Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-23 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sun 22 Aug 2021, at 15:37, David Wright wrote: > On Sun 22 Aug 2021 at 13:18:38 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > On Sun 22 Aug 2021, at 05:36, David Wright wrote: > > > On Fri 20 Aug 2021 at 14:13:55 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > > > > There is also no explanation in term.log, syslog or dp

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-22 Thread David Wright
On Sun 22 Aug 2021 at 13:18:38 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > On Sun 22 Aug 2021, at 05:36, David Wright wrote: > > On Fri 20 Aug 2021 at 14:13:55 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > > There is also no explanation in term.log, syslog or dpkg.log for the > > > second interruption: > > > > > > -- >

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-22 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sun 22 Aug 2021, at 13:18, Gareth Evans wrote: > On Sun 22 Aug 2021, at 05:36, David Wright wrote: > > On Fri 20 Aug 2021 at 14:13:55 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > > On Fri 20 Aug 2021, at 04:45, David Wright > > > wrote: > > > > On Thu 19 Aug 2021 at 07:42:56 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote:

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-22 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sun 22 Aug 2021, at 05:36, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 20 Aug 2021 at 14:13:55 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > On Fri 20 Aug 2021, at 04:45, David Wright wrote: > > > On Thu 19 Aug 2021 at 07:42:56 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > > $ apt policy pitivi > > pitivi: > > Installed: 0.999-1+b

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-21 Thread David Wright
On Fri 20 Aug 2021 at 14:13:55 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > On Fri 20 Aug 2021, at 04:45, David Wright wrote: > > On Thu 19 Aug 2021 at 07:42:56 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > $ apt policy pitivi > pitivi: > Installed: 0.999-1+b1 > Candidate: 0.999-1+b1 > Version table: > *** 0.999-1+b1

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-21 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sat 21 Aug 2021, at 13:42, Sven Hartge wrote: > Gareth Evans wrote: > > > So I would like to know if apt is not handling this properly, or if > > the scenario of a file changing packages (see David's previous email) > > is an expected exception to the (sort of) rule. > Hi Sven, > > Shouldn

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-21 Thread Sven Hartge
Gareth Evans wrote: > So I would like to know if apt is not handling this properly, or if > the scenario of a file changing packages (see David's previous email) > is an expected exception to the (sort of) rule. > Shouldn't pitivi 0.999 be disregarded anyway as it's being upgraded? No, because

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-20 Thread Gareth Evans
On Fri 20 Aug 2021, at 04:45, David Wright wrote: > On Thu 19 Aug 2021 at 07:42:56 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > On Thu 19 Aug 2021, at 05:50, David Wright wrote: > > > On Thu 19 Aug 2021 at 04:00:04 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > > > On Wed 18 Aug 2021, at 23:33, piorunz wrote: > > > > > O

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-20 Thread Gareth Evans
On Fri 20 Aug 2021, at 12:32, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:45:57PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > > One might assume so, but only you can check that. There are two logs > > of the upgrade. /var/log/apt/history.log (and its predecessors) shows > > the command issued, followed by

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-20 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:45:57PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > One might assume so, but only you can check that. There are two logs > of the upgrade. /var/log/apt/history.log (and its predecessors) shows > the command issued, followed by the packages affected, with the old > and new version number

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-19 Thread David Wright
On Thu 19 Aug 2021 at 07:42:56 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > On Thu 19 Aug 2021, at 05:50, David Wright wrote: > > On Thu 19 Aug 2021 at 04:00:04 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > > On Wed 18 Aug 2021, at 23:33, piorunz wrote: > > > > On 18/08/2021 16:14, Gareth Evans wrote: > > > > > Unpacking g

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-18 Thread Gareth Evans
On Thu 19 Aug 2021, at 05:50, David Wright wrote: > On Thu 19 Aug 2021 at 04:00:04 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > On Wed 18 Aug 2021, at 23:33, piorunz wrote: > > > On 18/08/2021 16:14, Gareth Evans wrote: > > > > Unpacking gir1.2-gst-plugins-bad-1.0:amd64 (1.18.4-3) ... > > > > [1mdpkg:[0m err

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-18 Thread David Wright
On Thu 19 Aug 2021 at 04:00:04 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > On Wed 18 Aug 2021, at 23:33, piorunz wrote: > > On 18/08/2021 16:14, Gareth Evans wrote: > > > Unpacking gir1.2-gst-plugins-bad-1.0:amd64 (1.18.4-3) ... > > > [1mdpkg:[0m error processing archive > > > /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-Un4rDW/28-

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-18 Thread Gareth Evans
On Wed 18 Aug 2021, at 23:33, piorunz wrote: > On 18/08/2021 16:14, Gareth Evans wrote: > > Unpacking gir1.2-gst-plugins-bad-1.0:amd64 (1.18.4-3) ... > > [1mdpkg:[0m error processing archive > > /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-Un4rDW/28-gir1.2-gst-plugins-bad-1.0_1.18.4-3_amd64.deb > > (--unpack): > > t

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-18 Thread piorunz
On 18/08/2021 16:14, Gareth Evans wrote: Unpacking gir1.2-gst-plugins-bad-1.0:amd64 (1.18.4-3) ... [1mdpkg:[0m error processing archive /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-Un4rDW/28-gir1.2-gst-plugins-bad-1.0_1.18.4-3_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/girepository-1.0/Gs

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-18 Thread Gareth Evans
On Wed 18 Aug 2021, at 00:44, Gareth Evans wrote: > Hello, > > I upgraded from Buster stable to Bullseye stable last night, with > apparent success eventually, but it went less than smoothly and I would > be grateful for any advice as to why that may have been. > > I followed the preparation a

Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-17 Thread Gareth Evans
Hello, I upgraded from Buster stable to Bullseye stable last night, with apparent success eventually, but it went less than smoothly and I would be grateful for any advice as to why that may have been. I followed the preparation advice at https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/amd64/release-