On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 03:34:00PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Have a look at ... for more information
>
Sorry :) Forgot to paste in URL's
http://qos.ittc.ukans.edu/
http://www.qosforum.com/docs/faq/
http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/linux/qos_tc/
http://qos.ittc.ukans.edu/howto/
http:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 12:45:24PM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > In TCP/IP we only have control of our outgoing traffic. Thus your
> > connections will be set up via one or the other. Say your wireless
> > device is 128k and your modem is 56k. With this sor
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In TCP/IP we only have control of our outgoing traffic. Thus your
> connections will be set up via one or the other. Say your wireless
> device is 128k and your modem is 56k. With this sort of primative
> balancing you initiate a download. It comes dow
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 08:58:32AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Recently I gave eql a try to spread load across two links that I
> > controlled both ends of. I had lots of problems and I believe eql has
> > not been actively maintaine
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Recently I gave eql a try to spread load across two links that I
> controlled both ends of. I had lots of problems and I believe eql has
> not been actively maintained in the kernel for a long time. The
> enslaving of links works for outbo
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 04:18:56PM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would it be possible to bind /dev/tunl0 and /dev/eth0 under eql? I mean,
> I'd like to have more bandwidth out from both devices.
> The packets will traverse two different default routes, I guess.
>
Recen
Hi,
Would it be possible to bind /dev/tunl0 and /dev/eth0 under eql? I mean,
I'd like to have more bandwidth out from both devices.
The packets will traverse two different default routes, I guess.
TIA,
Oki
Is it possible to do EQL with
broadband?
Brandt Dusthimer
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, steve j . kondik wrote:
> i've been trying to get eql working on a potato box without much luck.
> the two ppp links come up fine (and i've set nodefaultroute in the options),
> i do and ifconfig eql up ip, eql_enslave eql pppx 57600 for each of the
>
i've been trying to get eql working on a potato box without much luck.
the two ppp links come up fine (and i've set nodefaultroute in the options),
i do and ifconfig eql up ip, eql_enslave eql pppx 57600 for each of the
links, then route add default eql, and it refuses to route. the isp
Chewie here, with a quick update on the EQL problems I was having. In
case you hadn't seen the previous post, here's a quick synopsis. I
had compiled the 2.2.5 kernel with eql support, initiated my two modem
connections with no (absolutely NO) compression, and enslaved the
devices
Objective:
Use eql tools to utilize bandwidth of two modems for
connectivity and provide masquerading for local LAN
Progress:
Just trying to get eql to work w/out masquerading or
firewall options enabled...(Default policy = ACCEPT)
Materials Read:
RTFM
*- On 10 Mar, Craig T. Hancock wrote about "Re: EQL question"
> I ma just curious what is EQL
>
EQL Driver: Serial IP Load Balancing HOWTO
Simon "Guru Aleph-Null" Janes, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
v1.1, February 27, 1995
This is the manual for the EQL device driver
I ma just curious what is EQL
"Froilan C. Mendoza" wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Would like to ask if it's possible to have two or more EQL connections to
> a server? .. we have one existing EQL connection to our server (using two
> modems) and we are intending to put up a c
Hello!
Would like to ask if it's possible to have two or more EQL connections to
a server? .. we have one existing EQL connection to our server (using two
modems) and we are intending to put up a couple of connections using EQL.
Thanks in advanced.
Sincerely,
Froilan C. Me
Has anyone used EQL with USR Total Control Terminal Server.
I can connect twice to the term server and get the same IP and such
but i have alot of problems with route anyone have any docs besides the
NET-3-How-TO?
Dinesh
On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> My testing has been with 2.0.34 on both ends. Have you tried it on
> that version Lindsay?
Yes, fine on .34.
> On Thu, Jun 25, 1998 at 10:26:48PM -0700, George Bonser wrote:
> > ALso, maybe I am misunderstanding you but I thought th
From: Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Thu, Jun 25, 1998 at 10:26:48PM -0700, George Bonser wrote:
>> they both need to be the SAME IP Address for EQL to work.
>
>Hmmm. I got the impression that it should work on any link. They use
>plip as an example in the doc
My testing has been with 2.0.34 on both ends. Have you tried it on
that version Lindsay?
On Thu, Jun 25, 1998 at 10:26:48PM -0700, George Bonser wrote:
> ALso, maybe I am misunderstanding you but I thought that eql was only
> designed for serial devices. Also note that both network inte
;
> What we need is multi-link ppp. Available (so I'm told) for FreeBSD and
> W95 but not for Linux.
>
> There is an eql package. Contact me by email if you need help.
I couldn't find the package but I compiled the source off sunsite ok
(I think, some source hacks requi
On Fri, Jun 26, 1998 at 08:19:55AM +0800, Lindsay Allen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Jun 1998, Debian Mailing List wrote:
>
> >
> > hi there i am a newbie and was wondering if anyone has or know how to use
> > two modems or more to dial up to a isp and bond all the lines together..
> >
> > my isp curr
reeBSD and
W95 but not for Linux.
There is an eql package. Contact me by email if you need help.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Lindsay Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Perth, Western Australia
voice +61 8 9316 248632.0125S 115.
hi there i am a newbie and was wondering if anyone has or know how to use
two modems or more to dial up to a isp and bond all the lines together..
my isp currently uses ascend dial-up servers and supports 56k modems
--kim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Greetings,
I want to set up a small network using IP Masquarade over 2-4
phone lines, do I NEED eql, or can I set this up as two seperate PPP
connections and just let the machine route them independantly? Does this
cause any problems, or does it simply cause a less optimal use of the
>Now, if I go to dual modems (or even three), is the box going to be
>able
>to keep up when servicing three 33K modems and doing DNS lookups and
>running apache, squid, etc all at the same time?
Oh yeah, it will certianly keep up. A local ISP used to run their
whole ISP on a 486dx4/100, with 32mb,
. Another possibility is to use a spare
486/33 to handle the modems but, as we have only one IP address, that box
would have to have it and the Linux box would then be masqueraded behind
it (or use redir.) It starts to seem really messy.
Getting back to eql, I thought of writing up a mini HOWTO on the
>> > I have a fairly urgent need for load balancing two modems, but eql just
>> > does not work for me. All the bits are in place but all traffic goes
via
>> > ppp1.
>> >
>> You must make sure that the hardware at the other end of the connection
>>
On Wed, 31 Dec 1997, George Bonser wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jan 1998, Lindsay Allen wrote:
>
> >
> > I have a fairly urgent need for load balancing two modems, but eql just
> > does not work for me. All the bits are in place but all traffic goes via
> > ppp1.
> >
> > Is there a HOWTO or similar? I have /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/README.eql
> > and I got hold of eql-1.2.tar.gz which has the source for eql_enslave.
>
> It's in the NET-3 Howto.
>
> 6.6. EQL - multiple line traffic equaliser
Thanks - I missed that. But
> Is there a HOWTO or similar? I have /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/README.eql
> and I got hold of eql-1.2.tar.gz which has the source for eql_enslave.
It's in the NET-3 Howto.
6.6. EQL - multiple line traffic equaliser
> The application is for a school which needs 64K bandwid
I have a fairly urgent need for load balancing two modems, but eql just
does not work for me. All the bits are in place but all traffic goes via
ppp1.
There are quite a few steps in setting things up and I am wondering if
these things have to be done in a specific order.
How do I go about
> Could anyone point me towards documentation or help me with setting up EQL?
>
> I have installed the module in kernel 2.0.30 without problems but do not
> know where to go from there?
There is some documentation in /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/README.eql that
you might have missed
Hi All,
Could anyone point me towards documentation or help me with setting up EQL?
I have installed the module in kernel 2.0.30 without problems but do not
know where to go from there?
thanks
Rowan
-
Rowan Deppeler System Administrator
Cybernex Networking
> >To: "Steve Hsieh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Cc:
> > > > After burrowing around some, I finally found some info and docs on
> EQL;
> > > > however, Multilink PPP is mentioned as a newer, and improved
> alternative.
> > >
&
Steve Hsieh writes:
>
>
>Who has EQL running on their system? To those that do -- do you still
>have to run eql_enslave as written in the eql readme file in the kernel?
>The info and web sites listed there are out of date.
>
The short answer: yes
Brian
--
Mech
Who has EQL running on their system? To those that do -- do you still
have to run eql_enslave as written in the eql readme file in the kernel?
The info and web sites listed there are out of date.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL
> > > After burrowing around some, I finally found some info and docs on
EQL;
> > > however, Multilink PPP is mentioned as a newer, and improved
alternative.
> >
> > > Unfortunately, I can't find any info on Multilink PPP in the HowTo's,
> > etc
> > After burrowing around some, I finally found some info and docs on EQL;
> > however, Multilink PPP is mentioned as a newer, and improved alternative.
>
> > Unfortunately, I can't find any info on Multilink PPP in the HowTo's,
> etc.
> >
> > Can a
I've no responses so far, so thought I'd repost.
Please let me know if you've got any info for me.
Thx.
Kevin
> After burrowing around some, I finally found some info and docs on EQL;
> however, Multilink PPP is mentioned as a newer, and improved alternative.
> Unf
After burrowing around some, I finally found some info and docs on EQL;
however, Multilink PPP is mentioned as a newer, and improved alternative.
However, I can't find any info on Multilink PPP in any of the HowTo's, etc.
Can anyone point me in the right direction? Or, is it not yet
40 matches
Mail list logo
