On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 07:39:05PM +0200, Listas Locatel wrote:
> Hi, I am configuring a bonding in linux (Debian) and I have many
> problems. Always Only one card it's receiving and sending packets.
>
> My config is:
>
> iface bond0 inet static
> address 192.168.18.210
> netmask 255
Hi, I am configuring a bonding in linux (Debian) and I have many
problems. Always Only one card it's receiving and sending packets.
My config is:
iface bond0 inet static
address 192.168.18.210
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 192.168.18.0
broadcast 192.168.18.255
gate
Camm Maguire ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Greetings! I'll be doing channel bonding here soon on our cluster as
> well, and was thinking of packaging ifenslave. I've read somewhere
> that on redhat boxes, this tool is not necessary. Is this still the
> most 'modern' way of getting this done? In
Greetings! I'll be doing channel bonding here soon on our cluster as
well, and was thinking of packaging ifenslave. I've read somewhere
that on redhat boxes, this tool is not necessary. Is this still the
most 'modern' way of getting this done? In any case, I hope to have
more information with w
Hi
I'm setting up a Debian GNU/Linux based cluster, currently with 4 nodes,
each a PPro 200 :( but there may be more/other stuff coming :).
Considering the costs, we settled for Netgear 311 ethernet cards, for
which there is support in 2.4.x kernels. Patches for 2.2.x,
but since 2.4 is here... By
5 matches
Mail list logo
