dvalin wrote: > As "stats" is a grab bag larger inside than the Tardis, > I suspect that only on that other ship with the infinite > improbability drive is a stats babelfish interpreter to be > found. For the last 30+ years, I've just thrown together > a few lines of Awk to generate the initially required stats, > then tweaked the C-like code and regexes to add the > inevitable nice-to-haves. Some result is immediate, and > dissatisfaction with completeness motivates > thetweaking/temporary_satisfaction cycle. Options are > limitless, as is needed for an undefined task [...]
Haha, show us some stats then! *handclaps in anticipation* -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal
