/usr/src/linux/Documentation/proc.txt
i am in the process of compiling a kernel that allows 10,000 open files on
a machine that is a k6-2 350 with 64mb ram and 46gb hd space..does anyone
have any experiences with increasing the max open files in the kernel?(is
there a real limit? can i go to 20,000 30?) im having a curious samba
proble
On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 06:28:10PM -0400, Camiel Coenen wrote:
> I read somewhere that all kernels from 2.2.7 on, have sound support built-in.
Are you talking debians kernel-images?
> I have a ES1869 soundcard on my laptop and kernel 2.2.10 but still I
> don't have any sound. Al
I read somewhere that all kernels from 2.2.7 on, have sound support built-in.
I have a ES1869 soundcard on my laptop and kernel 2.2.10 but still I
don't have any sound. Although I tried several time to load the sound
module with modconf, it still doesn't work. though I have read the
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 12:43:12PM -0600, Alexis Maldonado wrote:
> Hello.
> It is possible. I have a Promise Ultra/66 board running with a Western
> Digital Expert 27.3GB, at UDMA/66.
> I'm using kernel 2.2.12, with patches that can be found on your local kernel
> mirror under people/hedrick.
Hi
Hello.
On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 08:15:12PM -0700, aphro wrote:
> i read in the kernel mailing list that UDMA66 isn't possible in the linux
> kernel yet. even with a patch its bound to cause lockups.
It is possible. I have a Promise Ultra/66 board running with a Western
Digital Expert 27.3GB, at
On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 08:15:12PM -0700, aphro wrote:
> i read in the kernel mailing list that UDMA66 isn't possible in the linux
> kernel yet. even with a patch its bound to cause lockups.
>
> http://kt.linuxcare.com/kt19990927_36.html#12
>
> "You can not currently use the second ATA-66 chann
i read in the kernel mailing list that UDMA66 isn't possible in the linux
kernel yet. even with a patch its bound to cause lockups.
http://kt.linuxcare.com/kt19990927_36.html#12
"You can not currently use the second ATA-66 channel under Linux. Unless
you have a rabbit in the hat to register/ser
Hi all,
I'm seeking for that patch, does it exists?
JY
--
Jean-Yves F. Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If graphics hackers are so smart, why can't they get the bugs out of
fresh paint?
The problem disasppeared today after an n-th upgrade.
I noticed that, before upgrading procps, ldconfig
complained about the absence of /usr/lib/libproc.so.
I think the problem was related to this.
Cheers,
Alberto
On 21 Sep 1999, Jonathan B. Leffe
Hi, All,
I'm running potato here at work. The stock kernel-image 2.2.10
works fine and prints properly. I compiled a custom kernel in order to
use the soundcard. Sound now works but printing doesn't. (I did select
printing support when running make xconfig). On booting I get this
messag
In an earlier email, I asked about a problem that I run across related to
an incompatibility between Kernel 2.2.x (x>7) and mount. I was advised to
update (rather than just recompile) the mount to potato (thanks!), however
it did not work. I updated the libraries, mount with all dependencies, but
I
I'm ready to compile a new kernel, moving up from 2.0.36 after just
upgrading to potato. Searching the archives showed one letter recently
espousing 2.2.11, but little else was found. I'm on a home system with
no fancy stuff (486-66, SB16Vibra and an HP scanner/Adapt. 152x card). When
(IF) I
u
I have a Stallion Brumby Multiport intelligent serial card. 4 port model. I
had this card working fine under 2.0.x series of kernels, and had it
compiled in as part of the kernel. I followed the info in the readme's for
the card, and edited /usr/src/linux-`kernel version`\char\istallion.c to
point
On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Marc Dubrowski wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I need to set a slink box running 2.2.10 to serve dhcp for one of
> > its network cards. It'll be a masquerade box.
> > Where can I get a working dhcpd package for slink+2.2.1
On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to set a slink box running 2.2.10 to serve dhcp for one of
> its network cards. It'll be a masquerade box.
> Where can I get a working dhcpd package for slink+2.2.10?
> Can someone help me sending some config s
Hi,
I need to set a slink box running 2.2.10 to serve dhcp for one of
its network cards. It'll be a masquerade box.
Where can I get a working dhcpd package for slink+2.2.10?
Can someone help me sending some config samples?
Thanks
[]s,
Mario O.de Menezes
Only 6 days ago on the list...
On Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 21:59:26 -0400, Timothy Burt wrote:
> Could it be some other motherboard problem? Or even the cpu?
http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11 lists a whole list of problems that have
resulted in signal11 and related unpredicatable behaviours.
On Tue,
*- On 10 Aug, Guilherme Soares Zahn wrote about "Kernel 2.2.10 make error
(internal compiler error)"
> Hi there,
>
> I was trying to compile and install the 2.2.10 kernel, but something
> didn't come out so well as I expected...
>
> I did it
Hi there,
I was trying to compile and install the 2.2.10 kernel, but something
didn't come out so well as I expected...
I did it the ¨general linux way¨, so I did:
make menuconfig (OK)
make dep (OK)
make clean (OK)
make modules (OK)
make bzImage
...and that's where t
Hi Graham,
On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 08:48:51AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have just downloaded and installed the image and headers for the 2.2.10
> kernel, and I am now getting the following error on boot
>
> SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument
>
> Does anyone know what the program
I have just downloaded and installed the image and headers for the 2.2.10
kernel, and I am now getting the following error on boot
SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument
Does anyone know what the program is?
Regards
Graham
Perhaps the "form factory" kernel-image-2.2.10 does not contain
'msdos' support? If so, you can probably use the 'vfat' filesystem
(which is backwards compatible) instead. Or, yes, build your own
image (the best way to do that would be via 'make-kpkg').
As for going back to an older kernel-imag
Jonas Steverud wrote:
> Used OS/2's fdisk and boot manager if that matters.
Fair enough. I don't know anything about OS/2's fdisk. Your /dev/hda2
may be different.
Matthew
Jonas,
I don't think that your dos partition would be on /dev/hda2. Dos fdisk
only lets you have two primary partions, and the second one is an
extended partion, which cant be mounted itself as it is only a container
for logical partitions, which appear in linux as /dev/hda[5678].
Check your parti
On 01-Aug-1999, Jonas Steverud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've just built a 2.2.10 kernel on my own (banging my own chest like
> Tarzan[1]) and compiled fat-fs-support as a module (and nls_cp437,
> vfat, hpfs, msdos, ...) but modprobe (or whatever reads
> /etc/conf.modules) complains when I bo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jonas Steverud) writes:
>
> I've just built a 2.2.10 kernel on my own (banging my own chest like
> Tarzan[1]) and compiled fat-fs-support as a module (and nls_cp437,
> vfat, hpfs, msdos, ...) but modprobe (or whatever reads
> /etc/conf.mod
Jonas Steverud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've just upgraded to the 2.2.10-kernel (using the
> kernel-image-package), I used 2.0.33 before and it worked without any
> problem.
>
> root% mount -t msdos /dev/hda2 /msdos -o noexec,ro,nosuid,blocksize=1024,auto
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option,
>
> I've just upgraded to the 2.2.10-kernel (using the
> kernel-image-package), I used 2.0.33 before and it worked without any
> problem.
>
> root% mount -t msdos /dev/hda2 /msdos -o noexec,ro,nosuid,blocksize=1024,auto
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda2,
>or
llo,
>
> I compiled kernel 2.2.10 today and almost everything went fine. The
> only problem is when booting.
> In /etc/rcS.d S40network is called and there you find the line
>
> route add -net 127.0.0.0
>
> wich gives me
>
> SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument
>
> W
On Sun, 27 Jun 1999, Ralf Comtesse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I compiled kernel 2.2.10 today and almost everything went fine. The
> only problem is when booting.
> In /etc/rcS.d S40network is called and there you find the line
>
> route add -net 127.0.0.0
>
> wich gives
Ralf Comtesse wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I compiled kernel 2.2.10 today and almost everything went fine. The
> only problem is when booting.
> In /etc/rcS.d S40network is called and there you find the line
>
> route add -net 127.0.0.0
>
> wich gives me
>
>
Hello,
I compiled kernel 2.2.10 today and almost everything went fine. The
only problem is when booting.
In /etc/rcS.d S40network is called and there you find the line
route add -net 127.0.0.0
wich gives me
SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument
Was there change that I did not get? Sth. else I missed
o the
kernel.
Should I ditch the card?
-Original Message-
From: Matt Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, 17 June 1999 2:04
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2.10
>Did you have to update any other packages before you could use the 2.2
kernel
I run Debian, I am running on 2.0.36 and have my Stallion Brumby 4 card
working (Intelligent ISA Multiport Serial Card)
Anyway, I installed 2.2.10 source, and edited
/usr/src/linux-2.2.10/drivers/char/istallion.c to show my cards io port and
address range.
Compiled in the support for the card, in
35 matches
Mail list logo
