Kirk Strauser wrote: > In a nutshell, before implementing this plan, I was receiving about 600 > emails and 50 spams per day. Afterward, I'm receiving about 600 emails and > 1 spam (yes, one) per day. In other words, I don't seem to be having any > false positives at all.
Lots of good up front common sense checks in there. An 3 bad ones:
# Blackhole lists
reject_rbl_client relays.ordb.org,
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
I'm of the opinion that RBL checks should provide weight to the argument
that a particular message should be rejected but not be sole test which can
pass or fail a message.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
