On 20150421_1048-0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> On 20150421_1137-0500, John J. Boyer wrote:
> > I am using msmtp to send mail. However, I get the error "Remote protocol
> > errot." The log file shows ""TLS handshake filed. Operation timed out."
> > There is no problem on an older Vinux system, whic
On 20150421_1137-0500, John J. Boyer wrote:
> I am using msmtp to send mail. However, I get the error "Remote protocol
> errot." The log file shows ""TLS handshake filed. Operation timed out."
> There is no problem on an older Vinux system, which I am using to send
> this message. The author of
I am using msmtp to send mail. However, I get the error "Remote protocol
errot." The log file shows ""TLS handshake filed. Operation timed out."
There is no problem on an older Vinux system, which I am using to send
this message. The author of msmtp tells me that the problem is most
likely with
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:09:12PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Brian wrote:
> > Tony Baldwin wrote:
> > > I have copied the muttrc for this account to
> > > http://tonyb.myownsite.me/pages/muttrc.txt (password removed, of course).
> > > Same muttrc on both the server and desktop.
> > > mutt works pe
Brian wrote:
> Tony Baldwin wrote:
> > I have copied the muttrc for this account to
> > http://tonyb.myownsite.me/pages/muttrc.txt (password removed, of course).
> > Same muttrc on both the server and desktop.
> > mutt works perfectly with both accounts from the server, not from the
> > desktop.
S
Moin mitnanner, moin Anthony.
I remember having had similar problems with my mutt/wheezy on my laptop.
(My mails are handled by my provider; I use fetchmail to get them.)
As Interrupt reactions of your mail system could be due to missing files
or directories, I put an excerpt of my own exim4/mu
On Tue 22 Jul 2014 at 22:41:31 +0200, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 06:50:54PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 22 Jul 2014 at 13:50:13 +, Curt wrote:
> >
> > > On 2014-07-22, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ultimately, that's what I'd like to determine, but have so far not
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 06:50:54PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 22 Jul 2014 at 13:50:13 +, Curt wrote:
>
> > On 2014-07-22, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> > >
> > > Ultimately, that's what I'd like to determine, but have so far not been
> > > able to. The error is too vague (Interrupted System Call),
On Tue 22 Jul 2014 at 13:50:13 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2014-07-22, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > Ultimately, that's what I'd like to determine, but have so far not been
> > able to. The error is too vague (Interrupted System Call), and all the
> > googling and duckgoing and ixquicking has produced
On 2014-07-22, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
> Ultimately, that's what I'd like to determine, but have so far not been
> able to. The error is too vague (Interrupted System Call), and all the
> googling and duckgoing and ixquicking has produced nothing useful.
>
We need to see your config.
--
To UNSUB
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:38:10PM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2014-07-22, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> >
> >> There is probably a good reason for you to use mutt's native smtp
> >> support but you could consider using exim to sidestep the issue.
> >
> > How would I change from one to the other?
> >
>
> I'm
On 2014-07-22, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
>> There is probably a good reason for you to use mutt's native smtp
>> support but you could consider using exim to sidestep the issue.
>
> How would I change from one to the other?
>
I'm all for sidestepping your issue if only I knew what the heck your
issue
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 02:33:50PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 20 Jul 2014 at 16:08:25 +0200, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 12:55:09PM +, Curt wrote:
> > >
> > > I understood that he is using Mutt's native smtp support and the default
> > > exim configuration, which only
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 02:33:50PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 20 Jul 2014 at 16:08:25 +0200, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 12:55:09PM +, Curt wrote:
> > >
> > > I understood that he is using Mutt's native smtp support and the default
> > > exim configuration, which only
On Sun 20 Jul 2014 at 16:08:25 +0200, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 12:55:09PM +, Curt wrote:
> >
> > I understood that he is using Mutt's native smtp support and the default
> > exim configuration, which only handles local mail, I believe.
> >
> > Maybe an attempt to send ma
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 12:55:09PM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2014-07-20, Brian wrote:
> >>
> >> Yeah, it does.
> >> But that doesn't tell me anything about why mutt is faiilng.
> >> It shows me that mail works for local users.
> >
> > Does 'mail' also work with remote users? Does mutt work with loc
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 12:55:55PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 20 Jul 2014 at 02:06:31 +0200, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 03:45:27PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > >
> > > Assuming a valid username is "tony", mainlog should show a record of
> > >
> > >mail -s TEST tony@localh
On 2014-07-20, Brian wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, it does.
>> But that doesn't tell me anything about why mutt is faiilng.
>> It shows me that mail works for local users.
>
> Does 'mail' also work with remote users? Does mutt work with local and
> remote users? Can we rule out a problem with exim?
I under
On Sun 20 Jul 2014 at 02:06:31 +0200, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 03:45:27PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> >
> > Assuming a valid username is "tony", mainlog should show a record of
> >
> >mail -s TEST tony@localhost
> >
> > being sent.
>
> Yeah, it does.
> But that doesn't tell
On Jo, 17 iul 14, 23:41:20, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
> Hi,
> I am unable to send mail with mutt from my home desktop, either through
> one of my own domains (this one, myownsite.me), or through gmx.com's SMTP
> server.
Please attach your .muttrc, just take care to replace passwords with XXX
or so.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 03:45:27PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 18 Jul 2014 at 15:26:50 +0200, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
> > /var/log/exim4/mainlog shows nothing I deem useful.
> > Lots of stuff like:
> > 2014-07-18 07:53:14 Start queue run: pid=13117
> > 2014-07-18 07:53:14 End queue run: pid=13117
>
On 2014-07-18, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
> yes, not customized, exim4 installed, so I assume that's sending the
> mail
>
I believe by default exim is configured only to handle email local to
the system.
That's how it works here (squeeze).
I use alpine to send directly to my ISP's smtp server (not h
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:52:15 -0600
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Tony Baldwin wrote:
> > What else can I do to diagnose this issue and/or, of course,
> > resolve it?
>
> I think this must be something other than mutt. In your description
> you didn't mention how you were sending email and therefore I kno
On Fri 18 Jul 2014 at 15:26:50 +0200, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> /var/log/exim4/mainlog shows nothing I deem useful.
> Lots of stuff like:
> 2014-07-18 07:53:14 Start queue run: pid=13117
> 2014-07-18 07:53:14 End queue run: pid=13117
> 2014-07-18 08:23:14 Start queue run: pid=14426
> 2014-07-18 08:23:
Am 18.07.2014 15:26, schrieb Tony Baldwin:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 03:14:09PM +0200, Tony Baldwin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 08:52:15PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
If you have not customized it then you are using /usr/sbin/sendmail
and the message is handed off to your system MTA for delivery.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 03:14:09PM +0200, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 08:52:15PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > If you have not customized it then you are using /usr/sbin/sendmail
> > and the message is handed off to your system MTA for delivery. If so
> > then the system MTA will
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 08:52:15PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Tony Baldwin wrote:
> > What else can I do to diagnose this issue and/or, of course, resolve it?
>
> I think this must be something other than mutt. In your description
> you didn't mention how you were sending email and therefore I kn
Tony Baldwin wrote:
> What else can I do to diagnose this issue and/or, of course, resolve it?
I think this must be something other than mutt. In your description
you didn't mention how you were sending email and therefore I know you
weren't looking at that part of things. I suspect it is in the
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:41:20PM +0200, Anthony Baldwin wrote:
> Hi,
> I am unable to send mail with mutt from my home desktop, either through
> one of my own domains (this one, myownsite.me), or through gmx.com's SMTP
> server.
> Furthermore, I can send through both with mutt when I login into t
Hi,
I am unable to send mail with mutt from my home desktop, either through
one of my own domains (this one, myownsite.me), or through gmx.com's SMTP
server.
Furthermore, I can send through both with mutt when I login into the
myownsite server (hosted in Germany by contabo.com) just fine.
So, I hav
Zenaan,
On Sunday 15 September 2013 11:30:56 am Zenaan Harkness wrote:
...
> >> On 9/15/13, Randy Kramer wrote:
> >>
> >> ... email intermittent on 36-48hr boundary ...
> http://checkmyip.com/
>
> They key is, what is the public-facing ip address, notwithstanding
> what eg ifconfig shows you for
On 9/16/13, Randy Kramer wrote:
> On Saturday 14 September 2013 8:15:18 pm Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> On 9/15/13, Randy Kramer wrote:
>>
>> ... email intermittent on 36-48hr boundary ...
>> I in recent days discovered something possibly of note for you, but
>> probably not - I've been using mail.
Zenaan,
Thanks very much for your response!
I might scribble a few notes below or on your subsequent email.
Just for the record, I should say that my interest in delving deeper into this
problem is both (1) reduced since I've switched back to a static address
(and/or found other ways to avoi
On 9/15/13, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 9/15/13, Randy Kramer wrote:
>
> ... email intermittent on 36-48hr boundary ...
>
>> update is to say that I've switched back to a static IP address on the
>> computer in question (instead of a dynamic address) and the problem is
>> "under control".
>>
>> B
On 9/15/13, Randy Kramer wrote:
... email intermittent on 36-48hr boundary ...
> update is to say that I've switched back to a static IP address on the
> computer in question (instead of a dynamic address) and the problem is
> "under control".
>
> By that, I mean that, it seems the problem still
FWIW, I thought I'd post an update on the status of the problem. The simplest
update is to say that I've switched back to a static IP address on the
computer in question (instead of a dynamic address) and the problem is "under
control".
By that, I mean that, it seems the problem still occurs
I was going to write a long email, detailing the various things I've tried,
but I thought I'd start with a short email, just generalizing on the problem,
to see if it rang a bell with someone. Read the entire email to see the
recent changes I made to my LAN--the problem did not exist before I m
I don't know what packages I upgraded, just that recently there was a
large group of upgrades. After I ran apt-get dist-upgrade and then try
to send from mozilla there is about a 30 second delay during which the
sending message is displayed and then mozilla reports that the SMTP link
could not
I don't know which packages were upgraded, just that it was a large
group. (This is an aggravation - in the past I tried starting a script
before upgrading but the result was pages of entries, one for each
packet received.)
After the upgrade mozilla tries to send for about 30 seconds and then
rep
--gm5TwAJMO0F2iVRz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Emily Dryden wrote:
> As in previous message, we have three computers in a local network=20
> linked through a route to a DSL modem. I am sending this message fro
As in previous message, we have three computers in a local network
linked through a route to a DSL modem. I am sending this message from
my daughter's computer. She is the DSL subscriber and I send mail from
my computers through her SMTP link. Suddenly, after distribution
upgrades of my two
I have a three computer home network connected through a router to a dsl
modem. Initial attempts to set up the email accounts with kde failed
because konqueror could supply the user name for the smpt account but
not the password. Fortunately, mozilla could do both. Now mozilla can
no longer
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 08:49:25AM -0500, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> Mark mentioned,
> > On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 12:20:12PM -0500, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > > I can send mail from my debian box to anywhere except my local domain.
> > You don't provide any details of your configuration - wh
Mark mentioned,
> On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 12:20:12PM -0500, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > I can send mail from my debian box to anywhere except my local domain.
> You don't provide any details of your configuration - which MTA are you
> using (smail?), and how did you set it up?
It's smail, as
On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 12:20:12PM -0500, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> I can send mail from my debian box to anywhere except my local domain.
You don't provide any details of your configuration - which MTA are you
using (smail?), and how did you set it up?
> The debian box is hawkins.cba.uni.edu
I can send mail from my debian box to anywhere except my local domain.
The debian box is hawkins.cba.uni.edu, and any mail to any account at
uni.edu yields the result,
hawkins at uni.edu: loses; [USER] 550 '<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
not matched: (ERR_100) unknown user.
post: 1 addressee undeliv
Hi Matt,
I have gotten rewriting working correctly now, though I don't understand
exactly why what I ended up having to do worked.
My rewrite configuration in /etc/exim.conf looks like this:
##
# REWRITE C
On Sun, Dec 27, 1998 at 10:43:53PM -0900, Britton wrote:
>
> I would try exim instead of smail, I've found it easier to set up with
> nice docs. I'm trying to get address re-writing working now, but at least
> I can send messages (albeit with [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a
> From: address). The rewrite
I would try exim instead of smail, I've found it easier to set up with
nice docs. I'm trying to get address re-writing working now, but at least
I can send messages (albeit with [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a
From: address). The rewrite stuff has fairly good instructions. I think
I got errors somethin
The following attempt to contact the outside world fails:
mail -s test [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
I immediately receive a message that includes the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... transport smtp: 553 <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>...unresolvable;
rejected. Check your DNS
All attem
This is my first post to this list.
I have been running Debian(currently Hamm)/ Win 95/98 for over 12
months, and gradually increasing the functionality of debian and using
windows only when I have to.
My email is working fine except when I try to send messages to other
users on my local ISP.
Fo
>> All of a sudden I can't send out mail, if I try to force exim with -qf
>> I get
>> 1998-10-16 19:01:26 0zUDEj-FQ-00 TCP service "smtp" not found
>>
>> (using Exim version 1.92 #1 built 13-May-1998 10:01:52)
>>
>> fetchmail delivers incoming mail without any trouble...
>>
>> Is this someth
All of a sudden I can't send out mail, if I try to force exim with -qf
I get
1998-10-16 19:01:26 0zUDEj-FQ-00 TCP service "smtp" not found
(using Exim version 1.92 #1 built 13-May-1998 10:01:52)
fetchmail delivers incoming mail without any trouble...
Is this something on my end or is it more
I just installed the Debian package exim and it doesn't work! In pine
when I try to send a message I get "421 STMP connection went away!"
Any ideas? It worked perfectly w/ smail...
-Paul
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble?
TECTED]>
Organization: Wildflower Hill, Head Waters, Virginia
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01b6C [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.29 i586)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: exmh User Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Can't send mail
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Trans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> When I send mail to myself at [EMAIL PROTECTED] it immediately goes to
> the /var/spool/mail/vtorrico file. I can then inc it with exmh and it
> appends to the end of the inbox list OK. The problem is that it never
> leaves my machine to go to my ISP's mail
56 matches
Mail list logo
