Micha :
Did you ever get a resolution to this problem? I know this is an old
threat, but I am currently experiencing the same issue and it would help
me to find someone who solved it. google is not much of a help.
Thanks for the help
Bob
In the current version of mozilla with tabbrowser extensio
In the current version of mozilla with tabbrowser extensions installed
under the tabbrowser settings->context menu the open in ... options are
grayed out and I can't get at the "Open in new active tab" option for
right clicking on links option which I used a lot and really like.
Any ideas what hap
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 at 12:19pm, Kenneth Jacker wrote:
: dpj> Java seems to be a major pain in Linux - it's all rather hit or
: dpj> miss to get it to work.
:
:I have had *no* problems w/ Java and its plugin until I upgraded to
:j2sdk1.4.2_04. I still can't get the plugin to work with 'firebird'.
dpj> Java seems to be a major pain in Linux - it's all rather hit or
dpj> miss to get it to work.
I have had *no* problems w/ Java and its plugin until I upgraded to
j2sdk1.4.2_04. I still can't get the plugin to work with 'firebird'.
Anyway, in general, Java & Linux have not been "a major p
On March 31, 2004 00:31, Mustafa Taha Al-Shawaf wrote:
>
> I looked at the site. I download two deb files:
> j2re1.4_1.4.1-6_i386.deb
> j2se-common_1.1_all.deb
>
> I then installed them. Now, Firebird doesn't crash when I open a
> page in Java. However, Java still doesn't work. I get a gray fra
ll the
> > Java plugin with Mozilla Firebird 0.7. BTW, I am running a
> > combination of Woody and Sarge.
>
> I had the same problem and I had undertaken the exact same steps you had
> to no avail. There's just something peculiar with the rpm for some
> reason. Here was my
On March 30, 2004 18:16, Mustafa Taha Al-Shawaf wrote:
> Hello group,
>
> This question will probably seem ridiculous to some of you, but I am
> just having a lot of trouble with it. I am trying to install the
> Java plugin with Mozilla Firebird 0.7. BTW, I am running a
> co
Hello group,
This question will probably seem ridiculous to some of you, but I am just
having a lot of trouble with it. I am trying to install the Java plugin with
Mozilla Firebird 0.7. BTW, I am running a combination of Woody and Sarge.
Here is what I have done so far:
1) I downloaded the
Kent West wrote:
Michal R. Hoffmann wrote:
BTW, I found GNOME uses mozilla-browser, but firebird/firefox is not
satisfying this dependency :(
I _think_ you can fix this with:
update-alternatives --config x-www-browser
This ain't help, as this is dependency on mozilla-browser. But, anyway it
Michal R. Hoffmann wrote:
BTW, I found GNOME uses mozilla-browser, but firebird/firefox is not
satisfying this dependency :(
I _think_ you can fix this with:
update-alternatives --config x-www-browser
--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 at 11:18am, Michal R. Hoffmann wrote:
:I use debian/unstable. I have had installed and configured Mozilla
:Firebird. Recently the project has been renamed again, into Mozilla
:Firefox. Unfortunately
:# apt-get upgrade
:is not upgrading firebird to firefox. So I have had
hello,
I use debian/unstable. I have had installed and configured Mozilla
Firebird. Recently the project has been renamed again, into Mozilla
Firefox. Unfortunately
# apt-get upgrade
is not upgrading firebird to firefox. So I have had installed:
# apt-get install mozilla-firefox
what a surprise
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 10:04:46 -0500
"S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah really?! You can read/write an e-mail while Sylpheed is pulling
> down mesages? Cool -- not being able to b4 is the primary reason I
> left it, for Mozilla.
>
> I liked it's ability to reply with higlighted materia
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 09:30:12AM +1000 or thereabouts, Peter A. Cole wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 12:57:01 -0500
> "S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > No it doesn't thread the processes. In other words one can't do anything
> > while one is downloading e-mail. The application is locke
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 12:57:01 -0500
"S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No it doesn't thread the processes. In other words one can't do anything
> while one is downloading e-mail. The application is locked, until that
> I/O finishes.
Ahh ok, in that case this situation has been resolved. I ca
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 12:31:17PM +1000 or thereabouts, Peter A. Cole wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:24:29 -0500
> "S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It's been some time since I last used Sylpheed, but one can set specific
> > reply-to behaviours for each mail directory. For a GUI client
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:24:29 -0500
"S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's been some time since I last used Sylpheed, but one can set specific
> reply-to behaviours for each mail directory. For a GUI client Sylpheed
> isn't too bad -- Too bad it isn't a threaded client though. I disliked
> the
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 12:07:25PM +1000 or thereabouts, Peter A. Cole wrote:
>
> I noticed on the site they're talking about another 12 months to get it
> where I need it to be. If I had lots of $$$ I'd make a donation to help!
>
> Also, I noticed by default in Sylpheed when you hit reply, it ma
- Original Message -
From: "David P James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 3:34 AM
Subject: Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
>
> There's Skipstone, but for some reason it does not appear
- Original Message -
From: "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter A. Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
> * [28/02/2004 02:47] Peter A. Cole <[EMAIL PROTEC
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:58:50 +0100, Jan Schulz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Schulz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 10:58 PM
Subject: Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
> * Peter A. Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just wondering i
On February 27, 2004 07:17, Peter A. Cole wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering if anyone can suggest a lighter weight alternative to
> Mozilla Firebird?
>
> So far, I think Galeon may be similar to Firebird, but I think it
> will want Gnome installed, which I definit
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:58:50 +0100, Jan Schulz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Peter A. Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just wondering if anyone can suggest a lighter weight alternative to
Mozilla
Firebird?
I'm running Sarge on an old P200MMX with 160MB RAM, but Firebird still
* Peter A. Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone can suggest a lighter weight alternative to Mozilla
> Firebird?
> I'm running Sarge on an old P200MMX with 160MB RAM, but Firebird still chews
> up a little too much memory.
Opera.
empty:
PID USER
- Original Message -
From: "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter A. Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
>
> Just check it out then. I'm quite sure dillo know
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Huggins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 10:17:21PM +1000, Peter A. Cole wrote:
> &g
* [27/02/2004 13:20] Peter A. Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Just wondering if anyone can suggest a lighter weight alternative to Mozilla
> Firebird?
If you can live with less features and GTK 1: dillo. :-)
Otherwise: Opera? (non-free, though)
Greets,
Tom
--
"Mongolian drivers
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 10:17:21PM +1000, Peter A. Cole wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone can suggest a lighter weight alternative to
> Mozilla Firebird?
dillo is very lightweight but not very featureful. I guess it depends
where your cutoff lies.
--
Simon Huggins \ Cows turn them
Hi all,
Just wondering if anyone can suggest a lighter weight alternative to Mozilla
Firebird?
I'm running Sarge on an old P200MMX with 160MB RAM, but Firebird still chews
up a little too much memory.
I've gone down the Blackbox window manager path and am planning on using
Sylpheed
m wrote:
> > > > > Micha wrote:
> > > > > > Is it possible to tell mozilla-firebird how to handle mailto links?
> > > > > > I am using exim4 + mutt for mail.
> > > > >
> > > > > yep, http://mozex.mozdev.org/
> > > >
On 18 Feb 2004, Mike M wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:41:51AM +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > On 17 Feb 2004, David P James wrote:
> > > On February 16, 2004 06:39, Michael Graham wrote:
> > > > Micha wrote:
> > > > > Is it possible to tel
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:41:51AM +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 17 Feb 2004, David P James wrote:
> > On February 16, 2004 06:39, Michael Graham wrote:
> > > Micha wrote:
> > > > Is it possible to tell mozilla-firebird how to handle mailto links?
> >
On 17 Feb 2004, David P James wrote:
> On February 16, 2004 06:39, Michael Graham wrote:
> > Micha wrote:
> > > Is it possible to tell mozilla-firebird how to handle mailto links?
> > > I am using exim4 + mutt for mail.
> >
> > yep, http://mozex.mozdev.org/
&
On February 16, 2004 06:39, Michael Graham wrote:
> Micha wrote:
> > Is it possible to tell mozilla-firebird how to handle mailto links?
> > I am using exim4 + mutt for mail.
>
> yep, http://mozex.mozdev.org/
Or there's the way it's supposed to work (at least w
On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 15:59, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 03:52:13PM +0100, Olle Eriksson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 08:02, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > > Is it possible to tell mozilla-firebird how to handle mailto links?
> > > I am using exim4
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 03:52:13PM +0100, Olle Eriksson wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 08:02, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > Is it possible to tell mozilla-firebird how to handle mailto links?
> > I am using exim4 + mutt for mail.
>
> A quick Google search tells me you need the Moze
On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 08:02, Micha Feigin wrote:
> Is it possible to tell mozilla-firebird how to handle mailto links?
> I am using exim4 + mutt for mail.
A quick Google search tells me you need the Mozex extension to get it to
work. Homepage: http://mozex.mozdev.org
Olle
--
To UNSUB
Micha wrote:
> Is it possible to tell mozilla-firebird how to handle mailto links?
> I am using exim4 + mutt for mail.
yep, http://mozex.mozdev.org/
--
OoberMick
Dealer: "19"
Homer: "Hit me!"
Dealer: "20"
Homer: "Hit me!"
Dealer: "21"
Ho
Is it possible to tell mozilla-firebird how to handle mailto links?
I am using exim4 + mutt for mail.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On January 28, 2004 14:52, Matt Price wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:30:31PM -0500, David P James wrote:
>
> sounds great -- but what's the name of the password file? is it
> cert8.db? I don't see an obvious 'psswords' file.
duh - I should have mentionned that. They take on the form of:
#
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:30:31PM -0500, David P James wrote:
> On January 27, 2004 07:13, Matt Price wrote:
> If I understand you correctly, pressing "View Passwords" does absolutely
> nothing at all? The password manager in Firebird was changed in the 0.7
> release which might be the source of
On January 27, 2004 07:13, Matt Price wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> after a recent upgrade I can't view the paasswords stored by
> mozilla-firebird. In the options menu under privacy, I still see a
> button marked 'view paswords' but clickingo n the button has no
>
Hey there,
after a recent upgrade I can't view the paasswords stored by
mozilla-firebird. In the options menu under privacy, I still see a
button marked 'view paswords' but clickingo n the button has no
effect. I'd like to clean up my password files, so it's irritat
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:01:35PM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
> My mozilla firebird decided that it can show imbeded pdfs apparently it
> can't which causes problems when trying to download files which aren't
> linked directly but the download is supposed to start automatica
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:01:35PM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
> My mozilla firebird decided that it can show imbeded pdfs apparently it
> can't which causes problems when trying to download files which aren't
> linked directly but the download is supposed to start automatica
On 08 Jan 2004, Andrew A. Raines wrote:
> Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Clicking on mailto buttons in Mozilla and Firebird always
> > produces a message about the protocol not being available.
> >
> > Is there something that needs to be installed for this to work?
>
> Yup.
>
Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Clicking on mailto buttons in Mozilla and Firebird always
> produces a message about the protocol not being available.
>
> Is there something that needs to be installed for this to work?
Yup.
http://mozex.mozdev.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
My mozilla firebird decided that it can show imbeded pdfs apparently it
can't which causes problems when trying to download files which aren't
linked directly but the download is supposed to start automatically,
such as from sourceforge.
All I see is a gray page with a message: Loading
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 15:13:41 +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> Clicking on mailto buttons in Mozilla and Firebird always produces a
> message about the protocol not being available.
>
> Is there something that needs to be installed for this to work?
>
Right click on the mailto link, select copy
Clicking on mailto buttons in Mozilla and Firebird always produces a
message about the protocol not being available.
Is there something that needs to be installed for this to work?
A.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|| http://www.acampbell.org.uk
using Linux GNU/Debian || for book reviews, electroni
On 22 Dec 2003, Kristian Niemi wrote:
> There's been some writing about similar problems earlier in this
> newsgroup. Search it?
>
> In short; I had the same problem, caused by the same thing
> (libjavaplugin). I had downloaded the java from Sun's pages. Problem
> solved when I, instead, apt-got t
h.)
h: Kristian
Anthony Campbell wrote:
I've been using java (j2re1.4.2_01) for some time without problems on
mozilla-firebird 0.7. Today it crashed repeatedly when accessing a
particular site (the Telegraph newspaper web page) and finally it became
impossible to run firebird at all. I reinst
On 21 Dec 2003, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> I've been using java (j2re1.4.2_01) for some time without problems on
> mozilla-firebird 0.7. Today it crashed repeatedly when accessing a
> particular site (the Telegraph newspaper web page) and finally it became
> impossible to run f
I've been using java (j2re1.4.2_01) for some time without problems on
mozilla-firebird 0.7. Today it crashed repeatedly when accessing a
particular site (the Telegraph newspaper web page) and finally it became
impossible to run firebird at all. I reinstalled it; no luck. I
therefore fetche
:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I have mozilla firebird 0.70 installed. Everything looks good
>
> except I can't get the plugin for x-java-vm to work. When I load a site
>
I have mozilla firebird 0.70 installed
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:36:58PM -0500, James D. Freels wrote:
> I have an html file containing collected bookmarks from opera. I want
> to import them into mozilla-firebird. I use manage
> bookmarks->import->opera6.html. However, they do not appear and are not
> saved. I c
I have an html file containing collected bookmarks from opera. I want
to import them into mozilla-firebird. I use manage
bookmarks->import->opera6.html. However, they do not appear and are not
saved. I can view the opera6.html file just fine within the browser.
--
James D. Freels, Ph.
". You'll get a list, and you can
> choose User Agent Switcher. There are 119 extensions in my version
> 0.6.1 from testing. Fun for hours!
I should have mentioned that this extension comes preconfigured with
extensions for plain Mozilla (it shows Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux
i686; en
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:40:20PM -0600, Lance Simmons wrote:
> * Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031115 17:30]:
> >
> > But I can't find the place to change UserAgentString in Mfirebird.
> > Where is it?
>
> I think it's one of the extensions you can download and install.
>
> --
> Lance S
* Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031115 17:30]:
>
> But I can't find the place to change UserAgentString in Mfirebird.
> Where is it?
I think it's one of the extensions you can download and install.
--
Lance Simmons
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> on Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 12:57:46AM -0800, Martin J. Hillyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> >
> > I've found an example of a problem apparently caused by the
> > UserAgentString check. I recently switched to Mozilla-firebird, and
> > found that after the sw
gent string has been the source of many of the Web's worst
> > ills. It's strongly encouraged that it be done away with in a way
> > that encourages better practices from site authors.
> >
> >
> [...]
>
> I've found an example of a pro
a way
> that encourages better practices from site authors.
>
>
[...]
I've found an example of a problem apparently caused by the
UserAgentString check. I recently switched to Mozilla-firebird, and
found that after the switch, amazon.com wouldn't recognis
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:02:16AM +0100, John L. Fjellstad wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 November 2003 18:24, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > I'm using the Firebird nightlys, current running version is:
>
> Which Debian are you using?
Mix of testing and unstable.
--
Jamin W. Collins
Facts do not cease
John L. Fjellstad([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tuesday 11 November 2003 22:00, Wayne Topa wrote:
>
> > I didn't put the link in -my- mozilla-plugin directory but here
> >
> > l
Easier
for me... Install them in /opt
I use the sun.com JRE and Mozilla Firebird 0.7 from Sid and everything
Just Works(tm). The difference for me is that I install the JRE in
/usr/local.
-Roberto
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 18:24, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> I'm using the Firebird nightlys, current running version is:
Which Debian are you using?
- --
John_
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 22:50, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> BTW, are there any debs around for 0.7...? I'm one sid, nothing there,
> and I can't find any on apt-get.org either...
Couldn't tell you. Usually pick up the mozilla.org/sun.com versions. E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 22:00, Wayne Topa wrote:
> I didn't put the link in -my- mozilla-plugin directory but here
>
> ls -l /usr/lib/mozilla-firebird/plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so ->
> /usr/local/j2re1.4.2/plugin/i386/ns610-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 19:41, Micha Feigin wrote:
> Last time I checked the debian packages, there was a problem with the
> have plugins.
But I'm not using the debian packages.
> You will need to install the non-debian version compiled with gcc
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 16:22, John L. Fjellstad wrote:
> Mozilla Firebird 0.7 (from Mozilla.org),
BTW, are there any debs around for 0.7...? I'm one sid, nothing there,
and I can't find any on apt-get.org either...
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Astrophysicist/IT Consu
John L. Fjellstad([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'm currently running Debian Testing, Mozilla Firebird 0.7 (from Mozilla.org),
> and Java 1.4.2_02 (from sun.com), and I'm having problems with the
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 17:22, John L. Fjellstad wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'm currently running Debian Testing, Mozilla Firebird 0.7 (from Mozilla.org),
> and Java 1.4.2_02 (from sun.com), and I'm having problems with the
> com
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 04:22:41PM +0100, John L. Fjellstad wrote:
>
> I'm currently running Debian Testing, Mozilla Firebird 0.7 (from
> Mozilla.org), and Java 1.4.2_02 (from sun.com), and I'm having
> problems with the combination.
>
> Even though I followed the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm currently running Debian Testing, Mozilla Firebird 0.7 (from Mozilla.org),
and Java 1.4.2_02 (from sun.com), and I'm having problems with the
combination.
Even though I followed the instructions at sun.com and mozilla.org (putting a
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:21, Clive Menzies wrote:
> On (06/11/03 17:35), Joseph Jones wrote:
> > Lukas Ruf wrote:
> > >Dear all,
> > >
> > >is there any way to make Mozilla Firebird send a faked browser
> > >identification to the server? I would
on Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 10:21:45PM +, Clive Menzies ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm intrigued. why would you want to do this? I understand Opera
> does it because MS had found a way to lock them out of certain sites.
> Is this also a problem for Mozilla?
http://twiki.iwethey.org/Mai
On (06/11/03 16:48), Kent West wrote:
> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 16:48:50 -0600
> From: Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Faked Browser with Mozilla Firebird
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Clive Menzies wrote:
>
> >I'm intrigued. why would y
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 10:21:45PM +, Clive Menzies wrote:
> On (06/11/03 17:35), Joseph Jones wrote:
> >
> > Lukas Ruf wrote:
> >
> > >Dear all,
> > >
> > >is there any way to make Mozilla Firebird send a faked browser
> > >identi
Clive Menzies wrote:
I'm intrigued. why would you want to [make Firebird/Mozilla look
like IE to websites]? I understand Opera does it because MS had
found a way to lock them out of certain sites. Is this also a problem
for Mozilla?
It's not that MS had found a way to lock out Opera; it's tha
On (06/11/03 17:35), Joseph Jones wrote:
>
> Lukas Ruf wrote:
>
> >Dear all,
> >
> >is there any way to make Mozilla Firebird send a faked browser
> >identification to the server? I would like it to send for some sites
> >the MSIE identification, while f
Lukas Ruf wrote:
Dear all,
is there any way to make Mozilla Firebird send a faked browser
identification to the server? I would like it to send for some sites
the MSIE identification, while for others Netscape 4.7.
Can I do this with Mozilla Firebird? And how?
Thanks for any help!
wbr,
Lukas
Lukas Ruf wrote:
Dear all,
is there any way to make Mozilla Firebird send a faked browser
identification to the server? I would like it to send for some sites
the MSIE identification, while for others Netscape 4.7.
Can I do this with Mozilla Firebird? And how?
Tools/Options/Extensions/Get
Lukas Ruf wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> is there any way to make Mozilla Firebird send a faked browser
> identification to the server? I would like it to send for some sites
> the MSIE identification, while for others Netscape 4.7.
>
> Can I do this with Mozilla Firebird? And
Dear all,
is there any way to make Mozilla Firebird send a faked browser
identification to the server? I would like it to send for some sites
the MSIE identification, while for others Netscape 4.7.
Can I do this with Mozilla Firebird? And how?
Thanks for any help!
wbr,
Lukas
--
Lukas Ruf
Hello all,
Since approx two weeks, mainly two applications make enourmous problems:
mozilla-firebird and gnome-sound-recorder.
All this happended just after an apt-get upgrade. I do think that the
reason is to be found in some base libs (gtk or so?). I think i can
exlude defect versions of the
I used to have realplay working quite well in Mozilla, but since a
recent upgrade to the version in Testing it no longer works, even though
it shows up as a plugin. The same applies to Firebird. This means I
cannot access any of the ram files on the BBC site.
At times the Realplay window appears b
Hi,
I've noticed that my mozilla-firebird in debian testing
does not respond to XIM. It turns out I have to change
my locale settings.
This was my locale:
LANG=C
LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5
LC_TIME=C
mozilla-firebird gives no hint about XIM under these settings.
Then I
On Fri, September 19 at 3:44 PM EDT
"Jean-Marc V. Liotier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I thought I had everything set to get Java and Flash in
>mozilla-firebird but it is actually not the case. I followed advice
>from various pages fished from Google, downloaded the JRE
Op vr 19-09-2003, om 15:44 schreef Jean-Marc V. Liotier:
> I thought I had everything set to get Java and Flash in mozilla-firebird
> but it is actually not the case. I followed advice from various pages
> fished from Google, downloaded the JRE package and the non-free
> flashplugin pa
> TMK, this has always happened. However as I've stated (on this list)
> before, if you invoke the second with a "-" option it will launch
> seperately.
>
>$ mozilla & # launches and backgrounds mozilla
>$ MozillaFirebird - & # launches and backgrounds firebird
>
`Thanks Jamie, and than
I thought I had everything set to get Java and Flash in mozilla-firebird
but it is actually not the case. I followed advice from various pages
fished from Google, downloaded the JRE package and the non-free
flashplugin package, and I put the right simlinks in
/usr/lib/mozilla-firebird/plugins
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:19:08AM -0400, Matt Price wrote:
> after recent upgrades mozilla and mozilla-firebird seem unable to
> start up separately -- if one is already running, invoking the other
> just opens a new window in the existing session of the first. I seem
> to reca
after recent upgrades mozilla and mozilla-firebird seem unable to
start up separately -- if one is already running, invoking the other
just opens a new window in the existing session of the first. I seem
to recall that this didn't happen with earlier versions. Anyone know
what's chan
David Crane wrote:
[mozilla-firebird]
I am unsure what I should be moving toward:
(1) Go back to the "stable" distribution, and find backports at
www.apt-get.org?
I am on stable and tried to do this.
Apt also tried to remove much of KDE.
(Someone told me this was because firebird
Hi!
On Sun Aug 24, 2003 at 07:31:53PM -0400, David Crane wrote:
> This fixed it. An "apt-get dist-upgrade" would now succeed. But it
> will have to wait until next weekend, since it says it will download
> 291MB of archives, which will take 21.6 hours over my modem.
>
> I'll try to remove bun
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 18:43, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 01:27:52PM -0400, David Crane wrote:
> > In the other branch of this thread, I asked whether multiple rounds of
> > "apt-get upgrade" would be needed to bring a 3.0rev1 "woody" distribution
> > up to a current "testing" dist
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 01:27:52PM -0400, David Crane wrote:
> In the other branch of this thread, I asked whether multiple rounds of
> "apt-get upgrade" would be needed to bring a 3.0rev1 "woody" distribution
> up to a current "testing" distribution.
Here's the documentation of 'upgrade' from the
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
