Re: problem with fonts in bitchx?

2008-05-10 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 07:50:41PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote: > I have just performed an 'apt-get install bitchx' on a debian x86 Etch > system, but there seems to be a problem with with the package configuration. > > The install finishes with a warning: > Warning: /us

problem with fonts in bitchx?

2008-05-10 Thread Digby Tarvin
I have just performed an 'apt-get install bitchx' on a debian x86 Etch system, but there seems to be a problem with with the package configuration. The install finishes with a warning: Warning: /usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc does not exist.. This is understandable, as it seems that the in

BitchX problem with multiple server

2006-01-27 Thread Dirk
Hello, What will I have to write into .bitchxrc to... join channel A and B on server A and channel C and D on server B at the same time in the same window ...? Thank you, Dirk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Using BitchX safely

2003-10-24 Thread Scott C. Linnenbringer
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 13:33:32 -0700, Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I used to use mIRC a lot, but I knew Windows expertly enough that > things like DCC didn't scare me. I'm scared I'll open a security hole > on my system if I use BitchX and install identd. >

Re: Using BitchX safely

2003-10-24 Thread David Palmer.
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 13:33:32 -0700 Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I used to use mIRC a lot, but I knew Windows expertly enough that > things like DCC didn't scare me. I'm scared I'll open a security hole > on my system if I use BitchX and install identd. >

Using BitchX safely

2003-10-24 Thread Tom
I used to use mIRC a lot, but I knew Windows expertly enough that things like DCC didn't scare me. I'm scared I'll open a security hole on my system if I use BitchX and install identd. (1) Is BitchX secure by default? (2) Is Linux identd secure by default? Does it work behind f

Re: BitchX question

2002-05-15 Thread Theo Bierman
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:34:47PM +0200, Romuald DELAVERGNE wrote: > Le 2002.05.15 12:46, Theo Bierman a ecrit : > > Hi All > > > > This is probably meant to go somewhere else but anyway: > > > > WindowMaker allows for multiple desktops via alt+1/2/3/4/5/6/7 etc

Re: BitchX question

2002-05-15 Thread Romuald DELAVERGNE
Le 2002.05.15 12:46, Theo Bierman a écrit : Hi All This is probably meant to go somewhere else but anyway: WindowMaker allows for multiple desktops via alt+1/2/3/4/5/6/7 etc etc and BitchX also allows for multiple windows via alt+1/2/3/4/5/6/7 etc etc, Can I change my window handling in

BitchX question

2002-05-15 Thread Theo Bierman
Hi All This is probably meant to go somewhere else but anyway: WindowMaker allows for multiple desktops via alt+1/2/3/4/5/6/7 etc etc and BitchX also allows for multiple windows via alt+1/2/3/4/5/6/7 etc etc, Can I change my window handling in BitchX? I have checked bxfaq.html but I cannot

BitchX

2001-11-30 Thread DE SMAELE Kim \(BMB\)
Title: BitchX Does any one know how to configure bitch to connect to an irc server with a proxi identification. I'm after a firewall. thanks DISCLAIMER "This e-mail and any attachment thereto may contain information which is confidential and/or protected by in

xterm, bitchx, latin2, rxvt

2001-05-19 Thread Tomasz Olszewski
Standard potatoe's bitchx package doesn't support non iso8859-1 charsets so I had to recompile bitchx from source. I did it using potatoe's source package. I modified include/config.h: undefined LATIN1 and defined CHRSET_CUSTOM. My iso8859-2 fonts are now displayed properly (unf

Re: BitchX 1.0c18

2001-03-21 Thread Frederik Vanrenterghem
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Ethan Benson wrote: > i know the debian maintainer, he is sooo busy i don't see how he finds > time to sleep. give it some time, and don't nag, he knows about it. Okido, I was just checking ;-) Actually, I've been able to use alien to convert an rpm to a deb, I only had to

Re: BitchX 1.0c18

2001-03-20 Thread Ethan Benson
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 10:17:40PM +0100, Frederik Vanrenterghem wrote: > Hi all, > > does someone know whether or not this new version of BitchX (out for > 2 > months now) will be packaged sometime? > A quick check on google didn't turn up any package, neither did I fin

Re: BitchX 1.0c18

2001-03-20 Thread Nate Amsden
Frederik Vanrenterghem wrote: > > Hi all, > > does someone know whether or not this new version of BitchX (out for > 2 > months now) will be packaged sometime? > A quick check on google didn't turn up any package, neither did I find a > lot of .rpm's for t

BitchX 1.0c18

2001-03-20 Thread Frederik Vanrenterghem
Hi all, does someone know whether or not this new version of BitchX (out for > 2 months now) will be packaged sometime? A quick check on google didn't turn up any package, neither did I find a lot of .rpm's for this version. Is there a particular reason for this? Is BitchX consi

Re: BitchX auto accept DCC

2000-10-14 Thread Rino Mardo
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 07:33:24PM -0500 or thereabouts, Timmy Douglas wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 07:53:03PM -0400, Joel Dinel wrote: > > By default, BitchX auto accepts DCC transfers. I'm reading the (long) man > > pages right now, but it doesn't mention an

Re: BitchX auto accept DCC

2000-10-14 Thread Timmy Douglas
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 07:53:03PM -0400, Joel Dinel wrote: > By default, BitchX auto accepts DCC transfers. I'm reading the (long) man > pages right now, but it doesn't mention anything about DCC settings. > > How do I disable that ? try: /set option value /set -- will

Re: BitchX auto accept DCC

2000-10-12 Thread William Jensen
Inside your ~/.BitchX directory is a file called BitchX.sav. Find the line listed below and set the value to off not on. SET DCC_AUTOGET OFF Regards, Bill On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 07:53:03PM -0400, Joel Dinel wrote: > By default, BitchX auto accepts DCC transfers. I'm reading the (l

BitchX auto accept DCC

2000-10-12 Thread Joel Dinel
By default, BitchX auto accepts DCC transfers. I'm reading the (long) man pages right now, but it doesn't mention anything about DCC settings. How do I disable that ? Thanks, -- Joel Dinel [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bitchx and screen do NOT cooperate in 2.2

2000-10-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ain i dont use this either :) nate On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Gecco wrote: gecco >Hi, gecco > gecco >I've got debian 2.2 installed on TWO computers with all security updates gecco >applied. However, when I run bitchx under screen and try to create new gecco >window (/window creat

Re: bitchx and forward delete key

2000-09-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i've been using bitchx for many years and never had a need for either forward delete or ctcp cloaking. same goes for scrollz or ircii or epic4 .. nate On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, C. Falconer wrote: criggi >At 03:34 PM 9/29/00 -0400, you wrote: criggi >>Is there any reason that anyone w

Re: bitchx and forward delete key

2000-09-29 Thread C. Falconer
plies not go to the list? I happen to have started using bitchx at work, and I might be interested in someones answer... also the thread can diverge into another semi-related area which other people will find interesting. Just a thought. -- Criggie

bitchx and forward delete key

2000-09-29 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
Is there any reason that anyone would object if I changed the forward delete key to do something sane, like delete forward, instead of toggling cloaking? Replies just to me, please. Dan /\ /\ | Daniel Jacobowitz|__|

Re: Bitchx and screen do NOT cooperate in 2.2

2000-09-25 Thread Gecco
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, William Jensen wrote: > Gecco, > > This isn't directly addressing your question, however, what I do when I have > screen and bitchx running is I manage screen like this: > > ctrl-a c<-- new screen > ctrl-a a<-- swap back and forth

Re: Bitchx and screen do NOT cooperate in 2.2

2000-09-25 Thread William Jensen
Gecco, This isn't directly addressing your question, however, what I do when I have screen and bitchx running is I manage screen like this: ctrl-a c<-- new screen ctrl-a a<-- swap back and forth between the last screen and this one ctrl-a x<-- x is the number of the s

Bitchx and screen do NOT cooperate in 2.2

2000-09-25 Thread Gecco
Hi, I've got debian 2.2 installed on TWO computers with all security updates applied. However, when I run bitchx under screen and try to create new window (/window create) it ends up with: -:- Opening new screen... -:- The screen is now dead. child signaled with 11 Errno is 4 -:- Cannot c

Bitchx and failure in creating new windows

2000-09-22 Thread Gecco
Hi, I've recently switched from slink to potato and installed my fav. irc client bitchx plus screen of course. But I have a problem with them. I can't create new windows with /window create command. All I get is: -:- Opening new screen... -:- The screen is now dead. child signaled wit

bitchx screens?

2000-03-14 Thread Attila Csosz
Where are the 'login' screens ( asci art graphics ) in the new bitchx? I installed it from deb package under potato. When I have had slink it was in it. :( Thanks Attila -- -- - Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Debian

Re: BitchX irc server list

2000-01-09 Thread 2
the way i do it is i create a file $HOME/.ircservers and list all my fav irc servers there. then, when i invoke bitchx i use $ bitchx -r $HOME/.ircservers and it starts wif my own list of default servers. note: this only needs to be done once. invoking bitchx after this 1st time will continue to

BitchX irc server list

2000-01-09 Thread Alisdair McDiarmid
I'm struggling to get BitchX to recognise my server list. I've put an ircII.servers file in /etc/irc/, copied it to just /etc/irc/servers/, and even /usr/lib/bitchx/. I still can't get it to use my [shorter] list of servers. The only way so far I've managed to do it is by do

Re: font vga11x19, bitchx

1999-05-16 Thread J.H.M. Dassen
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 21:07:49 +0200, Johan Pettersson wrote: > Were can I find font vga11x19 ? As "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/vga11x19.pcf.gz" in the Debian "bitchx" package. HTH, Ray -- J.H.M. Dassen | RUMOUR Believe all you hear. Your world

Re: font vga11x19, bitchx

1999-05-14 Thread add|ct|on
//e0i-cyberpimps.virtualave.net help, I got sucked into /dev/null - Original Message - From: Johan Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, May 13, 1999 3:07 PM Subject: font vga11x19, bitchx > Hi! > > Were can

font vga11x19, bitchx

1999-05-13 Thread Johan Pettersson
Hi! Were can I find font vga11x19 ? -- //thx Johan

annoying server messages in BitchX

1999-03-26 Thread David Porter
When I use BitchX I get a lot of messages of the form: [net]!efnet.telstra.net.au motd was last changed at 8/10/1998 20:40 [net]Foreign OperKill: Dustyn killed Stupid (flooder) which I assume are coming from the server. I've looked everywhere I can think of for information on what setting

bitchx - ircrc syntax-change?

1999-03-24 Thread Toens Bueker
Hi *, since I did an upgrade to 75p1 bitchx seems to ignore my .ircrc. Is this a known problem? What can I do? By Töns -- _o) /\\ pgp fingerprint: 9B AC A5 CB C8 CC FC DC 25 B5 26 9A 5D 28 C0 3D _\_V

Re: IRC stuff (was: bitchx (sucks!))

1999-03-10 Thread Steve Lamb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 10 Mar 1999 01:16:08 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: >> Then you don't understand the nature of these people. It is like going >> into alt.nuke-the-usa (I think that is it) and trying to rationally discuss >> topics with anyone there. >No

Re: IRC stuff (was: bitchx (sucks!))

1999-03-10 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 03:40:22PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: > >I would try talking to them, inviting them to participate in whatever the > >channels mission is, what else could I do? > > Then you don't understand the nature of these people. It is like going > into alt.nuke-the-usa (I think th

IRC stuff (was: bitchx (sucks!))

1999-03-09 Thread Steve Lamb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 10 Mar 1999 00:32:39 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: >There is no general solution to such a problem, but I have seen worse in >Real Life. Sure, you can lock the door, but then? See who is knocking. >I would try talking to

Re: Fwd: Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-09 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 02:55:43PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: > > No, banning is the way to get control of an otherwise unwieldy > situation. Have you been on a channel that gets 10-20 clone/flood attacks > per week? You can that a social problem but tell me, exactly how would > *YOU* solve it

Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-09 Thread homega
Steve Lamb dixit: > [ ... ] btw, so please, stop preaching to the choir. and just what's calling someone publicly a clueless newbie... whining... ? Horacio

Re: Fwd: Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-09 Thread Steve Lamb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 9 Mar 1999 23:24:21 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: >Yeah, why should we try to improve our social life when a simple ban command >makes us feel powerful. >Banning and ignoring is the simplest way to deal with social problems. No, banning

Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-09 Thread MallarJ
In a message dated 3/9/99 4:33:12 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> See what you want, just know that you're more than likely 100% wrong. > > >I can only see what you project with your attitudes and behaviors. > > Which are only a reflection of your own. >

Re: bitchx (sucks!) (forwarded, oops!)

1999-03-09 Thread homega
assume that #bitchx has banned me b'c of my country of origin, and feel free to spread that around. Very well, they have their right to do so (I can't assume it's b'c of my ISP domain since it's a rather new one). > So far I've seen no evidence of that. So far

Re: Fwd: Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-09 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 02:06:18PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: > > >The ability of some IRCers to blatantly ban entire countries because of the > >acts of a few is why EfNet is in a decline. Too many little kids fighting > >for "power" in a virtual medium. It's funny in a sad sort of way. > >

Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-09 Thread Steve Lamb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 9 Mar 1999 15:51:00 -0600 (CST), steven walsh wrote: >> Funny, looks alphabetized to me. > Man, "cwhom". Chgaop cghchanch... VERY INFORMATIVE. Alphabetical >sorting isn't enough, "help" should be helpful. You said it was

Fwd: Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-09 Thread Steve Lamb
>Reply-To: "Steve Lamb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: PMMail 99 Professional (2.10.0382) For Windows NT (4.0.1381;3) >In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Content-T

Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-09 Thread steven walsh
> [l] Help on Topic: index > 4OP ABORT ADDIDLE ADDSHIT ADDUSER ADDLAME ADDFORWARD > ADDWORD ADMIN AJOIN AJOINLIST AWAY BACK BAN > BANS BANSTABANTYPE BANWORD BEEP BKBOTLIST > BYE C CDCDCC

Re: bitchx (sucks!) (forwarded, oops!)

1999-03-09 Thread steven walsh
- Begin Forwarded Message - Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 15:24:00 -0600 (CST) From: steven walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: bitchx (sucks!) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-MD5: tm9kkgAIpk3NEqxSyKGLDg== > I didn't guess, I RTFM'd.

Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-09 Thread Steve Lamb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 9 Mar 1999 10:44:12 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Steve, most of the docs you pointed out say next to nothing. One may try to >guess (as surely most bitchx users do) how to work things out, and that >works some times, but n

Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-09 Thread Steve Lamb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 17:17:40 -0500, Wayne Topa wrote: > I agree Steve, there are plenty of Manual(s) to read. But for a new >IRC user they sure confusing. I have been trying to Window it but, as >of yet, no luck. As for anything new, it is confu

Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-09 Thread Rafael Kitover
Check out http://www.innerx.net/~nuke I need not say more. The package for epic in debian is called "epic4". -- Rafael Kitover [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpyyBFY6cHF4.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-09 Thread steven walsh
atures in it. > > Steve, most of the docs you pointed out say next to nothing. One may try to > guess (as surely most bitchx users do) how to work things out, and that > works some times, but not always. > > What really puts me off is the fact that, eg., /help say, will tell me

Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-09 Thread homega
, there's plenty of documentation, unfortunately that's like > saying MS Office has plenty of documentation. It's a pain to sort through > sometimes because there's just too many features in it. Steve, most of the docs you pointed out say next to nothing. One may try to guess (

Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-09 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: Re: bitchx (sucks!) Date: Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 01:45:18PM -0600 In reply to:steven walsh Quoting steven walsh([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > BitchX suffers from it's own unique form of feature creep. Use >

Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-09 Thread steven walsh
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Wayne Topa wrote: [snip] > I agree Steve, there are plenty of Manual(s) to read. But for a new > IRC user they sure confusing. I have been trying to Window it but, as > of yet, no luck. Sure, there's plenty of documentation, unfortunately that's like saying MS Offic

Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-08 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: Re: bitchx (sucks!) Date: Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 01:30:33PM -0800 In reply to:Steve Lamb Quoting Steve Lamb([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 19:53:26 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >

Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-08 Thread Steve Lamb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 19:53:26 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Sorry about that (), but even if the program itself is damn good, the docs >and /help really suck... further more, #bitchx SUCKS. /bhelp, not /help. /help is the ircII help file

Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-08 Thread homega
Thanks Lawrence and Stephen, I downloaded ircii and it looks better documented than bitchx. I still don't know how to deal with the scripts, but they look promising and fun, and I even found a mailing list for ircii. Horacio

Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-08 Thread steven walsh
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BitchX suffers from it's own unique form of feature creep. Use IRCII with a nice script (one you are comfortable with and hopefully has no nasty backdoors like the ircN script that mIRC had *snicker*). I hear EPIC is a nice clie

Re: bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-08 Thread Lawrence Walton
: > Sorry about that (), but even if the program itself is damn good, the docs > and /help really suck... further more, #bitchx SUCKS. > > I've been desperately trying to get help around, and even went to #bitchx at > irc.chat.org, just to be kicked out every time I try to join it

bitchx (sucks!)

1999-03-08 Thread homega
Sorry about that (), but even if the program itself is damn good, the docs and /help really suck... further more, #bitchx SUCKS. I've been desperately trying to get help around, and even went to #bitchx at irc.chat.org, just to be kicked out every time I try to join it, the reason being &quo

Re: IRC and BitchX newbie -- how to get started?

1999-03-02 Thread wtopa
Subject: Re: IRC and BitchX newbie -- how to get started? Date: Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 01:33:29PM +0100 In reply to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Mark Phillips dixit: > > > > I've just installed BitchX because I want

Re: IRC and BitchX newbie -- how to get started?

1999-03-02 Thread Eric Gillespie, Jr.
also applies to BitchX, as it is just an improved version. -- /---\ | Eric Gillespie, Jr.| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |<*>| | "Between depriving a man of one hour from his

Re: IRC and BitchX newbie -- how to get started?

1999-03-02 Thread homega
Mark Phillips dixit: > > I've just installed BitchX because I want to join in on the Slink > release IRC party thingy. Unfortunately I have never used IRC, let > alone BitchX before, and I'm really not sure how to get started. I > tried man bitchx, and also looked i

IRC and BitchX newbie -- where do I read about how to get started?

1999-03-02 Thread Mark Phillips
I've just installed BitchX because I want to join in on the Slink release IRC party thingy. Unfortunately I have never used IRC, let alone BitchX before, and I'm really not sure how to get started. I tried man bitchx, and also looked in /usr/doc/bitchx, but it seems this documentat

Re: bitchx and libncurses4

1999-02-28 Thread John Galt
e may I find > that library? > > TIA > > P.S. is bitchx the "right" package for irc? > > > Horacio. > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null > Pardon me, but you have obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a damn. email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

bitchx and libncurses4

1999-02-27 Thread homega
that library? TIA P.S. is bitchx the "right" package for irc? Horacio.

Re: BitchX: Scripts

1998-12-23 Thread Alexander N. Benner
hi Ship's Log, Lt. Stef Hoesli Wiederwald, Stardate 231298.1613: > I try to load and use the autoop script in BitchX. Si within BitchX I say: > > /load autoop > > Then I say: > > /addchan #channel > > But BitchX tellx me: Unknown command. What do I do wron

BitchX: Scripts

1998-12-23 Thread Stef Hoesli Wiederwald
I try to load and use the autoop script in BitchX. Si within BitchX I say: /load autoop Then I say: /addchan #channel But BitchX tellx me: Unknown command. What do I do wrong? Stef

Re: bitchx configuration

1998-02-23 Thread Norbert Veber
On Sun, Feb 22, 1998 at 10:50:41AM -0800, Adam Klein wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 1998 at 01:45:37PM -0500, Paul Miller wrote: > > hmm.. that directory does exist, bitchx is using a list though.. > > > > What is the format for /etc/irc/servers?? > > I don't know. All

Re: bitchx configuration

1998-02-22 Thread Adam Klein
On Sun, Feb 22, 1998 at 01:45:37PM -0500, Paul Miller wrote: > hmm.. that directory does exist, bitchx is using a list though.. > > What is the format for /etc/irc/servers?? I don't know. All mine has is one line containing my default server. Adam Klein -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FRO

Re: bitchx configuration

1998-02-22 Thread Paul Miller
hmm.. that directory does exist, bitchx is using a list though.. What is the format for /etc/irc/servers?? On Sun, 22 Feb 1998, Adam Klein wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 1998 at 02:46:47AM -0500, Paul Miller wrote: > > where are the bitchx configuration files (.74p2 deb package)? I found o

Re: bitchx configuration

1998-02-22 Thread Adam Klein
On Sun, Feb 22, 1998 at 02:46:47AM -0500, Paul Miller wrote: > where are the bitchx configuration files (.74p2 deb package)? I found one > in /etc/bitchx, but I can't find where the server list is stored..? /etc/irc/servers -- Adam Klein -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST:

bitchx configuration

1998-02-22 Thread Paul Miller
where are the bitchx configuration files (.74p2 deb package)? I found one in /etc/bitchx, but I can't find where the server list is stored..? --- Paul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, finger for public PGP key -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubs

Re: bitchx and xterm

1998-02-05 Thread Gergely Madarasz
On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Luiz Otavio L. Zorzella wrote: > > Is there a way to make bitchx (irc client) work "properly" under a > xterm? > > It sorta works, but the color and special chars mess some things... IIRC there is an xbitchx script in the latest bitchx package

bitchx and xterm

1998-02-05 Thread Luiz Otavio L. Zorzella
Is there a way to make bitchx (irc client) work "properly" under a xterm? It sorta works, but the color and special chars mess some things... -- Luiz Otavio L. Zorzella Product Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.conexware.com -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM TH

Re: Bitchx windows

1998-01-18 Thread tjferrell
On 17 Jan, Mark W Blunier wrote: > > When bitchx tries to create a new window under X, it fails > with the message > > xterm: Can't execvp /usr/bin/wserv > > Is there a package that provides swerv, or should it > have been included with bitchx? > if wserv is

Bitchx windows

1998-01-18 Thread Mark W. Blunier
When bitchx tries to create a new window under X, it fails with the message xterm: Can't execvp /usr/bin/wserv Is there a package that provides swerv, or should it have been included with bitchx? Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "u

Re: hacker attack: leaves .BitchX dir in root's home

1998-01-16 Thread Frank Barknecht
Carlos Carvalho hat gesagt: // Carlos Carvalho wrote: > My site has been atacked by a hacker using a method that leaves a > directory .BitchX (or something close) in root's home dir. It gets the > user/password combination of any user that telnet, ftp or use pop3 to > get to th

Re: hacker attack: leaves .BitchX dir in root's home

1998-01-15 Thread Rick Jones
Carlos: BitchX is an IRC program that put's a directory called .BitchX in the users home directory. Either you have this and have used it or your hacker used it as root. Of course a hacker may have just created it so it might look normal in your directory. What's in the

hacker attack: leaves .BitchX dir in root's home

1998-01-14 Thread Carlos Carvalho
My site has been atacked by a hacker using a method that leaves a directory .BitchX (or something close) in root's home dir. It gets the user/password combination of any user that telnet, ftp or use pop3 to get to the machine (no ssh). What's the security hole that's being exploite