On 27 January 2018 at 12:43, Michael Lange <klappn...@freenet.de> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 12:12:57 +0000 > Michael Fothergill <michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Should the filename be something like linux-image-4.14.14.deb etc? > > With default settings for make-kpkg the filename is probably a little > longer, here it looks like > > linux-image-4.15.0-rc9-klappnase270118_4.15.0-rc9- > klappnase270118-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb > > > > > > Maybe Greg could think some find command that would search everywhere in > > the install I have here and then find it in some funny directory (even > > /tmp?) no one has ever heard of. > > > > I would be grateful for suggestions here. > > > > Could there be a bug in gcc 8 that made it forget to actually output the > > file? > > I don't think that gcc is to blame. I think I will sign up on the gcc gnu help page and ask people if they have a test case file I can run to 100% confirm the GCC 8 compiler is running properly. Once I am convinced it is then the next stage is to try to talk to the developers who maintain the make-kpkg program. Cheers MF > Did you look at the final messages > make-kpkg printed? If run successfully it should say something like > "building package linux-image-..." . > > Regards > > Michael > > > > .-.. .. ...- . .-.. --- -. --. .- -. -.. .--. .-. --- ... .--. . .-. > > Power is danger. > -- The Centurion, "Balance of Terror", stardate 1709.2 > >
