Martin Konold writes: > Sorry I still do not get the point. Debian 1.1 never seemed to be slow to > me compared to any other distribution. Of course any broken setup you > might get by unstable/partial updates might slow down your machine to any > degree. But this still means that contradictionary to the above statement > 1.1 was not slow.
I was pointing out that someone had problems because it was a "partial" update. I saw another gentleman who had kernel compilation problems. When he found the source of his predicament (and posted a message), I checked the very same source file and mine was fixed already. Difference being, I installed from a stable distribution and he didn't. And yes, if you don't do an entire upgrade, you stand a chance of having problems, kernel or otherwise. Based on what you have posted so far, I take it that you are a thorough individual who insures that he has an entire distribution and can't take a step backwards to see the "big picture". My favorite phrase: one can't see the forest for the trees being in your way. -- -= Sent by Debian 1.2 Linux =- Thomas Kocourek KD4CIK [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
