On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > My testing has been with 2.0.34 on both ends. Have you tried it on > that version Lindsay?
Yes, fine on .34. > On Thu, Jun 25, 1998 at 10:26:48PM -0700, George Bonser wrote: > > ALso, maybe I am misunderstanding you but I thought that eql was only > > designed for serial devices. Also note that both network interfaces need > > the same IP address. In other words, if you have two dialup connections, > > they both need to be the SAME IP Address for EQL to work. > > Hmmm. I got the impression that it should work on any link. They use > plip as an example in the doco, I think. I did try it with the same IP > on both links (a bit weird on ethernet but anyway) and didn't seem to > get anywhere further. I'll try again soon and check out the kernel list. Hmm, I think they talk about slip rather than plip. I would not have dreampt of trying it with ethernet, but why not? From: Marsh Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The thing with eql is you need a linux box on both ends of the > connections. Our company put a linux box out at our ISP's site > so we can use eql. They're a small ISP and easy to work with. Not correct. Livingston Portmasters support eql. My problem is that my ISP has four PMs and as I dial in through a rotary it is pot luck as to which box I get. eql requires that all lines be to the same box and that's where it gets difficult and expensive. I now have FreeBSD 2.2.6 here and will try that. I followed up the altavista idea and found Michael Bruck's web page http://mp.ins-coin.de/ but he has dropped the project due to lack of time. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Lindsay Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Perth, Western Australia voice +61 8 9316 2486 32.0125S 115.8445E vk6lj Debian Linux =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
