I have strange problem:
there is an ansible playbook.
And on some some computers this playbooks takes < 500M RAM, on 2 others
more than 3-4GG.
I cannot see any corelations between python versions, ansible versions,
or python modules.
Any thoughts (I do not know, libc version or kernel memory stra
On 04/23/2012 03:01 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
You didn't say... Have you rebooted your VM since then? Bob
Hi Bob,
yes I did and the behavior didn't changed.
--
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
Peter Viskup wrote:
> The target_kb value changed on VPS, but the available memory didn't
> increased for some unknown reason:
You didn't say... Have you rebooted your VM since then?
Bob
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello everyone,
we have issue with memory increase for virtual servers on one of our
boxes. We are running Debian Squeeze and Xen 4.0.
Looks like after last upgrade of xen-utils-4.0 and xenstore-utils
without upgrade of xen-hypervisor and linux-image packages the memory
management stopped
Hello everyone,
we have issue with memory increase for virtual servers on one of our
boxes. We are running Debian Squeeze and Xen 4.0.
Looks like after last upgrade of xen-utils-4.0 and xenstore-utils
without upgrade of xen-hypervisor and linux-image packages the memory
management stopped
bowen wrote:
> Previously, memory use looks good. And I use mysql> load data infile
> 'file' into table to import a very large mysql data file. So the
> memory used became large quickly and soon exhaust all the memory to
> use swap space. After that the system became slow for cpu fully
> waiting
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 11:51:46AM +0800, bowen wrote:
> (Why mysql or system do not automatic free some of
> the loaded data from memory, Just use a little swap space to sawp out
> a little memory).
> shell# free
> total used free sharedbuffers cached
> Mem:
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 11:51:46AM +0800, bowen wrote:
> Previously, memory use looks good. And I use mysql> load data infile
> 'file' into table to import a very large mysql data file. So the
> memory used became large quickly and soon exhaust all the memory to
> use swap space. After that the s
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006 11:51:46 +0800
bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a little memory). After a long time, the mysql load process complete
> and I restart the mysqld daemon, but the memory does still hold large
> memory.
How much does mysqld take up now? From what you've said here it would
seem th
Previously, memory use looks good. And I use mysql> load data infile
'file' into table to import a very large mysql data file. So the
memory used became large quickly and soon exhaust all the memory to
use swap space. After that the system became slow for cpu fully
waiting IO status. (Why mysql
Check if any of programs in 'Memory debugging' suits you at:
http://www.yolinux.com/TUTORIALS/LinuxTutorialSoftwareDevelopment.html
Good luck!
El vie, 05-11-2004 a las 19:37 +0100, Silvan Villiger escribió:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone give me a link to a guide which int
2004 19:37:56 +0100, Silvan Villiger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone give me a link to a guide which introduces into memory
> management?
>
> I need to understand expressions like "rss", "sz", "shared memory",
> "memory lea
On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 23:17 +0100, Silvan Villiger wrote:
> Thank you for this fast answer. Let's forget the thing with the
> memory-leak for a moment. I'm more interested in understanding the
> memory management. Does anyone knows a guide which introduces me into
&
Thank you for this fast answer. Let's forget the thing with the
memory-leak for a moment. I'm more interested in understanding the
memory management. Does anyone knows a guide which introduces me into
the meaning of the expressions I mentioned in my first post?
Greetings... Si
On Friday 05 November 2004 12:37, Silvan Villiger wrote:
> My goal is to write a script to monitor the memory-usage of a program
> and to detect memory-leaks using the ps-command. How would you detect
> memory leaks with it?
You wouldn't. A memory leak, in a nutshell, is a call to malloc() witho
Hi,
Can anyone give me a link to a guide which introduces into memory
management?
I need to understand expressions like "rss", "sz", "shared memory",
"memory leak", "core image of a process", "data section", "kernel
stack", &quo
t; my system has been having an interesting memory management.
> 1. When Iboot the syste up, memory consumed is right where it should be.
> Shortly after a startup, memory usage goes from 20M (Right after boot) to
> completely fill the physical Ram. top shows a large amount of data in
>
Hi all. Ever since I went from kernel 2.0.36 to 2.2.10 (Still glibc2.0),
my system has been having an interesting memory management.
1. When Iboot the syste up, memory consumed is right where it should be.
Shortly after a startup, memory usage goes from 20M (Right after boot) to
completely fill
even better! They out
did themselves with 1.2. Memory management is better (not that it was bad to
begin with). A few installation problems, but new distributions usually do.
--
-= Sent by Debian 1.2 Linux =-
Thomas Kocourek KD4CIK
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e
Martin Konold writes:
> Sorry I still do not get the point. Debian 1.1 never seemed to be slow to
> me compared to any other distribution. Of course any broken setup you
> might get by unstable/partial updates might slow down your machine to any
> degree. But this still means that contradictionary
On Tue, 31 Dec 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Thank heavens! 1.1 had terrible memory management. 1.2 (REX) is _much_
> > > > better.
> > > The memory management issue mentioned here with 1.1 may explain some
> > > slowness with my (1.1) mac
Martin Konold writes:
[snip]
> > > Thank heavens! 1.1 had terrible memory management. 1.2 (REX) is _much_
> > > better.
> >
> > The memory management issue mentioned here with 1.1 may explain some
> > slowness with my (1.1) machines.
>
> I do not get
"David B. Teague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What package(s) do I upgrade to fix it? We are running the 2.0.27 kernel.
Upgrade libc5. Version 5.4 of libc5 uses dl-malloc, while 5.2 used
gnu-malloc. You'll also need to upgrade ldso. Long-running,
memory-intensive apps, like X servers, will
Martin Konold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I do not get the point! Memory management is the job of the kernel.
> How does it depend on the distribution?
Actually, it's more complicated than that unless you use sbrk
etc. directly. If you use malloc (in C) or new (in C++) then
On Sun, 29 Dec 1996, David B. Teague wrote:
Hi there,
> > Thank heavens! 1.1 had terrible memory management. 1.2 (REX) is _much_
> > better.
>
> The memory management issue mentioned here with 1.1 may explain some
> slowness with my (1.1) machines.
I do not get the poi
Hi folks:
> Bruce Perens writes:
> >
> > Buzz went to Infinity, and Beyond!
> >
> Thank heavens! 1.1 had terrible memory management. 1.2 (REX) is _much_
> better.
The memory management issue mentioned here with 1.1 may explain some
slowness with my (1.1) machi
26 matches
Mail list logo
