On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, Joost Kooij wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, Lawrence Chim wrote:
>
> > Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > >
> > > If a standard package depends on a non-free package it should be reported
> > > as a bug. To my knowledge there are no such packages in 1.3.0.
>
> Lawrence, you proba
On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, Lawrence Chim wrote:
> Dale Scheetz wrote:
> >
> > If a standard package depends on a non-free package it should be reported
> > as a bug. To my knowledge there are no such packages in 1.3.0.
Lawrence, you probably mean "package in stable depends on package in
non-free."
On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, Lawrence Chim wrote:
> Dale Scheetz wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, Lawrence Chim wrote:
> >
> > > If a standard package depends a non-free package, it won't resolve it
> > > and I have to manually install the non-free package free before
> > > installing
> > > the stand
Dale Scheetz wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, Lawrence Chim wrote:
>
> > If a standard package depends a non-free package, it won't resolve it
> > and I have to manually install the non-free package free before
> > installing
> > the standard package.
> >
> If a standard package depends on a non-f
Dale Scheetz wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, Lawrence Chim wrote:
>
> > If a standard package depends a non-free package, it won't resolve it
> > and I have to manually install the non-free package free before
> > installing
> > the standard package.
> >
> If a standard package depends on a non-f
On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, Lawrence Chim wrote:
> If a standard package depends a non-free package, it won't resolve it
> and I have to manually install the non-free package free before
> installing
> the standard package.
>
If a standard package depends on a non-free package it should be reported
as a
I appreciate the help guys. I know the first post was kind of vague, but it
was late...
Anyway, it looks like what I did wrong was try to install too much stuff
all at once. I'm going to try some of the methods outlined in earlier posts
and hope for a better install, which I'm sure it will be.
T
If a standard package depends a non-free package, it won't resolve it
and I have to manually install the non-free package free before
installing
the standard package.
Lawrence
Dale Scheetz wrote:
> I can offer several suggestions...
>
> I did about 5 installs from scratch during pre-release test
On Sun, 15 Jun 1997, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> A. After a failed intallation pass with dselect, make a
> "configure" pass followed by another installation pass. Repeat
> until all packages successfully install.
My experience is that some parts remain subtly broken if you try
> It might perhaps help if you explained where exactly the problems were,
> how you tried to install, what didn't work, etc. Your problem is rather
> vauge as it stands.
I agree. One thing that has gotten me into trouble when attempting to
install Debian is selecting too many things at the ini
>Please pardon the rant, but I gotta let this out.
You are pardoned.
>Where the heck can I get a CD with a WORKING debian distribution on it?
>I've tried LDR, LSL's Trilinux, and stuff I've FTP'd. I've yet to get 1.3
>to work.
Dunno; I did my installation with the base1_3.tgz file and LOADLIN
On Sun, 15 Jun 1997, Tim O'Brien wrote:
>
> It looked like it might work, but it crapped out big-time when it cam time
> to install X. In fact, errors to the degree that there were missing links,
> and xf86config couldn't run.
>
> I've used debian before, and it worked great! I like it! Is ther
On Sun, 15 Jun 1997, Tim O'Brien wrote:
> Please pardon the rant, but I gotta let this out.
>
> It looked like it might work, but it crapped out big-time when it cam time
> to install X. In fact, errors to the degree that there were missing links,
> and xf86config couldn't run.
This is a pain
Please pardon the rant, but I gotta let this out.
Where the heck can I get a CD with a WORKING debian distribution on it?
I've tried LDR, LSL's Trilinux, and stuff I've FTP'd. I've yet to get 1.3
to work.
Since I intended to format the drive Linux lived on anyway, I thought I'd
see what the diff
14 matches
Mail list logo
