Steve, it is not unreasonable to want dselect (or apt) to be
configurable such that you can choose to have it not do anything that
you do not explicitely request it to do.
I have maintained a partial mirror of debian for quite some time now and
still would find it handy if dselect were to have a m
On Fri, May 15, 1998 at 09:34:22PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 1998 10:40:23 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> >We are all volunteers here. Generally speaking, constructive criticism
> >is welcome -- unconstructive criticism just makes people leave the project.
>
> Exactly. I ha
>
> On Sat, 16 May 1998 10:40:23 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> >We are all volunteers here. Generally speaking, constructive criticism
> >is welcome -- unconstructive criticism just makes people leave the project.
>
> Exactly. I have been giving constructive critism and in return I have
Hi,
>>"Steve" == Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That happens not to be the case. If the reverse were true: that all
>> packages were held be default, and I had to do two ops to turn them
>> t be upgraded. I would do it. If I had to release them one by one,
>> that would be unacceptable.
On 16 May 1998 00:22:29 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>Steve> Exactly. I have been giving constructive critism and in return
>Steve> I have been getting a flippant attitude of "It isn't that many
>Steve> ketstrokes." In fact, one person has said that if the
>Steve> situation were reverse he(?)'
Hi,
>>"Steve" == Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> On Sat, 16 May 1998 10:40:23 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>> We are all volunteers here. Generally speaking, constructive
>> criticism is welcome -- unconstructive criticism just makes people
>> leave the project.
Steve> Exactly. I h
Steve wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 1998 10:40:23 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> >We are all volunteers here. Generally speaking, constructive criticism
> >is welcome -- unconstructive criticism just makes people leave the project.
>
> Exactly. I have been giving constructive critism and in ret
On Sat, 16 May 1998 10:40:23 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>We are all volunteers here. Generally speaking, constructive criticism
>is welcome -- unconstructive criticism just makes people leave the project.
Exactly. I have been giving constructive critism and in return I have
been getting a
On Fri, May 15, 1998 at 10:59:33AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 1998 13:58:02 -0400 (EDT), Scott Ellis wrote:
>
> >Go to the select screen, hit 'o', go to the top of the updated packages
> >section (the header), hit '='. There, all the updated packages are on
> >hold.
>
> My isn
Hi,
>>"Steve" == Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> That is what a nice, simple command line parameter or
Steve> configuration would be good for, we'd both have out default
Steve> behavior, now wouldn't we?
Patches shall probably be gratefully accepted.
manoj
--
"Exp
On Fri, 15 May 1998 13:58:02 -0400 (EDT), Scott Ellis wrote:
>Go to the select screen, hit 'o', go to the top of the updated packages
>section (the header), hit '='. There, all the updated packages are on
>hold.
My isn't that obvious. Not.
>That's what placing packages on hold is good for.
11 matches
Mail list logo
