On Thu 27 Aug 2020 at 19:44:56 (-0500), R. Ramesh wrote:
> I finally decided to move from debian 7 to 10. As a first step I
> wanted to upgrade to debian 8 (jesse)
>
> I changed all ftp.us.debian.org part in /etc/apt/sources.list to
> archive.debian.org and tried aptitude upd
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 12:43:35PM -0500, R. Ramesh wrote:
> My only wish is apt is updated to say something about the fact
> that this is unsupported and users are on their own, but still
> provide the download/install without we having to manually
> intervene.
I think¹ that there are
The expired keys do complicate life but my understanding of the
rationale is that the limited key lifetime serves as a sort of
contract regarding the integrity of the files. Once a release has
been archived it does not fall under that promise from the project
any more and so the expired keys serve
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 08:23:33PM -0500, R. Ramesh wrote:
> I did think about fresh install, but every method has its drawback. There
> are subtle changes that I could not get right in the past, so I chose
> upgrade path.
Last year I did do a squeeze to stretch upgrade by upgrading to eac
That said, Wheezy is *way* too far away from Buster! For example,
"Update in Place" is likely to fail, because of SystemD changes.
(Heck, I had trouble updating Stretch to Buster in Place, but some of
that was User Error).
I did think about fresh install, but every method has its drawback
On 2/9/20 3:56 am, Kenneth Parker wrote:
My Recommendation, if it isn't too late, is to Install Buster in a
separate Partition, and then copy /home files as desired. Reclaim the
Wheezy Partition when you are sure that you don't need it anymore.
+1
FWIW I'd recommend this course for most ma
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020, 12:17 PM R. Ramesh wrote:
> My attempts to upgrade to Jesse (8) did not work at all and all the
> information on the net seem old and not current that Buster is out and
> jesse is already archived. Anyway, after looking around, I made ddrescue
> copy of the current install di
My attempts to upgrade to Jesse (8) did not work at all and all the
information on the net seem old and not current that Buster is out and
jesse is already archived. Anyway, after looking around, I made ddrescue
copy of the current install disk (only 64GB, so easy) first and then
directly upgra
I finally decided to move from debian 7 to 10. As a first step I wanted
to upgrade to debian 8 (jesse)
I changed all ftp.us.debian.org part in /etc/apt/sources.list to
archive.debian.org and tried aptitude update and got the following error
W: GPG error: http://archive.debian.org wheezy
On Saturday, July 15, 2017 04:10:01 AM Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> rhkra...@gmail.com wrote on 07/14/17 14:10:
> > Can you provide a more precise link--that link gives me "Oh! Die Seite
> > konnte nicht gefunden werden."
...
> Today, at 7:57 UTC o'clock both links worked for me.
Thanks--it worked
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote on 07/14/17 14:10:
>> Am 13.07.17 12:13 nachm., schrieb Jörg-Volker Peetz:
>>> there's this nice blog in German:
>>> https://blog.dafb-o.de/neue-firmware-fuer-garmin-devices-unter-linux/
>>> where the firmware update procedure from Linux is detailed and a link to
>>> the fi
> Am 13.07.17 12:13 nachm., schrieb Jörg-Volker Peetz:
> >there's this nice blog in German:
> >https://blog.dafb-o.de/neue-firmware-fuer-garmin-devices-unter-linux/
> >where the firmware update procedure from Linux is detailed and a link to
> >the firmware files for your device is given http://gawi
Am 13.07.17 12:13 nachm., schrieb Jörg-Volker Peetz:
there's this nice blog in German:
https://blog.dafb-o.de/neue-firmware-fuer-garmin-devices-unter-linux/ where the
firmware update procedure from Linux is detailed and a link to the firmware
files for your device is given http://gawisp.com/perry
Hi Joerg,
I use an older Garmin device, so have not tested what follows:
there's this nice blog in German:
https://blog.dafb-o.de/neue-firmware-fuer-garmin-devices-unter-linux/ where the
firmware update procedure from Linux is detailed and a link to the firmware
files for your device is given http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:20:17PM +, Joerg Desch wrote:
> Am Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:14:20 +0200 schrieb tomas:
[whine... cloud... blah... ;-]
> My mistake... The Forerunner works like a charm without cloud connection.
> It's my personal choose to
Am Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:14:20 +0200 schrieb tomas:
> I'm downright appalled to see that a little piece of hardware comes tied
> to TahCloud and doesn't give the user any choices in that. I'd be raging
> at Garmin, were I their customer, for being (mis)treated like that.
My mistake... The Forerunne
Am Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:08:22 +0200 schrieb solitone:
> Yes, I used to have a VirtualBox instance on my previous laptop, and it
> did work. Then I migrated that VirtualBox image to KVM when I prepared
> my new laptop, and it continued to work.
Just because you mentioned it You have build a Vir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:58:10AM +, Joerg Desch wrote:
> Am Wed, 12 Jul 2017 07:43:31 -0400 schrieb Fungi4All:
>
> > I think you need to read up to the NMEA183 protocol, which for a while
> > it was the standard of i/o data ever since the first
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 11:55:25 CEST Joerg Desch wrote:
> I could use the Windows license key of the dead
> windows notebook and run it inside VirtualBox. Do you know if the USB
> connection to the Garmin devices runs through the virtual host?
Yes, I used to have a VirtualBox instance on my pr
Am Wed, 12 Jul 2017 07:43:31 -0400 schrieb Fungi4All:
> I think you need to read up to the NMEA183 protocol, which for a while
> it was the standard of i/o data ever since the first gps had wired
> connections on it.
Both devices are visible as filesystem. So I can easily copy and convert
the re
Am Wed, 12 Jul 2017 13:28:11 +0200 schrieb solitone:
> I have a Garmin Edge 520, and I use the Garmin Connect app on my
> smartphone to sync it, not the Windows tool. I just needed the Windows
> tool during initial configuration, but once it's registered you no
> longer need it (except for some ra
> From: solit...@mail.com
> On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 11:07:39 CEST Joerg Desch wrote:
>> I"m using a Garmin Edge 520 for my bycicle and a (new) Forerunner for
>> running. How can I access Garmin Connect without installing the Windows
>> tools?
>>
>> The Garmin Edge 520 is already registered to my
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 11:07:39 CEST Joerg Desch wrote:
> I'm using a Garmin Edge 520 for my bycicle and a (new) Forerunner for
> running. How can I access Garmin Connect without installing the Windows
> tools?
>
> The Garmin Edge 520 is already registered to my Garmin Connect account.
> I've
I'm using a Garmin Edge 520 for my bycicle and a (new) Forerunner for
running. How can I access Garmin Connect without installing the Windows
tools?
The Garmin Edge 520 is already registered to my Garmin Connect account.
I've used an old Windows 7 notebook with isn't functional anymore. Now
I'
Hello,
I have been pretty much desperately trying to get a serial B&R 900 series
touchscreen to work on Debian 7 using the elographics driver.
The device works but it is not well calibrated, and we are using LXDE so
the manufacturer tool does not work.
I have tried a mishmash of solutions,
On 12/20/2015 08:36 AM, Mimiko wrote:
zpool create -f -m none -o ashift=12 zfspool raidz2
wwn-0x5xxx . (all disks).
On 12/21/2015 11:20 PM, Mimiko wrote:
> One channel is connected to 8 x 2TB the other channel to 8 x 1TB.
...
> zfs list
> NAME USED AVAIL REFE
On 12/21/2015 11:20 PM, Mimiko wrote:
One [RAID] channel is connected to 8 x 2TB the other channel to 8 x 1TB.
What is the part number of your cables?
JBOD for software raid [on Wheezy].
I thought the 'zpool create ...' invocation showed all 16 drives in one
raidz2 pool (?). This is not
On 21.12.2015 09:58, David Christensen wrote:
On 12/20/2015 08:36 AM, Mimiko wrote:
The HDD's are connected thru SuperMicro SAS RAID AOC-USASLP-L8i
(PCI-E).
http://www.supermicro.com.tr/AOC-USASLP-L8i.cfm.htm
So, one RAID card, eight SAS channels, and one 2 TB and one 1 TB drive
per channel
On 12/21/2015 12:24 AM, David Christensen wrote:
Download a live CD image, burn two discs/ USB flash drives, and try again:
https://www.debian.org/CD/live/
debian-live-8.2.0-amd64-standard.iso
I just realized that the live disc might not have iperf...
Perhaps Knoppix:
http://knopp
On 12/19/2015 07:24 PM, David Christensen wrote:
> I ran iperf ... ~950 MB/s.
Oops -- make that 950 Mbps.
On 12/20/2015 09:13 AM, Mimiko wrote:
I've tested using iperf the file server to the windows server and I've
got 400Mbits.
Something is wrong.
The other li
On 12/20/2015 08:36 AM, Mimiko wrote:
If LUKS you mean Linux Unified Key Setup, then I don't use [it].
Okay.
The HDD's are connected thru SuperMicro SAS RAID AOC-USASLP-L8i
(PCI-E).
http://www.supermicro.com.tr/AOC-USASLP-L8i.cfm.htm
So, one RAID card, eight SAS channels, and one 2 TB an
I've tested using iperf the file server to the windows server and I've
got 400Mbits. The other linux server got 600Mbits. Also I've tested
iperf between windows server and another same type supermicro with
hyper-v and got around 650Mbits.
I've tested samba speed from windows to other linux ser
On 20.12.2015 02:36, Frank Pikelner wrote:
> There appear to be driver issues discussed in other threads with
> respect to Intel driver and slow throughput due to interrupts and CPU
> offloading. May want to review driver parameters and look at trying a
> few changes.
Yes, I've read about that. I
RAM is too much, too little, or just right?
Same cable types, same server type on windows gives faster file
transfer. All servers is on gigabit switch.
Then it's software and/or configuration.
iperf between two Debian 7 servers gives a good performance almost. The
problem server has Inte
There appear to be driver issues discussed in other threads with
respect to Intel driver and slow throughput due to interrupts and CPU
offloading. May want to review driver parameters and look at trying a
few changes.
Frank
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Mimiko wrote:
>
Mimiko wrote:
> After reviewing the results of test, I've modified smb.conf. I've added
> max protocol = SMB2 and removed SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 from
> socket options. The read speed from this server increased to 40MB/s, the
> write speed to this server increased to 30MB/s.
The SO_*BUF
U @ 2,4GHz with 18 GB ram.
> What version of Debian? Which kernel? Any other customizations?
Message title states Debian 7 which is Wheezy, Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1
SMP Debian 3.2.68-1+deb7u6 x86_64 GNU/Linux. All updates installed. It's
a standard install with ZFS for software raid and
On 12/18/2015 09:44 AM, Mimiko wrote:
ifconfig
bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST MTU:9000 Metric:1
RX packets:654308767 errors:0 dropped:5238 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:761897714 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:
On 12/18/2015 03:35 AM, Mimiko wrote:
I've bonded two onboard Intel 82576 Gigabit networks on an supermicro
server for load balancing (round-robin). It is working, but transfer
rate is about 10-20MB/s, while on same type of server the same
configuration in windows I get around 100MB/s.
How did
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 07:44:58PM +0200, Mimiko wrote:
> iperf -c ip
>
> Client connecting to ip, TCP port 5001
> TCP window size: 23.5 KByte (default)
>
> [ 3] local ip port
On 18.12.2015 16:32, Michael Beck wrote:
> Any lost packets?
ifconfig
bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST MTU:9000 Metric:1
RX packets:654308767 errors:0 dropped:5238 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:761897714 errors:0 dropped:0
> Am 18.12.2015 um 12:35 schrieb Mimiko :
>
> Hello.
>
> I've bonded two onboard Intel 82576 Gigabit networks on an supermicro server
> for load balancing (round-robin). It is working, but transfer rate is about
> 10-20MB/s, while on same type of server the same configuration in windows I
> g
Hello.
I've bonded two onboard Intel 82576 Gigabit networks on an supermicro
server for load balancing (round-robin). It is working, but transfer
rate is about 10-20MB/s, while on same type of server the same
configuration in windows I get around 100MB/s.
cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0
Ethernet
Andrew Puschak wrote:
> I inherited some Debian servers running 7 wheezy and am upgrading to 8
> jessie. During apt-get upgrade (after setting /etc/apt/sources.list to
> jessie) I get a less command displaying changelogs as seen below with
> the first package being nagios-nrpe. I also get a list
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 04:11:13PM +, Andrew Puschak wrote:
> Hi Everyone!
>
> I inherited some Debian servers running 7 wheezy and am upgrading to 8
> jessie. During apt-get upgrade (after setting /etc/apt/sources.list to
> jessie) I get a less command displaying changelogs as seen below with
Hi Everyone!
I inherited some Debian servers running 7 wheezy and am upgrading to 8 jessie.
During apt-get upgrade (after setting /etc/apt/sources.list to jessie) I get a
less command displaying changelogs as seen below with the first package being
nagios-nrpe. I also get a list of packages dur
I found a solution. I compared this .srt file with another .srt file
that works on my version of VLC. I found that the difference is the
format of the time tags. I changed it accordingly from:
00:03:47.47 --> 00:03:53
to:
00:03:47,470 --> 00:03:53,000
(which is the format used in the .sr
Hello.
When I try to watch a video with external .srt subtitles in VLC, I get
strings like "98 --> 00:00:11" (which are strings part of the .stt file)
instead of the proper text. The problem is the same whether I open the
subtitles with the "Open (advanced)" menu option, or name both files the
On Sat, 2015-10-10 at 13:08 -0500, Mario Castelán Castro wrote:
> Hello.
>
> When I try to watch a video with external .srt subtitles in VLC, I
> get
> strings like "98 --> 00:00:11" (which are strings part of the .stt
> file)
> instead of the proper text. The problem is the same whether I open
Hey guys,
Thanks so much for your help! I can confirm removing the default gateway
from eth0 solved this!
I don't use ethernet much, so it's not a big deal to add the default
gateway manually when I do so.
Thanks
On 16 Jun 2015 20:24, "Bob Proulx" wrote:
> Reco wrote:
> > linuxthefish wrote:
>
Reco wrote:
> linuxthefish wrote:
> > auto lo
> > iface lo inet loopback
> >
> > auto eth0
> > iface eth0 inet static
> > address 172.16.0.4
> > gateway 172.16.0.1
> > netmask 255.255.0.0
> >
> > allow-hotplug wlan0
> > iface wlan0 inet static
> > wpa-conf /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant0.conf
Hi.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:00:23PM +0100, linuxthefish wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It looks like Debian will only connect to a wireless network when the
> ethernet cable has been plugged in and unplugged. Both the wired and
> wireless connections are set to automatically come up - but wireless
> wil
linuxthefish wrote:
> It looks like Debian will only connect to a wireless network when the
> ethernet cable has been plugged in and unplugged.
No. If you are seeing this it is either a bug or a configuration or
use problem. Works fine for most of us. So my guess is a
configuration or use probl
Hello,
It looks like Debian will only connect to a wireless network when the
ethernet cable has been plugged in and unplugged. Both the wired and
wireless connections are set to automatically come up - but wireless
will not come up and fails to respond to ping unless a ethernet cable
has been plug
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:35:13PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Chris Bannister (cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz):
> > On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 04:03:37PM +, Curt wrote:
> > > On 2015-04-19, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> > > >
> > > > With this many others of us not having any problems on multip
Celejar writes:
> I run my main browser instance with all JavaScript disabled…
I wrote:
> So do I. Lots of sites put up banners warning me that some "features"
> may not operate properly without JS but generally those are exactly the
> "features" that I specifically don't want. A few other sites
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 20:51:58 -0500
John Hasler wrote:
> Celejar writes:
> > I run my main browser instance with all JavaScript disabled…
>
> So do I. Lots of sites put up banners warning me that some "features"
> may not operate properly without JS but generally those are exactly the
> "feature
Quoting Chris Bannister (cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz):
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 04:03:37PM +, Curt wrote:
> > On 2015-04-19, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> > >
> > > With this many others of us not having any problems on multiple
> > > various browsers, I wonder what (other) secondary things might
On 2015-04-20, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> Don't confuse primary and secondary with counting. Think 'primary =
I'm not confused, nor do I require any lessons from you, nor
will I bugger this gnat any further.
Let's leave it at that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 04:03:37PM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2015-04-19, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> >
> > With this many others of us not having any problems on multiple
> > various browsers, I wonder what (other) secondary things might be
>
> 2 is 'many' in your book?
Don't confuse primary and sec
On 04/19/2015 11:46 AM, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
Saw the other responses so chiming in. https://www.capitalone.com/
works for me here, too.
Works for me, Firefox with java enabled.
--
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, a
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 19 April 2015 13:06:44 Lisi Reisz wrote:
I want my nose to stay on my face.
This was rather excellent. Tres droll. Not in any need
of explication.
We should not support the current horror of inducing
discomfort in others. Learning how to
On 2015-04-19, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
>
> With this many others of us not having any problems on multiple
> various browsers, I wonder what (other) secondary things might be
2 is 'many' in your book?
At any rate, I got the site to load in chromium. In iceweasal, even in
safe mode (all extensio
On 4/19/15, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting John Hasler (jhas...@newsguy.com):
>>
>> So do I [run browser with javascript disabled].
>> Lots of sites put up banners warning me that some "features"
>> may not operate properly without JS but generally those are exactly the
>> "features" that I specifi
On 2015-04-19, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> >
>> > Lisi.
>>
>> The page will not load for me with javascript enabled (I use NoScript).
>> Iceweasal endlessly spins its wheels 'waiting for login.capital.com...'
>
> Yes, I have javascript enabled.
Me too, but the page in question wouldn't load here.
--
On Sunday 19 April 2015 13:06:44 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> I want my nose to stay on my face.
After what has been said about comprehensibility. I mean that i do not want
to cut off my nose to spite my face.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cutting_off_the_nose_to_spite_the_face
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Sunday 19 April 2015 12:49:23 Curt wrote:
> On 2015-04-19, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > I can't answer the question, but I have just successfully loaded it in
> > Chrome, Iceweasel and Konqueror. In Iceweasel it insisted on cookies.
> >
> > Lisi.
>
> The page will not load for me with javascript enab
On 2015-04-19, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> I can't answer the question, but I have just successfully loaded it in
> Chrome,
> Iceweasel and Konqueror. In Iceweasel it insisted on cookies.
>
> Lisi.
>
The page will not load for me with javascript enabled (I use NoScript).
Iceweasal endlessly spins it
On Sunday 19 April 2015 05:44:36 David Wright wrote:
> With JS enabled (as it has been for me) and Flash available (at the
> moment I have to "Allow Now" on each page) there are odd sites that
> still will not work, eg https://www.capitalone.com/ where, if I
> try to login, it just says
> "The conn
Quoting John Hasler (jhas...@newsguy.com):
> Celejar writes:
> > I run my main browser instance with all JavaScript disabled…
>
> So do I. Lots of sites put up banners warning me that some "features"
> may not operate properly without JS but generally those are exactly the
> "features" that I spe
Celejar writes:
> I run my main browser instance with all JavaScript disabled…
So do I. Lots of sites put up banners warning me that some "features"
may not operate properly without JS but generally those are exactly the
"features" that I specifically don't want. A few other sites really
won't w
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 08:38:43 + (UTC)
Liam O'Toole wrote:
...
> So do you normally run browsers on squeeze with javascript /dis/abled? I'm
> surprised that any modern web sites work at all.
I run my main browser instance with all JavaScript disabled, and many /
most of the sites I use run pe
osts - it is to do with the
> RAM being used up without memory swapping, occurring, when memory
> usage shows at 90-95%, with no memory swapping.
>
> But, this thread has now descended into flaming, and so I simply give
> up on it, and, on trying to get Debian 7 to work, via the mai
> I suspect the OP is confused about used vs free memory[1].
>
No.
It has been made quite clear, in previous posts - it is to do with the
RAM being used up without memory swapping, occurring, when memory
usage shows at 90-95%, with no memory swapping.
But, this thread has now descended into f
On 2015-04-17, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
>> The computers upon which I run Debian 6, have only 16 GB of RAM, and,
>
> Lucky you. 2GB here.
>
>> expecially with Debian 6 not having adequate memory management (as
>> previously mentioned, memory swapping does no
Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
> The computers upon which I run Debian 6, have only 16 GB of RAM, and,
Lucky you. 2GB here.
> expecially with Debian 6 not having adequate memory management (as
> previously mentioned, memory swapping does not work effectively), so,
Eh? Squeeze ran qui
on Debian" does not mean that important system packages are
interchangeable. If I'm not mistaken, Ubuntu get their packages from
Jessie/Sid, if you try to install on Wheezy you likely have an older X
server, at the least. I wouldn't attempt it without first doing a
little resear
t; It is not "nice" new hardware. This partivular computer was bought to
> try to determine whether Debian 7 could run an external monitor - it
> has a different graphics hardware configuration. So far, it is not
> "nice", as I can't get Debian 7 to run the exter
in squeeze was EOL'ed years ago, from a security
>>> perspective if nothing else.
>>>
>>
>>
>> What it comes down to, has nothing to do with the version number of
>> Debian.
>>
>> What it came down to, is, the web page bien aspx shite, it req
no idea, as I
> haven't tried, but I would take a backup first, as they may hose things
> considerably.
>
I am well aware that Ubuntu is not Debian, although, from what I
understand, it may still be derived from, and, based on Debian.
As I had said, the Seamonkey package for Ubuntu, in
ceweasel on jessie.
>> It should work on wheezy, which has the same version of iceweasel, too.
>>
>> Any browser you run in squeeze was EOL'ed years ago, from a security
>> perspective if nothing else.
>>
>
>
> What it comes down to, has nothing to d
Petter Adsen writes:
But. These packages are for *Ubuntu*. Ubuntu is not Debian. Yes,
they both use .deb packages, but that does not mean that the
Ubuntu packages will work well (or at all) on Debian.
Since joining this list, i have been quite startled by how many
questions get asked here
On 2015-04-17, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 17/04/2015, David Wright wrote:
>> Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
>>> On 17/04/2015, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>>> > On 2015-04-16, Bret Busby wrote:
>>> >> On 17/04/2015, Ric Moore wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>> Have you tried "catalyst" for the
On 2015-04-17, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 17/04/2015, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>
>
>
>> Any browser you run in squeeze was EOL'ed years ago, from a security
>> perspective if nothing else.
>>
>
>
> So, are you claiming that the LTS of Debian 6 LTS, is imaginary, and
> does not exist?
I am not. I am telli
om whence do I get that?
See above.
> >> So, I searched within Synaptic, for xserver-xorg-video-radeon .
> >>
> >> I found that xserver-xorg-video-ati and xserver-xorg-video-radeon,
> >> are already installed.
> >
> > I take it that's on your whee
's point. You said you were running a
> squeeze browser, 21 lines above and again 6 lines below this one.
> That would be a security risk were it not LTS.
>
Liam's point appeared to be that if anyone (me) is stupid enough to be
still using "squeeze", then they (me) can&#x
t comes down to, has nothing to do with the version number of Debian.
I don't think that was Liam's point. You said you were running a
squeeze browser, 21 lines above and again 6 lines below this one.
That would be a security risk were it not LTS.
> What it came down to, is, the web
hing of the sort. The site Works fine in iceweasel on
> > jessie. It should work on wheezy, which has the same version of
> > iceweasel, too.
> >
> > Any browser you run in squeeze was EOL'ed years ago, from a security
> > perspective if nothing else.
> >
&g
s EOL'ed years ago, from a security
> perspective if nothing else.
>
What it comes down to, has nothing to do with the version number of Debian.
What it came down to, is, the web page bien aspx shite, it requires
javascript (javashite).
I installed a 12.x version of opera (from my Debi
On 17/04/2015, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> Any browser you run in squeeze was EOL'ed years ago, from a security
> perspective if nothing else.
>
So, are you claiming that the LTS of Debian 6 LTS, is imaginary, and
does not exist?
--
Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia
..
"So once you
On 04/16/2015 06:07 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2015-04-16, Bret Busby wrote:
On 17/04/2015, Ric Moore wrote:
Have you tried "catalyst" for the AMD setup?? Under AMD Mobility
Product Family your 6000 series is listed.
http://support.amd.com/en-us/kb-articles/Pages/AMDCatalyst14-9LINRelease
On 2015-04-16, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 17/04/2015, Ric Moore wrote:
>> Have you tried "catalyst" for the AMD setup?? Under AMD Mobility
>> Product Family your 6000 series is listed.
>> http://support.amd.com/en-us/kb-articles/Pages/AMDCatalyst14-9LINReleaseNotes.aspx
>>
>
> Hello.
>
> I assume
g/category/VIDEO/?&page=3
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> David.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Now, you say that, but, Ubuntu 14.04 shows two different sets of
>> information, as shown in my preceding messages;
>>
>>
>> "
>>
>>
note that, having just installed (and presently updating) Ubuntu
14.04LTS, on the Acer E5-521-238Q, the same graphics drive shows as
being used, as for Debian 7 on the Acer V3772G;
from System Settings -> Hardware -> Overview, I have
"
Processor: AMD E2-6110 APU with AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
lins [Radeon APU A4-6000 with R2 Graphics]")
> of the CPU that I had specified;
> ("AMD E2-6110 APU with AMD Radeon R2 Graphics x4")
Yes.
> but, however it is interpreted, my deduction that both Debian 7 and
> Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, appear to be lacking a(n adequate) driver for
ing messages;
"
>> >>
>> >> I note that, having just installed (and presently updating) Ubuntu
>> >> 14.04LTS, on the Acer E5-521-238Q, the same graphics drive shows as
>> >> being used, as for Debian 7 on the Acer V3772G;
>> >>
>
Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
> bret@bret-Aspire-E5-521:~$ lspci | grep -i vga
> 00:01.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> [AMD/ATI] Mullins [Radeon APU A4-6000 with R2 Graphics]
I think you should concentrate on the string in brackets,
which appears on
http
Settings -> Details -> Graphics, it has
>> >> >
>> >> > "
>> >> > Driver: Gallium 0.4 on llvmpipe (LLVM 0x209)
>> >> > Experience: Fallback
>> >> > "
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >&g
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:21:46 +0800
Bret Busby wrote:
> On 16/04/2015, Petter Adsen wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:46:46 +0800
> > Bret Busby wrote:
> >
> >> On 14/04/2015, Bret Busby wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
&
On 16/04/2015, Petter Adsen wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:46:46 +0800
> Bret Busby wrote:
>
>> On 14/04/2015, Bret Busby wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > In the Debian 7 installation on the Acer V3-772G, for
>> > System -> Sett
1 - 100 of 563 matches
Mail list logo
