I have used openwrt, but not recent version of it. I have been using Ubiquiti
EdgeRouters running the stock EdgeOS. Very solid routers. I even have one
sitting up in a tree in a Tupperware container in the snowy mountains!
I recently discovered that EdgeOS is based on Debian and you can insta
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 16:42:40 -0500
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > > If you are OK buying used equipment, Intel-based gigabit NICs, 4 ports
> > > to a PCIe slot, cost about $35 (or $70 new). If you've got a 5 year old
> >
> > My understanding - please correct me if I'm wrong - is that wit
Celejar wrote:
> > If you are OK buying used equipment, Intel-based gigabit NICs, 4 ports
> > to a PCIe slot, cost about $35 (or $70 new). If you've got a 5 year old
>
> My understanding - please correct me if I'm wrong - is that with those
> types of cards, the ports are distinct and aren't actu
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 11:03:35 -0500
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > > I can be glad that OpenWRT has improved their security practices
> > > and simultaneously not be interested in using it.
> >
> > I think we are really in basic agreement. The reason I use OpenWRT is
> > that I use a resi
> I think we are really in basic agreement. The reason I use OpenWRT is
> that I use a residential all-in-one WAP / switch / router, which Debian
> is unsuitable for. If I ever go the separate WAP / switch / router
> route, I'll probably use Debian on the router for the reasons you
> give: good sup
Celejar wrote:
> > I can be glad that OpenWRT has improved their security practices
> > and simultaneously not be interested in using it.
>
> I think we are really in basic agreement. The reason I use OpenWRT is
> that I use a residential all-in-one WAP / switch / router, which Debian
> is unsuit
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 09:57:13 -0500
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 08:36:34 -0500
> > Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > > OpenWRT's security process doesn't look as terrible as it used
> > > to be, but it doesn't really look good right now, just trying to
> > > be better.
> >
Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 08:36:34 -0500
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > OpenWRT's security process doesn't look as terrible as it used
> > to be, but it doesn't really look good right now, just trying to
> > be better.
>
> Again, let's look at specific examples of vulnerabilities present i
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 08:36:34 -0500
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 06:41:23 -0500
> > Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > > Gregory Seidman wrote:
> > > > If you want a Linux router/AP, I recommend OpenWRT over Debian. It runs
>
Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 06:41:23 -0500
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > Gregory Seidman wrote:
> > > If you want a Linux router/AP, I recommend OpenWRT over Debian. It runs on
>
> ...
>
> > Debian gets security updates in a timely manner (for sta
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 06:41:23 -0500
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Gregory Seidman wrote:
> > If you want a Linux router/AP, I recommend OpenWRT over Debian. It runs on
...
> Debian gets security updates in a timely manner (for stable).
>
> How's OpenWRT's security team
Gregory Seidman wrote:
> If you want a Linux router/AP, I recommend OpenWRT over Debian. It runs on
> a variety of router hardware, but also PCs:
> https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/installation/openwrt_x86
>
> Importantly, it uses UCI
> <https://openwrt.org/docs/guide
If you want a Linux router/AP, I recommend OpenWRT over Debian. It runs on
a variety of router hardware, but also PCs:
https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/installation/openwrt_x86
Importantly, it uses UCI
<https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/base-system/uci> for configuration of
sw
Tixy writes:
> On Sat, 2021-02-06 at 11:00 -0800, John Conover wrote:
> > Stefan Monnier writes:
> > > > A wireless router made with hostapd/dnsmasq/dhcpcd is fairly easy, and
> > > > works well with iptables, with one shortcoming.
> > > >
> > > > After antagonizing the Google for hours, I can not
On Sat, 2021-02-06 at 11:00 -0800, John Conover wrote:
> Stefan Monnier writes:
> > > A wireless router made with hostapd/dnsmasq/dhcpcd is fairly easy, and
> > > works well with iptables, with one shortcoming.
> > >
> > > After antagonizing the Google for hours, I can not find any way to add
> >
Stefan Monnier writes:
> > A wireless router made with hostapd/dnsmasq/dhcpcd is fairly easy, and
> > works well with iptables, with one shortcoming.
> >
> > After antagonizing the Google for hours, I can not find any way to add
> > reserved IPs based on the the MAC address of devices connected on
> A wireless router made with hostapd/dnsmasq/dhcpcd is fairly easy, and
> works well with iptables, with one shortcoming.
>
> After antagonizing the Google for hours, I can not find any way to add
> reserved IPs based on the the MAC address of devices connected on
> wlan0, (presumably in dhcpcd.co
John Conover wrote:
>
> A wireless router made with hostapd/dnsmasq/dhcpcd is fairly easy, and
> works well with iptables, with one shortcoming.
>
> After antagonizing the Google for hours, I can not find any way to add
> reserved IPs based on the the MAC address of devices connected on
> wlan0,
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 02:29:08AM -0800, John Conover wrote:
>
> A wireless router made with hostapd/dnsmasq/dhcpcd is fairly easy, and
> works well with iptables, with one shortcoming.
>
> After antagonizing the Google for hours, I can not find any way to add
> reserved IPs based on the the MAC
A wireless router made with hostapd/dnsmasq/dhcpcd is fairly easy, and
works well with iptables, with one shortcoming.
After antagonizing the Google for hours, I can not find any way to add
reserved IPs based on the the MAC address of devices connected on
wlan0, (presumably in dhcpcd.conf.) Seem
* From: Bob Proulx
* Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:45:50 -0600
> Since those are old diagrams they don't show where carnot fits into
> things.
* From: "Jesús M. Navarro"
* Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 23:47:48 +0200
> There's neither "carnot" nor "Allied Telesis 3612TR" in your prov
* From: Bob Proulx
* Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:45:50 -0600
> Since those are old diagrams they don't show where carnot fits into
> things.
* From: "Jesús M. Navarro"
* Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 23:47:48 +0200
> There's neither "carnot" nor "Allied Telesis 3612TR" in your prov
* From: Bob Proulx
* Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:45:50 -0600
> Since those are old diagrams they don't show where carnot fits into
> things.
* From: "Jesús M. Navarro"
* Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 23:47:48 +0200
> There's neither "carnot" nor "Allied Telesis 3612TR" in your prov
142.103.107.138 then why does it need a
> private address ...
The primary objective is find whether the AT 3612TR can be
eliminated by routing through dalton. The private subnet
to Carnot was part of my study of whether and how this
objective might be reached. Typically, a Linux router
has
peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
> http://142.103.107.138/
So now I am really confused. carnot is already on the public internet
with 142.103.107.138? I thought that you had it on a private network
and were trying to tunnel it onto the public internet. I am really
confused now. Sorry.
> My network is
From: Bob Proulx
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:55:04 -0600
> Excellent diagram! Thank you very much for sharing it.
Welcome. Until I have a definite plan, the old configuration with carnot on
the
AT 3612TR is restored. All of these should work as long as the old disk drives
hold up.
http:
nued below.
I see and note that that address is one over from dalton's public IP
address.
> > Is dalton a router on the public Internet? (It would help to know if
> > it is a WRT54G type of router or if it is a full functionality Debian
> > host.)
>
> Dalton is a
ow.
> Is dalton a router on the public Internet? (It would help to know if
> it is a WRT54G type of router or if it is a full functionality Debian
> host.)
Dalton is a Linux router running Debian Squeeze with public address
142.103.107.137. The firewall will prevent a response by ping.
peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
> Given linux router dalton, eth 3, connected to a local machine
> carnot, eth0, with a cross-over cable, I need some help to set
> the configurations properly.
>
> #dalton:/etc/network/interfaces
>...
> iface eth3 inet static
> addre
Given linux router dalton, eth 3, connected to a local machine
carnot, eth0, with a cross-over cable, I need some help to set
the configurations properly.
#dalton:/etc/network/interfaces
...
iface eth3 inet static
address 172.24.2.1
up route add -host 142.103.107.138
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:16:15PM +, Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:18:24PM +0800, Bob wrote:
> > Alex Samad wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 09:23:52PM -0400, Zachary Uram wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I got an awesome deal today on a Linksys wired Eth
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:18:24PM +0800, Bob wrote:
> Alex Samad wrote:
>> On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 09:23:52PM -0400, Zachary Uram wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I got an awesome deal today on a Linksys wired Etherfast Cable/DSL
>>> router and 4 port switch - $5 USD at our local Goodwill Computer
Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 09:23:52PM -0400, Zachary Uram wrote:
Hello,
I got an awesome deal today on a Linksys wired Etherfast Cable/DSL
router and 4 port switch - $5 USD at our local Goodwill Computer Store.
They get donations and then sell them (they are a non-profit corp.
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 09:23:52PM -0400, Zachary Uram wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I got an awesome deal today on a Linksys wired Etherfast Cable/DSL
> router and 4 port switch - $5 USD at our local Goodwill Computer Store.
> They get donations and then sell them (they are a non-profit corp. that helps
>
Hello,
I got an awesome deal today on a Linksys wired Etherfast Cable/DSL
router and 4 port switch - $5 USD at our local Goodwill Computer Store.
They get donations and then sell them (they are a non-profit corp. that helps
the disabled). The model number is: BEFSR41 version 3.
What exactly can I
Andrew & others,
At Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:42:41 -0700 A.S-W. wrote,
"that does not mean that a rule for POP3 is not needed. I don't
remember if shorewall is case sensitive, but I bet it is in the
context of defining a rule. maybe post the actual config line to
produces the error?"
My /etc/sho
Paul & others,
At Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:33:50 -0700 Paul Johnson wrote,
"... the FTP server connects to the client: Two
connections are maintained ..."
As I am aware, ssh uses only one connection but it
also gets ACCEPT rules. So I still don't understand why
some protocols, dns, ftp and ssh, ne
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 04:01:39PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Folk,
>
> At Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:27:40 -0400 Douglas A. Tutty wrote,
> "... if you want to really understand it use
> shorewall after reading shorewall-doc."
>
> ipmasq works but I want to use shorewall.
>
> I wonder why rules
Folk,
At Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:27:40 -0400 Douglas A. Tutty wrote,
"... if you want to really understand it use
shorewall after reading shorewall-doc."
ipmasq works but I want to use shorewall.
I wonder why rules are needed for FTP but
a rule for POP3 produces a complaint about
"... unknown pro
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 16:01 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Folk,
>
> At Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:27:40 -0400 Douglas A. Tutty wrote,
> "... if you want to really understand it use
> shorewall after reading shorewall-doc."
>
> ipmasq works but I want to use shorewall.
>
> I wonder why rules are nee
Folk,
At Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:27:40 -0400 Douglas A. Tutty wrote,
"... if you want to really understand it use
shorewall after reading shorewall-doc."
ipmasq works but I want to use shorewall.
I wonder why rules are needed for FTP but not
for POP3. In fact, a rule for POP3 produces a
complaint
Folk,
At Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:27:40 -0400 Douglas A. Tutty wrote,
"... if you want to really understand it use
shorewall after reading shorewall-doc."
ipmasq works but I want to use shorewall.
I wonder why rules are needed for FTP but not
for POP3. In fact, a rule for POP3 produces a
complaint
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 09:07:32AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dt> Now you're using shaw.ca for your home domain. Do you own that? Would
> you like to e.g. relay mail for all of shaw.ca?
>
> Not really.
Didn't think so :)
>
> OK, I've invented the domain name petershouse;
> the curre
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 09:07:32AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Douglas,
>
> dt> Now you're using shaw.ca for your home domain. Do you own that? Would
> you like to e.g. relay mail for all of shaw.ca?
>
> Not really.
>
> OK, I've invented the domain name petershouse;
> the current host
Douglas,
dt> Now you're using shaw.ca for your home domain. Do you own that? Would
you like to e.g. relay mail for all of shaw.ca?
Not really.
OK, I've invented the domain name petershouse;
the current hosts file follows. Please let me know of any
remaining errors.
Isn't there a place to
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:20:24AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dt> if you don't own peasthope.yi.org, then I wouldn't use it even locally.
>
> But I do own the machine and the name.
OK
I, personally, for the 127.0.0.1 would only use localhost and
localhost.localdomain
> yi.org is a dynamic
Douglas,
dt> if you don't own peasthope.yi.org, then I wouldn't use it even locally.
But I do own the machine and the name.
yi.org is a dynamic dns service. Not
already being allocated is a precondition
to assigning "peasthope.yi.org" to my computer.
dt> It is a valid name.
So ... I miss
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 08:12:44PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 04:38:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > # /etc/hosts file
> > 127.0.0.1 peasthope.yi.orgjoule localhost
> ^^
> this should be: localho
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 04:38:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Douglas & others,
>
> dt> Now you will have three networks. ...
> ... You shouldn't have to add routes like this ...
>
> Right oh.
>
> dt> change this to 172.23.5.1, and change heaviside's to 172.23.5.2
>
> The revised config
Douglas & others,
dt> Now you will have three networks. ...
... You shouldn't have to add routes like this ...
Right oh.
dt> change this to 172.23.5.1, and change heaviside's to 172.23.5.2
The revised configuration follows. Everything
appears OK now. There is no hub consuming
power and two
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 02:40:22PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Folk,
>
> My LAN has a Debian router, joule, and two subordinate
> machines, curie and heaviside. The three connect to an
> old Linksys 10Base-T hub. joule connects to a
> cable modem through a second NIC and runs
> ipmasq.
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 02:40:22PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My LAN has a Debian router, joule, and two subordinate
> machines, curie and heaviside. The three connect to an
> old Linksys 10Base-T hub. joule connects to a
> cable modem through a second NIC and runs
> ipmasq.
>
> Curre
Folk,
My LAN has a Debian router, joule, and two subordinate
machines, curie and heaviside. The three connect to an
old Linksys 10Base-T hub. joule connects to a
cable modem through a second NIC and runs
ipmasq.
Currently I want to add a third NIC to joule,
remove the hub and connect each
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 08:52:54PM -0800, PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
> Folk,
>
> A system, connected to the 'net by a telephone modem,
> is configured to be a router providing a network connection
> to one Windows system and also to be a workstation.
>
> Which is the lesser of evils: running a dns f
Folk,
A system, connected to the 'net by a telephone modem,
is configured to be a router providing a network connection
to one Windows system and also to be a workstation.
Which is the lesser of evils: running a dns for one client
or forwarding name requests over the slow connection?
Thanks,
Captain's Log, stardate Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:22:48 -0600, from the fingers of
Michael Madden came the words:
> I figured out what was wrong with my OpenBSD 3.6 setup. I needed to
> setup pf=YES in /etc/rc.conf. I must have missed this when reading
> though the install documentation.
>
> Anyhow the
Captain's Log, stardate Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:23:08 -0600, from the fingers of
Michael Madden came the words:
>> The main point is that there are so many things to do in Linux in
>> order to configure it for masquerading (Recompiling Kernel etc).
>> There also so many different commands that do exac
I figured out what was wrong with my OpenBSD 3.6 setup.
I needed to setup pf=YES in /etc/rc.conf. I must have
missed this when reading though the install documentation.
Anyhow these are the steps that worked for me:
1.) Install OpenBSD 3.6 according to the directions at:
http://www.openbsd.org
> The main point is that there are so many things to do in Linux in order to
> configure it for masquerading (Recompiling Kernel etc). There also so many
> different commands that do exactly the same thing but in different ways. If a
> person is starting off in firewalling it's not good to overw
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 15:46 -0800, Scarletdown wrote:
> Michael Madden wrote:
>
> > Alex Barylo wrote:
[snip]
>
>
> Freesco is a pretty decent floppy based router.
>
> freesco.org
Note, though, that it uses kernel 2.0.39.
--
-
R
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 05:31:18PM -0600, Michael Madden wrote:
>
> Thanks for all the advice. I guess something like
> LRP appealed to me more since it was floppy based
> and didn't require setting up a distro with many
> unneeded utilities. Does anyone know of an active
> flop
Captain's Log, stardate Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:26:40 -0500, from the fingers of
Bruce Park came the words:
> Ken Gilmour wrote:
>> The only problem i have with Linux's iptables as opposed to
>> OpenBSD's PF is that iptables has an overwhelming amount of stuff
>> it can do and you can easily break it
Ken Gilmour wrote:
Captain's Log, stardate Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:11:46 -0600, from the fingers of
Michael Madden came the words:
Does anyone know of a decent Linux based router project out there?
In the past I've used LRP (http://www.linuxrouter.org), but it
looks like the project isn't maintained
I second that - I use my old AMD-K6 box with Sarge as a firewall. I use
and _highly_ recommend FIAIF firewall (http://www.fiaif.net/) - I
picked it up from securityfocus.com top tools.
HTH,
Alex.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 05:31:18PM -0600, Michael Madden wrote:
> unneeded utilities. Does anyone know of an active
> floppy based firewall (Linux or *BSD)?
No. Use an old laptop with a hard drive, and two PCMCIA net cards.
Take one floppy. Put the OpenBSD install image on it.
Install OpenBSD vi
Michael Madden wrote:
Alex Barylo wrote:
I second that - I use my old AMD-K6 box with Sarge as a firewall. I use
and _highly_ recommend FIAIF firewall (http://www.fiaif.net/) - I
picked it up from securityfocus.com top tools.
HTH,
Alex.
Thanks for all the advice. I guess something like
LRP appeal
Captain's Log, stardate Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:31:18 -0600, from the fingers of
Michael Madden came the words:
> Thanks for all the advice. I guess something like
> LRP appealed to me more since it was floppy based
> and didn't require setting up a distro with many
> unneeded utilities. Does anyone
Croy, Nathan wrote:
From: Michael Madden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 5:31 PM
Thanks for all the advice. I guess something like
LRP appealed to me more since it was floppy based
and didn't require setting up a distro with many
unneeded utilities. Does anyone know of an
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 17:31 -0600, Michael Madden wrote:
> Alex Barylo wrote:
[snip]
>
> Thanks for all the advice. I guess something like
> LRP appealed to me more since it was floppy based
> and didn't require setting up a distro with many
> unneeded utilities. Does anyone know of an active
> f
> From: Michael Madden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 5:31 PM
>
> Thanks for all the advice. I guess something like
> LRP appealed to me more since it was floppy based
> and didn't require setting up a distro with many
> unneeded utilities. Does anyone know of an act
Alex Barylo wrote:
I second that - I use my old AMD-K6 box with Sarge as a firewall. I use
and _highly_ recommend FIAIF firewall (http://www.fiaif.net/) - I
picked it up from securityfocus.com top tools.
HTH,
Alex.
Thanks for all the advice. I guess something like
LRP appealed to me more since it
Captain's Log, stardate Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:11:46 -0600, from the fingers of
Michael Madden came the words:
> Does anyone know of a decent Linux based router project out there?
> In the past I've used LRP (http://www.linuxrouter.org), but it
> looks like the project isn't maintained anymore.
>
> M
Does anyone know of a decent Linux based router project out there? In the
past I've used LRP (http://www.linuxrouter.org), but it looks like the
project isn't maintained anymore.
My requirements are pretty simple. I want to route traffic from network
A to network B and route traffice from networ
t: Re: 2 internet link problem on Linux router
> louie miranda said:
> > Hi things i have to clear first!
> >
> > DEFAULT GATEWAY = 203.100.100.1
> > MACHINE's (primary) IP = 203.100.100.2 - NIC1
> > MACHINE's (secondary) IP = 203.100.100.3 - NIC2
>
louie miranda said:
> Hi things i have to clear first!
>
> DEFAULT GATEWAY = 203.100.100.1
> MACHINE's (primary) IP = 203.100.100.2 - NIC1
> MACHINE's (secondary) IP = 203.100.100.3 - NIC2
you can't really do this, All network packets will go out of NIC 1
no matter what in this configuration.
if
Hi things i have to clear first!
DEFAULT GATEWAY = 203.100.100.1
MACHINE's (primary) IP = 203.100.100.2 - NIC1
MACHINE's (secondary) IP = 203.100.100.3 - NIC2
MASQ BLOCK = 10.0.0.0/16 - NIC3
I have 3 NIC Cards, My only problem is i want to route all my MASQ BLOCK
that when they
access IP BLOCK 20
Compaq Deskrpo 2000 - 32 MB - Eicon Diva PCI - Intel Ethernet 100 Pro
Debian 2.2 - Ipchains - Isdnutils
Installed packet = "Newbie help"
In at test now wit dynamic ip.
After the boot of both the linux router and a connected windows98-pc a start of
Netscape on the windows98-pc causes
Hi folks!
My name is Louis Byrne and I am the network administrator for a company in
Toronto, Canada. I am working on a project that will use the Linux Router.
As a feedback, the Linux Router Project started back in 1997 as an open source
variant of the Debian distro and intended to fit into a
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Now, my Question is, WHAT DOES I NEED to install a simpel Router ???
>
...
> Curently I must work with IP-Masquerading only...
> ...but it runs.
>
> OK, I have a LRP 2.9.4 box running which is based on Debian 2.1 (2.0.36).
> I have no knowledge from ipchains and ...
I
Hello and good day.
OK, today in the morning I have downloaded the Base-Installation
of Potato.
Now, my Question is, WHAT DOES I NEED to install a simpel Router ???
I have 5 NIC's 3c509-TPO and a fixed IP-Adress from my Provider (eth0).
The cable modem 2 will be installed next year but I like
Hello Alex
Look for SHAPER.
But you can limit the bandwidth of an Internal-IP-Address
from 9600Bps to 256kBpS only.
Webmistress Michelle
At 09:55 02.09.1999 +0400, you wrote
> This was the original Message:
MK>Hi, all,
MK>
MK>Need a quick answer for my boss about possibility to limit b
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alex V. Toropov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, all,
>
>Need a quick answer for my boss about possibility to limit bandwidth for
>special kind
>of ip-traffic (for specific source/dest network) .
>
>Linux-box is gateway from LAN to Internet. So this limitation is need
Hi, all,
Need a quick answer for my boss about possibility to limit bandwidth for
special kind
of ip-traffic (for specific source/dest network) .
Linux-box is gateway from LAN to Internet. So this limitation is needed on
WAN-NetInterface or on internal (kernel ?) routing.
Can anyone help me in t
ng IP Masquerading, which is working fine and has been
> > for a long time. Now, i'm trying to connect to a friend of mine through
> > Netmeeting and i can't get the router to let sound go both ways (i'm using
> > my intranet NT server, that goes through a Linux rout
h is working fine and has been
> for a long time. Now, i'm trying to connect to a friend of mine through
> Netmeeting and i can't get the router to let sound go both ways (i'm using
> my intranet NT server, that goes through a Linux router, that connects to
> the net by
e and has been
> for a long time. Now, i'm trying to connect to a friend of mine through
> Netmeeting and i can't get the router to let sound go both ways (i'm using
> my intranet NT server, that goes through a Linux router, that connects to
> the net by cable mode
ting and i can't get the router to let sound go both ways (i'm using
my intranet NT server, that goes through a Linux router, that connects to
the net by cable modem). I call my friend, he accepts the connection, i
speak through my microphone and he hears me ok but i can't hear him. I
I just used idiot.image-2.9.3-1.44MB,and my computer is a pentium 166
with ne2000 card.
1. I insert a disk (with idiot.image-2.9.3-1.44MB )and reboot my
computer.
2. After I login with root,I setup ip addrress ,subnetmask and setup
ne2000 in modules.
3. Then I reboot. I found systerm prompt not
(We could
sure use more people...join the mailing list!)
You can download the current beta via web or ftp:
http://www.psychosis.com/linux-router/
ftp.psychosis.com /pub/linux-router/
-
http://www.psychosis.com/emc/
I'm willing to help. Although not a networking guru I've created several
Debian networking-based packages (Merit radiusd, Hylafax, MRTG, gated
[internal use only], nocol).
--
Dermot Bradley
Derry/Belfast, Northern Ireland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING L
Try the root on the resc1440.bin floppy . It contains a functional Unix
tool set, a good shell, and an editor. It fits on a 1.44MB ramdisk image,
compresses down to 700KB on the floppy, leaves enough room for the kernel
on the same 1.44MB floppy, and supports shared libraries. You would be hard
pre
Linux Router Project -- About to get working and need more people!
The Linux Router Project is about to begin work on our minimal root fs.
Very crucial to this are people that truely understand the dependencies of
networking functions and utilities. I'm looking to use Debian 1.3.1 as the
One of the people that responded to me has setup a mailing list. Thanks
Jerry!
Linux Router Project -
to subscribe send email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the message body put:
subscribe
The people responding to my initial query are very willing to get something
going, and
Brian Candler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is working on something called
"Linnet" that would be a turn-key router and server.
Thanks
Bruce
--
Bruce Perens K6BP [EMAIL PROTECTED] 510-215-3502
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key.
PGP fingerprint = 88 6A 15 D0 65 D4 A3 A6 1F 89
*RFC* - Linux Router Project - Preliminary discussion
First if there is such a project already please point me towards it if not
here are my ideas:
LInux is a fine vertical network application OS, but hand building and
maintaining it from scratch is pain staking.
I would like to form the
95 matches
Mail list logo
