Re: Further problems with OOo

2007-04-16 Thread Greg Folkert
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 12:18 +0200, Dan H. wrote: > Greg Folkert wrote: > > > Remember, Debian supports your version currently installed. If you go > > outside Debian and something goes wrong... Debian and its community will > > likely point and laugh, that is if you dare ask... > > No they won't

Re: Further problems with OOo

2007-04-16 Thread Dan H.
Greg Folkert wrote: > Remember, Debian supports your version currently installed. If you go > outside Debian and something goes wrong... Debian and its community will > likely point and laugh, that is if you dare ask... No they won't. They just won't be of much help because the user (and trouble

Re: Further problems with OOo

2007-04-15 Thread Greg Folkert
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 01:26 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 04/16/07 00:55, Greg Folkert wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 23:44 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > >> On 04/15/07 22:56, Greg Folkert wrote: > >> [snip] > >>> Indeedly. If you want to make a OO.o v2.2 backport, it really isn't that > >>> tough

Re: Further problems with OOo

2007-04-15 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/16/07 00:55, Greg Folkert wrote: > On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 23:44 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: >> On 04/15/07 22:56, Greg Folkert wrote: >> [snip] >>> Indeedly. If you want to make a OO.o v2.2 backport, it really isn't that >>> tough. But I doubt you w

Re: Further problems with OOo

2007-04-15 Thread Greg Folkert
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 23:44 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 04/15/07 22:56, Greg Folkert wrote: > [snip] > > > > Indeedly. If you want to make a OO.o v2.2 backport, it really isn't that > > tough. But I doubt you will at the moment. > > According to the debian-oppenoffice list, a backport of v2.2

Re: Further problems with OOo

2007-04-15 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/15/07 22:56, Greg Folkert wrote: [snip] > > Indeedly. If you want to make a OO.o v2.2 backport, it really isn't that > tough. But I doubt you will at the moment. According to the debian-oppenoffice list, a backport of v2.2 is coming Soon. - --

Re: Further problems with OOo

2007-04-15 Thread Greg Folkert
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 19:03 +0100, andy wrote: > Jonathan Kaye wrote: > > andy wrote: > > > > > > > My wife, using Etch, was writing a long document in OOo, went to > > > go and > > > save it as *.doc (for transport to work) and the document crashed. > > > Now > > > everything except the very

Re: Further problems with OOo

2007-04-15 Thread Greg Folkert
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 04:58 +0200, Jonathan Kaye wrote: > My commiserations, Andy. The good news is that failure to set the auto-save > feature happens only once. Once you get burned you're unlikely to > forget it. > You're using a somewhat oldish version of OOo, 2.0.4. The STABLE ETCH versi

Re: Further problems with OOo

2007-04-15 Thread David Dawson
andy wrote: > My wife, using Etch, was writing a long document in OOo, went to go and > save it as *.doc (for transport to work) and the document crashed. Now > everything except the very earliest save is gone! She is *not* impressed > (so much for my Linux advocacy!). > How can I recover the docu

Re: Further problems with OOo

2007-04-15 Thread Jonathan Kaye
andy wrote: >>> >> Hi Andy, >> Again, it would be helpful if you indicate which version of OOo you are >> using. What was the backup frequency set to in Tools -> Options -> >> Load/Save -> "Save Autorecovery every . minutes"? That will determine >> with what frequency your work is backed

Re: Further problems with OOo

2007-04-15 Thread Glen Pfeiffer
On 04/15/2007 10:31 AM, andy wrote: > My wife, using Etch, was writing a long document in OOo, went > to go and save it as *.doc (for transport to work) and the > document crashed. Now everything except the very earliest save > is gone! She is *not* impressed (so much for my Linux > advocacy!). As

Re: Further problems with OOo

2007-04-15 Thread andy
Jonathan Kaye wrote: andy wrote: My wife, using Etch, was writing a long document in OOo, went to go and save it as *.doc (for transport to work) and the document crashed. Now everything except the very earliest save is gone! She is *not* impressed (so much for my Linux advocacy!). How can I

Re: Further problems with OOo

2007-04-15 Thread Jonathan Kaye
andy wrote: > My wife, using Etch, was writing a long document in OOo, went to go and > save it as *.doc (for transport to work) and the document crashed. Now > everything except the very earliest save is gone! She is *not* impressed > (so much for my Linux advocacy!). > How can I recover the docu

Re: Further problems with OOo

2007-04-15 Thread Jeff Zhang
On 4/15/07, andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My wife, using Etch, was writing a long document in OOo, went to go and save it as *.doc (for transport to work) and the document crashed. Now everything except the very earliest save is gone! She is *not* impressed (so much for my Linux advocacy!). Ho

Further problems with OOo

2007-04-15 Thread andy
My wife, using Etch, was writing a long document in OOo, went to go and save it as *.doc (for transport to work) and the document crashed. Now everything except the very earliest save is gone! She is *not* impressed (so much for my Linux advocacy!). How can I recover the document - the auto-reco