Re: Can't install Debian to CF card in SATA adapter

On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 09:33:42PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Mike wrote: > > I don't think that it's a bad grub binary, as I have reinstalled several > > times, with the same result. > > But if it's indeed shim which is complaining then it complains about the > content of grubx64.efi

Re: Can't install Debian to CF card in SATA adapter

Hi, Mike wrote: > I don't think that it's a bad grub binary, as I have reinstalled several > times, with the same result. But if it's indeed shim which is complaining then it complains about the content of grubx64.efi. I guess that the problem would show up in the output of objdump -x ...path

Re: Can't install Debian to CF card in SATA adapter

On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 12:45:12PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Mike wrote: > > booting to the EFI Shell, I > > can access the EFI parition, cd to EFI/debian and manaully call > > shimx64.efi, giving the following output: > > > > Reloc 0 block size 0 is invalid > > Relocation failed: Uns

Re: Can't install Debian to CF card in SATA adapter

Hi, Mike wrote: > booting to the EFI Shell, I > can access the EFI parition, cd to EFI/debian and manaully call > shimx64.efi, giving the following output: > > Reloc 0 block size 0 is invalid > Relocation failed: Unsupported The web has remarkably few info on that problem. The best i found is h

Re: Can't install Debian to CF card in SATA adapter

On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 09:11:56AM -0500, songbird wrote: > Mike wrote: > > > > "near identical" is perhaps not identical enough. :( > > to be practical IMO the SSD works, go with that. > the cost of time and effort to figure out the problem > is probably already larger than the cost of the

Re: Can't install Debian to CF card in SATA adapter

Mike wrote: > > --82iZo52UH5hltGCH > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > > Folks, > > I'm building a new NAS box which has five HDDs in a RAID 5 > configuration, using Linux software RAID. Historically this has caused > some challenges when dealing with /boot

Can't install Debian to CF card in SATA adapter

Folks, I'm building a new NAS box which has five HDDs in a RAID 5 configuration, using Linux software RAID. Historically this has caused some challenges when dealing with /boot. Some time back I set upon the idea of using an IDE > CF adapter and putting a small CF card in there for /boot, with t

Re: SOLVED - Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 7:03 AM Dave Sherohman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 10:28:34AM -0500, Marc Auslander wrote: > > One potential gotcha. When you boot from an mdadm file system containing > > /boot/grub, grub will not write to the file system. In particular, it > will > > not update gru

Re: SOLVED - Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 10:28:34AM -0500, Marc Auslander wrote: > One potential gotcha. When you boot from an mdadm file system containing > /boot/grub, grub will not write to the file system. In particular, it will > not update grub/grubenv even if you have a save_env line in grub.cfg. So if >

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

On Mi, 03 mar 21, 17:16:14, Felix Miata wrote: > Andrei POPESCU composed on 2021-03-03 17:50 (UTC+0200): > > > Felix Miata wrote: > > >> To start with, RAID1 is marginally slower than ordinary filesystems on > >> partitions. > > > This is true for some workloads, for others it can be significan

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

Hello, On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 10:04:34AM +, Darac Marjal wrote: > So, if your file is small, then yes, you won't see any performance > benefit. But if your file is larger than a block, or if you want > to access more than one file at once, then RAID can read the > second block from a differen

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

On 05/03/2021 09:25, Anssi Saari wrote: > Greg Wooledge writes: > >> to...@tuxteam.de (to...@tuxteam.de) wrote: 1x 4TB, single drive, 3.7 TB, w=108MB/s , rw=50MB/s , r=204MB/s 2x 4TB, mirror (raid1),3.7 TB, w=106MB/s , rw=50MB/s , r=488MB/s >>> Thanks. Real data :)

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

Greg Wooledge writes: > to...@tuxteam.de (to...@tuxteam.de) wrote: >> > 1x 4TB, single drive, 3.7 TB, w=108MB/s , rw=50MB/s , r=204MB/s >> > 2x 4TB, mirror (raid1),3.7 TB, w=106MB/s , rw=50MB/s , r=488MB/s > >> Thanks. Real data :) >> >> The doubling in read throughput is s

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 08:09:46AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > to...@tuxteam.de (to...@tuxteam.de) wrote: > > > 1x 4TB, single drive, 3.7 TB, w=108MB/s , rw=50MB/s , > > > r=204MB/s > > > 2x 4TB, mirror (raid1),3.7 TB, w=106MB/s , rw=50MB/s , r=488MB/s > > > Thanks. Real d

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

to...@tuxteam.de (to...@tuxteam.de) wrote: > > 1x 4TB, single drive, 3.7 TB, w=108MB/s , rw=50MB/s , r=204MB/s > > 2x 4TB, mirror (raid1),3.7 TB, w=106MB/s , rw=50MB/s , r=488MB/s > Thanks. Real data :) > > The doubling in read throughput is somewhat surprising to me. Some >

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

Dave Sherohman writes: > Any tips on making use of the grub shell to make further progress, such > as getting the system to boot in non-rescue mode (i.e., not chrooted > from the installer)? The help information available in the grub shell > itself isn't terribly useful because it scrolls off th

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:40:39PM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote: > Felix Miata wrote: > > Andrei POPESCU composed on 2021-03-03 17:50 (UTC+0200): > > > > > Felix Miata wrote: > > [...] Do > > you know of, or can you provide a reference to, any way RAID1 performance > > can be > > better than single d

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:16:14PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > Andrei POPESCU composed on 2021-03-03 17:50 (UTC+0200): > > > Felix Miata wrote: > > >> To start with, RAID1 is marginally slower than ordinary filesystems on > >> partitions. > > > This is true for some workloads, for others it can

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

Felix Miata wrote: > Andrei POPESCU composed on 2021-03-03 17:50 (UTC+0200): > > > Felix Miata wrote: > > >> To start with, RAID1 is marginally slower than ordinary filesystems on > >> partitions. > > > This is true for some workloads, for others it can be significantly > > faster. > > > htt

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

Andrei POPESCU composed on 2021-03-03 17:50 (UTC+0200): > Felix Miata wrote: >> To start with, RAID1 is marginally slower than ordinary filesystems on >> partitions. > This is true for some workloads, for others it can be significantly > faster. > https://arstechnica.com/information-technolog

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

On Ma, 02 mar 21, 14:01:52, Felix Miata wrote: > > To start with, RAID1 is marginally slower than ordinary filesystems on > partitions. This is true for some workloads, for others it can be significantly faster. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2020/04/understanding-raid-how-perf

Re: SOLVED - Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

On 3/3/2021 6:30 AM, Dave Sherohman wrote: Based on this, I'm guessing that the original problem was that the installer forgot to include mdadm support in its grub options, even though it was configured with an mdadm boot device. And then I missed a couple steps after adding mdadm support, so

SOLVED - Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

So, after my last message, I ran across a general mdadm setup guide at https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_(new)_system and, in the "booting" section of that document, it said to add GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="domdadm" to /etc/default/grub. Didn't have that, so I added it, did the checks

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

General update on my situation: Just before knocking off for the day, I tried telling the installer to finish up without installing a boot loader, then used the netinst USB stick as a rescue disk to boot my installed system. From there, I was able to use the regular grub-install program (instead

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 05:57:37AM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote: > I've got a new server and am currently fighting with the Debian 10 > installer (build 20190702) in my attempts to get it up and running. > After much wailing and gnashing of teeth, I managed to get it to stop > complaining about bein

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

Dan Ritter composed on 2021-03-02 07:54 (UTC-0500): > Dave Sherohman wrote: >> I've got a new server... > You'll want to create the following partitions on each, > identically: > 1 efi - type efi Not RAID I presum

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 09:50:22 -0500 Dan Ritter wrote: > > I'm not positive that that's the correct approach, however, > > especially given that I suspect that /boot will need to be visible > > to GRUB and may thus need to be outside the LVM. > > grub can find a root in LVM, but needs /boot to be

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

On 2021-03-02 at 09:50, Dan Ritter wrote: > The Wanderer wrote: > >> On 2021-03-02 at 07:54, Dan Ritter wrote: >> >>> You'll want to create the following partitions on each, >>> identically: >>> >>> 1 efi - type efi >>> 2 boot (or boot/root) - type MDADM volume >>> 3 root, if using separate boo

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

The Wanderer wrote: > On 2021-03-02 at 07:54, Dan Ritter wrote: > > > You'll want to create the following partitions on each, > > identically: > > > > 1 efi - type efi > > 2 boot (or boot/root) - type MDADM volume > > 3 root, if using separate boot - type MDADM volume > > 4 swap - type MDADM vol

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 09:26:21AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > I didn't parse what he wrote that way. He said: > > You'll want to create the following partitions on each, > identically: > > 1 efi - type efi > 2 boot (or boot/root) - type MDADM volume > 3 root, if us

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

On 2021-03-02 at 09:20, Dave Sherohman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 09:09:52AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > >> On 2021-03-02 at 09:01, Dave Sherohman wrote: >>> RAID Device #1 is 1.9 TB, ext4fs, and set to mount on / >>> RAID Device #2 is 2.0 GB, ESP, and bootable >> >> So the EFI partition

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 09:09:52AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2021-03-02 at 09:01, Dave Sherohman wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 07:54:01AM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote: > > >> Then you go to the mdadm setup and create MDADM RAID1 devices > >> out of each pair of boot, root and swap. > > >

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

On 2021-03-02 at 09:01, Dave Sherohman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 07:54:01AM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote: >> Then you go to the mdadm setup and create MDADM RAID1 devices >> out of each pair of boot, root and swap. > > RAID Device #1 is 1.9 TB, ext4fs, and set to mount on / > RAID Device #2 is

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 07:54:01AM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote: > In the installer, you want expert mode. Does the disk > partitioner recognize both nvme0n1 and nvme1n1 ? Yes. The list of disks shown in the partitioner is currently: RAID device #1 RAID device #2 /dev/nvme0n1 /dev/nvme1n1 SCSI2 (0,0

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

On 2021-03-02 at 07:54, Dan Ritter wrote: > You'll want to create the following partitions on each, > identically: > > 1 efi - type efi > 2 boot (or boot/root) - type MDADM volume > 3 root, if using separate boot - type MDADM volume > 4 swap - type MDADM volume > > Then you go to the mdadm setup

Re: Deb10 installer can't install grub

Dave Sherohman wrote: > I've got a new server and am currently fighting with the Debian 10 > installer (build 20190702) in my attempts to get it up and running. > After much wailing and gnashing of teeth, I managed to get it to stop > complaining about being unble to mount /boot/efi and complete t

Deb10 installer can't install grub

I've got a new server and am currently fighting with the Debian 10 installer (build 20190702) in my attempts to get it up and running. After much wailing and gnashing of teeth, I managed to get it to stop complaining about being unble to mount /boot/efi and complete the "Partition disks" step succe

Re: Can't install package in an offline desktop with Debian 9 (Stretch)

On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:17:18 +0300 dalios wrote: > On 9/21/19 11:50 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 21:50:40 +0300 > > dalios wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I have a desktop with Debian 9.9 (Stretch) installed. I have moved it in > >> a house were cable connection is not

Re: Can't install package in an offline desktop with Debian 9 (Stretch)

On 9/21/19 11:50 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote: > On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 21:50:40 +0300 > dalios wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have a desktop with Debian 9.9 (Stretch) installed. I have moved it in >> a house were cable connection is not available but wifi is (thanks >> neighbors), so I used an older wifi

Re: Can't install package in an offline desktop with Debian 9 (Stretch)

On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 21:50:40 +0300 dalios wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a desktop with Debian 9.9 (Stretch) installed. I have moved it in > a house were cable connection is not available but wifi is (thanks > neighbors), so I used an older wifi adapter that I have. The adapter is > (according to l

Can't install package in an offline desktop with Debian 9 (Stretch)

Hi all, I have a desktop with Debian 9.9 (Stretch) installed. I have moved it in a house were cable connection is not available but wifi is (thanks neighbors), so I used an older wifi adapter that I have. The adapter is (according to lsusb) a "ralink technology corp rt2870/rt3070 wireless adapter"

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 12:42:27PM +0100, Joe wrote: > On Tue, 7 May 2019 12:26:44 +0200 > Siard wrote: > > > On Sat, 4 May 2019 09:27:26 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > > > Running firefox-esr on buster I don't seem to be able to install > > > addons. > > > > I just read that they fixed it in a n

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

On Tue, 7 May 2019 12:26:44 +0200 Siard wrote: > On Sat, 4 May 2019 09:27:26 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > > Running firefox-esr on buster I don't seem to be able to install > > addons. > > I just read that they fixed it in a new release: > https://news.softpedia.com/news/mozilla-releases-firefo

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

On Sat, 4 May 2019 09:27:26 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > Running firefox-esr on buster I don't seem to be able to install > addons. I just read that they fixed it in a new release: https://news.softpedia.com/news/mozilla-releases-firefox-66-0-4-for-pcs-and-android-to-fix-major-add-ons-issue-525888.

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 07:03, Peter Ehlert wrote: > > On 5/4/19 9:27 AM, Ross Boylan wrote: > > Running firefox-esr on buster I don't seem to be able to install > > addons. I tried selenium IDE and katalon. Has Debian blocked the > > installation of addons? I don't see indications of that in the

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

On 5/4/19 9:27 AM, Ross Boylan wrote: Running firefox-esr on buster I don't seem to be able to install addons. I tried selenium IDE and katalon. Has Debian blocked the installation of addons? I don't see indications of that in the docs or the net. Likewise, I know selenium (and maybe katalo

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

On 05/05/2019 10:52, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: Setting about:config / xpinstall.signatures.required to false fixed extensions for me for firefox 66.0.1-1 amd64 on Debian sid and for Firefox 66.0.2 on Android. I needed to restart Firefox on Debian. Seems fixed in firefox 66.0.4-1 on Debian sid

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 02:10:01PM -0400, Lee wrote: > On 5/6/19, Reco wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 01:35:48PM -0400, Lee wrote: > >> On 5/6/19, Dave Sherohman wrote: > >> > On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 07:29:55PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > >> >> > >> >> No, Mozilla really screwe

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

On 5/6/19, Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 01:35:48PM -0400, Lee wrote: >> On 5/6/19, Dave Sherohman wrote: >> > On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 07:29:55PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: >> >> >> >> No, Mozilla really screwed up. >> > >> > Understatement of the month, if not the year. And

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

Hi. On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 01:35:48PM -0400, Lee wrote: > On 5/6/19, Dave Sherohman wrote: > > On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 07:29:55PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > >> > >> No, Mozilla really screwed up. > > > > Understatement of the month, if not the year. And yet, on the Mozilla > > blog, all

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

On 5/6/19, Dave Sherohman wrote: > On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 07:29:55PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: >> >> No, Mozilla really screwed up. > > Understatement of the month, if not the year. And yet, on the Mozilla > blog, all the comments are "oh, you're so awesome for working on a > weekend to fix this!

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 07:29:55PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > No, Mozilla really screwed up. Understatement of the month, if not the year. And yet, on the Mozilla blog, all the comments are "oh, you're so awesome for working on a weekend to fix this!", completely ignoring that there wouldn't have

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

Being impatient and easily annoyed, I just installed Waterfox, which works fine. Yes, I know about the theoretical security issues. -- Carl Fink nitpick...@nitpicking.com Read my blog at blog.nitpicking.com. Reviews! Observations!

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

Ross Boylan wrote: > Running firefox-esr on buster I don't seem to be able to install > addons. I tried selenium IDE and katalon. Has Debian blocked the > installation of addons? I don't see indications of that in the docs > or the net. > No, Mozilla really screwed up. Every Firefox user has

re: can't install add-ons for firefox

One thing that can happen with firefox is you can install webvisum on firefox for windows but because webvisum supports no other operating system you can't install webvisum on linux or android or an iphone even though firefox works on all of those platforms. --

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

On 05/05/2019 21:30, Dave Sherohman wrote: On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 10:52:56AM +1200, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: Setting about:config / xpinstall.signatures.required to false fixed extensions for me for firefox 66.0.1-1 amd64 on Debian sid and for Firefox 66.0.2 on Android. I needed to restart Fir

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 10:52:56AM +1200, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Setting about:config / xpinstall.signatures.required to false fixed > extensions for me for firefox 66.0.1-1 amd64 on Debian sid and for Firefox > 66.0.2 on Android. I needed to restart Firefox on Debian. When I tried that yeste

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 02:34:16PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > Just wanted to draw people's attention to a couple of things: > > "There are a number of work-arounds being discussed in the community. > These are not recommended as they may conflict with fixes we are > deploying. We’ll let you know

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

Setting about:config / xpinstall.signatures.required to false fixed extensions for me for firefox 66.0.1-1 amd64 on Debian sid and for Firefox 66.0.2 on Android. I needed to restart Firefox on Debian. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Director Transient Software Limited

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

I have been just waiting for Mozilla. A few moments ago I saw this: https://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/firefox-addons-disabled-bug.html simple and logical work-around... just remember to check back and re-enable. Peter running ESR on Buster Mate On 5/4/19 2:34 PM, Ross Boylan wrote: Just wante

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

Just wanted to draw people's attention to a couple of things: "There are a number of work-arounds being discussed in the community. These are not recommended as they may conflict with fixes we are deploying. We’ll let you know when further updates are available that we recommend, and appreciate yo

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

Thanks Cindy, Jonas, Curt, Trevor and Erwan for all the good info. I wish my internet searches were as effective as yours! I noticed a few days ago that I started having problems accessing a lot of sites through https* (might have been on Windows at the time, either FF or FF ESR). The errors alw

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

Le 04/05/2019 à 18:50, Curt a écrit : > On 2019-05-04, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> It is an error in Mozilla infrastructure upstream - they have fixed it >> by abusing a backdoor in Firefox to update a certificate, but Debian >> has that backdoor disabled by default. >> >> https://blog.mozilla.or

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

* Ross Boylan (rossboy...@stanfordalumni.org) wrote: > Running firefox-esr on buster I don't seem to be able to install > addons. I tried selenium IDE and katalon. Has Debian blocked the > installation of addons? I don't see indications of that in the docs > or the net. https://github.com/mozil

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

On 2019-05-04, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > It is an error in Mozilla infrastructure upstream - they have fixed it > by abusing a backdoor in Firefox to update a certificate, but Debian > has that backdoor disabled by default. > > https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

Quoting Ross Boylan (2019-05-04 18:27:26) > Running firefox-esr on buster I don't seem to be able to install > addons. I tried selenium IDE and katalon. Has Debian blocked the > installation of addons? I don't see indications of that in the docs > or the net. > > Likewise, I know selenium (and

Re: Can't install addons for firefox

On 5/4/19, Ross Boylan wrote: > Running firefox-esr on buster I don't seem to be able to install > addons. I tried selenium IDE and katalon. Has Debian blocked the > installation of addons? I don't see indications of that in the docs > or the net. > > Likewise, I know selenium (and maybe katalo

Can't install addons for firefox

Running firefox-esr on buster I don't seem to be able to install addons. I tried selenium IDE and katalon. Has Debian blocked the installation of addons? I don't see indications of that in the docs or the net. Likewise, I know selenium (and maybe katalon) have had compatibility issues with some

Re: Can't install lightdm?

On 3/1/19, Dan Ritter wrote: > riveravaldez wrote: >> >> Right now I can start Xorg (apparently) but can't start IceWM, so, I >> >> only have CLI. >> > >> > Use 'startx' to start X. >> > >> > Write a .xinitrc like this: >> > >> > --- >> > #!/bin/sh >> > exec icewm >> > --- >> > >> > Later, testing

Re: Can't install lightdm?

riveravaldez wrote: > >> Right now I can start Xorg (apparently) but can't start IceWM, so, I > >> only have CLI. > > > > Use 'startx' to start X. > > > > Write a .xinitrc like this: > > > > --- > > #!/bin/sh > > exec icewm > > --- > > > > Later, testing will be fixed and you can install lightdm a

Re: Can't install lightdm?

>> Right now I can start Xorg (apparently) but can't start IceWM, so, I >> only have CLI. > > Use 'startx' to start X. > > Write a .xinitrc like this: > > --- > #!/bin/sh > exec icewm > --- > > Later, testing will be fixed and you can install lightdm again. > > -dsr- > Thanks a lot, Dan. After in

Re: Can't install lightdm?

riveravaldez wrote: > Hi, I'm on debian-testing (updated). > > As far as I understand I can't install lightdm unless I update systemd > which presents 2 errors. So, what should I do? That's what happens with testing. > So, what should I do? > > Right n

Can't install lightdm?

Hi, I'm on debian-testing (updated). As far as I understand I can't install lightdm unless I update systemd which presents 2 errors. So, what should I do? Here are the terminal outputs (system is in Spanish, these are machine-translations): $ sudo apt-get install lightdm Readi

Re: Can't install Debian without dedicated /boot partition

Le 04/09/2018 à 21:05, Dominik George a écrit : AFAICS you did not write anything about /boot/grub. I did not mention it by name, I only said there are two parts I do not remember reading about this either. grub-install must hardcode the location of /boot/grub into the core image. I guess i

Re: Can't install Debian without dedicated /boot partition

> AFAICS you did not write anything about /boot/grub. I did not mention it by name, I only said there are two parts and I do not see why the mere installation to the MBR or to the EFI area should fail ;). > > Can you explain why this fails on installation, where /boot/grub can be > > written? >

Re: Can't install Debian without dedicated /boot partition

Le 04/09/2018 à 20:21, Dominik George a écrit : *cough* You should get some information about how GRUB is installed and works. GRUB comes in two main parts : - the core image in various locations (+ boot image in some boot sector for GRUB BIOS) - the /boot/grub directory Yep. I basically said t

Re: Can't install Debian without dedicated /boot partition

Hi! That said, have you made sure to mount the EFI ESP partition as /boot/efi? I've just create an partition in the installer with the type `EFI`. Is this what you mean, or do you mean something else? There are quite a few mentions of this error spread over all kinds of distributions (just

Re: Can't install Debian without dedicated /boot partition

>*cough* >You should get some information about how GRUB is installed and works. >GRUB comes in two main parts : >- the core image in various locations (+ boot image in some boot sector > >for GRUB BIOS) >- the /boot/grub directory Yep. I basically said that (in paragraphs you removed from the quo

Re: Can't install Debian without dedicated /boot partition

Le 04/09/2018 à 13:50, Dominik George a écrit : I'm trying to install Debian Stretch with full disk encryption (LVM-on-LUKS). But when the installer is trying to install Grub in crashes with the following error message: Unable to install GRUB in dummy Executing 'grub-install dummy' failed. Th

Re: Can't install Debian without dedicated /boot partition

Hi, > I'm trying to install Debian Stretch with full disk encryption > (LVM-on-LUKS). But when the installer is trying to install Grub in crashes > with the following error message: > > ``` > Unable to install GRUB in dummy > Executing 'grub-install dummy' failed. > > This is a fatal error. > ``

Can't install Debian without dedicated /boot partition

Hi! I'm trying to install Debian Stretch with full disk encryption (LVM-on-LUKS). But when the installer is trying to install Grub in crashes with the following error message: ``` Unable to install GRUB in dummy Executing 'grub-install dummy' failed. This is a fatal error. ``` The disk is p

Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386)

On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 01:10:31PM +, T BkRl wrote: > Pascal, top reply is the default on many clients and web mail. I’m on my > iPhone using MS Outlook and it doesn’t let you choose where to put the cursor > relative to the reply text. Then stop using that.

Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386)

On Sun, Aug 5, 2018, 09:28 Nicolas George wrote: > T BkRl (2018-08-05): > > Sorry Nicolas > > Saying sorry when you do it again is a lie. > > Good bye, this is the last you will hear of me. > > -- > Nicolas George > Someone needs a hug . . . < *virtual hug given* > : )

Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386)

T BkRl (2018-08-05): > Sorry Nicolas Saying sorry when you do it again is a lie. Good bye, this is the last you will hear of me. -- Nicolas George signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386)

: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386) T BkRl (2018-08-05): > Long, it’s much safer to generate a new sources.list without security "Safer without security". Please refrain from spreading misinformation. > Pascal, top reply is the default on many clients and web m

Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386)

T BkRl (2018-08-05): > Long, it’s much safer to generate a new sources.list without security "Safer without security". Please refrain from spreading misinformation. > Pascal, top reply is the default on many clients and web mail The *default* is just that: whatever happens if you do not do anyth

Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386)

where to put the cursor relative to the reply text. From: Pascal Hambourg Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2018 8:50 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386) Le 05/08/2018 à 14:24, Long Wind a écrit : > S

Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386)

Le 05/08/2018 à 14:24, Long Wind a écrit : Sorry, it seems that default behavior of yahoo mail is top post Can't you move the cursor below the quoted text ? yes, i've comment out all sources in sources.list except http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian stretch main Why ? You don't get security u

Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386)

Sorry, it seems that default behavior of yahoo mail is top post yes, i've comment out all sources in sources.list except http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian stretch main On Sunday, August 5, 2018, 8:05:45 PM GMT+8, Pascal Hambourg wrote: Please don't top post, it makes it harder to read

Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386)

Please don't top post, it makes it harder to read and reply. Le 05/08/2018 à 13:52, Long Wind a écrit : fuse:   Installed: 2.9.7-1   Candidate: 2.9.7-1   Version table:  *** 2.9.7-1 500     500 http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 Packages     100 /var/lib/dpkg/statu

Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386)

Le 05/08/2018 à 12:58, Long Wind a écrit : apt-get remove libfuse2 after running command above, i can install jmtpfs Weird. fuse depends on the same version of libfuse2, so if removing libfuse2 allowed to install fuse, it means that the version of fuse that you just installed does not matc

Re: (solved)Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386)

August 5, 2018, 6:13:17 PM GMT+8, Shea Alterio < > krus...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Long, > Please send the output of > > *dpkg -l | grep fuse* > > > On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 6:08 AM Long Wind wrote: > > last time i install security update during stre

Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386)

wrote: > > > Long, > Please send the output of > > *dpkg -l | grep fuse* > > > On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 6:08 AM Long Wind wrote: > > last time i install security update during stretch installation and can't > install mplayer > > this time mplayer can

Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386)

no network connection. That method is more predictable. I don't install updates with the OS anymore, too risky. On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 6:14 AM likcoras wrote: > On 08/05/2018 07:03 PM, Long Wind wrote: > > last time i install security update during stretch installation and > can&

Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386)

On 08/05/2018 07:03 PM, Long Wind wrote: > last time i install security update during stretch installation and can't > install mplayer > > this time mplayer can be installed, but jmtpfs can't, below is error msg: > The following packages have unmet dependencies: >  j

Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386)

Long, Please send the output of *dpkg -l | grep fuse* On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 6:08 AM Long Wind wrote: > last time i install security update during stretch installation and can't > install mplayer > > this time mplayer can be installed, but jmtpfs can't, below is er

Re: can't install jmtpfs of stretch(i386)

Long Wind (2018-08-05): > last time i install security update during stretch installation and can't > install mplayer > > this time mplayer can be installed, but jmtpfs can't, below is error msg: > > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree

(solved) Re: can't install mplayer of stretch

i've found the causegcc-6-base from security update is cause9.3.0 CD isn't cause during re-installation, i disconnect ethernetto prevent installing security update On Monday, March 5, 2018 6:02 AM, Long Wind wrote: there is a typo in my last post:  not -> now the cause might be i use in

Re: can't install mplayer of stretch

Mark Fletcher wrote: > On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 10:01:23PM +, Long Wind wrote: >> there is a typo in my last post:  not -> now >> the cause might be i use installation CD 9.3.0but now apt source is >> newest (ftp.utexas.edu) >> >> On Sunday, March 4, 2018 4:55 PM, Long Wind >> wrote:

Re: can't install mplayer of stretch

ely at the libraries mplayer depends on and see if you have something pinning an older version of them or a conflict preventing them from being installed. I don't recall if apt has a why / why-not command, but aptitude does -- one early step would be to let the system tell you why it can

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >