>> Well if you were prepared to type a search for
>> computational linguistics software into google, you would
>> find several free tools available for linux listed on pages
>> such as
>>
>> https://martinweisser.org/corpora_site/comp_ling_resources.html
>
> Indeed, that page has 4 hits for Unix an
debian-user wrote:
> Well if you were prepared to type a search for computational
> linguistics software into google, you would find several
> free tools available for linux listed on pages such as
>
> https://martinweisser.org/corpora_site/comp_ling_resources.html
Indeed, that page has 4 hits fo
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>
> > Those books teach and discuss some of the software that's
> > used. I doubt you will find them in debian's repositories.
> > Of course you can do plenty of computational linguistics
> > with perl or python which you already have.
> >
> > What i
>> A basic search finds this web tool:
>>
>> https://www.usingenglish.com/resources/text-statistics/
>
> I didn't get it to work in Emacs-w3m, be it lack of JavaScript
> support or something else. Anyway the page and tool claims to
> do this:
>
> Total Word Count
> Total Word Count (Excluding
Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> Those books teach and discuss some of the software that's
> used. I doubt you will find them in debian's repositories.
> Of course you can do plenty of computational linguistics
> with perl or python which you already have.
>
> What is a "regular expression" which is at
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023, 10:32 AM Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>
> > If you have python programming skills, you might
> > consider NLTK
>
> Unbelievable if there are no such tools anywhere already,
> but I don't have one either so maybe there aren't then?
> >
Joel Roth wrote:
> A basic search finds this web tool:
>
> https://www.usingenglish.com/resources/text-statistics/
I didn't get it to work in Emacs-w3m, be it lack of JavaScript
support or something else. Anyway the page and tool claims to
do this:
Total Word Count
Total Word Count (Excludi
Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> If you have python programming skills, you might
> consider NLTK
Unbelievable if there are no such tools anywhere already,
but I don't have one either so maybe there aren't then?
>>>
>>> There's a big subject called computational linguistics.
>>> T
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023, 8:32 AM Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>
> >>> If you have python programming skills, you might consider
> >>> NLTK
> >>
> >> Unbelievable if there are no such tools anywhere already,
> >> but I don't have one either so maybe there aren't then?
> >>
> >
> > T
Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>>> If you have python programming skills, you might consider
>>> NLTK
>>
>> Unbelievable if there are no such tools anywhere already,
>> but I don't have one either so maybe there aren't then?
>>
>
> There's a big subject called computational linguistics.
> They have some
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023, 3:04 PM Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Cousin Stanley wrote:
>
> > If you have python programming skills, you might consider
> > NLTK
>
> Unbelievable if there are no such tools anywhere already, but
> I don't have one either so maybe there aren't then?
>
There's a big subject calle
dvalin wrote:
> As "stats" is a grab bag larger inside than the Tardis,
> I suspect that only on that other ship with the infinite
> improbability drive is a stats babelfish interpreter to be
> found. For the last 30+ years, I've just thrown together
> a few lines of Awk to generate the initially
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 08:28:05AM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> tomas wrote:
>
> I mean a general tool, but with options to tweak the
> report included, of course.
> >>>
> >>> If you can bear some tweaking, R is it.
> >>
> >> Sure! Let's run R on this e-mail. Does it work and if so, wha
tomas wrote:
I mean a general tool, but with options to tweak the
report included, of course.
>>>
>>> If you can bear some tweaking, R is it.
>>
>> Sure! Let's run R on this e-mail. Does it work and if so, what
>> does it say?
>
> T a generic question -- a generic answer
R is a program
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 10:00:05PM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> tomas wrote:
>
> >> Is there a CLI and FOSS tool that creates stats from text
> >> indata - e.g.,
> >>
> >> $ txt2stats path/to/indata/*.txt
> >>
> >> I mean a general tool, but with options to tweak the report
> >> included, of c
Emanuel Berg writes:
> Sure! Let's run R on this e-mail. Does it work and if so, what
> does it say?
Run 'apt-cache show r-base'. You will want to look at all the 'r-cran'
packages for one that does what you need.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
tomas wrote:
>> Is there a CLI and FOSS tool that creates stats from text
>> indata - e.g.,
>>
>> $ txt2stats path/to/indata/*.txt
>>
>> I mean a general tool, but with options to tweak the report
>> included, of course.
>
> If you can bear some tweaking, R is it.
Sure! Let's run R on this e-
Cousin Stanley wrote:
> If you have python programming skills, you might consider
> NLTK
Unbelievable if there are no such tools anywhere already, but
I don't have one either so maybe there aren't then?
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
Joel Roth wrote:
> A basic search finds this web tool:
>
> https://www.usingenglish.com/resources/text-statistics/
Cool, I'll get back to you when I tried it God willing ...
> Otherwise, I think you'll have to write your own -- or hire
> someone (like me :^) to write one for you.
Surely there m
paulf wrote:
>>> I don't know about all of your wishlist, but gnuplot is
>>> the proper tool for taking data from, say, a CSV file, and
>>> putting it into graphs of various types.
>>
>> Well, gnuplot is great obviously but is more a tool to
>> visualize data, organized data, here we need a tool
On 2023-06-23 13:30, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Is there a CLI and FOSS tool that creates stats from text
> indata - e.g.,
>
>$ txt2stats path/to/indata/*.txt
>
> I mean a general tool, but with options to tweak the report
> included, of course.
>
> To produce neat stats, maybe even figures, and g
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 10:20:50PM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Is there a CLI and FOSS tool that creates stats from text
> indata - e.g.,
>
> $ txt2stats path/to/indata/*.txt
>
> I mean a general tool, but with options to tweak the report
> included, of course.
If you can bear some tweaking,
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 10:20:50PM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Is there a CLI and FOSS tool that creates stats from text
> indata - e.g.,
>
> $ txt2stats path/to/indata/*.txt
>
> I mean a general tool, but with options to tweak the report
> included, of course.
>
> To produce neat stats, mayb
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 23:05:10 +0200
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> paulf wrote:
>
> > I don't know about all of your wishlist, but gnuplot is the
> > proper tool for taking data from, say, a CSV file, and
> > putting it into graphs of various types.
>
> Well, gnuplot is great obviously but is more a tool
paulf wrote:
> I don't know about all of your wishlist, but gnuplot is the
> proper tool for taking data from, say, a CSV file, and
> putting it into graphs of various types.
Well, gnuplot is great obviously but is more a tool to
visualize data, organized data, here we need a tool to analyze
and
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 22:20:50 +0200
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Is there a CLI and FOSS tool that creates stats from text
> indata - e.g.,
>
> $ txt2stats path/to/indata/*.txt
>
> I mean a general tool, but with options to tweak the report
> included, of course.
>
> To produce neat stats, maybe eve
Is there a CLI and FOSS tool that creates stats from text
indata - e.g.,
$ txt2stats path/to/indata/*.txt
I mean a general tool, but with options to tweak the report
included, of course.
To produce neat stats, maybe even figures, and generate fun
facts of the kind
The longest word that occ
27 matches
Mail list logo
