Hello,
an upgrade from Debian 8 Jessie to Debian 9 Stretch caused a similar
problem as described by Tony Stoneley in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/03/msg01272.html
The solution of working with xserver-xorg-video-vesa was not
satisfying as I was not able to configure the display cor
Użytkownik Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>Hello,
>
>I use a Matrox G400 DH as graphics controller, and i run debian/unstable
>on an amd64 system.
>
>Unfortunately this leads to system freezes when i try to use 3d
>rendering (GLX).
>
>Some examples whi
Hello,
I use a Matrox G400 DH as graphics controller, and i run debian/unstable
on an amd64 system.
Unfortunately this leads to system freezes when i try to use 3d
rendering (GLX).
Some examples which do always freeze my system are xmms visualisations,
tuxkart and mixxx.
Do you have any
Greetings,
I was enjoying fullscreen Xawtv until the recent X11R7 switch, it
seems. (xawtv is the only application I found to be able to display
the composite input from my v4l2-ccapable DC10 card). The fullscreen
mode was previously used XVideo, output on a Matrox G400 with DRI
enabled.
Snce
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 12:01, Tom Allison wrote:
> I was trying to get my x-window-server installed last night and ran
> into a seemingly dumb problem.
>
> I have a minimalist installation with sources.list have both stable
> and testing entries.
>
> I used tasksel to select X-Window system an
I was trying to get my x-window-server installed last night and ran into
a seemingly dumb problem.
I have a minimalist installation with sources.list have both stable and
testing entries.
I used tasksel to select X-Window system and nothing else (no Desktop).
Answered all the questions.
se
xtension (xv). I've only
recently enabled DRI on one computer with a Radeon VE, but have
been able to watch videos of various formats at decent frame
rates for the past two years or so.
Hi!
Sorry for butting in but I'm wondering if you are using the Matrox supplied
drivers for the G400
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 20:22:12 -0800,
Paul Mackinney wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed:
> > > "Paul" == Paul Mackinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Paul> I don't have a device /dev/dri/card0. Am I supposed to be
> > Paul> running devfs? Kernel config shows
> >
> > Paul> $ gr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed:
> Hmm...I've got a DH G400 on my AMD K6-II/450, and DVDs play fine for me.
> Actually play better under Linux than under Windows. Although the DVD apps
> under Linux I have tend to be more glitchy. But the system w/ video card if
&g
rt).
>>
>> be sure and load the agpgart module _before_ starting X.
>>
>> Brian
>
> Loading agppart was the key, I added it with modconf before starting X,
> the device node was created somehow, and DRI is loading fine. Still not
> enough to allow this tired
[EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed:
> > "Paul" == Paul Mackinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Paul> I don't have a device /dev/dri/card0. Am I supposed to be
> Paul> running devfs? Kernel config shows
>
> Paul> $ grep DEVFS config-2.4.20-k6 CONFIG_DEVFS_FS=y #
> Paul> CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT
> "Paul" == Paul Mackinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> I don't have a device /dev/dri/card0. Am I supposed to be
Paul> running devfs? Kernel config shows
Paul> $ grep DEVFS config-2.4.20-k6 CONFIG_DEVFS_FS=y #
Paul> CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT is not set # CONFIG_DEVFS_DEBUG is not set
Mark Zimmerman declaimed:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 12:08:56PM -0800, Slava ZHdanobvich wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:23:03 -0800
> > Paul Mackinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I've got a Matrox Millenium G400, and recently installed a DVDR
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 07:23:03PM -0800, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> I've got a Matrox Millenium G400, and recently installed a DVDROM drive.
> Unfortunately, Xine drops too many frames to really watch anything
> (mpeg & avi files play fine).
>
> I've been trying to tw
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 12:08:56PM -0800, Slava ZHdanobvich wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:23:03 -0800
> Paul Mackinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've got a Matrox Millenium G400, and recently installed a DVDROM drive.
> > Unfortunately, Xine drops too many
Concerning G400 config files, could someone send my some X11 config
files.
I have dual head setup working and would like to see what other
options I could use to configure it better. (E.g. I can't run
tuxracer etc)
Thanks in advance,
--
Rudy Gevaert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:23:03 -0800
Paul Mackinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a Matrox Millenium G400, and recently installed a DVDROM drive.
> Unfortunately, Xine drops too many frames to really watch anything
> (mpeg & avi files play fine).
>
> I&#x
I've got a Matrox Millenium G400, and recently installed a DVDROM drive.
Unfortunately, Xine drops too many frames to really watch anything
(mpeg & avi files play fine).
I've been trying to tweak my video performance, and notice the following
errors in my X log:
(==) MGA(1): W
"vbe"
> EndSection
>
> Section "InputDevice"
> Identifier "Generic Keyboard"
> Driver "keyboard"
> Option "CoreKeyboard"
> Option "XkbRules" "xfree86"
"XkbModel" "pc104"
Option "XkbLayout" "us"
EndSection
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Configured Mouse"
Driver "mouse"
Option "CorePointer"
Opt
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry declaimed:
> >>
> >> I use a dual head matrox card every day.
> >>
> > I use a Matrox G400 AGP, works great with the blackbox window manager
> > which I have to plug with Sean on the thread. I run the CVS build of
> &
Michael J. Madden wrote:
Has anyone gotten hardware acceleration for the Matrox G400 working
under Woody. I am using XFree86 4.1.0-14 with kernel 2.4.18.
I keep getting the following message in XFree86.0.log and glxinfo
reports direct rendering is disabled.
(==) MGA(0): Direct rendering
As soon as I mailed this I figured it out. I needed to compile in the
Matrox driver into my 2.4.18 kernel. I had the AGP support but no
Matrox support.
Thanks,
Mike
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:29:10AM -0500, Michael J. Madden wrote:
> Has anyone gotten hardware acceleration for the Matrox G
Has anyone gotten hardware acceleration for the Matrox G400 working
under Woody. I am using XFree86 4.1.0-14 with kernel 2.4.18.
I keep getting the following message in XFree86.0.log and glxinfo
reports direct rendering is disabled.
(==) MGA(0): Direct rendering disabled
Here is my
,
Your message is not clear as regards whether you can start up the X server
or not. I will assume the latter. I ran into problems myself with the G400
with the 2.2.19pre17 kernel. I think the error message in question is
misleading, as the real problem is elsewhere, possibly with the dri
module. T
Randolph S. Kahle wrote:
> When I try to start X, I am told the mga_hal module can not be found.
You need to get the linux drivers from the matrox support site if you want
this lib.
You might like this:
apt-cache show mgapdesk
Simon Hepburn.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
I have just installed Woody from the network install CDROMs.
When I try to start X, I am told the mga_hal module can not be found.
Is this an X configuration problem, compilation problem, or a kernel
problem?
Thanks -- Randy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
this was the right thing
this led me to read throught he xinerama howto and now things are better than
they were before as i now have proper xinerama support
thanks
on Thu, 21 Mar 2002 Simon Hepburn typed
> You are trying to use Xinerama and 3D accel together. They are incompatible.
>
> Simon
You are trying to use Xinerama and 3D accel together. They are incompatible.
Simon Hepburn.
hello
here is what i have
Enlightenment was installed using apt-get
X was installed using apt-get
I have a matrox g400 32 meg dual head card.
A manually configured the XF86Config-4 file to support dual monitors
so i did an apt-get upgrade on my potato box with kernel 2.4.17
when i logged in via
On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 20:16, Oki DZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following in my XFree86.0.log:
> (EE) MGA(0): [dri] MGADRIScreenInit failed because of a version mismatch.
> [dri] mga.o kernel module version is 2.0.1 but version 3.0.x is needed.
> [dri] Disabling DRI.
>
> How can I fix it?
> Where
Hi,
I have the following in my XFree86.0.log:
(EE) MGA(0): [dri] MGADRIScreenInit failed because of a version mismatch.
[dri] mga.o kernel module version is 2.0.1 but version 3.0.x is needed.
[dri] Disabling DRI.
How can I fix it?
Where can I get the newer mga.o? I use kernel version 2.4.5; shoul
eem to directly support this. But is a feature I used frequently on my windows box.
Anyhow, I will let you know if any answers are found.
Matt
On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 14:49, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote:
* Matthew Reath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I installed Debian potato on a system
* Matthew Reath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I installed Debian potato on a system with a Matrox G400 DualHead.
>
> I was wondering if anybody has worked with the Matrox Power Desk and
> drivers for XFree86.
>
> I want to setup a TV on the secondary display that I can use Xi
I installed Debian potato on a
system with a Matrox G400 DualHead.
I was wondering if anybody has worked with the Matrox Power Desk and drivers for XFree86.
I want to setup a TV on the secondary display that I can use
Xine/Xawtv on full screen and use the primary display
has my
r
2.4 kernels did not like mga compiled into them. However, if I made it
into a module I'd get dri. Go figure. It seems to work fine in 2.4.14.
There are a couple of mini how-to's on the web related to G400 and dri.
Here are a couple of links I used when setting mine.
http://ogre.rocky
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 12:23:23AM -0500, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote:
>
> Eugene,
>
> To my untrained eye this log doesn't really show if dri was loaded. I
> had the same log, but dri didn't work on my G400. I apologize if I
> needlesly reiterate what you've
7;-depth 16', I don't get libGL error, but bzflag still
> uses indirect rendering.
>
> Any suggestions on how to fix this?
>
> --ET.
Eugene,
To my untrained eye this log doesn't really show if dri was loaded. I
had the same log, but dri didn't work on m
Hello,
I'm having trouble with this strange error message from bzflag (.deb
1.7e2-1) and GL in general:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ bzflag
libGL error: failed to open DRM: Operation not permitted
libGL error: reverting to (slow) indirect rendering
loading fixedbr...
loading panel...
At the same time,
my ICAClient settings from scratch after switching from sid to potato linux
distribution.
My new opinion: The Matrox G400 video card works great under both XFree86
versions 3.3.6 and 4!
-Kris
-Original Message-
From: nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:03
are
> "re-painted" within the ICA Client application.
I ran 3.3.6 on my G400 for about a year with no problems.
> Display mode under both versions was/is 24-bit color, quite high-res mode
> ("1472x1104", a custom one I set up).
I used 1280x1024 and 24 bit color
Kris Huber said:
> If anyone has an idea why my Matrox G400 output isn't always
> looking great under v3.3.6, I'd appreciate suggestions! It's not
> too bad, but a little annoying.
i ran it under xfree 3.3.6 up until about 50 days ago,
it ran perfect. never had a singl
I have a G400 and know that there is support in X v4. In fact I believe the
support in v4 is better than in v3.3.6.
I recently changed from using the unstable distribution to the stable one.
In the process I ended up changing from XFree86 v4 to v3.3.6. I never
noticed any display problems under
* Tom Allison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have this Matrox G400 video card that's supposed to be really spiffy
> (or was, in it's day).
> I'm just trying to confirm the support in X v4.
>
> It seems that this card has taken a serious step back in basic
> pe
I have this Matrox G400 video card that's supposed to be really spiffy
(or was, in it's day).
I'm just trying to confirm the support in X v4.
It seems that this card has taken a serious step back in basic
performance. I'm not talking about frames/second, the basic picture
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, R. Alexander wrote:
> Simon you are a genius !!!
>
> We are getting closer.
>
> I have enlightement window manager installed but maybe the /etc/X11/Xsession
> is not invoking it ...
>
> When I launch xinit (not startx) as a matter of fact I see the X desktop
> with just a w
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Simon Law wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, R. Alexander wrote:
>
> > Dear friends,
> > I have desperately searched some appends but really cannot understand if
> > they apply to my case.
> >
> > With XFree 3.x I had a perfect XF86Con
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, R. Alexander wrote:
> Dear friends,
> I have desperately searched some appends but really cannot understand if
> they apply to my case.
>
> With XFree 3.x I had a perfect XF86Config for my Matrox G400 driving my 16"
> TFT display.
>
> Upgraded
Dear friends,
I have desperately searched some appends but really cannot understand if
they apply to my case.
With XFree 3.x I had a perfect XF86Config for my Matrox G400 driving my 16"
TFT display.
Upgraded to 4.1.10 (on a 2.4.10 kernel) and am not able to get the
XF86Config-4 to work
Hello,
Running up-to-date woody with Matrox G400: kernel 2.4.10 and X 4.1.0-6.
It seems that I have to choose in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 between DRI
and textures:
(**) MGA(0): Option "TexturedVideo" "on"
(EE) MGA(0): Textured video enabled, not initializing the DRI
The i
--- Nuhn Yobiznez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 02:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Nuhn Yobiznez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Matrox G400 dri woes
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --- Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&
Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I try to run X with the mga_drv.o that comes with XFree86 or the one
> from Matrox website I get this error:
The driver from matrox is for XFree86 4.0.2/4.0.3.
> [dri] mga.o kernel module version is 2.0.1 but version 3.0.x is needed.
Compile a
/lib/modules/...
6. make sure you have X4.1.0
you should have dri acceleration now
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 01:28:43AM -0500, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having no end of trouble trying to get dri work on my dual-head
> Matrox G400 32Mb. The xfree86 in question is n
Hi,
I'm having no end of trouble trying to get dri work on my dual-head
Matrox G400 32Mb. The xfree86 in question is newly appearing in unstable
4.1.0.
If I try to run X with the mga_drv.o that comes with XFree86 or the one
from Matrox website I get this error:
[dri] mga.o kernel m
I'm following up on my own post of a day or two ago, because a Google
search suggests that the problem I asked about is quite a common one.
It was this: under X 4.0.3 (debian testing) I couldn't get hardware
acceleration enabled for my Matrox G400. The problem was that the
kernel modul
xist, just go in /dev and type :
MAKEDEV agpgart
All this is exactly what I did with my own G400, and it worked. Don't
hesitate to mail me (I'm not in the mailing list) for more questions.
See you,
- --
Thibaut Cousin
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web : http://clrwww.in2p3.fr
Dominique Deleris wrote:
>
> Hello...
>
> I'd like to play games with my Woody box : I have a Matrox G400
> card, and I'd really appreciate to get HW 3d acceleration to play
> SOF (soldier of fortune).
>
> When I start the game, it is relly
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 07:41:49PM +0200, Dominique Deleris wrote:
> Hello...
>
> I'd like to play games with my Woody box : I have a Matrox G400
> card, and I'd really appreciate to get HW 3d acceleration to play
> SOF (soldier of fortune).
>
> When I start th
Hello...
I'd like to play games with my Woody box : I have a Matrox G400
card, and I'd really appreciate to get HW 3d acceleration to play
SOF (soldier of fortune).
When I start the game, it is relly slow :(, no
acceleration at all.
Here is my XF86Config-4 file (configured
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 11:18:43AM -0400, Austin Jones wrote:
> Help!
>
> I'm running Debian potato on a PIII-800EB w/ Tyan Tiger Motherboard.
>
> I have the dual head Matrox G400 card connected to a ViewSonic (monitor 1)
> and Komodo (monitor 2) and I cannot get a
Help!
I'm running Debian potato on a PIII-800EB w/ Tyan Tiger Motherboard.
I have the dual head Matrox G400 card connected to a ViewSonic (monitor 1)
and Komodo (monitor 2) and I cannot get a signal to the
second monitor. During the boot sequence I would expect to get some
indication
Sorry, that should have been private mail.
/Allan
--
Allan M. Wind email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.O. Box 2022 finger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (GPG/PGP)
Woburn, MA 01888-0022
USA
pgpE185wSOlOt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
at kernel are you running?
2.2.18pre21
> Can you send a copy of /var/log/XFree86.log?
Attached.
> Is support for the G400 module or in the kernel?
Hmm... you need to compile a kernel module for DRI support?
/Allan
--
Allan M. Wind email: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Wella couple of questions 1st...
Have you looked in your /var/log/XFree86.log to see if
it is enabling DRI?
What kernel are you running?
Can you send a copy of /var/log/XFree86.log?
Is support for the G400 module or in the kernel?
=
Regards- Tim Stetson Whiskey Sour Nuhn O
Dave Sherohman wrote:
>
> Where can I find TFM on setting up hardware acceleration for a Matrox G400
> AGP? Is it worth doing this under X 3.3.6 or will it be less trouble to make
> the jump to X 4.0.2 and set up acceleration there?
>
> Also, I'm doing this for the sake
Where can I find TFM on setting up hardware acceleration for a Matrox G400
AGP? Is it worth doing this under X 3.3.6 or will it be less trouble to make
the jump to X 4.0.2 and set up acceleration there?
Also, I'm doing this for the sake of playing Loki's games, which are all
hellben
I've got the G450 also. I'm running dual-head. I think I read
somewhere that DRI doesn't work under dual-head. Is this true?
> On 20010213.2045, Damon Muller said ...
>
> Quoth Lee Elliott,
> > I'm not able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. K
SubSection "Display"
> > ...
> >
> > LeeE
> >
> >
> >
> > Chun Kit Edwin Lau wrote:
> > >
> > > Well 2.4.1 kernel does impress me, but the mga problem is still there.
> > > 32bpp just freeze my system. and I don't
(--) MGA(0): VideoRAM: 32768 kByte
could it be the problem? and also I have trouble trying to use DDC for my
Optiquest V95 monitor... pls help
Edwin Lau
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001 11:05:01 Joris Lambrecht wrote:
> I remember reading that kernel 2.4.1(01?) has improved handling of the
> G400
> cards and
> just have 24bpp XFree log attached
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Feb 2001 11:05:01 Joris Lambrecht wrote:
> > > I remember reading that kernel 2.4.1(01?) has improved handling of
> the
> > > G400
> > > cards and fixes some (if not all ...) known issues, i&#
e log attached
>
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2001 11:05:01 Joris Lambrecht wrote:
> > I remember reading that kernel 2.4.1(01?) has improved handling of the
> > G400
> > cards and fixes some (if not all ...) known issues, i'd suggest you'd
> > take a
> > look at this
improved handling of the
> G400
> cards and fixes some (if not all ...) known issues, i'd suggest you'd
> take a
> look at this kernel. The 2.4.x kernels really impressed me, if the rest
> of
> linux development would have similar level of quality linux would
> definetly
nd if that works I'll consider getting a 32MB card,
> assuming that 16MB isn't enough for DRI at 1600x1200. If anyone can
> actually confirm that this is the problem I'd appreciate it.
>
<--snip-->
I have a Matrox G400 32MB card, and run X at 24/32bpp @ 1600x1200, with D
:
(EE) MGA(0): [drm] Insufficient memory for direct rendering
My G400 has 16MB, running at 1600x1200 screen res.
ssystem -bench gave me the same results on both 16bpp and 24/32bpp! -
about 11fps. No errors with 16bpp but still not working.
Then I saw your posting and spotted ***1) Install
I remember reading that kernel 2.4.1(01?) has improved handling of the G400
cards and fixes some (if not all ...) known issues, i'd suggest you'd take a
look at this kernel. The 2.4.x kernels really impressed me, if the rest of
linux development would have similar level of quality l
I am using 2.2.18 and have agp, via, dri compiled in the kernel, but
leaving mga as a module and i guess I have the same problem as you. X4.02
crashes my machine at 16 and 32bpp. I guess it has to do will drm. When i
check the XF86 website, it seems to be that they suggested kernel 2.4.x
kernel. I
, Yes to
Direct Rendering Manager, and Module to Matrox g200/g400
Of course, recompile the kernel. I would also get rid of or move away
any modules from Matrox that you may have lying around. It might be
good to check Section 6 and 10.3 in the sourceforge document mentioned
above to be sure your XF86
> Quoth Lee Elliott,
> > > I'm not able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. Kernel is
> > > currently 2.4.0-test11 (2.4.0 was a bit wobbly for me - haven't d/loaded
> > > 2.4.1 yet) and I'm getting the follwing error in /var/log/XFre86.0.log
&g
t able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. Kernel is
> > currently 2.4.0-test11 (2.4.0 was a bit wobbly for me - haven't d/loaded
> > 2.4.1 yet) and I'm getting the follwing error in /var/log/XFre86.0.log
>
> I don't know if this will help for your particu
orking on test10 then I'd have thought it would work on test11 or
2.4.0.
LeeE
brian moore wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 11:39:11PM +, Lee Elliott wrote:
> > Hello List,
> >
> > I'm not able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. Kernel is
>
Quoth Lee Elliott,
> I'm not able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. Kernel is
> currently 2.4.0-test11 (2.4.0 was a bit wobbly for me - haven't d/loaded
> 2.4.1 yet) and I'm getting the follwing error in /var/log/XFre86.0.log
I don't know if this
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 11:39:11PM +, Lee Elliott wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I'm not able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. Kernel is
> currently 2.4.0-test11 (2.4.0 was a bit wobbly for me - haven't d/loaded
> 2.4.1 yet) and I'm getting the follw
Hello List,
I'm not able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. Kernel is
currently 2.4.0-test11 (2.4.0 was a bit wobbly for me - haven't d/loaded
2.4.1 yet) and I'm getting the follwing error in /var/log/XFre86.0.log
(II) Setting vga for screen 0.
(II) Loading sub mod
Hello Hans,
I've continued to try to achieve a working/useable DRI/X4 setup for my
G400 and last night I got a combination working with my 2.4.0test5
kernel by doing the following:-
1. I downloaded the mga_drv.o driver from the Matrox web site and
replaced the version that came wi
Hello,
After help from various people DRI is now working on my Debian Woody
440BX/ZX Celeron SMP box with MGA G400 DH 32MB no max, SB live using
alsa and kernel-2.4.0-test11. Thank you all, especially for the hints
about processor type entry in the kernel configuration and the need
for interrupt
on emulation (timeout: 50ms)
> (**) SVGA: Graphics device ID: "Generic VGA"
^
> (**) SVGA: Monitor ID: "Monitor"
> (**) SVGA: Graphics device ID: "Matrox Millennium G400 16MB"
> (**) SVGA: Moni
> Dear all.
>
> I've just bought a new computer and I've choosen a Matrox
> Millennium G400 AGP card (as they're one of the most open
> source friendly companies out there).
>
[snip]
i'm using one as well, which is working beautifull
7;t explain why
it won't work under 3.3.6 for you, because I ran it for about a month with
no problems on that.
Thinking maybe I should go get the latest driver from off their website.
Charles Lewis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dear all.
>
> I've just bought a new computer and I've
> I've just bought a new computer and I've choosen a Matrox Millennium G400
> AGP card
I'm using one. Works fine.
> I've got an Asus A7V
I seem to recall a problem with the G400 and a certain motherboard. That
may be it.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jo
Dear all.
I've just bought a new computer and I've choosen a Matrox
Millennium G400 AGP card (as they're one of the most open
source friendly companies out there).
Everything seems to be working fine with my hardware (I've got
> i'm not entirely sure if this is a g200 local problem - but DRI works fine on
> my g400. the error message says drmOpen failed.
Is there anything else that can cause DRI to fail?
I don't see any error messages in /var/log/XFree86.0.log. drm/DRI
seem to install fine, but t
Mike Cathcart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Well, ok, I lied, but who was going to read another boring email about the
> G400 and DRI? Well, enough for sensationalistic email...
[ snip ]
> glxinfo output:
>
[ snip ]
> OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect
> Ope
Well, ok, I lied, but who was going to read another boring email about the
G400 and DRI? Well, enough for sensationalistic email...
I'm trying to get accelerated 3D in woody. Here's my system:
* K62-400
* G400
* ALI M1541 on an ASUS P5A
* linux 2.4.0test10, compiled with:
/d
on 9/10/00 4:03 PM, Philipp Schulte at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One possible solution is to find somebody with the same mouse and ask
> him hor his config. You could just copy the "pointer" section.
I could reinstall Redhat and look at it's config
looks.. and then, well that would be ti
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 02:13:44PM -0500, William Jensen wrote:
> I've seen this type of mouse behavior before when gdm(?) is being run. If
> you check the archives just a couple weeks ago you will see a fair amount
> of usefull fixes for this situation.
It's called "gpm". It sucks ;)
Phil
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 02:12:08PM -0500, Paul T. McNally wrote:
> I did a reinstall. The first time I installed potato, the mouse was
> all fd up, it sticks to the bottom of the screen and refuses to
> com up. I can see the tip of the pointer on the bottom edge of the
> screen. When that happene
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 02:12:08PM -0500, Paul T. McNally wrote:
> I did a reinstall. The first time I installed potato, the mouse was
> all fd up, it sticks to the bottom of the screen and refuses to
> com up. I can see the tip of the pointer on the bottom edge of the
> screen. When that happened,
I did a reinstall. The first time I installed potato, the mouse was
all fd up, it sticks to the bottom of the screen and refuses to
com up. I can see the tip of the pointer on the bottom edge of the
screen. When that happened, I ran XF86Setup and changed
a couple settings on the mouse and I think t
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> I'm replacing my RedHat system with Potato and want to know what is
> the best XServer to run with my Matrox G400.
XF86_SVGA is the best for any Matrox
On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 01:31:43PM -0500, Paul T. McNally wrote:
> I'm replacing my RedHat system with Potato and want to know
> what is the best XServer to run with my Matrox G400.
The same one that you would run on RH: SVGA.
(And, yes, it -is- accelerated. Despite the name, the SVG
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
