On Thu 16 Jun 2022 at 20:39:55 +0100, mick crane wrote: > On 2022-06-16 20:19, gene heskett wrote: > > > The shell I ran digikam from is reporting screens full of > > missing this and that despite the installation of digikam > > pulling in: > > 0 upgraded, 261 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > > Need to get 273 MB of archives. > > After this operation, 726 MB of additional disk space will be used. > > > > Then when I run it, there are hundred of missing that and than lines > > spit out in the shell I launched it from. > > try gphoto2 ?
The OP wants to use digikam. You have no advice on that? > if camera is on list > http://gphoto.org/proj/libgphoto2/support.php > should you not be able to mount it as a filesystem ? > I like geeqie for viewing images. That really nice to know. It sorts out the digikam issue? -- Brian.