On 6/27/23 14:22, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 09:51:14AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 09:39:26AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 6/27/23 07:23, Greg Wooledge wrote:
How are you performing this download?
With digiKam V8.0.0 AppImage's import fun
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 09:51:14AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 09:39:26AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > On 6/27/23 07:23, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > How are you performing this download?
> > >
> > With digiKam V8.0.0 AppImage's im
On Mon 26 Jun 2023 at 19:45:45 (+0200), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:46:32AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > Something with "gvfsd-gphoto2 service" in its name is being blamed for
> > digiKam being able to see the pix in the camera when a usb cab
gene heskett wrote:
...
> gene@coyote:~$ ls -l .local/share/shotwell/data
> total 3656
> -rw-r--r-- 1 gene gene 1871872 Jun 26 10:48 photo.db
> -rw-r--r-- 1 gene gene 1871872 Jun 26 10:48 photo.db.bak
if you want to see what that has in it:
$ echo .dump | sqlite3 photo.db | more
years ago
On 6/27/23 10:26, songbird wrote:
Greg Wooledge wrote:
...
I know absolutely nothing about this software, but look at that QUrl in
the last line of the log. That looks entirely wrong to me. You said in
another message that the full path of the directory was
/home/gene/Pictures/Saw4Bruce so sho
Greg Wooledge wrote:
...
> I know absolutely nothing about this software, but look at that QUrl in
> the last line of the log. That looks entirely wrong to me. You said in
> another message that the full path of the directory was
> /home/gene/Pictures/Saw4Bruce so shouldn't the URL be
> file:///h
On 6/27/23 09:46, songbird wrote:
gene heskett wrote:
...shotwell...
I ran if from the menu, took it about 10 minutes to import my Pictures
tree and missed several subdirs contents. When I quit it, all traces of
the nearly 4000 pictures it claimed to have imported during the scan
simply disap
On 6/27/23 09:46, songbird wrote:
gene heskett wrote:
...shotwell...
I ran if from the menu, took it about 10 minutes to import my Pictures
tree and missed several subdirs contents. When I quit it, all traces of
the nearly 4000 pictures it claimed to have imported during the scan
simply disap
On 6/27/23 09:30, songbird wrote:
gene heskett wrote:
songbird wrote:
...
disabling or masking. i do that along with a few other
things that i don't use or care about.
I swear, this place is haunted, Songbird. There are no wires hooking up
a back doorbell, I've checked, but at random ti
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 09:39:26AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On 6/27/23 07:23, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > How are you performing this download?
> >
> With digiKam V8.0.0 AppImage's import function. I can see the images on the
> cameras card, but cannot download them the
gene heskett wrote:
...shotwell...
> I ran if from the menu, took it about 10 minutes to import my Pictures
> tree and missed several subdirs contents. When I quit it, all traces of
> the nearly 4000 pictures it claimed to have imported during the scan
> simply disappeared, Probably still tak
On 6/27/23 07:23, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 12:52:09AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
And let me re-iterate for at least the third time, I can see the pix IN the
camera just fine in the digiKam import window, but I cannot download then to
my storage in Pictures.
How are you
gene heskett wrote:
> songbird wrote:
...
>>disabling or masking. i do that along with a few other
>> things that i don't use or care about.
>>
> I swear, this place is haunted, Songbird. There are no wires hooking up
> a back doorbell, I've checked, but at random times, usually at night,
>
On 6/27/23 07:23, Greg Wooledge wrote:
namei -l ~/Pictures/Saw4Bruce (one of the directories it has complained
about)
gene@coyote:~/AppImages$ namei -l ~/Pictures/Saw4Bruce
f: /home/gene/Pictures/Saw4Bruce
drwxr-xr-x root root /
drwxr-xr-x root root home
drwxr-xr-x gene gene gene
drwxr-xr-x gen
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 12:52:09AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> And let me re-iterate for at least the third time, I can see the pix IN the
> camera just fine in the digiKam import window, but I cannot download then to
> my storage in Pictures.
How are you performing this download?
What
mething else is still active.
And let me re-iterate for at least the third time, I can see the pix IN
the camera just fine in the digiKam import window, but I cannot download
then to my storage in Pictures.
I am beginning to think the gphoto2 thing is a unrelated rabbit hole we
are all tra
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 07:15:52PM -0400, songbird wrote:
> to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> ...
> > Yikes. Those gnomies do love complexity. I know why our ways parted
> > long ago.
>
> yes, among the many other assumptions. i'm afraid though
> that some of these things creep into MATE in time. :(
On 6/26/23 19:56, Bret Busby wrote:
On 27/6/23 07:15, songbird wrote:
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
...
Yikes. Those gnomies do love complexity. I know why our ways parted
long ago.
yes, among the many other assumptions. i'm afraid though
that some of these things creep into MATE in time. :(
On 6/26/23 19:16, songbird wrote:
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
...
Yikes. Those gnomies do love complexity. I know why our ways parted
long ago.
yes, among the many other assumptions. i'm afraid though
that some of these things creep into MATE in time. :(
You might try disabling gvfs-gphoto
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 14:07:45 -0400
gene heskett wrote:
> that got noisy, I turned on the plugged n camera for about 10 secs:
> Jun 26 14:03:41 coyote systemd[2283]:
> gvfs-gphoto2-volume-monitor.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
In that case, use
journalctl -f -u gvfs-gphoto2-volume-mon
Bret Busby wrote:
...
> I simply use shotwell. It works for me, without any problems.
i use shotwell for tagging and being able to find certain
pictures by tag or by date (or both), but eventually i
still want an easy way to find specific files easily and so
i have a separate index by date so i
On 27/6/23 07:15, songbird wrote:
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
...
Yikes. Those gnomies do love complexity. I know why our ways parted
long ago.
yes, among the many other assumptions. i'm afraid though
that some of these things creep into MATE in time. :(
You might try disabling gvfs-gphoto
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
...
> Yikes. Those gnomies do love complexity. I know why our ways parted
> long ago.
yes, among the many other assumptions. i'm afraid though
that some of these things creep into MATE in time. :(
> You might try disabling gvfs-gphoto2-volume-monitor.service and see
>
e and gnome desktops, gnome looks great, just one major
> > > problem.
> > >
> > > Something with "gvfsd-gphoto2 service" in its name is being blamed for
> > > digiKam being able to see the pix in the camera when a usb cable is
> > > plugged
On 6/26/23 14:17, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 02:07:45PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 6/26/23 13:45, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
journalctl -f
that got noisy, I turned on the plugged n camera for about 10 secs:
Jun 26 14:03:41 coyote systemd[2283]: gvfs-gphoto2-volume-monitor.
On 6/26/23 14:17, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 02:07:45PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 6/26/23 13:45, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
journalctl -f
that got noisy, I turned on the plugged n camera for about 10 secs:
Jun 26 14:03:41 coyote systemd[2283]: gvfs-gphoto2-volume-monitor.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 02:07:45PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On 6/26/23 13:45, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > journalctl -f
> that got noisy, I turned on the plugged n camera for about 10 secs:
> Jun 26 14:03:41 coyote systemd[2283]: gvfs-gphoto2-volume-monitor.service:
> Failed with result 'exit-c
On 6/26/23 13:45, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
journalctl -f
that got noisy, I turned on the plugged n camera for about 10 secs:
Jun 26 14:03:41 coyote systemd[2283]:
gvfs-gphoto2-volume-monitor.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
Jun 26 14:03:41 coyote systemd[2283]: Failed to start
gvfs-gpho
gene heskett wrote:
...
> It also deletes the camera's pix as it copies them out. DigiKam doesn't
> do that so I've always had a backup copy in the camera. So I won't dl
> this script.
>
> I'd much rather find the real problem and get it fixed.
i
hoto2 service" in its name is being blamed for
> digiKam being able to see the pix in the camera when a usb cable is plugged
> into it [...]
This would hint at an udev rule. I have little idea about the brave new
systemd world, but this one [1] recommends doing (in a terminal, most
likely
blamed for
digiKam being able to see the pix in the camera when a usb cable is
plugged into it, but prevents digiKam from actually downloading the pix
using its import menu. So what package or where is that controlled. I
can kill it with htop, but its magicly restarted by plugging in the
ca
gene heskett wrote:
> Greetimgs all;
>
> Something wiped my passwd so was forced to install bookworm. This time I
> install both kde and gnome desktops, gnome looks great, just one major
> problem.
>
> Something with "gvfsd-gphoto2 service" in its name is being b
Greetimgs all;
Something wiped my passwd so was forced to install bookworm. This time I
install both kde and gnome desktops, gnome looks great, just one major
problem.
Something with "gvfsd-gphoto2 service" in its name is being blamed for
digiKam being able to see the pix in the c
estions to this list have not been helpful.
>
> What mailing list do I complain on?
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> Thanks all.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett.
>
--
in a
reader.
Questions to this list have not been helpful.
You said it :)! How about the answers?
They were from folks who obviously were not digikam users, so not all
that helpful. suggesting script based solutions. They meant well but did
not actually address the problem.
One item of note, th
n a
> reader.
>
If digikam is punching your buttons - apt-get remove it and purge it.
There are always other applications to try. I know you prefer TDE
but you've had the issues with installing TDE.
Complaining about digikam to upstream developers may or may not be
helpful.
> Qu
On Sun 26 Jun 2022 at 15:13:35 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> I've run out of patience with digikams inability to see existing
> albums, or to create a new one. That is disabling its importing
> from the camera, making me take the card out and put it in a
> reader.
>
> Questions
Greetings all;
I've run out of patience with digikams inability to see existing
albums, or to create a new one. That is disabling its importing
from the camera, making me take the card out and put it in a
reader.
Questions to this list have not been helpful.
What mailing list do I complain on?
On Friday, 17 Jun 2022 at 21:51, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> I can chose that in my camera's menu (memory, MTP, auto, something else
> I forgot). I chose memory and "download" the stuff with rsync. Works a
> charm.
I can choose the USB connection properties/protocol on my day to day
camera (aka phon
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 06:29:52PM +0100, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 Jun 2022 at 21:27, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
> > I must be missing something here...
> >
> > When I plug in my camera to a US port, it shows up on the desktop, at
> > which point I can mount it. Then I can access it
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 01:09:39PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 17 Jun 2022 at 13:57:00 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > Perhaps I was over-sensitive. My apologies in that case.
>
> I do not think apologies are necessary. The reminder to attempt
> really helpful and tolerant responses is
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 09:32:43AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On 6/17/22 08:25, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 08:05:16AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > > On 6/17/22 01:02, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 08:39:19PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > > >
> > >
On 6/17/22 12:40, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
On Thursday 16 June 2022 09:45:21 pm gene heskett wrote:
I must be missing something here...
When I plug in my camera to a US port, it shows up on the desktop, at which
point I can mount it. Then I can access it and copy/move stuff to wherever,
On Thursday, 16 Jun 2022 at 21:27, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
> I must be missing something here...
>
> When I plug in my camera to a US port, it shows up on the desktop, at
> which point I can mount it. Then I can access it and copy/move stuff
> to wherever, using mc or whatever utility you like
On 2022-06-17, gene heskett wrote:
>>
>> When I plug in my camera to a US port, it shows up on the desktop,
>> at which point I can mount it. Then I can access it and copy/move
>> stuff to wherever, using mc or whatever utility you like. Why is
>> some special program needed for this?
> Proba
On Thursday 16 June 2022 09:45:21 pm gene heskett wrote:
> > I must be missing something here...
> >
> > When I plug in my camera to a US port, it shows up on the desktop, at
> > which point I can mount it. Then I can access it and copy/move stuff to
> > wherever, using mc or whatever utility
environment, but not one of its desktops, the environment is
installed.
That was install #31,
So I chose xfce4 for #32 because it runs fine on 5 other machines here.
And digikam, if I boot from the other drive, also with 11-3 on it, but
running kde, works flawlessly there. But despite pulling in
with the TDE folks - we can't help you, though if you were better
able to show us exactly what you mean, one of us might try.
You did write earlier that you'd managed to install GNOME as well as xfce
> That was install #31,
>
> So I chose xfce4 for #32 because it runs fine on
On Fri 17 Jun 2022 at 13:57:00 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 12:53:02PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Fri 17 Jun 2022 at 06:59:11 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 08:39:19PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > Is this the f
will not install on bullseye. Broken dependencies.
That was install #31,
So I chose xfce4 for #32 because it runs fine on 5 other machines here.
And digikam, if I boot from the other drive, also with 11-3 on it, but
running kde, works flawlessly there. But despite pulling in 261 other
bit and pieces of k
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 12:53:02PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 17 Jun 2022 at 06:59:11 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 08:39:19PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Is this the first time you have tried this?
> > >
> > > Go for another 32 times and you cou
On Fri 17 Jun 2022 at 06:59:11 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 08:39:19PM +0100, Brian wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Is this the first time you have tried this?
> >
> > Go for another 32 times and you could get success :).
> >
> > Just a suggestion, in the light of your recen
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 08:39:19PM +0100, Brian wrote:
[...]
> Is this the first time you have tried this?
>
> Go for another 32 times and you could get success :).
>
> Just a suggestion, in the light of your recent experiences.
This is unnecessarily rude. If you can't cope with how some
folks
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 03:19:38PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> I just took a pix of one of my projects to send to a friend, but
> when I had installed digikam to download the pix from my camera,
> going thru the usual steps to access the camera, which it did
On 6/16/22 21:23, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
On Thursday 16 June 2022 03:19:38 pm gene heskett wrote:
Greetings all;
I just took a pix of one of my projects to send to a friend, but
when I had installed digikam to download the pix from my camera,
going thru the usual steps to access the
On Thursday 16 June 2022 03:19:38 pm gene heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> I just took a pix of one of my projects to send to a friend, but
> when I had installed digikam to download the pix from my camera,
> going thru the usual steps to access the camera, which it did as
>
On 6/16/22 20:49, Fred wrote:
Hi,
I use this in a script called get_photo for downloading:
#!/bin/sh
gphoto2 --auto-detect --skip-existing -P
Best regards,
Fred
If that worked it would dl 20 gigs of stuff I've already
dl'd and sorted & renamed. I'd be another week sorting it..
I just needed t
On 6/16/22 13:23, gene heskett wrote:
On 6/16/22 15:42, mick crane wrote:
On 2022-06-16 20:19, gene heskett wrote:
The shell I ran digikam from is reporting screens full of
missing this and that despite the installation of digikam
pulling in:
0 upgraded, 261 newly installed, 0 to remove and
On 2022-06-16 16:23, gene heskett wrote:
On 6/16/22 15:42, mick crane wrote:
On 2022-06-16 20:19, gene heskett wrote:
The shell I ran digikam from is reporting screens full of
missing this and that despite the installation of digikam
pulling in:
0 upgraded, 261 newly installed, 0 to remove
ere, but the server would puke all over itself rejecting it.
So until we figure out what digikam is missing this problem
is solved.
mick
it detect a default camera that is gone when I turn it off,
but does not identify it as the Cannon SK420 it is.
whats next then? If it can do a dir, I need the
=FOLDER]
[-R|--recurse] [--no-recurse] [--new] [--force-overwrite]
[--skip-existing]
gene@coyote:~$
IOW, that didn't work either if its supposed to be gnomes answer to
digikam.
Next?
Thanks Mick. Take care and stay well.
It's ages since I did anything with cameras.
In the past
On 6/16/22 15:42, mick crane wrote:
On 2022-06-16 20:19, gene heskett wrote:
The shell I ran digikam from is reporting screens full of
missing this and that despite the installation of digikam
pulling in:
0 upgraded, 261 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 273 MB of
On Thu 16 Jun 2022 at 20:39:55 +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2022-06-16 20:19, gene heskett wrote:
>
> > The shell I ran digikam from is reporting screens full of
> > missing this and that despite the installation of digikam
> > pulling in:
> > 0 upgraded, 261 newl
On 2022-06-16 20:19, gene heskett wrote:
The shell I ran digikam from is reporting screens full of
missing this and that despite the installation of digikam
pulling in:
0 upgraded, 261 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 273 MB of archives.
After this operation, 726 MB
On Thu 16 Jun 2022 at 15:19:38 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> I just took a pix of one of my projects to send to a friend, but
> when I had installed digikam to download the pix from my camera,
> going thru the usual steps to access the camera, which it did as
&g
Greetings all;
I just took a pix of one of my projects to send to a friend, but
when I had installed digikam to download the pix from my camera,
going thru the usual steps to access the camera, which it did as
usual, but when I had selected the pix, and tried o dl it, the album
selector window
that machine, and digikam took about a second to find it and load the
first 2 snaps I'd taken.
So a hearty tip of the 5 gallon hat to the digikam folks, you done good,
thank you very much.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot,
Il 06/01/19 12:41, Étienne Mollier ha scritto:
Since you can reproduce the bug in Debian, I guess it is worth a
report, with a mention to the upstream bug page and, if possible
the patch fixing it. Put information necessary to the context,
but no need to copy the entire thread on KDE bug track
On 1/6/19 12:26 PM, Andrea Borgia wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Case in point: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395875
>
> There is no corresponding bugreport for the Debian package; had I not found
> the upstream bug, I would have filed a report with nearly the same
> information, since my tests match
Hi.
Case in point: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395875
There is no corresponding bugreport for the Debian package; had I not
found the upstream bug, I would have filed a report with nearly the same
information, since my tests match the issue perfectly.
Question is, for tracking purpo
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 18:16:18 +0100
Jürgen Köhler wrote:
> I have a little "problem" in testing with gkrellm last updated since:
> a conflict between gkrellm and digikam
Not sure how far testing is behind unstable, but there has been a
serious problem in the sensors area of unsta
I have a little "problem" in testing with gkrellm last updated since:
a conflict between gkrellm and digikam
gkrellm
gkrellm : Hängt ab von: libsensors4 (>= 1:3.0.0) soll aber nicht
installiert werden
root@jk:/home/juergen1# apt-get -s install
libsensors4
Paket
On 2017-05-08 20:48 +0200, B.M. wrote:
> I've just upgraded two installations from jessie to stretch. Both have
> digikam
> installed. First installation runs digikam without any problem. But on the
> second one I've a shared library error:
>
> Digikam: error wh
Hi,
I've just upgraded two installations from jessie to stretch. Both have digikam
installed. First installation runs digikam without any problem. But on the
second one I've a shared library error:
Digikam: error while loading shared libraries: libgphoto2_port.so.10: cannot
open sha
On 11/09/2015 06:38 PM, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
Hi,
I see digikam in unstable for a very long time now. But it is not coming to
testing. Why is that? Wasnt the push to testing supposed to be an automatic
process? Or does digikam in unstable still have critical bugs? What is the
reason
On Tuesday 10 November 2015 00:05:45 Frank Miles wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 19:30:02 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Monday 09 November 2015 17:53:05 Frank Miles wrote:
> >> On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:40:03 +0100, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> &
On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 19:30:02 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Monday 09 November 2015 17:53:05 Frank Miles wrote:
>> On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:40:03 +0100, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I see digikam in unstable for a very long time now. But it i
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 17:53:05 - (UTC)
Frank Miles wrote:
Hello Frank,
>digikam exists in many debian versions, including testing.
I beg to differ;
[2015-07-11] digikam REMOVED from testing (Britney)
Above taken from the Debian Package Tracking System at
https://packages.qa.debian.or
On 11/09/2015 04:17 PM, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
> Many thanks. This is helpful ... but confusing either.
>
> The page
> https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=digikam
> says:
>
> * digikam is waiting for opencv
> * opencv has the same version
On Monday 09 November 2015 17:53:05 Frank Miles wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:40:03 +0100, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see digikam in unstable for a very long time now. But it is not coming
> > to testing. Why is that? Wasnt the push to testing supp
Am 09.11.2015 um 18:42 schrieb Francesco Ariis:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 06:38:11PM +0100, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I see digikam in unstable for a very long time now. But it is not coming
>> to testing. Why is that? Wasnt the push to testing supposed to
On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:40:03 +0100, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see digikam in unstable for a very long time now. But it is not coming to
> testing. Why is that? Wasnt the push to testing supposed to be an automatic
> process? Or does digikam in unstable still hav
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 06:38:11PM +0100, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see digikam in unstable for a very long time now. But it is not coming
> to testing. Why is that? Wasnt the push to testing supposed to be an
> automatic process? Or does digikam in unstable still hav
Hi,
I see digikam in unstable for a very long time now. But it is not coming to
testing. Why is that? Wasnt the push to testing supposed to be an automatic
process? Or does digikam in unstable still have critical bugs? What is the
reason for the delay?
Matthias
maderios schreef:
Bonjour
Un bug persistant depuis des lustres affecte digikam 2.6 + mysql avec wheezy.
Il est impossible de supprimer les tags que l'on crée. J'ai posté un message
sur la liste digikam, aucune réponse.
Ce bug n'est pas listé ici
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pk
Bonjour
Un bug persistant depuis des lustres affecte digikam 2.6 + mysql avec
wheezy. Il est impossible de supprimer les tags que l'on crée. J'ai
posté un message sur la liste digikam, aucune réponse.
Ce bug n'est pas listé ici
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?p
2008/12/31 Tzafrir Cohen :
>> Does the Picasa client have a built-in facility for downloading entire
>> albums?
>
> Yes.
>
>>
>> No: You will have to script something
>> Yes: You will have to either reverse-engineer the API or google for
>> someone who has already done that.
>
> $ apt-cache search
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 10:45:31AM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> 2008/12/31 Tzafrir Cohen :
> >> Can you link to such an album? I will try to import it and see how it goes.
> >
> > ...snip...
>
> Replying on list so that others can help contribute, with private links
> removed.
>
> I do not s
2008/12/31 Tzafrir Cohen :
>> Can you link to such an album? I will try to import it and see how it goes.
>
> ...snip...
Replying on list so that others can help contribute, with private links removed.
I do not see any facility to download entire albums from Picasa, just
individual photos.
Does
2008/12/27 Tzafrir Cohen :
>> Does he want to make an album of his Digikam photos available via
>> Picasa web service,
>
> No. There's already a plugin to do that. Though I haven't tested it.
>
>> or does he want to import a Picasa album to Digikam?
>
> Y
set up pictures collections using digikam, and would prefer to
> > use it.
> >
> > Digikam is generally the only KDE program used, so I would consider
> > upgrading to kde2 if it helped. Though aparantly this is not supported
> > there (in kipi-plugins, specifically). I also h
2008/12/27 Tzafrir Cohen :
> Hi
>
> I set up a Lenny system for someone. One thing he wants to be able to
> do is to download albums from the Picasa service of Google. I have
> already set up pictures collections using digikam, and would prefer to
> use it.
>
> Digikam i
Hi
I set up a Lenny system for someone. One thing he wants to be able to
do is to download albums from the Picasa service of Google. I have
already set up pictures collections using digikam, and would prefer to
use it.
Digikam is generally the only KDE program used, so I would consider
hi folks,
digikam under lenny does not give any more the codes of the photographs
(an archive of 4000 out of the psychological practice of my wife) in the
'right-side' window. So for my use of the program under lenny it seems
worthless because i cannot find the photoos back under th
On Saturday 01 March 2008, David Fox wrote:
> On 2/28/08, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > May be irrelevant, but I just got an FE-340, and gphoto2 (which
> > digikam uses to take to the camera) sees it perfectly in MTP (is
> > that the same as PTP?) mode.
On 2/28/08, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> May be irrelevant, but I just got an FE-340, and gphoto2 (which
> digikam uses to take to the camera) sees it perfectly in MTP (is
> that the same as PTP?) mode. In "storage" mode, gphoto2 thinks it's
> a C-3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/23/08 13:41, Chris wrote:
> after a recent upgrade in testing, digikam does not recognize my Olympus
> fe-190 camera correctly anymore. Instead, it reports the camera as a Olympus
> C-310Z and fails to connect.
>
> Using PTP
after a recent upgrade in testing, digikam does not recognize my Olympus
fe-190 camera correctly anymore. Instead, it reports the camera as a Olympus
C-310Z and fails to connect.
Using PTP USB mode it is possible to connect, but not with the functionality I
had before (new pictures are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hello.
>
> I have the same problem :
> * if i install digikam, then kipi-plugins is removed automatically
> * if i install kipi, then digikam is removed .
> :-(
>
> and about :
>> "All plugins previously provided by the digikamimagep
hello.
I have the same problem :
* if i install digikam, then kipi-plugins is removed automatically
* if i install kipi, then digikam is removed .
:-(
and about :
> "All plugins previously provided by the digikamimageplugins package are
> now included in this package."
I don&
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
