On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 12:04:34PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 01:50:04AM -0500, Michael Heironimus wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:11:02AM -0500, Christopher L. Everett wrote:
> > > Can anyone tell me if Gnome in Testing is anywhere near usable?
> >
> > When I last
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:02:31AM -0600, user list wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 12:04:34PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Some of the blockages to this are disappearing as I type; lots more
> > GNOME packages will be in testing today, and gdbm should make it
> > tomorrow. There's a build probl
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 01:50:04AM -0500, Michael Heironimus wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:11:02AM -0500, Christopher L. Everett wrote:
> > Can anyone tell me if Gnome in Testing is anywhere near usable?
>
> When I last looked it was usable, but not complete. The migration from
> GNOME 1 to
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:11:02AM -0500, Christopher L. Everett wrote:
> Can anyone tell me if Gnome in Testing is anywhere near usable?
When I last looked it was usable, but not complete. The migration from
GNOME 1 to 2 isn't all that smooth, several big components went through
but now it's goin
Can anyone tell me if Gnome in Testing is anywhere
near usable?
I'm using sid, but frankly I'm being distracted from doing real
work: I find both the Mozilla Navigator and Mozilla ThunderBird
browsers pretty well unusable, & I'm having a hard time getting
real work done--I think stepping b
]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: Gnome2 in testing - any chances?
> Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > DvB sez:
> > } The only real problem I have with gnome1.4 is that it appears to want
to
> > } create a new pager for e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Once upon a time René Seindal wrote @ Tue, 18 Feb 2003 00:11:33 +0100
> Will I be better of reverting to stable and use the backport than 'risk'
> an upgrade to unstable?
>
Why don't you compile from source ?
Using garnome 0.21.0 on a woody box with
Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> DvB sez:
> } The only real problem I have with gnome1.4 is that it appears to want to
> } create a new pager for every "workspace" I create with sawfish, so I've
> } ended up having one workspace and adding an extra row/column to it.
>
> Eh? I don't k
DvB sez:
} Derrick 'dman' Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
} > On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:11:33AM +0100, René Seindal wrote:
} > | Is gnome2 worth the hassle?
} > No. (IMO)
}
} Does this mean that, once gnome2 gets into testing, we're all screwed?
Um, well, depends on your point of view. I was
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 21:04, DvB wrote:
> Derrick 'dman' Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:11:33AM +0100, René Seindal wrote:
> >
> > | Is gnome2 worth the hassle?
> >
> > No. (IMO)
> >
>
> Does this mean that, once gnome2 gets into testing, we're all screwed
Derrick 'dman' Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:11:33AM +0100, René Seindal wrote:
>
> | Is gnome2 worth the hassle?
>
> No. (IMO)
>
Does this mean that, once gnome2 gets into testing, we're all screwed?
I keep hearing about how much less configurable gnome2 is
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:11:33AM +0100, René Seindal wrote:
| Are there any chances that gnome2 will make it into testing within, say,
| a few months?
There is a chance, yes. ;-).
| Will I be better of reverting to stable and use the backport than 'risk'
| an upgrade to unstable?
Probably, o
Hi,
I use testing and hence Gnome1. Some day I'd like to try out Gnome2,
but I am a bit reluctant to switch to unstable, as I have work to do,
and need a usable desktop.
Are there any chances that gnome2 will make it into testing within, say,
a few months?
Will I be better of reverting to stabl
13 matches
Mail list logo
