> I currently have and use, seamonkey v 2.29 (.1, I think), as
>>> the latest version of which I have been aware, has been
>>> available as a .deb package.
>>
>> Is that package available for Debian, or only for the Ubuntu
>> offshoot? I ran Lisi's URL for
available as a
>> .deb package.
>
> Is that package available for Debian, or only for the Ubuntu offshoot?
> I ran Lisi's URL for =Seamonkey instead of =Iceweasel but received a
> nil return. Since the demise of Iceape I am using Seamonkey,
> presently version 2.31, di
800, Bret Busby wrote:
>>>>> I searched for a .deb package, for iceape, so that I could
>>>>> download the package for the iceape suite, to try to
>>>>> install it.
>>>>
>>>> AFAIK, Iceape, being the Debian version of Seamonkey
Bret Busby wrote:
> On 26/02/2016, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
>> That is more than risky.
>> 1) Iceape is EOL since 2013: https://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2819
> Now that has me puzzled.
> Given that iceape was (I believe) part of Debian 6, I am surprised
> tha
On 26/02/2016, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
> That is more than risky.
> 1) Iceape is EOL since 2013: https://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2819
Now that has me puzzled.
Given that iceape was (I believe) part of Debian 6, I am surprised
that the LTS that is due to expire on Monday
On 26/02/2016, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
> That is more than risky.
> 1) Iceape is EOL since 2013: https://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2819
> 2) While Ubuntu is based on Debian, there's (sometimes) a huge
> difference in the software releases shipped:
> * libc6: 2.11
That is more than risky.
1) Iceape is EOL since 2013: https://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2819
2) While Ubuntu is based on Debian, there's (sometimes) a huge
difference in the software releases shipped:
* libc6: 2.11 (Debian 6) vs. 2.21 (Ubuntu 15.10)
* libssl: 0.9.8o vs. 1
On 25/02/2016, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 2/25/2016 7:38 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> On Thursday 25 February 2016 12:59:29 Siard wrote:
>>> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:08:20 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>>>> I searched for a .deb package, for iceape, so that I could download
&
On 2/25/2016 7:38 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Thursday 25 February 2016 12:59:29 Siard wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:08:20 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
I searched for a .deb package, for iceape, so that I could download
the package for the iceape suite, to try to install it.
AFAIK, Iceape, being
On 25/02/2016, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yes, and no. You can run `apt-get -d install iceape`, and it will
> download the package, and the missing dependencies, to
> /var/cache/apt/archives/. However, if you want to install something on a
> machine without internet a
On Thursday 25 February 2016 12:59:29 Siard wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:08:20 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> > I searched for a .deb package, for iceape, so that I could download
> > the package for the iceape suite, to try to install it.
>
> AFAIK, Iceape, being the Debian
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:08:20 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> I searched for a .deb package, for iceape, so that I could download
> the package for the iceape suite, to try to install it.
AFAIK, Iceape, being the Debian version of Seamonkey, has been
discontinued for quite some time now. There i
to handle dependencies. Open a
command line / terminal and enter
sudo apt-get install iceape
It will pull iceape, and all dependencies, from the Debian repos, and
install them.
Updates are handled similarily.
Regards,
/peter
Am 25.02.2016 um 07:08 schrieb Bret Busby:
Hello.
I searched for a .deb pac
Hello,
Yes, and no. You can run `apt-get -d install iceape`, and it will
download the package, and the missing dependencies, to
/var/cache/apt/archives/. However, if you want to install something on a
machine without internet access you might be better off with apt-medium
[1], although I never
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:32:47 +0800
Bret Busby wrote:
> Is there a way (a switch for the apt-get command?) to download all of
> the dependencies? I have looked at man apt-get, and, that has an
> option "download" (as opposed to install or find), but I could not
> find, from the man entry for apt-g
d line / terminal and enter
> sudo apt-get install iceape
>
> It will pull iceape, and all dependencies, from the Debian repos, and
> install them.
>
> Updates are handled similarily.
>
> Regards,
> /peter
>
> Am 25.02.2016 um 07:08 schrieb Bret Busby:
>> Hello
Hello,
Searching for a single .deb & trying to install that is the way
proprietary systems handle it. With Debian, and most other Linux
distros, there's repositories, and tools to handle dependencies. Open a
command line / terminal and enter
sudo apt-get install iceape
It will pull ic
Hello.
I searched for a .deb package, for iceape, so that I could download
the package for the iceape suite, to try to install it.
Ahat I found, is apparently submerged in a "security pool".
I found that what is apparently provided as the iceape suite .deb
package, is just somethin
On 2015-05-13, Thomas H. George wrote:
> For some years I have been using the iceape suit but some months ago I
> was advised the browser was a security risk - it does always start with
> a notice it should be updated and contains a link to firefox.
>
> With the successful upgr
For some years I have been using the iceape suit but some months ago I
was advised the browser was a security risk - it does always start with
a notice it should be updated and contains a link to firefox.
With the successful upgrade to Jessie I believe it has been discontinued.
On a new computer
gt;>>On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 03:39:44AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> >>>>>On 12/03/2015, Thomas H. George wrote:
> >>>>>>Ok, iceape must go. What next?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>My installed iceape has an extensive lis
, iceape must go. What next?
My installed iceape has an extensive list of email addresses some of
which include complete snailmail addresses. What email clients can
accept/assist transfer of all this information?
Tom
The replacement for iceape was discussed in the original thread that
you started
On 14/03/2015, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> I've not really messed with them in YEARS so I've never gone to the
> extent of noticing which one matches to what other. Looking at them
> side by side as presented by The Wanderer now, it's:
>
> * bird names
> * weasely names
Ah.
Them'd be Ron Weasely
On Friday 13 March 2015 16:30:33 Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> Looking at them
> side by side as presented by The Wanderer now, it's:
>
> * bird names
> * weasely names
> * ape names
Yes. Deliberately done to match. And FIREfox ICEweasel, less obvious but
THUNDERbird IceDOVE. Ice and Sea don't wor
On 3/13/15, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 03/13/2015 at 11:03 AM, Thomas H. George wrote:
>
>> OK. Seamonkey is Icedove in Jessie, looks familiar.
>
> No.
>
> Icedove is a renamed version of Thunderbird.
>
> Iceweasel is a renamed version of Firefox.
>
> Icea
On 03/13/2015 at 11:03 AM, Thomas H. George wrote:
> OK. Seamonkey is Icedove in Jessie, looks familiar.
No.
Icedove is a renamed version of Thunderbird.
Iceweasel is a renamed version of Firefox.
Iceape is a renamed version of Seamonkey.
Icedove and Iceweasel are still available in jes
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 05:11:55AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 13/03/2015, Bret Busby wrote:
> > On 13/03/2015, Thomas H. George wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 03:39:44AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> >>> On 12/03/2015, Thomas H. George wrote:
> &g
On 13/03/2015, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 13/03/2015, Thomas H. George wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 03:39:44AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>>> On 12/03/2015, Thomas H. George wrote:
>>> > Ok, iceape must go. What next?
>>> >
>>> > My installe
On 13/03/2015, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 03:39:44AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>> On 12/03/2015, Thomas H. George wrote:
>> > Ok, iceape must go. What next?
>> >
>> > My installed iceape has an extensive list of email addresses some of
&
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 03:39:44AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 12/03/2015, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > Ok, iceape must go. What next?
> >
> > My installed iceape has an extensive list of email addresses some of
> > which include complete snailmail addresses. What e
On 13/03/2015, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 03:01:12PM -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
>> On 03/12/2015 11:28 AM, Thomas H. George wrote:
>> >Ok, iceape must go. What next?
>> >
>> >My installed iceape has an extensive list of email addresse
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 03:01:12PM -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> On 03/12/2015 11:28 AM, Thomas H. George wrote:
> >Ok, iceape must go. What next?
> >
> >My installed iceape has an extensive list of email addresses some of
> >which include complete snailmail address
On 12/03/2015, Thomas H. George wrote:
> Ok, iceape must go. What next?
>
> My installed iceape has an extensive list of email addresses some of
> which include complete snailmail addresses. What email clients can
> accept/assist transfer of all this information?
>
> Tom
&
On 03/12/2015 11:28 AM, Thomas H. George wrote:
Ok, iceape must go. What next?
My installed iceape has an extensive list of email addresses some of
which include complete snailmail addresses. What email clients can
accept/assist transfer of all this information?
You could just install
Ok, iceape must go. What next?
My installed iceape has an extensive list of email addresses some of
which include complete snailmail addresses. What email clients can
accept/assist transfer of all this information?
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi,
On 03/11/2015 04:14 PM, Thomas H. George wrote:
> Is iceape gone in Jessie?
It got removed from everywhere some time ago due to no longer being
security-supported. See the last four news entries on
https://packages.qa.debian.org/i/iceape.html.
> I am still using it regularly in Whee
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 03:56:27PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 March 2015 15:21:58 Bret Busby wrote:
> > On 11/03/2015, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > > Is iceape gone in Jessie?
> > >
> > > I am still using it regularly in Wheezy and it still shows
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 15:21:58 Bret Busby wrote:
> On 11/03/2015, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > Is iceape gone in Jessie?
> >
> > I am still using it regularly in Wheezy and it still shows up in
> > apt-cache search iceape when run from Wheezy but is missing whe
On 2015-03-11, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>>
>> Actually, your output proves that it ISN'T. All the results are virtual
>> packages, each of which is an Add-On for iceape (caused, presumably,
>> because e.g. xul-ext-adblock-plus provides ice$ANIMAL-adblock-plus.
>
> Doh
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 16:00:38 Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 03:56:27PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 March 2015 15:21:58 Bret Busby wrote:
> > > On 11/03/2015, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > > > Is iceape gone in Jessie?
>
On 11/03/2015, Thomas H. George wrote:
> Is iceape gone in Jessie?
>
> I am still using it regularly in Wheezy and it still shows up in
> apt-cache search iceape when run from Wheezy but is missing when I run
> the search from Jessie.
>
>
iceape is present in Debian 6, but i
Is iceape gone in Jessie?
I am still using it regularly in Wheezy and it still shows up in
apt-cache search iceape when run from Wheezy but is missing when I run
the search from Jessie.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Bret Busby wrote:
On 24/07/2014, Bret Busby wrote:
On 24/07/2014, Richard Owlett wrote:
CAVEAT LECTOR:
I didn't get to learn Latin very well, but that seems like "Let
Hannibal beware".
:)
And thence, I think that I may have worked out what it means.
"Tread carefully (watch where
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
iceape browser is available in squeeze-backports, but not in wheezy or
jessie. It is however available in sid; so it may in time be moved to
jessie. Maybe the sid version may work in jessie now.
The squeeze-backports version of squeeze may work in
eamonkey
> [server news.mozilla.org]
You will get support for Mozilla's Seamonkey there.
> #3 I suspect my eventual response will be use generic Linux
> version of Seamonkey
>
Iceape is integrated: it may also be useful to use the single purpose
applications
if th
On 24/07/2014, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 24/07/2014, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
>
>>
>> CAVEAT LECTOR:
>
> I didn't get to learn Latin very well, but that seems like "Let
> Hannibal beware".
>
> :)
>
And thence, I think that I may have worked out what it means.
"Tread carefully (watch where you pu
On 24/07/2014, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> CAVEAT LECTOR:
I didn't get to learn Latin very well, but that seems like "Let
Hannibal beware".
:)
--
Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia
..
"So once you do know what the question actually is,
you'll know what the answer means."
- Deep T
On 24/07/2014, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Bret Busby wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:58:44AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>>>> Hello.
>>>>
>>>> Is a .deb package of iceape
Bret Busby wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:58:44AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
Hello.
Is a .deb package of iceape or seamonky, available for Debian
7.x (amd64)?
I have not been able to find one.
Thank you in anticipation.
I'm fairly sur
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:58:44AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
Hello.
Is a .deb package of iceape or seamonky, available for Debian 7.x (amd64)?
I have not been able to find one.
Thank you in anticipation.
I'm fairly sure the whole packag
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:58:44AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Is a .deb package of iceape or seamonky, available for Debian 7.x (amd64)?
>
> I have not been able to find one.
>
> Thank you in anticipation.
>
I'm fairly sure the whole package was r
Hello.
Is a .deb package of iceape or seamonky, available for Debian 7.x (amd64)?
I have not been able to find one.
Thank you in anticipation.
--
Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia
..
"So once you do know what the question actually is,
you'll know what the answer mean
Iceape browser and mail has suddenly become very slow in scrolling and
paging. I have found an kludge fix: kill plugin-containe. This
temporarily restores normal performance.
Does anyone know the underlying cause and a permanent solution?
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 04:05:38PM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> I ran a dist-upgrade. View in iceape mail has changed - for the
> worst.
>
> Previously view would show all four of the mail accounts I have and for
> each the choice of mailbox, sent, drafts and trash.
>
>
I ran a dist-upgrade. View in iceape mail has changed - for the
worst.
Previously view would show all four of the mail accounts I have and for
each the choice of mailbox, sent, drafts and trash.
Now only one account is opened and the options sent, drafts, and trash
are missing.
For me this is
On 12/03/12 10:51 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:05:32 -0400, H.S. wrote:
>
> Try by reinstalling the package (or check for a package update) and then,
> should you encounter no gain and still sluggish, back to the last version
> that workded fine. If you can't experience any delay
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:05:32 -0400, H.S. wrote:
> On 10/03/12 01:38 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> Before anything, I would first try with an empty and fresh browser
>> profile and check if you still experience the slowness when typing at
>> the location bar from there.
>
> I tried that today. It happ
On 10/03/12 01:38 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> Before anything, I would first try with an empty and fresh browser
> profile and check if you still experience the slowness when typing at the
> location bar from there.
I tried that today. It happens in the new profile as well. Mostly when I
am entering
On 10/03/12 01:38 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:12:51 -0500, H.S. wrote:
>
>> Since the last some days, I am experiencing a slowness and sluggishness
>> in the text I type in Iceape's location bar (this version of iceape has
>> the new blue logo).
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:12:51 -0500, H.S. wrote:
> Since the last some days, I am experiencing a slowness and sluggishness
> in the text I type in Iceape's location bar (this version of iceape has
> the new blue logo). For the first some times, it appears fine, but then
> th
Since the last some days, I am experiencing a slowness and sluggishness
in the text I type in Iceape's location bar (this version of iceape has
the new blue logo). For the first some times, it appears fine, but then
the response of the location bar slows down very fast and becomes
slu
folder, this way I can see how both work: Firefox uses Adobe flash
>> while Epiphany loads Gnash :-)
>>
> I went to /usr/lib, moved nspluginwrapper to x_nspluginwrapper and
> rebooted.
>
> First WOW! The sluggish behavior of the iceape browser was gone. It
> brought u
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 06:12:15PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:39:07 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 04:44:06PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> (...)
>
> >> To ensure what flash plugin your browser sees, you can:
> &g
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:39:07 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 04:44:06PM +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> To ensure what flash plugin your browser sees, you can:
>>
>> 1/ Open Iceape browser and type "about:plugins"
>
> This is how
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 04:44:06PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 10:55:26 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 11:01:20AM +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> >> You mean Iceape browser is not displaying images nor flash player
> >> v
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 10:55:26 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 11:01:20AM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> You mean Iceape browser is not displaying images nor flash player
>> videos at all? For this problem, I would take a look into this KB:
>>
>>
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 11:01:20AM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:33:28 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
>
> > My system is squeeze. For years I have used the iceape mail which
> > automaticaly transfers url links in received emails to the iceape
> > brow
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 09:44:41AM +0100, didier gaumet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Images_in_messages_do_not_appear
> may be this page will hell you
>
I checked out this reference. The iceape preference settings are the
recommended settings.
>
> --
>
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:33:28 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> My system is squeeze. For years I have used the iceape mail which
> automaticaly transfers url links in received emails to the iceape
> browser. Convenient but the browser is not alway able to display images
> in the link
Hi,
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Images_in_messages_do_not_appear
may be this page will hell you
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/2005094441.68f83..
My system is squeeze. For years I have used the iceape mail which
automaticaly transfers url links in received emails to the iceape
browser. Convenient but the browser is not alway able to display images
in the linked url sites, not even some utube videos. This problem has
gotten worse since
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 02:20:17 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 11/06/11 22:04, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> I also get the black diamond but *only* when I force a utf-8 encoding
>> for the folder it contains the messages and click on "apply default to
>> all messages in the folder..." :-)
>>
>> So.
On 11/06/11 22:04, Camaleón wrote:
> El 11/06/11 13:07, Scott Ferguson escribió:
>> On 11/06/11 03:57, � "the dark oracle" wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:01:36 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>>
On 11/06/11 01:02, � "the dark oracle" wrote:
>>>
>>
>
> I asked you to test this because of t
El 11/06/11 13:07, Scott Ferguson escribió:
On 11/06/11 03:57, � "the dark oracle" wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:01:36 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 11/06/11 01:02, � "the dark oracle" wrote:
Scott, let's see if this works: open Icedove and create a new folder
(name it "test" or "the
On 11/06/11 03:57, � "the dark oracle" wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:01:36 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>> On 11/06/11 01:02, � "the dark oracle" wrote:
>
>
> Scott, let's see if this works: open Icedove and create a new folder
> (name it "test" or "the dark oracle", at your wish...). The
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:22:13 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 10 iun 11, 17:57:44, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> Sure they tell me. After looking into them in my cache I've seen that
>> all those were sent by me using Mutt :-)
>
> mutt respects your locale, so just make sure you have some UTF-8 loc
On Vi, 10 iun 11, 17:57:44, Camaleón wrote:
>
> Sure they tell me. After looking into them in my cache I've seen that all
> those were sent by me using Mutt :-)
mutt respects your locale, so just make sure you have some UTF-8 locale
and delete any 'charset' or similar option from your .muttrc
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:01:36 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 11/06/11 01:02, � wrote:
>> But how about the fourth of the snapshots? It seems to display the name
>> just right.
>
> Yes - but they're the only ones from you this year that do, which is why
> I showed them. Hoping the dates might m
On 11/06/11 01:02, � wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:46:12 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>> On 10/06/11 20:46, � wrote:
>
> (...)
>
> Wow... I look horrible 8:-)
Aw, I dunno - looks classier that the symbol used by the artist formerly
know as... ;-p
>
> But how about the fourth of the snaps
On Jun 10, 2011, at 5:58 AM, Lisi wrote:
I presumed it *likely* that you are female, but was uncertain
Yes, most of the time on line it is very difficult to be sure. And
we have to
accept that statistically the majority ...
On the internet, nobody knows you're a God...
-- Dysl
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:46:12 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 10/06/11 20:46, � wrote:
(...)
>>> I'm not convinced - I don't get the problem with other Pan users,
>>> though it could be a combination of Pan and gmane.
>>
>> Yup. Maybe a combo with how Pan encodes and your MUA?
>>
>> (what puz
On 10/06/11 20:46, � wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:06:18 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>> On 10/06/11 04:10, � wrote:
>>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 03:16:12 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>>
On 10/06/11 02:01, Camaleón wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Eureka! We have found the cul
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:06:18 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 10/06/11 04:10, � wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 03:16:12 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/06/11 02:01, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>
>> Eureka! We have found the culprit!
>>
>> It seems to be my Pan ne
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 11:03 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Friday 10 June 2011 09:47:43 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 18:41 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> > > I don't
> > > know if it's your formal name, a nickname
> >
> > a nick, she wrote her real name
>
> Did I? I wonder why? And I wo
On Friday 10 June 2011 10:32:25 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 10/06/11 18:47, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 18:41 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> >> I don't
> >> know if it's your formal name, a nickname
> >
> > a nick, she wrote her real name several mails before, pardon, I've
> > forg
On Friday 10 June 2011 09:47:43 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 18:41 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> > I don't
> > know if it's your formal name, a nickname
>
> a nick, she wrote her real name
Did I? I wonder why? And I wonder why I said that it was not my real name?
Lisi is what I
On Friday 10 June 2011 09:41:22 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 10/06/11 08:30, Lisi wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 June 2011 19:10:40 Camaleón wrote:
> >> that Lisi bloke
> >
> > I hope that that is a joke Not that I find it funny, but I would
> > hate to think that you were serious. :-)
> >
> > Lisi
>
On 10/06/11 18:47, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 18:41 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> I don't
>> know if it's your formal name, a nickname
>
> a nick, she wrote her real name several mails before, pardon, I've
> forgotten her name, but it's in the archive
>
>
Funnily enough I've
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 10:47 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 18:41 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> > I don't
> > know if it's your formal name, a nickname
>
> a nick, she wrote her real name several mails before, pardon, I've
> forgotten her name, but it's in the archive
Nonsense
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 18:41 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> I don't
> know if it's your formal name, a nickname
a nick, she wrote her real name several mails before, pardon, I've
forgotten her name, but it's in the archive
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On 10/06/11 08:30, Lisi wrote:
> On Thursday 09 June 2011 19:10:40 Camaleón wrote:
>> that Lisi bloke
>
> I hope that that is a joke Not that I find it funny, but I would hate to
> think that you were serious. :-)
>
> Lisi
>
>
No no! It was not Camaleón who wrote that. It was me. Self-dep
On 10/06/11 04:10, � wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 03:16:12 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>> On 10/06/11 02:01, Camaleón wrote:
>
>
> Eureka! We have found the culprit!
>
> It seems to be my Pan newsreader... oh, well, another bug for it >:-)
I'm not convinced - I
On 10/06/11 03:30, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 06/09/2011 12:16 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> [snip]
>
> It's definite not Icedove per se, since Camaleón's name has always
> rendered correctly for me, even when I used Icedove.
>
> Bottom line is that something in your box is misconfigured.
Agreed. Spe
On Thursday 09 June 2011 19:10:40 Camaleón wrote:
> that Lisi bloke
I hope that that is a joke Not that I find it funny, but I would hate to
think that you were serious. :-)
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 03:16:12 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 10/06/11 02:01, Camaleón wrote:
Eureka! We have found the culprit!
It seems to be my Pan newsreader... oh, well, another bug for it >:-)
>> I would start thinking about Gmail's webmail.
>
> Pass - I'm
On 06/09/2011 12:16 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
[snip]
Pass - I'm thinking about changing email clients, just as soon as I can
figure out how to keep all my email, and, what's causing the encoding
problem.
It's definite not Icedove per se, since Camaleón's name has always
rendered correctly fo
On 10/06/11 02:01, Camaleón wrote:
> El 09/06/11 17:38, Scott Ferguson escribió:
>> On 10/06/11 00:16, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>>> �
>>
>>^ That's how Camaleón's name appears as the usually appears as sender
>> In this case there's four of them (black diamond with white question
>> ma
On 10/06/11 01:59, Lisi wrote:
> On Thursday 09 June 2011 16:38:25 Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> but it's consist with
>> the From string on the list, and it only affects him.
>
> I think that "him" should be "her". I'm sure trhat she will correct me if I
> am wrong!
>
> Lisi
>
>
Gee.
Thanks.
Lis
On 10/06/11 01:00, � - Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> And now?
>
>
>From "BlackDiamond - Ralf Mardord" in Icedove.
>From "Camaleón - Ralf Mardorf" on the list in Iceweasel:-
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2011/06/msg00684.html
Headers from Icedove:-
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Camale=F3n?= - Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 01:38:25 +1000
From: Scott Ferguson
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6
compatibility)
Resent-Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:39:14 + (UTC)
Resent-From
1 - 100 of 365 matches
Mail list logo
