hugo vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There was a post on this list a while ago on g++-3.3. I find that if I
> use *that* on rolling Qt, things fall apart. I now use 3.2 for
> everything.
There was a new g++-3.3 last week in testing. I haven't seen any
problems with that one (although, h
Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hell, depends on gcc 3.2? Is that true? Do I really need another gcc
> install?
Weird. I only have gcc-3.3 (g++-3.3) installed on my system and have no
problems recompiling the kernel (with qt3). I did check, and I had
installed libqt3-mt-dev instead
Bill Moseley wrote:
Geeze, I can't get kernel-image-2.6.5 to work right (wireless busted), so
trying to build from source using the new QT interface.
Here's my gcc:
laptop:/home/moseley# gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (Debian 20040401)
Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is fre
Here's my gcc:
laptop:/home/moseley# gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (Debian 20040401)
So I need the qt3 library:
laptop:/home/moseley# apt-get install libqt3-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
g++-3.2 gcc-3.2 l
Geeze, I can't get kernel-image-2.6.5 to work right (wireless busted), so
trying to build from source using the new QT interface.
Here's my gcc:
laptop:/home/moseley# gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (Debian 20040401)
Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the
5 matches
Mail list logo