: when you write an article in which you use MegaBytes and
> MegaBits a lot, how do you distinguish between them?
Somewhere I have read that it is common to use Bits when talking about
data that has to be transmitted and B
>> IIRC `K' as in KB means 1024 (2^10), while `k' as in kB (or kg, or almost
>> anything else) means 1000 (10^3). Still not confused?
>
>That's true and this is well defined in the SI.
>But does that mean, we have to distinguish between mb, Mb, mB and MB?
yes.
cheers,
&rw
--
/ Ing. Robert Wal
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Philipp Schulte wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:44:34AM +0100, Michal F. Hanula wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:25:10AM +0100, Sebastiaan wrote:
> > > On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Philipp Schulte wrote:
> > > > > KB = Kelvin Byte
> > > >
> > IIRC `K' as in KB means 1024 (
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:44:34AM +0100, Michal F. Hanula wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:25:10AM +0100, Sebastiaan wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Philipp Schulte wrote:
> > > > KB = Kelvin Byte
> > >
> IIRC `K' as in KB means 1024 (2^10), while `k' as in kB (or kg, or almost
> anything el
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:25:10AM +0100, Sebastiaan wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Philipp Schulte wrote:
> > > > KB = Kelvin Byte
> > >
> IIRC `K' as in KB means 1024 (2^10), while `k' as in kB (or kg, or almost
> anything else) means 1000 (10^3). Still not confused?
Ok, and what about Mega
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:25:10AM +0100, Sebastiaan wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Philipp Schulte wrote:
> > > KB = Kelvin Byte
> >
IIRC `K' as in KB means 1024 (2^10), while `k' as in kB (or kg, or almost
anything else) means 1000 (10^3). Still not confused?
Miso&
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Philipp Schulte wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:02:49PM +0100, Sebastiaan wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Philipp Schulte wrote:
>
> > > I guess you are mixing up MBit and MByte.
> > > Phil
> > You too, it is Mb for megabit and MB for megabyte.
> > Same for kB = kiloBy
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:36:15AM +0100, Philipp Schulte wrote:
> Could you please give me an URL, where this is defined?
> I searched the SI units but it does not mention any difference between
> MB and Mb.
> Phil
>
I don't know where this is defined, but this is a consistency I've
noticed as w
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:02:49PM +0100, Sebastiaan wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Philipp Schulte wrote:
> > I guess you are mixing up MBit and MByte.
> > Phil
> You too, it is Mb for megabit and MB for megabyte.
> Same for kB = kiloByte.
>
> Please do not use silly shorts, like
> mb = milibit
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Philipp Schulte wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:37:56PM -0500, Tim Sailer wrote:
>
> > I have a Debian box with 2 NICs. Both 100Meg, running in full duplex. This
> > machine is running as a ftp proxy. As part of the traffic going through the
> > box, some streams have 1
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:07:23AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 12:04:13AM +0100, Philipp Schulte wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:37:56PM -0500, Tim Sailer wrote:
> >
> > > I have a Debian box with 2 NICs. Both 100Meg, running in full duplex. This
> > > machin
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 12:04:13AM +0100, Philipp Schulte wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:37:56PM -0500, Tim Sailer wrote:
>
> > I have a Debian box with 2 NICs. Both 100Meg, running in full duplex. This
> > machine is running as a ftp proxy. As part of the traffic going through the
> > box,
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:37:56PM -0500, Tim Sailer wrote:
> I have a Debian box with 2 NICs. Both 100Meg, running in full duplex. This
> machine is running as a ftp proxy. As part of the traffic going through the
> box, some streams have 1000k window size for a certain reason. How do
> I tune t
I have a Debian box with 2 NICs. Both 100Meg, running in full duplex. This
machine is running as a ftp proxy. As part of the traffic going through the
box, some streams have 1000k window size for a certain reason. How do
I tune the NICs to handle the streams better? There are ways of doing this
on
31 matches
Mail list logo
