Paul Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 06:19:02PM -0500, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
Mmmm, what if I have two machines that are on the same LAN segment,
having a conversation of interest, but I want to run my sniffer from,
say, a Linux server on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 06:19:02PM -0500, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> Mmmm, what if I have two machines that are on the same LAN segment,
> having a conversation of interest, but I want to run my sniffer from,
> say, a Linux server on the same segment?
Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 11:43:40AM -0500, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
>
>>I take minor issue with this blanket statement: a switch doesn't really
>>gain you anything unless you're getting enough traffic for collisions,
>>and takes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 11:43:40AM -0500, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> I take minor issue with this blanket statement: a switch doesn't really
> gain you anything unless you're getting enough traffic for collisions,
> and takes away your ability to monitor
Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>
> [1] Switch would be better.
>
I take minor issue with this blanket statement: a switch doesn't really
gain you anything unless you're getting enough traffic for collisions,
and takes away your ability to monitor everything (tcpdump, ethereal)
that's going on from one p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 11:12:00PM +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
> This is a DSL _router_, not a bridge - it's just another internal network,
> so the ISP has nothing to do with it. Assuming of course the router is doing
> NAT, like mine does.
Oh? Did
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:47:38AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 04:45:18PM +0200, Kosta Porotchkin wrote:
> >eth0: 10.0.0.150/24 connected to ADSL modem/router (10.0.0.138)
>
> Is eth0 really 10.0.0.150? If so, your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 04:45:18PM +0200, Kosta Porotchkin wrote:
> First Windows workstation: 192.168.1.2/16, gw 192.168.1.1
> Second Windows workstation 192.168.2.2/16, gw 192.168.2.1
> Linux server/NAT firewall/gateway running Debian Woody 3.0:
>
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 04:45:18PM +0200, Kosta Porotchkin wrote:
> Hello, experts!
> My feeling that I have a simple problem, which I cannot solve alone.
> Would appreciate any help from community.
>
> I have a 3-computer network at home:
> First Windows workstation: 192.168.1.2/16, gw 192.168.1.
Hello, experts!
My feeling that I have a simple problem, which I cannot solve alone.
Would appreciate any help from community.
I have a 3-computer network at home:
First Windows workstation: 192.168.1.2/16, gw 192.168.1.1
Second Windows workstation 192.168.2.2/16, gw 192.168.2.1
Linux server/NAT f
try iptraf
> -Original Message-
> From: Eduardo Gargiulo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 9:45 AM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: LAN traffic
>
>
> Hi all.
>
> I have a masquerading linux boxx running between Intern
Hi all.
I have a masquerading linux boxx running between Internet and my Internal LAN.
I want to know the load traffic for a given host of my LAN and the bandwidth
I'm getting from my provider.
Which tool can do It?
PD: sorry again for my english!
--
:%s/Micros~1/GNU\/Linux/g^M
:wq!
12 matches
Mail list logo
