, please!
>
>Well, I'm not the OP, but I am somewhat interested more out of curiosity than
>any real intent to try the HURD.
>
>I suspect the following:
>
> * Libraries (and other software) in source form might be valid / work for
>either kernel, but they have to be c
I think that the Hurd has to boot from its own partition. You probably
could share some binaries with Linux, but why? It would just complicate
maintenance for both systems.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
'm not the OP, but I am somewhat interested more out of curiosity than
any real intent to try the HURD.
I suspect the following:
* Libraries (and other software) in source form might be valid / work for
either kernel, but they have to be compiled for the specific kernel they are to
be use
Marek Mosiewicz wrote:
> |Just asked if it is technically possible. Application do not call
> kernel directly and they are using glibc library for example. I'm just
> curios how many libraries are there for abstracting kernel and if it is
> possible in future release to have common libraries which
gt; W dniu 10.12.2018, pon o godzinie 13∶49 -0600, użytkownik John
> > Hasler
> > napisał:
> > > Hurd differs from Linux as much as Linux differs from Windows
> > > (maybe
> > > more). Put it on a seperate partition.
> >
> > That is probably best to do but
use a different partition for each of them.
Good luck.
On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 22:12 +0100, Marek Mosiewicz wrote:
> W dniu 10.12.2018, pon o godzinie 13∶49 -0600, użytkownik John Hasler
> napisał:
> > Hurd differs from Linux as much as Linux differs from Windows
> > (maybe
>
W dniu 10.12.2018, pon o godzinie 13∶49 -0600, użytkownik John Hasler
napisał:
> Hurd differs from Linux as much as Linux differs from Windows (maybe
> more). Put it on a seperate partition.
That is probably best to do but I do not agree that difference is so
big. There is Debian BSD,
Hurd differs from Linux as much as Linux differs from Windows (maybe
more). Put it on a seperate partition.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
W dniu 10.12.2018, pon o godzinie 15∶11 -0200, użytkownik Francisco M
Neto napisał:
> Either create a virtual machine (VirtualBox, qemu, etc) or find some
> space for a new partition. GNU/Hurd is an entirely different
> operating
> system and it will ruin you Debian installation i
I don't think it's just a matter of sharing libraries and system files.
This is not just another kernel version, it's an entirely different
kernel. A backup might not be enough, and even if it is, keep in mind
that every time you decide to switch from Hurd to Linux or vice-versa
y
Either create a virtual machine (VirtualBox, qemu, etc) or find some
space for a new partition. GNU/Hurd is an entirely different operating
system and it will ruin you Debian installation if you try to install
it in the same partition.
My 2¢.
[]'s,
--Francisco
On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 16:05
Hi,
I'm curios about HURD. I understand that it is already available in
sid. Is there any possibility to install it side by side with linux
kernel and having both options in GRUB ?
Are all libraries separate for HURD or just gnu abstraction layer ?
--
Gaining from harming others is str
Le 14.11.2014 11:14, Darac Marjal a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 09:51:42PM -0400, Jetro Costa wrote:
When Debian Hurd gona be ready for us for x64 plataform?
Probably when the upstream develops a 64-bit version. Which,
according
to [1], is currently never.
[1] https://www.gnu.org
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 09:51:42PM -0400, Jetro Costa wrote:
> When Debian Hurd gona be ready for us for x64 plataform?
Probably when the upstream develops a 64-bit version. Which, according
to [1], is currently never.
[1] https://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/faq/64-bit.html
>
>
&
When Debian Hurd gona be ready for us for x64 plataform?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1415929902.3579.1.camel@gordao300
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 12:26:33AM -0500, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >here i go, installing the hurd. I'll report back.
> >
> >If you don't hear from me by the spring, I'm either dead or found
> >paradise. Either way send whiske
* Dave Witbrodt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 Feb 05 23:31 -0600]:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >here i go, installing the hurd. I'll report back.
> >
> >If you don't hear from me by the spring, I'm either dead or found
> >paradise. Either way send
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
here i go, installing the hurd. I'll report back.
If you don't hear from me by the spring, I'm either dead or found
paradise. Either way send whiskey and reinforcements.
What hardware are you installing on? (Just curious.)
Dave W.
--
To UNS
here i go, installing the hurd. I'll report back.
If you don't hear from me by the spring, I'm either dead or found
paradise. Either way send whiskey and reinforcements.
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 06:31:46AM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Dec 06 01:25 -0600]:
>
> > I've been thinking about it, but haven't had the time. Do you now have
> > a working install? how about X?
>
> I would say that it is mostly working. So f
* Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Dec 06 01:25 -0600]:
> I've been thinking about it, but haven't had the time. Do you now have
> a working install? how about X?
I would say that it is mostly working. So far I haven't been able to
cleanly shutdown the system. It doesn't (yet) su
n community (yes, there's Debian
> GNU/kFreeBSD, but...). So, enter Debian GNU/HURD as an interesting
> diversion.
>
> It's not too problematic to get going, almost too easy as well, but no
> automatic installer and a bit of manual work is required. A lot of
> Unstable
Okay, so I'm bored.
Linux may be getting too complete, easy, and stable. ;-)
So, what's a geek to do? *BSD? Nawww, too mature, and I don't like to
wander too far away from the Debian community (yes, there's Debian
GNU/kFreeBSD, but...). So, enter Debian GNU/HURD as an i
On 2/21/06, Peter McAlpine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The biggest thing that seems to be holding up development has been the
> realization by key members of the project that the Mach kernel has
> fundamental flaws that do not support the long term goals of the Hurd.
> There was
an be done) it's not very useful yet. It also likely
wont be useful for quite a while.
Debian GNU/Hurd and vanilla GNU/Hurd are two different things. The
former uses Debian packages and the latter is usually a 'from-scratch'
environment (I'm told most developers run vmwar
On 2/9/06, Gabriel Parrondo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As Hurd is an official part of the GNU project, it's not GNU/Hurd, but GNU.
> I mean, if I use Windows with Linux (the kernel) it should be
> Windows/Linux. But if I use just Windows it's just windows, not
> &qu
debian wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:25:45PM +, John Halton wrote:
GNU/Hurd.
As Hurd is an official part of the GNU project, it's not GNU/Hurd, but GNU.
I mean, if I use Windows with Linux (the kernel) it should be
Windows/Linux. But if I use just Windows it's just wi
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 04:39:20PM +, debian wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:25:45PM +, John Halton wrote:
>
> > GNU/Hurd. There is a lot of work to do before we can make a release."
>
> But, what are its advantages of it over the Debian we know now and
&g
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 04:39:20PM +, debian wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:25:45PM +, John Halton wrote:
> > GNU/Hurd. There is a lot of work to do before we can make a release."
>
> But, what are its advantages of it over the Debian we know now and
> love so
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:25:45PM +, John Halton wrote:
> GNU/Hurd. There is a lot of work to do before we can make a release."
But, what are its advantages of it over the Debian we know now and
love so well ?
Joe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
On 03/02/06, Joseph Smidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been reading up on the GNU Hurd OS. Unfortunately most articles are
> several years old. I know Debian is actively assisting in the Hurd project.
> My question is, will Etch be released officially on the Hurd, or is th
I have been reading up on the GNU Hurd OS. Unfortunately most
articles are several years old. I know Debian is actively
assisting in the Hurd project. My question is, will Etch be
released officially on the Hurd, or is there any goals in the future
for when Debian/Hurd will be officially
On 10/30/05, Daniel Robitaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Have you read the L4-Hurd threads? What's going on there are some
> > discussions about some really advanced OS design concepts... it's like
> > a free computer science class. Just have a peak.
>
&g
Hello,
Have you read the L4-Hurd threads? What's going on there are some
discussions about some really advanced OS design concepts... it's like
a free computer science class. Just have a peak.
On Sunday 05 Jun 2005 22:21, Marty wrote:
> Funny you should mention it.
>
> I've been seriously considering writing or porting a driver for Hurd, just
> to get an idea of what microkernels are all about, and hopefully even help
> get the Hurd microkernel into wider usage.
nothing about driver authoring! Please help! (Any advices,
links would be appreciated!)
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/linuxdrive/
Might want to lookup the Linux Kernel Hacker's Guide, too. Alternatively, you
could just make it for HURD, instead ;)
Funny you should mention it.
I&#x
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Paul writes:
>> Has any read that a possible 283 patent violations could be in the
>> Linux kernel?
>
> Yes.
>
>> Does anyone know the possible ramifications of this?
>
> Not as dire as you think.
I wish I could share your optimism.
There is no lack of c
matt zagrabelny writes:
> regarding debian, i would guess that the BSD kernel would become viable
> sooner than a HURD kernel. it is already at production stability and has
> much more development behind it than HURD.
The BSD kernel likely has about as many potential patent infringemen
On Sat, 2004-08-07 at 16:29, Paul Tsai wrote:
> Has any read that a possible 283 patent violations could be in the Linux
> kernel? Does anyone know the possible ramifications of this? Also what
> do you feel the timeline is for Hurd to actually become the main kernel
> for Debian?
Paul writes:
> Has any read that a possible 283 patent violations could be in the Linux
> kernel?
Yes.
> Does anyone know the possible ramifications of this?
Not as dire as you think.
> Also what do you feel the timeline is for Hurd to actually become the
> main kernel for De
Has any read that a possible 283 patent violations could be in the Linux
kernel? Does anyone know the possible ramifications of this? Also what
do you feel the timeline is for Hurd to actually become the main kernel
for Debian? Or is that not a possibility.
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 06:31:15PM +0200, David Fokkema wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 08:49:41PM -0700, Ron Graves wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I have been installing the hurd on my box. I have a 2 gb slice for the root
> > and a 1 gb slice for swap. I have been installi
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 08:49:41PM -0700, Ron Graves wrote:
> Hello,
> I have been installing the hurd on my box. I have a 2 gb slice for the root
> and a 1 gb slice for swap. I have been installing via k5 iso. After failing
> to 'startx' I 'apt-get install lynx-
Hello,
I have been installing the hurd on my box. I have a 2 gb slice for the root
and a 1 gb slice for swap. I have been installing via k5 iso. After failing
to 'startx' I 'apt-get install lynx-cur' and begin googling for similar
trouble. I subscribed to this list in fa
; so long without an acknowlegement, but I just haven't had time to get
> back to playing with the Hurd/grub. Looks like your post will help a lot
> when I get back to it though; thanks!
your welcome:) Oh, and when you do make a grub flop like this, be sure
not to skip the above "dd ... cou
t --superverify /dev/fd0 hd
# dd if=/dev/null of=/dev/fd0 bs=512 count=1
# mke2fs /dev/fd0
# mount /floppy
# mkdir -p /floppy/boot/grub
# cp /usr/lib/grub/i386-pc/stage{1,2} /floppy/boot/grub
# cat >/flop py/boot/grub/menu.lst <
title The Hurd
root (hd0,0)
kernel
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:14:44PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
...
> I've wiped the drive and started over, and started a new, much cleaner
> document. It can be found at
> http://faculty.acu.edu/~westk/A_Beginners_Second_Attempt_to_Install_the_Hurd.html
looking at your scribbles, I noticed that one
e run into problems again, so I still can't report
> that the Hurd is usable. Give me time . . . .
Well, at least the installation part looked a _lot_ cleaner than on your
first attempt. So you're definately making progress! And you already
mentioned that the mailing list was a gre
At the risk of sounding smug, I managed to install the Hurd onto an Asus
L3 without too much trouble. I followed the "Installing the Hurd"
document by Neal Walfield and it all went well. I think (it was a while
ago) I did a little "ad libbing" but not much. It can be done!
David Fokkema wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 03:29:23PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
David Fokkema wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 02:20:00PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
I just installed the Hurd on a Gateway E-1800. It's a bare minimum
install, with lots of broken-ness.
And the
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 03:29:23PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> David Fokkema wrote:
>
> >On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 02:20:00PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I just installed the Hurd on a Gateway E-1800. It's a bare minimum
> >>install,
Aryan Ameri wrote:
On Thursday 29 May 2003 01:39, Kent West wrote:
It's about time for me to subscribe to the Debian-Hurd mailing list.
The regulars here on this list might be getting tired of seeing
Hurd-related stuff.
AFAIK this list's name is Debian-user, it doesn'
> -Original Message-
> From: Aryan Ameri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 4:45 PM
> To: debian users
> Subject: Re: The Hurd
>
> Sure, debian-hurd is more specific, but I don't consider Hurd
> stuff OT
> here. And last t
On Thursday 29 May 2003 01:39, Kent West wrote:
> deFreese, Barry wrote:
> >>deFreese, Barry wrote:
> >>>>From: Kent West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>>I just installed the Hurd on a Gateway E-1800. It's a bare
> >>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kent West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 3:55 PM
> To: debian users
> Subject: Re: The Hurd
>
>
> deFreese, Barry wrote:
>
> >>deFreese, Barry wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
deFreese, Barry wrote:
deFreese, Barry wrote:
From: Kent West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just installed the Hurd on a Gateway E-1800. It's a bare minimum
install, with lots of broken-ness.
Which ISO did you use, K3??
The latest should be K3. DId you look here?
On Wednesday 28 May 2003 22:48, David Fokkema wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 02:20:00PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> > I just installed the Hurd on a Gateway E-1800. It's a bare minimum
> > install, with lots of broken-ness.
> >
> > And they say installing Debian GNU
> -Original Message-
> From: Kent West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:01 PM
> To: debian users
> Subject: Re: The Hurd
>
>
> deFreese, Barry wrote:
>
> >>From: Kent West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
deFreese, Barry wrote:
From: Kent West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just installed the Hurd on a Gateway E-1800. It's a bare minimum
install, with lots of broken-ness.
Which ISO did you use, K3?? If so, let me know if your network applications
such as ping, cvs, telnet, ftp, etc
David Fokkema wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 02:20:00PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
I just installed the Hurd on a Gateway E-1800. It's a bare minimum
install, with lots of broken-ness.
And they say installing Debian GNU/Linux is hard. Debian GNU/Linux is a
piece of cake. If anyone
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 02:20:00PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> I just installed the Hurd on a Gateway E-1800. It's a bare minimum
> install, with lots of broken-ness.
>
> And they say installing Debian GNU/Linux is hard. Debian GNU/Linux is a
> piece of cake. If anyone ever
> -Original Message-
> From: Kent West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:35 PM
> To: debian users
> Subject: OT: The Hurd
>
>
> I just installed the Hurd on a Gateway E-1800. It's a bare minimum
> install, with lots of broken-ne
I just installed the Hurd on a Gateway E-1800. It's a bare minimum
install, with lots of broken-ness.
And they say installing Debian GNU/Linux is hard. Debian GNU/Linux is a
piece of cake. If anyone ever complains about how hard it is to install
Debian again, point 'em to the Hurd
I am trying to get a running Debian/GNU/Hurd system , nad
had some problems with grub and with the partition.
I will outline what I did :
- downloaded the hurd base system.
- I have a ext3 partition that I think I can do away with .
mke2fs -o hurd /dev/hda11
IIRC this hda11 appears in the
urces.list to
another file, touched a new sources.list... apt-cdrom add-ed disk 1 from
this set... apt-get update then apt-get -s upgrade ... love the -s!
so, the upgrade list is huge... my concern is that the packages mention
hurd on a lot of them, such as:
less[less from hurd]
in the c
Isaac Aranda Nebot wrote:
Por favor, ¿dónde podría encontrar información sobre el nuevo Kernel
GNU/HURD? y ¿dónde podría bajármelo? Muchas gracias.
http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd.html
--
Jerome
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 10:52:37PM +0200, Isaac Aranda Nebot wrote:
| Por favor, ¿dónde podría encontrar información sobre el nuevo Kernel
| GNU/HURD? y ¿dónde podría bajármelo? Muchas gracias.
Check out the 'debian-hurd' mailing list. Be aware though that the
people on it may not kn
Por favor, ¿dónde podría encontrar información
sobre el nuevo Kernel GNU/HURD? y ¿dónde podría bajármelo? Muchas
gracias.
contrib
> non-free
> deb http://sunsite.tut.fi/ftp/Mirror/debian/kde.tdyc.com/pub potato main
> optional crypto qt1apps
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
>
> and ran
> apt-get -s dist-upgrade
>
> Now I am confused about this me
contrib non-free
and ran
apt-get -s dist-upgrade
Now I am confused about this message:
Inst shellutils [shellutils on hurd] []
Conf shellutils []
and so on with all packages...
Does that mean, that apt will install hurd-packages?
I am running stable for i386.
--
Brot für die Welt
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:08:00 +0100, studenten wg wrote:
>everything works fine but i just wanted to know what it means...
"Hurd" is a GNU operating system, it probably just means the program you're
installing is contained in the "shellutils" package under Hurd (alt
hi
does anyone know what the "shellutils on hurd" thing means when i do a
apt-get -s install somepackage ??
for example...
--
apt-get -s install ssh
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
ssh
0 package
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 01:24:58AM +0100, wolfman wrote:
|
|La cuestión es donde puedo encontrar el kernel para bajarmelo???
|
I don't understand much Spanish (no hablo mucho espanol), but maybe
this will help :
http://www.debian.org/ports/hurd/
-D
La cuestión es donde puedo encontrar el kernel para
bajarmelo???
t -s
>> >dist-upgrade | less`. While looking at the output I see a lot of
>> >packages marked "[shellutils on hurd]" such as
>> >
>> >---snip---
>> >Inst gcc [shellutils on hurd]
>>
>> See my explanation of this in the "Debian GN
.list to point to testing and did `apt-get -s
> > >dist-upgrade | less`. While looking at the output I see a lot of
> > >packages marked "[shellutils on hurd]" such as
> > >
> > >---snip---
> > >Inst gcc [shellutils on hurd]
> >
> > See my
king at the output I see a lot of
> >packages marked "[shellutils on hurd]" such as
> >
> >---snip---
> >Inst gcc [shellutils on hurd]
>
> See my explanation of this in the "Debian GNU/Hurd?" thread on this
> mailing list recently.
Is there an archive f
Viktor Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>another question regarding `apt-get dist-upgrade`.
>
>I have modified my sources.list to point to testing and did `apt-get -s
>dist-upgrade | less`. While looking at the output I see a lot of
>packages marked "[shellutils on
Hello,
another question regarding `apt-get dist-upgrade`.
I have modified my sources.list to point to testing and did `apt-get -s
dist-upgrade | less`. While looking at the output I see a lot of
packages marked "[shellutils on hurd]" such as
---snip---
Inst gcc [shellutils on
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
>> csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >From a tip given somewhere on this list, I typed:
>> >
>> ># apt-get dist-upgrade -s
>> >
>> >And lo and behold cam
Actually, I think it's just a minor bug in apt-get. I see it too even
though I'm not running hurd, it mentions hurd in brackets with the -s
option. I've never worried about it, since it provides the need
functionality - telling me what packages will be upgraded.
On Wed, 17 Jan 200
csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From a tip given somewhere on this list, I typed:
>
># apt-get dist-upgrade -s
>
>And lo and behold came the following output:
[...]
>Inst diff [shellutils on hurd]
[...]
>What does the "shellutils on hurd" mean?
The shellu
>From a tip given somewhere on this list, I typed:
# apt-get dist-upgrade -s
And lo and behold came the following output:
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
6 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not
upgraded.
Inst diff [shellutils on hurd]
Conf diff
I
For a long while now most (but not all) of the packages that I see
listed by things like "apt-get -s install" all have "[shellutils on
hurd]" shown on the line after them:
Inst xsok [shellutils on hurd]
Inst xterm [shellutils on hurd]
Inst xtoolwait [shellutils o
OK, sorry for the last email. Found my problem: I mistakenly had my
sources.list file set for unstable. Glad I didn't do the dist-upgrade and
move to unstable by accident. However, still perplexed by the [shellutils
on hurd]. Anyone know what this means?
Thanks,
Bryan
On Tue, 22 Aug
little
confused. Apt-get wants to upgrade 86 packages and next to each of the
package names, it says [sheellutils on hurd]. Now, I don't have the hurd
installed on my computer currently. I did in the past, but that partition
is no longer in existence. What does this mean?
Thanks,
Bryan
Mark Sanchez wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Is there anybody out there ?
>
> sorry, too much pink floyd!,
>
> Is there anybody out there using HURD ??
>
> Im curious about this kernel(?), has anyone got it
> working?.
>
> Is it compatible with Linux executables?.
Hi.
Is there anybody out there ?
sorry, too much pink floyd!,
Is there anybody out there using HURD ??
Im curious about this kernel(?), has anyone got it
working?.
Is it compatible with Linux executables?.
Bye for now. Mark.
__
Do You Yahoo
;
>> Lately when I've been doing 'apt-get -s dist-upgrade' on my woody system
>> I often get dozens of things like
>>
>> Inst kernel-package [shellutils on hurd]
>>
>> Can someone tell me what this means? Thanks.
>>
>> Dan
>>
ist-upgrade' on my woody
> > system I often get dozens of things like
> >
> > Inst kernel-package [shellutils on hurd]
> >
> > Can someone tell me what this means? Thanks.
> >
> > Dan
Something to do with the Hurd port?? Did anything bad happen?
--
¶ One·should·only·use·the·ASCII·characterset·when·compos
» ing·email·messages.
On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 12:41:52AM +0200, Ron Rademaker wrote:
> I got no idea what it means, but: Why the hell are you trying to do a
> dist-upgrade when you are running
> woody!?!?!?!??!?!?!!!
"dist-upgrade" does not simply mean "upgrade from one release to another".
It means
stem
> I often get dozens of things like
>
> Inst kernel-package [shellutils on hurd]
>
> Can someone tell me what this means? Thanks.
>
> Dan
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
>
Lately when I've been doing 'apt-get -s dist-upgrade' on my woody system
I often get dozens of things like
Inst kernel-package [shellutils on hurd]
Can someone tell me what this means? Thanks.
Dan
Try debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
or help-hurd@gnu.org
Visit the webpage
http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/getting-help.html#contents
Ali.
On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, John Foster wrote:
> I am trying to locate mailing lists for Debian HURD users or an active
> news group?? Anyone know
I am trying to locate mailing lists for Debian HURD users or an active
news group?? Anyone know of any??
--
AdVance-Computing Systems
We sell fine quality servers and workstations.
We specialize in multiprocessor units.
We install Debian Linux at no extra charge!
John Foster
I tried upgrading my woody system using apt-get, and I noticed that apt-get
produces the following strange output:
16 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded.
Inst shellutils [shellutils on hurd]
Inst base-files [shellutils on hurd]
Inst lilo [shellutils on hurd
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 11:56:02AM +0200, Arjen v. V. wrote:
> I've downloaded all the binary files for Debian Hurd, now i wan't to install
> them but i can't find anything to install it wit.
> I've momentarely no linux on my comp. installed. Does anybody know ho
Hi all,
I've downloaded all the binary files for Debian Hurd, now i wan't to install
them but i can't find anything to install it wit.
I've momentarely no linux on my comp. installed. Does anybody know how i can
install it, whitout first installing an other Linux versio
On Fri, 23 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've read binutils 2.9.1-0.2 is broken or faulty, and the suggestion is
> to get 2.9.1-0.3
> I found the package in ftp.debian.org/.../sid/main/bin/binary-hurd-i386
> what's the reason behind adding "hurd" to binar
I've read binutils 2.9.1-0.2 is broken or faulty, and the suggestion is
to get 2.9.1-0.3
I found the package in ftp.debian.org/.../sid/main/bin/binary-hurd-i386
what's the reason behind adding "hurd" to binary-i386?
is it safe to install that package from sid?
TIA
Horacio
--
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
