Gareth Evans <donots...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > So I would like to know if apt is not handling this properly, or if > the scenario of a file changing packages (see David's previous email) > is an expected exception to the (sort of) rule.
> Shouldn't pitivi 0.999 be disregarded anyway as it's being upgraded? No, because Debian Policy says that partial upgrades are supported and must work. > It's not a conflict involving two Bullseye packages, nor with one from > Bullseye and one held/pinned etc, so I don't see why it should happen. This might be a genuine bug in one of the two packages here, where a Conflict/Breaks/Replaces dependendy was needed to move a file from one package to another. I think https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=965007 is part of that problem. Grüße, S° -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
