Re: Dependencies of the Damned!

2003-12-23 Thread Carl Fink
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 11:52:56AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > I don't understand. There's no package called libxrender1.1 in any > Debian distribution, and no mention of it in any other package's > dependencies. Where are you getting it from? Hmm. From http://ftp.acc.umu.se/mirror/mirrors.evi

Re: Dependencies of the Damned!

2003-12-23 Thread CaT
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 11:52:56AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 06:12:11AM -0500, Carl Fink wrote: > I don't understand. There's no package called libxrender1.1 in any > Debian distribution, and no mention of it in any other package's > dependencies. Where are you getting it

Re: Dependencies of the Damned!

2003-12-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 06:12:11AM -0500, Carl Fink wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:50:53PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: > > And now you see why all that other stuff had to be removed. It depends on > > libxrender1, and you're trying to install libxrender1.1... > > So libxrender1.1 isn't backwar

Re: Dependencies of the Damned!

2003-12-23 Thread Carl Fink
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:50:53PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: > And now you see why all that other stuff had to be removed. It depends on > libxrender1, and you're trying to install libxrender1.1... So libxrender1.1 isn't backward-compatible and you can't have both installed? > It's doing exactl

Re: Dependencies of the Damned!

2003-12-23 Thread Marc Wilson
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 10:41:43PM -0500, Carl Fink wrote: > I'm trying to install the newest avidemux (2.0.20) on my Testing system. > Since Christian Marillat hasn't built a .deb of it, I have to build it. > Can't be installed because it depends on libxrender1.1, which isn't going to > be ins

Re: Dependencies of the Damned!

2003-12-22 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Carl Fink: > I'm trying to install the newest avidemux (2.0.20) on my Testing system. > Since Christian Marillat hasn't built a .deb of it, I have to build it. You can save yourself a lot of time with "apt-get --dry-run install avidemux". That tells me there's mountains of stuff th

Dependencies of the Damned!

2003-12-22 Thread Carl Fink
I'm trying to install the newest avidemux (2.0.20) on my Testing system. Since Christian Marillat hasn't built a .deb of it, I have to build it. Okay, download the tar file, unarchive, run "./configure". It wants libgtk2-dev. Fair enough. apt-get install libgtk2.0-dev Can'