On 11/30/08 01:05, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 18:32, Hendrik Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have friend who's interested in trying out free software. Her
immediate request is for something to replace Framemaker. It seems she's
involved in the use of Fr
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 18:32, Hendrik Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have friend who's interested in trying out free software. Her
> immediate request is for something to replace Framemaker. It seems she's
> involved in the use of Framemaker to make "books&qu
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I have friend who's interested in trying out free software. Her
> immediate request is for something to replace Framemaker. It seems she's
> involved in the use of Framemaker to make "books" for salesmen.
>
> I have little more i
Hendrik Boom wrote:
I have friend who's interested in trying out free software. Her
immediate request is for something to replace Framemaker. It seems she's
involved in the use of Framemaker to make "books" for salesmen.
I have little more information about her applica
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 02:32:58 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I have friend who's interested in trying out free software. Her
> immediate request is for something to replace Framemaker. It seems
> she's involved in the use of Framemaker to make "books" for sale
I have friend who's interested in trying out free software. Her
immediate request is for something to replace Framemaker. It seems she's
involved in the use of Framemaker to make "books" for salesmen.
I have little more information about her application at present, but I
g shared libraries
> : undefined symbol: __register_frame_info
>
> The FrameMaker executable is incompatible with certain releases
> of version 2.0.7 of the GNU C Library, which are included with
> some distributions noted above.
>
> Frame
Hi,
is anyone else trying to use framemaker with debian/slink?
Yesterday I got a mail from adobe:
(1) C library incompatibiliy with some distributions of Linux, including
Red Hat 5.2 and Debian 2.1.
Users will typically see the following message in this case:
./maker: error in
Hello,
Phillip Deackes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Syrus, could you please tell us how you got FrameMaker running? I have a
>potato system, upgraded weekely using apt-get. FrameMaker will not run
>at all, I get no error messages, I just get the $ prompt back again. Am
>I pe
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Phillip Deackes wrote:
> Syrus Nemat-Nasser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hmmm. Framemaker is running fine on my potato system. It does not seem
> > to
> > run over remote X, at least to a system running in 16 bit color depth.
> >
Syrus Nemat-Nasser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmmm. Framemaker is running fine on my potato system. It does not seem
> to
> run over remote X, at least to a system running in 16 bit color depth.
> However, it certainly works under the correct set of circumstances.
> T
> what slink uses. Imagine my disappointment...
> >
> That's why i bothered downloading it. In the meantime i have finally
> dist-upgraded to potato but this didn't help very much because
> FrameMaker dies upon startup without any further complaints. S
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 07:27:11 -0600 (CST), Phil Brutsche wrote:
>A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
>
>> Well, it explicitly SAYS so on the website that it's a 2.1.2 binary.
>
>It does say that. It also say's it'll work with glibc 2.0.7, which is
>what slink uses. Imagine
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Well, it explicitly SAYS so on the website that it's a 2.1.2 binary.
It does say that. It also say's it'll work with glibc 2.0.7, which is
what slink uses. Imagine my disappointment...
--
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 17:51:17 -0600 (CST), Phil Brutsche wrote:
>I can't run FrameMaker either with my slink setup; chances are that it's a
>glibc2.1 binary, which is why it works under potato.
Well, it explicitly SAYS so on the website that it's a 2.1.2 binary.
--
Sign th
r your question about slink, but I had no trouble installing
> the FrameMaker demo under potato (apt-getted this morning).
I can't run FrameMaker either with my slink setup; chances are that it's a
glibc2.1 binary, which is why it works under potato.
--
7;t answer your question about slink, but I had no trouble installing
> the FrameMaker demo under potato (apt-getted this morning).
apt-get? There's a *.deb for it? Or does apt-get have a feature that
will allow it to work with tarballs?
Also, do you have the aforementioned dynamic libr
> installed it under Debian/slink. Unfortunately it doesn't run because
> it is linked to the following libraries which are not available under
> Debian (even not with potato):
I can't answer your question about slink, but I had no trouble installing
the FrameMaker demo under
On Sat, Feb 21, 1998 at 03:10:38PM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
> I have written to Adobe and they have informed me that no Linux version of
> FramMaker exists or is planned.
FrameMaker is being developed using gcc, and there has been a usenet posting
by one of the Adobe engineers that it wo
I have written to Adobe and they have informed me that no Linux version of
FramMaker exists or is planned.
On 21-Feb-98 Ralph Winslow wrote:
> Is there a Debian package of FrameMaker or something that does
> the same kinds of things? I've started using it a work and
> would li
Is there a Debian package of FrameMaker or something that does
the same kinds of things? I've started using it a work and
would like to practice using it on my home machine.
--
-
Ralph Winslow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mary bought a pair of s
21 matches
Mail list logo
