On Tuesday 13 July 2004 08:13 pm, John Summerfield wrote:
> Is this correct?
>check_sender_access hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/sender_access
>check_sender_access hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/recipient_access
Nope. Good eye - I made an error when transcribing changes in my local config
to
Kirk Strauser wrote:
I've been following the thread about TMDA with some interest, mainly because
I recently started rejecting about 99.9% of incoming spam *without* using
challenge-response or other load-increasing methods. For details, read:
http://subwiki.honeypot.net/cgi-bin/view/Freebsd
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 14:00, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> On Tuesday 2004-07-13 11:49 am, Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> > I like your attitude Kirk. I have used many of your snippets/pages to
> > make things more workable in the WWOIT (Wonderful World Of Information
> > Technology)
>
> Thanks, Greg! I appre
On Tuesday 2004-07-13 01:17 pm, Steve Lamb wrote:
> As for my comment about false positives, here's one for you.
> Literally. Check your logs for this message I'm sending right to you (I
> normally trim out copies to the author) and see what it says. :D
You just encouraged me to make a long-ove
Kirk Strauser wrote:
> I feel badly that your ISP has taken on a spammer as a paying customer,
> and that it is causing problems for you and their other legitimate
> customers, but it seems as though the blacklist is returning accurate
> information.
Technically, yes. It is returning a broad
On Tuesday 2004-07-13 01:17 pm, Steve Lamb wrote:
> As well as legitimate mail. :)
Very little. Most of the filtering magic is via greylisting which has
proven to be remarkably effective.
> But that's only 1/2 the equation. False positives are far more
> destructive than false negatives. How
Kirk Strauser wrote:
> I've started using RulesDuJour, too. However, I really mean what I say in
> the comments: by the time email gets to the ClamAV/SpamAssassin phase, the
> vast majority (read: nearly all) of spam and viruses have already been
> filtered.
As well as legitimate mail. :)
On Tuesday 2004-07-13 11:49 am, Greg Folkert wrote:
> I like your attitude Kirk. I have used many of your snippets/pages to
> make things more workable in the WWOIT (Wonderful World Of Information
> Technology)
Thanks, Greg! I appreciate the feedback.
> I can say this, those .cf directives are
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 11:46, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> I've been following the thread about TMDA with some interest, mainly because
> I recently started rejecting about 99.9% of incoming spam *without* using
> challenge-response or other load-increasing methods. For details, read:
>
> http://s
Kirk Strauser wrote:
> In a nutshell, before implementing this plan, I was receiving about 600
> emails and 50 spams per day. Afterward, I'm receiving about 600 emails and
> 1 spam (yes, one) per day. In other words, I don't seem to be having any
> false positives at all.
Lots of good up
I've been following the thread about TMDA with some interest, mainly because
I recently started rejecting about 99.9% of incoming spam *without* using
challenge-response or other load-increasing methods. For details, read:
http://subwiki.honeypot.net/cgi-bin/view/Freebsd/FilterMailWithPostF
11 matches
Mail list logo
