cc. to commun...@debian.org because I'm explaining CT involvment.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:47:51PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 03:49:13PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> > On 12/21/23 14:27, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > > Posting well-intentioned private repl
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 03:49:13PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> On 12/21/23 14:27, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > Posting well-intentioned private replies back to the list is not
> > appropriate.
>
> Please clarify how the Debian Community Team wishes us to respond to the
> following u
I'm not Andrew, and can't answer for Andrew or for anyone on the
Debian Community Team, but my take on this is:
On 21 Dec 2023 15:49 -0800, from dpchr...@holgerdanske.com (David Christensen):
> On 12/21/23 14:27, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>> Posting well-intentioned private replies back to the lis
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 02:59:26PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
Clarification, please. Occasionally a miss-configured mail reader will
cause a private off-list reply, which the correspondent does not notice.
My usual response to that sort of thing is to suggest that the
correspondent fix his mail
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 02:59:26PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 21:36:00 +
> "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
>
> > Replies to you which are specifically marked as replies off-list are
> > private. Don't repost private information. The normal expectation is
> > that the list
5 matches
Mail list logo
