Firstly, thank you everyone who tried to help, it was much
appreciated, even if it maybe didn't sound like it (I was getting a
bit frustrated).
As I reported, removing the second disk drive (a 2TB SATA SSD),
allowed me to to the install with no problems at all. I had installed
the drive when the s
Installation was on second drive, and grub was installed to the MBR
of that drive. Restart dropped me into grub rescue mode with the
message about normal.mod not being found. After mounting the drive
in Wheezy, I find that the directory that normal.mod is supposed to
be in, is not there. There are
Installation was on second drive, and grub was installed to the MBR of
that drive. Restart dropped me into grub rescue mode with the message
about normal.mod not being found. After mounting the drive in Wheezy, I
find that the directory that normal.mod is supposed to be in, is not
there. There
I'm a long-time Debian user and this system (Wheezy) is result of at
least 3 dist-upgrades (as well as motherboard upgrades). Last
dist-upgrade was not completely successful, so I thought to do a new
install of Jessie, onto a second hard drive. Since the current
motherboard is AMD FX 64bit capa
Maybe this will help:
http://www.tummy.com/journals/entries/scott_20060106_01
kai
Joseph Michael Smidt wrote:
I have installed Etch about 5 or 6 times using the Beta1 installer. I
tried the daily builds and I get this error when trying to connect with
the mirrors:
Bad archive mirror, The
Joseph Michael Smidt wrote:
I have installed Etch about 5 or 6 times using the Beta1 installer. I
tried the daily builds and I get this error when trying to connect with
the mirrors:
Bad archive mirror, The specified Debian mirror is unavailable or does
not have a valid release file on it.
Whe
Joseph Michael Smidt wrote:
I have installed Etch about 5 or 6 times using the Beta1 installer. I
tried the daily builds and I get this error when trying to connect with
the mirrors:
Bad archive mirror, The specified Debian mirror is unavailable or does
not have a valid release file on it.
I
I have installed Etch about 5 or 6 times using the Beta1 installer. I
tried the daily builds and I get this error when trying to connect with
the mirrors:
Bad archive mirror, The specified Debian mirror is unavailable or does
not have a valid release file on it.
When I went back to try again wi
On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 22:08 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 06:36:28PM -0700, Scarletdown wrote:
> > Okay, why is this particular system being such a bitch to get Debian
> > installed on. I'm using the etch net install CD ...
>
> That might answer your question. Etch is current
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 06:36:28PM -0700, Scarletdown wrote:
> Okay, why is this particular system being such a bitch to get Debian
> installed on. I'm using the etch net install CD ...
That might answer your question. Etch is currently in the middle of some
major changes, and at least some deve
Okay, why is this particular system being such a bitch to get Debian
installed on. I'm using the etch net install CD, and get as far as
"Install Base System". However, that step ultimately fails. Here's a
"screenshot" of the error (no way in hell am I going to write all that
crappe down)
http:/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
My installation did not go too well. Although I did manage to get the
initial installation done, there is a show-stopper problem:
When the system is booting, it gets to the point where it says:
"Calculating module dependencies..." ( ..
On 10 May 1997, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Thanks again, Rick.
> I've just tried again:
>
> For each of three brand new diskettes, I put resc1440.bin on it from
> my Linux box using dd (first with dd-3.16, later using dd-3.12,
> and then cat) to write the disks, then tried to boot with it.
>
>
As others have noted, the Debian 1.1 disks work for installation on
Thinkpads. That is how I originally bootstrapped mine. Apologies if
this has been mentioned elsewhere in the thread, but I believe that
the culprit is the bzImage kernel format. When compiling a custom
kernel for my Thinkpad 760
Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, when you rebuilt the kernel image, did you copy it to a floppy
> with a cat or something, or did you make a lilo boot floppy? If you
> went the cat route, I'm willing to bet that you're passing of the
> floppy=thinkpad option on the rescue flopp
] (Chris Hanson) writes:
> |From: Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |Subject: failed installation of 1.2 on thinkpad. Tips?
> |
> |I am trying to install Debian/GNU/Linux 1.2 from floppy disks on
> |a Thinkpad w/pentium.
> |I have made the 6 di
Thanks for the reply.
Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| What kind of Thinkpad is this? Not all require the floppy=thinkpad
It's a 760EL.
The floppy drive is external.
| option. I believe the 365 family is one of those - it's been a while
| since I installed Debian on a Thinkpad, bu
What kind of Thinkpad is this? Not all require the floppy=thinkpad
option. I believe the 365 family is one of those - it's been a while
since I installed Debian on a Thinkpad, but I think I'm correct here :)
Also, when you rebuilt the kernel image, did you copy it to a floppy
with a cat or somet
First, thanks to all who have taken the time to reply.
I really appreciate all the help.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Hanson) writes:
|From: Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|Subject: failed installation of 1.2 on thinkpad. Tips?
|
|I am trying to install Debian/GNU/Lin
On Sat, 10 May 1997, Chris Hanson wrote:
> The most likely answer to your problem is that you should not use
> "floppy=thinkpad"; I didn't use it on the 760C. Modern ThinkPads do
> not need that switch, only older ones, such as the trusty 755C I'm
> using right now.
I concur. I loaded Debian 1.
From: Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: failed installation of 1.2 on thinkpad. Tips?
I am trying to install Debian/GNU/Linux 1.2 from floppy disks on
a Thinkpad w/pentium.
I have made the 6 disks as described in
ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/stable/disk
On 10 May 1997, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Thanks again, Rick.
> I've just tried again:
>
> For each of three brand new diskettes, I put resc1440.bin on it from
> my Linux box using dd (first with dd-3.16, later using dd-3.12,
> and then cat) to write the disks, then tried to boot with it.
>
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Then I got the loading root.bin..., then loading linux..
> messages, but nothing more. It just hung -- I waited at
> least 15 minutes before giving up.
I had this same trouble a couple of months ago when trying to install
Debian on a friends ThinkPa
Thanks for the reply!
I just tried again using resc1440.bin from
../debian/frozen/disks-i386/current/
I wrote and tried booting with three brand new floppies.
Same result :-(
Christian Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On May 10, Jim Meyering wrote
| > I am trying to install Debian/GNU/Linu
On May 10, Jim Meyering wrote
> I am trying to install Debian/GNU/Linux 1.2 from floppy disks on
> a Thinkpad w/pentium.
> I have made the 6 disks as described in
>
>ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/stable/disks-i386/current/install.html
>
> I inserted rescue diskette and power cycled.
> I read
Thanks again, Rick.
I've just tried again:
For each of three brand new diskettes, I put resc1440.bin on it from
my Linux box using dd (first with dd-3.16, later using dd-3.12,
and then cat) to write the disks, then tried to boot with it.
Same result: hangs after the `loading linux..
In the instructions there is a possible explaination. Unless those disks
are flawless it will lock just as you have described. It's happened to
me. Sometimes you have to go through a few disks before you find a good
one. This is because DOS is more forgiving of flaws in a floppy.
On 9 May 199
I am trying to install Debian/GNU/Linux 1.2 from floppy disks on
a Thinkpad w/pentium.
I have made the 6 disks as described in
ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/stable/disks-i386/current/install.html
I inserted rescue diskette and power cycled.
I read through the on-line instructions and typed
28 matches
Mail list logo
