On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 11:51:02PM +0300, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
> On 5/2/22 23:25, michaelmorgan...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Can anyone kindly instruct me how to install gcc-6 in Debian 11? I need
> > compile a software and was hinted gcc version (10) is too high. I have
> > o
On 5/2/22 23:25, michaelmorgan...@gmail.com wrote:
> Can anyone kindly instruct me how to install gcc-6 in Debian 11? I need
> compile a software and was hinted gcc version (10) is too high. I have
> old machine with gcc 6 and was able to compile it there.
>
It seems that Debian 9
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 03:25:20PM -0500, michaelmorgan...@gmail.com wrote:
> Can anyone kindly instruct me how to install gcc-6 in Debian 11? I need
> compile a software and was hinted gcc version (10) is too high. I have
> old machine with gcc 6 and was able to compile it there.
Sto
Can anyone kindly instruct me how to install gcc-6 in Debian 11? I need
compile a software and was hinted gcc version (10) is too high. I have
old machine with gcc 6 and was able to compile it there.
Thank you very much.
Michael
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 10:36:57PM +0100, Steve Keller wrote:
> On debian bullseye I have installed GCC but don't find any manual page.
> What am I missing?
>
You'll need to add 'contrib' and 'non-free' to your sources and then
install the gcc-doc pack
On debian bullseye I have installed GCC but don't find any manual page.
What am I missing?
Steve
On Vi, 10 dec 21, 17:17:24, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 12:41:01PM +0100, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> > At the very least Debian could split non-free into sections or add more
> > areas (non-free firmware being another obvious candidate for splitting
> > out).
> >
>
> Do w
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 12:41:01PM +0100, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 31 oct 21, 17:37:10, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > > This is because GNU releases their documentation under a different license
> > > than their source code. And Debian considers the GNU documentation
> > > license to be non-free
On Du, 31 oct 21, 17:37:10, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > This is because GNU releases their documentation under a different license
> > than their source code. And Debian considers the GNU documentation
> > license to be non-free (rightly so, because it prohibits distributing
> > modified versions).
On Du, 07 nov 21, 08:08:51, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Paul M. Foster wrote:
>
> > Folks:
> >
> > I'm sure everyone but me knows this, but I can't find a man
> > page for gcc.
>
> Everyone knows it ... but this question has still been asked
> one zi
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021, 5:05 PM Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2021 31 Oct 16:27 -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>
> > The info command is what you want for gcc. You may need to install the
> > package for gcc info files. Another set of commands you might need info
> > file
* On 2021 31 Oct 16:27 -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> The info command is what you want for gcc. You may need to install the
> package for gcc info files. Another set of commands you might need info
> files for are coreutils. Try "info coreutils".
While info is probabl
Paul M. Foster wrote:
> Folks:
>
> I'm sure everyone but me knows this, but I can't find a man page for gcc.
> There must be some docs somewhere. First question: why isn't there a man
> page? Second question: what docs are available (or what package provides
> t
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021, 4:07 PM Paul M. Foster
wrote:
> Folks:
>
> I'm sure everyone but me knows this, but I can't find a man page for
> gcc. There must be some docs somewhere. First question: why isn't there
> a man page? Second question: what docs are available (o
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 04:58:34PM -0400, Paul M. Foster wrote:
> I'm sure everyone but me knows this, but I can't find a man page for gcc.
> There must be some docs somewhere. First question: why isn't there a man
> page? Second question: what docs are available (or what
Folks:
I'm sure everyone but me knows this, but I can't find a man page for
gcc. There must be some docs somewhere. First question: why isn't there
a man page? Second question: what docs are available (or what package
provides them)? Running Debian 11.
Paul
On 2021-09-03 12:24 +0200, Piotr A. Dybczyński wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in contrary to previous versions, now in Debian 11 with gcc-10:
>
> gcc aa.c -lm -o aa works, but
>
> gcc -lm aa.c -o aa does not work, saying:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccWyhudO.o: in fun
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 12:59:27PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 02:12:46PM +0100, Tixy wrote:
> > > A man page a found online [1] says linking happens as Greg described,
> > > and this is true looking at a 6 year old copy of that page on
> > > archive.org. So seems strange
use
the non-option ".bashrc" terminates option processing. All remaining
arguments are to be treated as files or directories.)
All I can speculate is that GNU ld (the linker that gcc uses) must have
had some tweaks done to it over the years, and now has settled back into
its original behav
On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 14:10 +0100, Tixy wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 12:24 +0200, Piotr A. Dybczyński wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > in contrary to previous versions, now in Debian 11 with gcc-10:
> >
> > gcc aa.c -lm -o aa works, but
> >
> &g
On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 12:24 +0200, Piotr A. Dybczyński wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in contrary to previous versions, now in Debian 11 with gcc-10:
>
> gcc aa.c -lm -o aa works, but
>
> gcc -lm aa.c -o aa does not work, saying:
[...]
> It seems that an option
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 12:24:39PM +0200, Piotr A. Dybczyński wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in contrary to previous versions, now in Debian 11 with gcc-10:
>
> gcc aa.c -lm -o aa works, but
>
> gcc -lm aa.c -o aa does not work, saying:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: /
Hi,
in contrary to previous versions, now in Debian 11 with gcc-10:
gcc aa.c -lm -o aa works, but
gcc -lm aa.c -o aa does not work, saying:
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccWyhudO.o: in function `main':
aa.c:(.text+0x1f): undefined reference to `sqrt'
collect2: error: ld
Mikhail Morfikov wrote:
> I know, but have you ever seen the debian/ dir in the gcc sources? Take a
> look here[1].
>
Until now I have not, but what is exactly the problem?
You have what you need in the beginning
include debian/rules.defs
include debian/rules.unpack
include debian/ru
an/ dir I should change
>> to build the GCC for my machine only. Any suggestions? Also how to
>> include/exclude patches so they were applied to the source -- there's no
>> "debian/patches/series" file.
>
> usually it is in debian/rules (this is the debians
Mikhail Morfikov wrote:
> I've read something about setting flags like: --enable-languages= or
> --disable-multilib , which I think would speed the whole process up, but
> unfortunately I have no idea which file in the debian/ dir I should change
> to build the GCC for my
I wanted to change the GCC source a little bit by adding some patches that
aren't available in Debian. I downloaded the Debian GCC source via "apt-get
source" . I tried to build the source in the Debian way (using pbuilder) just
to test how much time would it take. I gave up a
Franco Martelli, on 2019-08-20:
> mm/memory.o: warning: objtool: remap_pfn_range()+0xd5: unsupported
> intra-function call
>
> that it's part of linux-kbuild-4.19 package maybe I should submit a bug
> report to this package or is another one a better choice?
Hi Franco,
Should you submit a bug re
On 19/08/19 at 21:18, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Franco Martelli, on 2019-08-19:
>> I was thinking to submit a bug report against gcc-8 package. Now that I
>> have a work around, "bdver1" compiles without warnings, I can say
>> enough, what do you think about?
>
&g
Franco Martelli, on 2019-08-19:
> I was thinking to submit a bug report against gcc-8 package. Now that I
> have a work around, "bdver1" compiles without warnings, I can say
> enough, what do you think about?
I don't know, to me it sounds more like little bugs on kernel
I was thinking to submit a bug report against gcc-8 package. Now that I
have a work around, "bdver1" compiles without warnings, I can say
enough, what do you think about?
Best regards
--
Franco Martelli
Franco Martelli, on 2019-08-16:
> On 16/08/19 at 17:22, Étienne Mollier wrote:
[...]
> > Compilers may have good optimization routines to boost the speed
> > of the code in several situations, but in other ones there are
> > trade-offs to take between size and performance of the code. I
> > person
> were a tremendous amount of warnings too, but some of the ones
> you encountered did not appear: the thing with the missing jump
> target for instance, nor the ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE on the
> retpoline thing. I am running Debian Sid, currently shipping
> with Gcc 9, so
line thing. I am running Debian Sid, currently shipping
with Gcc 9, so this is a difference to take in account though.
Finally, building an upstream Linux 5.2 kernel instead of
Buster's 4.19 does not show most of the warnings I encountered,
as these are being fixed as they come, but probably no
On 13/08/19 at 19:35, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Hi Franco,
>
> I'm not fluent enough in GCC 8 for x86_64 to answer to all the
> various warnings you indicated. Some may be harmless, and some
> may eat your data. I would do a few tests with a virtual
> machine support
ed warnings...]
> what does it means? Is there a way to get the kernel optimized for my
> CPU as it happened in the previous Debian versions?
Hi Franco,
I'm not fluent enough in GCC 8 for x86_64 to answer to all the
various warnings you indicated. Some may be harmless, and some
may ea
Hi, everybody
in order to achieve Linux kernel optimized for my CPU AMD FX-8350
Bulldozer2 I changed the line 121 of linux-source-4.19/arch/x86/Makefile
from:
cflags-$(CONFIG_MK8) += $(call cc-option,-march=k8)
to:
cflags-$(CONFIG_MK8) += $(call cc-option,-march=bdver2) \
$(call
On 07/22/2018 02:20 PM, Joe wrote:
...snip...
At the level of the Arduino, and what it is used for, the C required
isn't going to differ too much from Python. You're mostly going to
be bit-banging. If you know one modern procedural language, you can at
least potter around in others quite easily
format is the same on both), select the board you
have, plug it into a serial port (USB/serial chip these days) and
you're away. The Arduino board has a built-in bootloader, meaning you
don't need a specialist programmer, just a serial port.
>
> After watching some YouTube tutoria
On 7/21/18, cyaiplexys wrote:
> On 07/21/2018 07:36 PM, deloptes wrote:
>> Hi, how old are you?
>> The way you wrote is supposing you are New Gen kid.
>
> Why thank you! :) Actually, physically I'm over half a century old. I
> just try to keep a young mind. I'm a New Gen kid to all this new tech
>
to perform real-time tasks.
After watching some YouTube tutorials, I am starting to see that. The
IDE isn't "real" C in that you're not directly compiling using gcc from
the command line. It does everything for you behind the scenes. Not used
to that since my old Windows da
On 22.07.18 10:29, cyaiplexys wrote:
> I think my mindset also came from my days of trying to program the WowWee
> RoboSapien RS Media (ARM/Linux with Java). That was like a fully
> programmable computer and robot all in one.
Then the full arduino environment will be more comfortable than raw C on
might
forget a year or two later. For my own hobbies, I just get curious about
some of the "new" (I know this stuff has been around awhile) technology
out there and like to see how it all works.
It might be also worth learning some C.
I had done some C programming now and then (K &a
rce and upload it to the
Arduino board. I would like to use gcc.
Is there a cross-platform compiler for Arduino and gcc that anyone
has had experience with that works or they can recommend?
Or some way to program in Python?
Sure if I was going there I wouldn't be after starting fr
cyaiplexys wrote:
> Well, since I use Debian I assumed this would be a place to ask what to
> get from the Debian repo that would help in achieving my goal. But you
> do make a good point. I'll have to find some Arduino forums to ask some
> questions in because I'm quite sure I'll have a lot of th
nrelated) and even compiled them to .so (binary) using the 'cython'
> compiler.
>
> While I could create C source of a Python script using cython, I
> don't know how to compile the resulting C source and upload it to the
> Arduino board. I would like to use gcc.
>
> I
.so (binary) using the 'cython'
compiler.
While I could create C source of a Python script using cython, I don't
know how to compile the resulting C source and upload it to the
Arduino board. I would like to use gcc.
Is there a cross-platform compiler for Arduino and gcc that anyon
On 07/21/2018 07:36 PM, deloptes wrote:
Hi, how old are you?
The way you wrote is supposing you are New Gen kid.
Why thank you! :) Actually, physically I'm over half a century old. I
just try to keep a young mind. I'm a New Gen kid to all this new tech
stuff though.
Anyway few answers inli
hile I could create C source of a Python script using cython, I don't
know how to compile the resulting C source and upload it to the Arduino
board. I would like to use gcc.
Is there a cross-platform compiler for Arduino and gcc that anyone has
had experience with that works or they can
' compiler.
>
More to learn -> add to the list
> While I could create C source of a Python script using cython, I don't
> know how to compile the resulting C source and upload it to the Arduino
> board. I would like to use gcc.
>
More to learn -> add to the list
n script using cython, I don't
know how to compile the resulting C source and upload it to the Arduino
board. I would like to use gcc.
Is there a cross-platform compiler for Arduino and gcc that anyone has
had experience with that works or they can recommend?
Or some way to program in P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 08:35:29AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > Took out mk-sbuild for a whirl. What I didn't like at all: when you
> > invoke a command and it goes out and starts installing packages fo
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> Took out mk-sbuild for a whirl. What I didn't like at all: when you
> invoke a command and it goes out and starts installing packages for
> you (and doing other assorted sysadmin tasks).
You can do everything that mk-sbuild does for you manually, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 01:06:27PM +0200, Irek Szcześniak wrote:
> I tried schroot in a different way, as described here:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/Schroot
>
> As part of the process, you install a complete, fresh Buster with:
>
> debootstrap bust
I tried schroot in a different way, as described here:
https://wiki.debian.org/Schroot
As part of the process, you install a complete, fresh Buster with:
debootstrap buster /srv/chroot/buster
So this solution is like a container.
Best,
Irek
On 14.06.2018 12:47, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 08:37:57AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Irek Szcześniak wrote:
> > Thanks for pointing out pbuilder, I think I'll give it a try. I also might
> > want to try virtual containers, but it seems like an overki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:44:59AM +0200, Irek Szcześniak wrote:
> Tomás, thank you again for your email.
>
> I didn't finally try pbuilder, because compiling GCC solved my
> problem. If something goes wrong, I'll use schroot.
Tomás, thank you again for your email.
I didn't finally try pbuilder, because compiling GCC solved my problem.
If something goes wrong, I'll use schroot. Thanks for pointing out
pbuilder, it may come handy one day!
Best,
Irek
On 13.06.2018 12:20, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Thank you, Don, for your advice!
I tried schroot, and it's awesome! I followed the steps on:
https://wiki.debian.org/Schroot
I was able to build my code just as on Buster. The difference between
schroot and chroot is that with schroot you have assess to the files
outside the root directory
Georgi, thank you for you email.
I gave it a try. On Stretch, GCC 8.1 compiled and installed cleanly. I
put the path to the gcc binary (/usr/local/gcc-8.1.0/bin) in my PATH,
and I compiled and ran my code without any other configuration. I
expected some linking problems, but the binary
On 06/13/2018 11:04 AM, Irek Szcześniak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need GCC 7 on my Debian Stretch. Previously I upgraded my Stretch to
> Testing (Buster), but I ran to some problems, and reinstalled the system
> back to Stretch.
>
> Could someone offer an advice on how to get a wo
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Irek Szcześniak wrote:
> Thanks for pointing out pbuilder, I think I'll give it a try. I also might
> want to try virtual containers, but it seems like an overkill.
You might also try out schroot.
Something like:
apt-get install schroot ubuntu-dev-tools;
mk-sbuild unstable;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 12:06:21PM +0200, Irek Szcześniak wrote:
> Thanks, Tomás, for your email.
>
> I should have written before that I don't want the GCC 7 to be a
> system-wide compiler, along with libraries and some other
>
Thanks, Tomás, for your email.
I should have written before that I don't want the GCC 7 to be a
system-wide compiler, along with libraries and some other dependencies.
I need GCC 7 to compile my own code (C++17) that I run. I don't need to
distribute the binaries.
Yes, GCC 7 is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:04:25AM +0200, Irek Szcześniak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need GCC 7 on my Debian Stretch. Previously I upgraded my Stretch
> to Testing (Buster), but I ran to some problems, and reinstalled the
> system
Hi,
I need GCC 7 on my Debian Stretch. Previously I upgraded my Stretch to
Testing (Buster), but I ran to some problems, and reinstalled the system
back to Stretch.
Could someone offer an advice on how to get a working GCC 7 on Debian
Stretch, without upgrading to Testing?
Thanks &
On Tue 20 Mar 2018 at 23:18:29 (+0100), Neo wrote:
> Hey folks
>
> I've had a setup with xtables-addons running (on jessie with
> standard repos), especially the geoip module in this case. The
> normal upgrade path installed gcc-4.9 and broke my dkms setup and in
> turn m
Hey folks
I've had a setup with xtables-addons running (on jessie with standard
repos), especially the geoip module in this case. The normal upgrade
path installed gcc-4.9 and broke my dkms setup and in turn my iptables
setup. So it fell back on my fail2ban protection against ssh sc
Hi.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 05:57:59PM +, Bas Ali wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Just to need help for what concerning to build or/and install an older GCC on
> a new Debian Distro (e.g 8.8 or 9.3)
> The goal is to be able to compile and build binaries on the New Debian with
&g
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 05:57:59PM +, Bas Ali wrote:
> Just to need help for what concerning to build or/and install an older GCC on
> a new Debian Distro (e.g 8.8 or 9.3)
> The goal is to be able to compile and build binaries on the New Debian with
> an older GCC to keep backc
Hi,
Just to need help for what concerning to build or/and install an older GCC on a
new Debian Distro (e.g 8.8 or 9.3)
The goal is to be able to compile and build binaries on the New Debian with an
older GCC to keep backcompatibility of binaries program previously built on
Debian 7 (32bits
On 27/01/2018 22:47, Michael Lange wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 22:30:06 +0530
"tv.deb...@googlemail.com" wrote:
Hi, you need to read the kernel-package doc, it requires configuration.
Read at the minimum /usr/share/doc/kernel-package/README.gz
It contains all the info you need, and even gi
Hi,
On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 22:30:06 +0530
"tv.deb...@googlemail.com" wrote:
> Hi, you need to read the kernel-package doc, it requires configuration.
> Read at the minimum /usr/share/doc/kernel-package/README.gz
> It contains all the info you need, and even gives you hints as to how
> to configure
On 27/01/2018 20:30, Michael Fothergill wrote:
On 27 January 2018 at 13:38, Michael Lange wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:12:13 +
Michael Fothergill wrote:
I think I will sign up on the gcc gnu help page and ask people if they
have a test case file I can run to 100% confirm the GCC
On 27 January 2018 at 13:38, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:12:13 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > I think I will sign up on the gcc gnu help page and ask people if they
> > have a test case file I can run to 100% confirm the GCC 8 compi
On 27 January 2018 at 13:38, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:12:13 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > I think I will sign up on the gcc gnu help page and ask people if they
> > have a test case file I can run to 100% confirm the GCC 8 compi
On 27 January 2018 at 13:38, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:12:13 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > I think I will sign up on the gcc gnu help page and ask people if they
> > have a test case file I can run to 100% confirm the GCC 8 compi
On 27 January 2018 at 13:17, Michael Lange wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 12:32:24 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > On 27 January 2018 at 11:59, Michael Lange wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 11:26:25 +
> > > Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Where wo
Hi,
On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:12:13 +
Michael Fothergill wrote:
> I think I will sign up on the gcc gnu help page and ask people if they
> have a test case file I can run to 100% confirm the GCC 8 compiler is
> running properly.
> Once I am convinced it is then the next stage
it in some funny directory (even
> > /tmp?) no one has ever heard of.
> >
> > I would be grateful for suggestions here.
> >
> > Could there be a bug in gcc 8 that made it forget to actually output the
> > file?
>
> I don't think that gcc is to bla
On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 12:32:24 +
Michael Fothergill wrote:
> On 27 January 2018 at 11:59, Michael Lange wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 11:26:25 +
> > Michael Fothergill wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Where would the default location of such a file be if were created
> > > using the
It does seem as if make-kpkg has gone awol here.
MF
it in some funny directory (even
> > /tmp?) no one has ever heard of.
> >
> > I would be grateful for suggestions here.
> >
> > Could there be a bug in gcc 8 that made it forget to actually output the
> > file?
>
> I don't think that gcc is to blame.
On 27 January 2018 at 11:59, Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 11:26:25 +
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> >
> > Where would the default location of such a file be if were created using
> > the make-kpkg command?
>
> the package should be in the source's parent directory, in
.0-rc9-klappnase270118-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb
>
> Maybe Greg could think some find command that would search everywhere in
> the install I have here and then find it in some funny directory (even
> /tmp?) no one has ever heard of.
>
> I would be grateful for suggestions here.
>
>
5 open-vm-tools-10.1.5
> root@mikef-PC:/usr/src#
>
>
> Should the filename be something like linux-image-4.14.14.deb etc?
>
> Maybe Greg could think some find command that would search everywhere in
> the install I have here and then find it in some funny directory (even
> /
of.
I would be grateful for suggestions here.
Could there be a bug in gcc 8 that made it forget to actually output the
file?
Thanks
MF
>
> Regards
>
> Michael
>
>
> .-.. .. ...- . .-.. --- -. --. .- -. -.. .--. .-. --- ... .--. . .-.
>
> Vulcans never bluff.
> -- Spock, "The Doomsday Machine", stardate 4202.1
>
>
On 27 January 2018 at 11:26, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When you install the kernel, the following page (
> https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/i386/ch08s06.html.en) says you
> must run the following command:
>
> *dpkg -i ../linux-image-3.16-subarchitecture_1.0
Hi,
On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 11:26:25 +
Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> Where would the default location of such a file be if were created using
> the make-kpkg command?
the package should be in the source's parent directory, in your case I
guess in /usr/src .
Regards
Michael
.-.. .. ...- .
When you install the kernel, the following page (
https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/i386/ch08s06.html.en) says you must
run the following command:
*dpkg -i ../linux-image-3.16-subarchitecture_1.0.custom_i386.deb*.
Do I need to run mrproper beforehand?
I can't see any linux-image file in t
-e 's/=M/Unknown Kernel Package Maintainer
/g' \
-e 's/=ST/linux/g' -e 's/=B/x86_64/g' \
/usr/share/kernel-package/changelog > debian/changelog
chmod 0644 debian/control debian/changelog
make -f debian/rules debian/stamp/conf/kernel-conf
make[2
(Intel/Baytrail); it is the same with msr,
> module not loaded automatically, when loaded manually the contents
> of /dev/cpu/0 look just as on my AMD desktop machine. The output of the
> checker script still says "No" in the lines referring to msr.
> *BUT*, since I finally mana
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 23:49:46 +0100
Sven Hartge wrote:
> Michael Lange wrote:
>
> > When I check /proc/cpuinfo I see that "msr" is listed in the "flags"
> > section. So why doesn't the driver load automagically?
>
> It is not programmed to load automatically, because writing to MSRs is
> danger
of /dev/cpu/0 look just as on my AMD desktop machine. The output of the
checker script still says "No" in the lines referring to msr.
*BUT*, since I finally managed to compile 4.15.rc9 with gcc-7.3, the
script claims the laptop is no longer vulnerable to "Spectre2".
I think I&#x
Michael Lange wrote:
> When I check /proc/cpuinfo I see that "msr" is listed in the "flags"
> section. So why doesn't the driver load automagically?
It is not programmed to load automatically, because writing to MSRs is
dangerous and can even damage your computer or CPU. In any normal
operation
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 12:45:13 -0500
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 06:07:13PM +0100, Michael Lange wrote:
> > I am definitely anything but an expert on this; but with sid's 4.14.15
> > (which I assumed was compiled with said gcc-7.2) the script here says:
>
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 23:25:55 +0100
Sven Hartge wrote:
> Do the contents of the /dev/cpu directory change between loaded and
> unloaded msr.ko?
>
> When msr.ko is loaded, there should be directory for each CPU in the
> system:
>
> # ls -ld /dev/cpu/*
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 Jan 26 23:23
Michael Lange wrote:
> Yes, it is the sid kernel, and the module exists. When running the
> script as root it is the same. lsmod shows that the msr module is not
> loaded. If I load it manually with modprobe it appears to load without
> errors, but the output of the checker-script does not change
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 21:28:19 +0100
Sven Hartge wrote:
> > Not me, that's the sid kernel :)
>
> No. The kernel from Sid has support for MSR as module:
>
> root@host:~# modinfo msr
> filename: /lib/modules/4.14.0-3-amd64/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/msr.ko
> license:GPL
> description:x86 ge
Michael Lange wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 18:38:23 +0100 Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Michael Lange wrote:
>>> Hardware check
>>> * Hardware support (CPU microcode) for mitigation techniques
>>> * Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation (IBRS)
>>> * SPEC_CTRL MSR is available: UNKNOWN (couldn
1 - 100 of 1511 matches
Mail list logo
