I have been using kernel 2.4.18-bf2 since my first
debian install about 2 years ago. Earlier this
week I upgraded to sarge and all went smoothly.
Now I'm trying something which should apparently
be pretty simple:
$ aptitude install kernel-image-2.6-686
But it fails. I get:
[...]
Setti
Tony Vandiver wrote:
Hi Jon,
What am I screwing up here? my subject was [newbie] ... not Re: [newbie]
... and the to address was debian-user@lists.debian.org What do I need to
do differently to start a new thread? I did actually start the email with a
reply all so I could catch the list add
Tony Vandiver wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> What am I screwing up here? ...
...
> I did actually start
> the email with a reply all so I could catch the list address
Don't reply to an existing email when starting you're own thread.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 04:46:11PM -0500, Tony Vandiver wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> What am I screwing up here? my subject was [newbie] ... not Re: [newbie]
> ... and the to address was debian-user@lists.debian.org What do I need to
> do differently to start a new thread? I did actually start the
the body and the
subject and removed the particular To: address. Is that what's making my
posts mess up?
Thanks,
Tony Vandiver
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Dowland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Compile Kerne
Tony Vandiver wrote:
Hi All,
How do I compile the 2.4.18 kernel to allow dynamic module loading
instead of statically building the selected modules into the kernel?
Start a new thread for a new question rather than replying to an
existing one which is unrelated, or most people will miss or ig
On (12/05/05 09:33), Tony Vandiver wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>How do I compile the 2.4.18 kernel to allow dynamic module loading
> instead of statically building the selected modules into the kernel?
Look at:
http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html
at the config stage (menuconfig,
Hi All,
How do I compile the 2.4.18 kernel to allow dynamic module loading
instead of statically building the selected modules into the kernel?
Thanks,
Tony Vandiver
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I've precompiled the selected modules into the kernel with make
menuconfig, do I have to recompile the kernel to add new ones?
Thanks, Tony
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tony Vandiver wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I started with a Debian Woody Distribution 3.0r5 where the kernel
> version is 2.2.20. I couldn't compile the Omnivision ov59x driver for
> a webcam and so based on the FAQ for the driver, I decided to upgrade
> to kernel 2.4. I found some inst
Hi All,
I started with a Debian Woody
Distribution 3.0r5 where the kernel version is 2.2.20. I couldn't compile
the Omnivision ov59x driver for a webcam and so based on the FAQ for the driver,
I decided to upgrade to kernel 2.4. I found some instructions for this,
and after a few tr
Hi all.
Last January I received the security announcement that
follows. When I tried to use apt-get update and
upgrade as always, this was not downloaded. Has anyone
else had this problem? I'm pretty sure that I
downloaded a kernel security upgrade last Sept. w/o
any problems.
Here's what I have i
All,
I believe I have a crash with alsa 1.0.1 on kernel 2.4.18.
Here is what happened.
I took alsa-driver-1.0.1.tar.bz2 from ALSA site and followed the
instruction to build/install under "Aureal Generic" document (readme
that comes when you search for aureal cards). I did
According description of iproute packet, the options CONFIG_NETLINK and
CONFIG_RTNETLINK must be compiled in the running kernel. I have a kernel
2.4.18 and on the config-2.4.18 I can see:
CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV=m
but I can't see any line relative to CONFIG_RTNETLINK. I have downladed
kernel-
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Weir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 08:05
Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX440 with kernel 2.4.18-bf24
Thanks for the assistance. I downloaded and installed the kernel-headers
then downlo
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:41:33AM -0500, Haines Brown said
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:26:40AM -0600, Hoyt Bailey said
Be careful trimming attributions, you don't want to be held responsible
for something I said ;-)
> > 3) get the non-free binary-only nvidia drivers. The "nvidia-glx-src"
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Haines Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 05:37
Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX440 with kernel 2.4.18-bf24
> > I placed the order for the 7 CD woody 3.0r1 -i386 on Sept 20,
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Haines Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 11:11
Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX440 with kernel 2.4.18-bf24
>
> > Would that be XFree86-4.0.2 or 4.0.3 or 4.2 or 4.3. If the latter I
- Original Message -
From: "Haines Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 05:39
Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX440 with kernel 2.4.18-bf24
> > Thanks you Haines. I have downloaded all the required stuff and
> > on
- Original Message -
From: "Haines Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 04:41
Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX440 with kernel 2.4.18-bf24
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:26:40AM -0600, Hoyt B
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:41:33AM -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
> > Rob Weir wrote:
> > > 3) get the non-free binary-only nvidia drivers. The "nvidia-glx-src"
> > >and "nvidia-kernel-src" packages make this rather easy. This is only
> > >an opti
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:41:33AM -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
> > Rob Weir wrote:
> > > 3) get the non-free binary-only nvidia drivers. The "nvidia-glx-src"
> > >and "nvidia-kernel-src" packages make this rather easy. This is only
> > >an opti
- Original Message -
From: "Travis Crump" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian User List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 23:30
Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX440 with kernel 2.4.18-bf24
This is a subject I have a qestion about. When I
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Weir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "debian-user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 23:01
Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX440 with kernel 2.4.18-bf24
Would that be XFree86-4.0.2 or 4.0.3 or 4.2 or 4.3. If the latter I
> Thanks you Haines. I have downloaded all the required stuff and
> only need to know where to put it to install. I hope no one says it
> dosent matter. That isnt the question. Where do I put the header
> files? Where to put the driver files?
> Sincere Thanks for your help;
> Hoyt
It _really_
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:41:33AM -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
> > 3) get the non-free binary-only nvidia drivers. The "nvidia-glx-src"
> >and "nvidia-kernel-src" packages make this rather easy. This is only
> >an option on x86, however.
>
> Rob, I follow you on points 1
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:26:40AM -0600, Hoyt Bailey said
> > Is anyone running the subject video card on the subject kernel. If so what
> > driver are you using? If you know where can I get a copy of your driver?
>
> Unfortunately, GeForce4 cards won't work with the "nv" driver included
> with
- Original Message -
From: "Haines Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 08:27
Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX440 with kernel 2.4.18-bf24
> > Is anyone running the subject video card on the subject kernel. If so
what
Hoyt Bailey wrote:
Is anyone running the subject video card on the subject kernel. If so what
driver are you using? If you know where can I get a copy of your driver?
Regards;
Hoyt
I use the 'nvidia' driver which you install from nvidia-kernel-source
and nvidia-glx. I have also used the 'nv' dr
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:26:40AM -0600, Hoyt Bailey said
> Is anyone running the subject video card on the subject kernel. If so what
> driver are you using? If you know where can I get a copy of your driver?
Unfortunately, GeForce4 cards won't work with the "nv" driver included
with X before X
> Is anyone running the subject video card on the subject kernel. If so what
> driver are you using? If you know where can I get a copy of your driver?
> Regards;
> Hoyt
Hoyt, that's my setup. I downloaded the new nVidia driver from the
nVidia website. Installation a bit rocky (I'll go into specif
Is anyone running the subject video card on the subject kernel. If so what
driver are you using? If you know where can I get a copy of your driver?
Regards;
Hoyt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi.
I'm using Debian Woody with kernel 2.4.18. I want to set-up the VPN
(FreeSWan) on my box. So I installed freeswan backport from Sid to Woody
(APT: deb http://www.backports.org/debian
./dists/woody/freeswan/binary-i386/).
I installed the following packages:
# dpkg -l |grep
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:48:08PM -0400, Antonio Rodr wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 14:38:54 -0400
> Mental Patient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Use the latest cvs code for the emu10k chips. You can get it here
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/emu10k1/
> >
> > Works fin with my Audigy and
Antonio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a sound blaster audigy card and an ati radeon 9800, none of them seem to be
visible to the kernel 2.4.18 (woody source) that I compiled.
According to what I have seen, emu10k1 should work with this card, but insmod is not
working for the reason that the
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 14:38:54 -0400
Mental Patient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I have a sound blaster audigy card and an ati radeon 9800, none of
> >them seem to be visible to the kernel 2.4.18 (woody source) that I
> >compiled. According to what I have seen, emu10k1
Antonio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a sound blaster audigy card and an ati radeon 9800, none of them seem to be visible to the kernel 2.4.18 (woody source) that I compiled.
According to what I have seen, emu10k1 should work with this card, but insmod is not working for the reason that the
I have a sound blaster audigy card and an ati radeon 9800, none of them seem to be
visible to the kernel 2.4.18 (woody source) that I compiled.
According to what I have seen, emu10k1 should work with this card, but insmod is not
working for the reason that the card is invisible.
Any ideas what
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 13:51:20 +0200
Gregory Soyez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just installed woody on my laptop. Things went fine and I installed
> the kernel 2.4.18, but it seems that the 'sis900' driver (network
> card) works only properly with the
Hi all,
just installed woody on my laptop. Things went fine and I installed the kernel
2.4.18, but it seems that the 'sis900' driver (network card) works only
properly with the kernel 2.4.21.
Since I cannot configure the network, it downloaded the kernel package and its
depend
On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 17:13, smurfd wrote:
> Mkay, well now i have been trying the 'make-kpkg' util, with the same
> source/config, and does still get the same errors..
>
> What "debian patch system" should that be?
>
> > > Just to make sure... you are using Debian's kernel Building system
> > >
Mkay, well now i have been trying the 'make-kpkg' util, with the same
source/config, and does still get the same errors..
What "debian patch system" should that be?
Best regards
/smurfd
On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 22:16, smurfd wrote:
> Hm im not using kpkg, im using the old fashioned way:
> make me
Hm im not using kpkg, im using the old fashioned way:
make menuconfig, make bzImage; make modules; make modules_install
I thought it wouldnt make any difference.
(But i _am_ using the kernel source, and kernel pach from debian)
/smurfd
On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 18:23, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Thu,
No one with my problem?!?
Really?
Oki, i tried mailing the package maintainer, but havent gotten any
response..
I add some more additional output/configs so that i might get help..
best regards
/smurfd
--- output of applying grsecurity patch --
debianservee:/usr/src/kernel-s
I have a problem with my Debian Woody. I have the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel.
My computer set up is the following:
Asus A7S266-VM/U2
AMP XP 2400+
hda: 60 gb hard drive
hdc: creative cdrom 52X
hdd: samsung cdrw
I have two nic cards.
My motherboard's specs are:
North Bridge: SiS 740
South Bridge: SiS 962
Hey folks, im not sure if this is a bug or if im doing something wrong.
Ive been having problems compiling the 2.4.18 kernel with the grsecurity
1.9.4 patch applied. Seems that it had something to do with the ACL
option that grsecurity offers.
Has someone had the same problem, and is there any so
On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 13:45, smurfd wrote:
> No one with my problem?!?
>
> Really?
>
> Oki, i tried mailing the package maintainer, but havent gotten any
> response..
> I add some more additional output/configs so that i might get help..
>
> best regards
> /smurfd
>
Just to make sure... you ar
Hi,
I'm using a G3 lombard an woody 3.0r0
Modem works fine with kernel vmlinux-2.2.20-pmac
But with kernel vmlinux-2.4.18-newpmac modem can not dialout
It make ATZ but nothing else
Thanks for help
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On 02 Jul 2003 17:32:18 -0500
Shyamal Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are mistaken about this (and it is a common misconception).
> If you use an initrd image, like the Debian 2.4.x kernels do, you
> can build ext3 as a module and boot a machine with an ext3 root
> file system.
>
> T
"paladin" == paladin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
paladin> Hi, On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 17:29:10 +0100
paladin> "Adam Gent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I want to run my main file system as ext3 and have already
>> converted it to ext3 and update the fstab file, but whenever I
Hi,
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 17:29:10 +0100
"Adam Gent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am running debian (woody) with the standard kernel
> 2.4.18-bf2.4-xfs which was installed when I installed debian.
>
> From looking through the modules dir for the ke
"Adam" == Adam Gent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> Hi All, I am running debian (woody) with the standard kernel
Adam> 2.4.18-bf2.4-xfs [...snip...]
Adam> I want to run my main file system as ext3 and have already
Adam> converted it to ext3 and update the fstab file, but whe
Hi All,
I am running debian (woody) with the standard kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4-xfs which
was installed when I installed debian.
>From looking through the modules dir for the kernel it looks like it loads
ext3 as a module.
I want to run my main file system as ext3 and have already converted it
Hi All,
I am running debian (woody) with the standard kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4-xfs which
was installed when I installed debian.
>From looking through the modules dir for the kernel it looks like it loads
ext3 as a module.
I want to run my main file system as ext3 and have already converted it
I'm running debian woody on a AMD Athlon and compiled a new kernel
(2.4.18) from kernel.org
Menuconfgig goes fine, and so does the compilation process. When I boot
up the new kernel, everything seems to be working except for my NIC. I have
a 3Com 3C905B-TX (3c59x.o) and it does work with m
I'm running debian woody on a AMD Athlon and compiled a new kernel (2.4.18)
from kernel.org
Menuconfgig goes fine, and so does the compilation process. When I boot up
the new kernel, everything seems to be working except for my NIC. I have a
3Com 3C905B-TX (3c59x.o) and it does work with m
There was no kernel-image package on your system because a kernel and its
modules are part of the basic system. (I believe that will change for Sarge,
and that will be a good thing.)
Let's step through a way to find the answer to some of your questions:
1. Go to www.debian.org, in the left sideba
Could somebody please provide a simple breakdown of what I need to do
update my kernel?
I started installed Debian(Woody) with kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4 on some
machines few months ago. I was (and still am) new to Debian, and don't
understand all of it's nuances yet.
I saw the Debian Securit
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 06:20:33AM -0500, Michael Bevilacqua wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 11:23:38AM -0500, Greg Morgan wrote:
> > Any ideas/thoughts on what's going on? Thanks in advance for any help.
>
> Does the Openboot screen initally display the hardware address? (mac
> hex address)
>
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 11:23:38AM -0500, Greg Morgan wrote:
> Any ideas/thoughts on what's going on? Thanks in advance for any help.
Does the Openboot screen initally display the hardware address? (mac
hex address)
Is it an onboard Sun Happy Meal chipset? If not, which chipset?
Do you get link
I have just loaded Debian 3.0(kernel
2.4.18) onto a Sun Ultra1 and the
built-in lan i/f doesn't seem to want to come
up. I keep getting the following
messages repeating on the console:
eth0: Link down. Cable problem?
eth0: Auto-Negotiation unsuccessful, trying force link
mode
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:12:51 +0100
"Alexander Bruns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on my debian box the debian-kernel 2.4.18-686 by woody is installed. I
> tried to kompile a 2.4.20 kernel, but it fails. Then I tried to
> kompile a 2.4.18 myseld,
Hi,
on my debian box the debian-kernel 2.4.18-686 by woody is installed. I
tried to kompile a 2.4.20 kernel, but it fails. Then I tried to
kompile a 2.4.18 myseld, but it fails too.
why does make_modules install not work?
I downloaded the original kernel sources from kernel.org
ant untar.gz it
d
be to stay well away from these boards at the moment.
Anyway my question, I'm now looking at using Eltora/Gigabyte GS-SR104,
anyway there have been reports of problem on "redhat 7.1" (I wont swear
again promise) with kernel 2.4.18, but I've not found much with rega
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 07:34:22AM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> A nice utility to use for figuring out which scsi the device is on is
>
> apt-get install sg3-utils
hey, yeah, that is pretty nice. maybe i can even use that to get
my reader to work as a hotplug device...
sean
msg3217
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:36:41AM -0500, sean finney wrote..
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 11:37:06AM +0800, Dai Yuwen wrote:
> > which device should I use in /dev (sda? or sdb? ... )
>
> whichever one mounts :) if you want to take a sneak peak, do
> file -s /dev/sda1 or /dev/sdb1, and if it
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 11:37:06AM +0800, Dai Yuwen wrote:
> which device should I use in /dev (sda? or sdb? ... )
whichever one mounts :) if you want to take a sneak peak, do
file -s /dev/sda1 or /dev/sdb1, and if it says something about
a vfat parition or an x86 boot sector, that's the one.
sean finney wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:00:20PM +0800, Dai Yuwen wrote:
Conclusion:
To use this USB flash disk, just install these 3 modules:
sg usb-storage usb-uhci
excellent :) question: if you plug yours in and unplug it, and then plug it
in again, is it still /dev/sda? every time
e:
3. cat /proc/scsi/scsi
Attached device: none
I use the stock kernel image of debian:
uname -r
2.4.18-686
I also found some info that said kernel 2.4.18 had some problem in USB. Is
that true? If yes, I'll have to compile another version of Linux kernel.
Any idea? Thanks in advance.
be
ot a valid block device'.
>
> Then I checked this file:
>
> 3. cat /proc/scsi/scsi
> Attached device: none
>
> I use the stock kernel image of debian:
> uname -r
> 2.4.18-686
>
> I also found some info that said kernel 2.4.18 had some problem in USB. Is
&g
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 04:15:26PM +0800, Dai Yuwen wrote:
> > excellent :) question: if you plug yours in and unplug it, and then plug it
> > in again, is it still /dev/sda? every time i do that on mine it changes to
> > sdb then sdc, etc...
> >
> I've no this problem. But I umount /dev/sda
sean finney wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:00:20PM +0800, Dai Yuwen wrote:
Conclusion:
To use this USB flash disk, just install these 3 modules:
sg usb-storage usb-uhci
excellent :) question: if you plug yours in and unplug it, and then plug it
in again, is it still /dev/sda? every time
sean finney wrote:
> heya, i have it running fine, and i'm
>
> balthasar[~]00:13:09$ uname -a
> Linux balthasar 2.4.19 #1 Sat Nov 16 15:49:07 EST 2002 i686 unknown
unknown GNU/Linux
>
> but i believe i've had it working on 2.4.18 as well. i believe you
> just need more modules installed. here's
. modprobe sg usb-storage
>
> Then I tried to mount it:
>mount /dev/sda1 /mnt
>
> But a messages said `/dev/sda1 is not a valid block device'.
>
> Then I checked this file:
>
> 3. cat /proc/scsi/scsi
> Attached device: none
>
> I use the stock kerne
e:
3. cat /proc/scsi/scsi
Attached device: none
I use the stock kernel image of debian:
uname -r
2.4.18-686
I also found some info that said kernel 2.4.18 had some problem in USB. Is
that true? If yes, I'll have to compile another version of Linux kernel.
Any idea? Thanks in advance.
be
> "Jonathan Brandmeyer" <...> writes:
> > Installed the stock kernel-image-2.4.18-i686 debian package, with
dselect.
> > Installed and unpacked kernel-source-2.4.18, with dselect and tar.
> > Downloaded and unpacked nvidia-kernel-source and nvidia-glx-source, with
> > apt-get and tar.
> > Built nv
"Jonathan Brandmeyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Installed the stock kernel-image-2.4.18-i686 debian package, with dselect.
> Installed and unpacked kernel-source-2.4.18, with dselect and tar.
> Downloaded and unpacked nvidia-kernel-source and nvidia-glx-source, with
> apt-get and tar.
> Built n
My system is a PIII, with woody 3.0_r0.
I am installing the nvidia kernel driver for a M64 card. It went like this:
Installed the stock kernel-image-2.4.18-i686 debian package, with dselect.
Installed and unpacked kernel-source-2.4.18, with dselect and tar.
Downloaded and unpacked nvidia-kernel-s
Hi,
Just like that, many thanks to Jerome-the altered grub sequence did the
trick.
Tim
grub> root (hd0,0)
grub> kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/hda1
grub> initrd /initrd.img
grub> boot
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:18:08PM +, Tim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a new computer on which I am trying to use kernel 2.4.18, so far
> without success. I can use 2.2.20-idepci without problems. I am using
> Debian Woody rev 0, on an AMD Athlon XP 2200+, with ASUS A7N266-V
Hi,
I have a new computer on which I am trying to use kernel 2.4.18, so far
without success. I can use 2.2.20-idepci without problems. I am using
Debian Woody rev 0, on an AMD Athlon XP 2200+, with ASUS A7N266-VM
motherboard, which has nVidia nForce chipset-that requires 2.4.18
kernel. I have
#include
* Donald R. Spoon [Sun, Nov 17 2002, 06:31:16PM]:
> I just had to go through this here, so I had better reply while it is
> "fresh" in my rather ancient mind! .
>
> The 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel is a "special" kernel that has been stripped of
Please? It is the most fat kernel.
> a lot of
"Michael" == Michael Rauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> now i'm wondering if there is some other way to get this
Michael> module on my system beside of getting the kernel and
Michael> module sources and baking a new kernel.
apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-{arch}
where
hi,
i recently replaced the SuSE installation on my desktop with
debian/woody. now i have some troubles getting my IDE cd-burner (alias
hdd) working. after reading the CD-WRITING-HOWTO and googling around for
some time i figured that the module sr_mod (afaik SCSI CD-ROM support)
is not present
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 08:09:19PM +0100, lacostej wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are having trouble to set up NAT on a server to act as gateway to a
> private home network.
Tricky, eh. It is a FAQ.
> I've done so on other machines, but each time compiled my own kernel.
> This time we tried to use Debian's.
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 20:09:19 +0100 lacostej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are having trouble to set up NAT on a server to act as gateway to a
> private home network.
>
> I've done so on other machines, but each time compiled my own kernel.
> This time we tried to use Debian's. I.e. kernel-image
It sounds like you do not have the ipmasq package installed.
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 08:09:19PM +0100, lacostej wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are having trouble to set up NAT on a server to act as gateway to a private
> home network.
>
> I've done so on other machines, but each time compiled my own ker
Hi,
We are having trouble to set up NAT on a server to act as gateway to a private
home network.
I've done so on other machines, but each time compiled my own kernel. This
time we tried to use Debian's. I.e. kernel-image-2.4.18-586tsc as distributed
in woody 3.0 images.
The machine connects
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Seneca wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:59:27AM -0400, Walter Tautz wrote:
> > namley
> > # lilo
> > Warning: Int 0x13 function 8 and function 0x48 return different
> > head/sector geometries for BIOS drive 0x80
> > Warning: Int 0x13 function 8 and function 0x48 return di
I recently successfully custom compiled a 2.4.18 kernel and the only
problem I am having is with rp-pppoe... all services are compiled into
the kernel, I have no modules at all. I can manipulate eth0 and eth1
(only eth0 is relevant here) but i cannot use rp-pppoe to connect to
the internet. I no
I'm tracking down an issue with USB cameras as well... I have a
Creative Labs WebCam 3 (ov511.o) that works fine on 2.4.17 but I've yet
to get any post-2.4.17 kernel to see it and handle it properly... I'm
curious as to what might have changed so dramatically after 2.4.17 to
the USB subsys
Okay, not *all* of the usb subsystem is gone - I can still find the two
hubs, but the devices off them are lost to Linux. The problem comes from
trying to get an STV680 based USB camera to work with my computer - it
feeds 20 images in rapid succession into the computer, and then thinks
it has take
if someone responded please post to the list also as Barry isn't the
> > only one with the problem.
> >
> > On Saturday 31 August 2002 12:18 pm, Barry Mathieu wrote:
> > > I am currently running Woody with kernel 2.2.19 and both my dial-up ppp
> > > connec
>
> On Saturday 31 August 2002 12:18 pm, Barry Mathieu wrote:
> > I am currently running Woody with kernel 2.2.19 and both my dial-up ppp
> > connection and scsi system work as expected. I have installed kernel
> > 2.4.18-686 for potential use of the USB capability (d
and both my dial-up ppp
> connection and scsi system work as expected. I have installed kernel
> 2.4.18-686 for potential use of the USB capability (digital camera).
> Unfortunately, when I restart my machine with the 2.4.18-686 kernel,
> neither my ppp nor scsi system work.
>
> I thin
I am currently running Woody with kernel 2.2.19 and both my dial-up ppp
connection and scsi system work as expected. I have installed kernel
2.4.18-686 for potential use of the USB capability (digital camera).
Unfortunately, when I restart my machine with the 2.4.18-686 kernel,
neither my ppp nor
* Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020621 00:17]:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 11:44:21PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> > Where's the misunderstanding?
On my part, to be sure. (Re-reading this I realize that I didn't word it
so as to imply that that was my guess; apologies if it sounded rude.)
> The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 11:44:21PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> [CPU]--serial-cable--[modem]--phone-line--wall
> | |
> | power cord
> | |
> +-[surge protector]---wall
[CPU]--serial cable-
* Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020620 23:28]:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 11:24:50PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> > You should be able to find a surge protector with RJ11 jacks on it for
> > around $9.95 at circuit city...
>
> These tend to introduce a considerable amount of line noise and you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 11:24:50PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> You should be able to find a surge protector with RJ11 jacks on it for
> around $9.95 at circuit city...
These tend to introduce a considerable amount of line noise and you end
up pluggi
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
