Joris Lambrecht wrote:
> i've got the MUA blues, badly, i'm feeling slightly depressed, let down and
> so on.
> I'm also freaking out on text-based mailclients (i know, i'm a wuzz) and
> can't find a reasonalby good X-MUA.
> Mutt, is to much of a hassle for me and lacks some feature. Pine seems lik
To quote Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# > To quote Joris Lambrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# > # Do i REALLY have to install kde to get something close to say
outlook
# > # express (i know, i know, but it beats any linux mua i've seen)
# >
# > No, you don't - not in my experience.
# >
# > Cu
> To quote Joris Lambrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> # Do i REALLY have to install kde to get something close to say outlook
> # express (i know, i know, but it beats any linux mua i've seen)
>
> No, you don't - not in my experience.
>
> Currently, for me, Sylpheed is in the "sweet spot". It has all
To quote Joris Lambrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# Do i REALLY have to install kde to get something close to say outlook
# express (i know, i know, but it beats any linux mua i've seen)
No, you don't - not in my experience.
Currently, for me, Sylpheed is in the "sweet spot". It has all the
features
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Bowsers is my one complaint :). Ie is still betetr than anything on
> >Linux.
>
> One word: Opera.
I would tend to agree. Of them all, and I believe I've tried them all,
Opera is light, good looking, and fast. he only problem is the beta and
they still charge. Though
>
> > and so on and on and on
> >
> > tkmail, tkrat, tried it but didn't really got thrilled.
> >
> > Do i REALLY have to install kde to get something close to say outlook
> > express (i know, i know, but it beats any linux mua i've seen)
> >
> >
> > Suggestion PLEASE.
I've been using ex
: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 11:58 AM
To: Joris Lambrecht
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: MUA Blues in X
apt-get install sylpheed
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:02:55 +0100
Joris Lambrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i've got the MUA blues, badly, i'm feeling slightly
apt-get install sylpheed
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:02:55 +0100
Joris Lambrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i've got the MUA blues, badly, i'm feeling slightly depressed, let down and
> so on.
> I'm also freaking out on text-based mailclients (i know, i'm a wuzz) and
> can't find a reasonalby
At Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:55:12 +0100 , Jonathan Gift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Joris Lambrecht wrote:
>> Well, it does make it clear to me that i will have to embrace console base
>> mua's sooner then i think.
[..]
>I was in ypur position a little while back with a dual boot finally just
>to use
Joris Lambrecht wrote:
> Well, it does make it clear to me that i will have to embrace console base
> mua's sooner then i think. Don't wanna go back to Win2K, thought it is
> tempting. Still, how HARD can it be to write something decent ? That does
> not require knowledge of compiler's to install a
01 10:19 AM
To: Joris Lambrecht; 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
Subject: Re: MUA Blues in X
> i've got the MUA blues, badly, i'm feeling slightly depressed, let down
and
> so on.
> I'm also freaking out on text-based mailclients (i know, i'm a wuzz) and
> can't find
> i've got the MUA blues, badly, i'm feeling slightly depressed, let down and
> so on.
> I'm also freaking out on text-based mailclients (i know, i'm a wuzz) and
> can't find a reasonalby good X-MUA.
> Mutt, is to much of a hassle for me and lacks some feature. Pine seems like
> really good but dar
i've got the MUA
blues, badly, i'm feeling slightly depressed, let down and so
on.
I'm also freaking
out on text-based mailclients (i know, i'm a wuzz) and can't find a reasonalby
good X-MUA.
Mutt, is to much of
a hassle for me and lacks some feature. Pine seems like really good but darn i
13 matches
Mail list logo
