Re: Dumb question about unicode

2006-10-30 Thread cothrige
* Bruno Delalleau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > I would strongly suggest that you use rxvt-unicode, as it has tabs > (using a perl extension) which is what you are requesting. > > Bruno > Okay, I am installing it right now. I will see how it goes. Many thanks, Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Dumb question about unicode

2006-10-30 Thread Bruno Delalleau
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 08:55:43PM -0600, cothrige wrote : > * Angelina Carlton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > [snip] > > At the moment mrxvt does not support utf-8 but perhaps it will in the > > near future? If so, you might find rxvt-unicode an adequate interim > > replacement. I would think this

Re: Dumb question about unicode

2006-10-30 Thread cothrige
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [snip] > > > That should at least ease the ulgly-line-problem a little. > > That's twice in two days I've seen ugly spelled as ulgly, and I don't > recall ever having seen it spelled this way before? Is a cosmic > spelling change starting to take e

Re: Dumb question about unicode

2006-10-30 Thread hendrik
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 08:47:38AM -0600, cothrige wrote: > * Martin M?ller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > * cothrige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [29-10-2006 14:07:51 -0600]: > > > My main trouble is mrxvt, which does not have unicode support. If I > > > run mutt in that terminal, which is my favorite, it

Re: Dumb question about unicode

2006-10-30 Thread cothrige
* Martin M?ller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > * cothrige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [29-10-2006 14:07:51 -0600]: > > My main trouble is mrxvt, which does not have unicode support. If I > > run mutt in that terminal, which is my favorite, it will not draw the > > trees right. Instead of nice little lines

Re: Dumb question about unicode

2006-10-30 Thread Martin Möller
* cothrige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [29-10-2006 14:07:51 -0600]: > My main trouble is mrxvt, which does not have unicode support. If I > run mutt in that terminal, which is my favorite, it will not draw the > trees right. Instead of nice little lines and arrows, it now produces > junk looking characte

Re: Dumb question about unicode

2006-10-29 Thread cothrige
* Angelina Carlton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [snip] > At the moment mrxvt does not support utf-8 but perhaps it will in the > near future? If so, you might find rxvt-unicode an adequate interim > replacement. I would think this is a little simpler than trying to > remove unicode from your OS. >

Re: Dumb question about unicode

2006-10-29 Thread Angelina Carlton
cothrige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The big problem is that I don't particularly like xterm and use mrxvt, > which does not have unicode support yet. I can work around it mostly, > but it isn't perfect and still breaks sometimes. If possible, and > assuming it won't break things, I would pref

Re: Dumb question about unicode

2006-10-29 Thread cothrige
* Justin Piszcz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > One reason for it is to display e-mails correctly in pine, mind you, it > needs to be patched and configured with UTF8 support and you need to run > xterm -u8 but then at least e-mails written in the UTF8 charset look > correct :) > > Justin. > >

Re: Dumb question about unicode

2006-10-29 Thread Justin Piszcz
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, cothrige wrote: > Okay, I really am an idiot when it comes to unicode. More than that > if you ask my wife. But, I have been wondering why I need unicode at > all? I never used it, knowingly, before Debian but I noticed that it > is apparently the default now. So, some a

Dumb question about unicode

2006-10-29 Thread cothrige
Okay, I really am an idiot when it comes to unicode. More than that if you ask my wife. But, I have been wondering why I need unicode at all? I never used it, knowingly, before Debian but I noticed that it is apparently the default now. So, some apps are acting funny and I am wondering if I abs