From: Andrei POPESCU
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 12:31:25 +0200
> Where did you find that path?
From: Andrei POPESCU
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:49:02 +0200
> Or did you mean https://packages.debian.org/buster/net/
> (the trailing '/' matters)?
Sorry to say, I haven't been able to substantiate my origi
On Du, 15 nov 20, 07:10:36, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> On Mi, 04 nov 20, 21:45:16, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> > According to packages.debian.org/buster/all/net, iw is not
> > available in the suite.
>
> From: Andrei POPESCU
> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 12:31:25 +0200
> > Where did you find that path?
On Mi, 04 nov 20, 21:45:16, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> According to packages.debian.org/buster/all/net, iw is not
> available in the suite.
From: Andrei POPESCU
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 12:31:25 +0200
> Where did you find that path?
>
> Or did you mean https://packages.debian.org/buster/net/
> (th
Andrei wrote:
Where did you find that path?
When the system is working again I might be able to answer.
... P.
On Mi, 04 nov 20, 21:45:16, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
>
> According to packages.debian.org/buster/all/net, iw is not
> available in the suite.
Where did you find that path?
Or did you mean https://packages.debian.org/buster/net/
(the trailing '/' matters)?
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.de
On Wed, 2020-11-04 at 21:45 -0600, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
[...]
> https://wiki.debian.org/WiFi instructs "For basic command
> line usage:
> 1. iw ...
> 2. wireless-tools ...
>
> According to packages.debian.org/buster/all/net, iw is not
> available in the suite.
That website appears a little br
Hello again,
Apologies for not setting the references field while composing
a reply with the roundcube mailer.
Reco replied,
sha1sum ...
sha256sum ...
Appears the only difficulty was a 9 deb file in the 10 system.
Retrieved and installed the right firmware-ath9k-htc from
debian.org.
https://
On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 12:22:44AM +0300, Reco wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 02:28:21PM -0600, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> > dpkg -i firm*
> > gives only this.
> > dpkg-deb: error: 'firmware-ath9k-htc-1.4.0-97-g75b3e59+dfsg-3_all.deb' is
> > not a debian format archive
> > dpkg: error processing
Hi.
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 02:28:21PM -0600, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> dpkg -i firm*
> gives only this.
> dpkg-deb: error: 'firmware-ath9k-htc-1.4.0-97-g75b3e59+dfsg-3_all.deb' is not
> a debian format archive
> dpkg: error processing archive ...
>
> The adapter worked until the previo
An elementary Buster was installed on a SATA drive.
The target machine boots from that.
The current objective is to establish a 'net
connection using a TP-Link TL-WN722N USB adapter.
firmware-ath9k-htc-1.4.0-97-g75b3e59+dfsg-3_all.deb
was retrieved from http://mirror.it.ubc.ca/debian/pool/main/o
6 21:36:45
From: Kynn Jones
To: Debian User
Subject: Is it possible to fully reinstall the base system without affecting
/home?
My system is badly damaged, and it looks like the only way to fix it
is to do a full re-install.
I figure I will have to back everything up to an external drive,
re
Kynn Jones:
>
> But I thought I'd ask if there's anything close to this that would not
> require backing up everything and reformatting the hard disk.
If there is anything on your hard disk worth keeping that you haven't
backed up at least weekly then you should start worrying about that now.
Ha
and reformatting the hard disk.
> > Wouldn't it be possible, for example, to boot the system up from a
> > live CD, and reinstall the base system, leaving /home untouched? (I
> > should mention that the hard disk in question is just one big
> > partition, including /h
On 22/02/16 20:10, Dalios wrote:
First of all you would have to move your /home to a new partition (to
the same disk or another) and you would need to start from a Live CD/USB
in order to do this step.
Or move /home from a terminal as root. But if you have to create a new
partition you might
Just to make sure, your filesystem is OK, right?
> But I thought I'd ask if there's anything close to this that would not
> require backing up everything and reformatting the hard disk.
> Wouldn't it be possible, for example, to boot the system up from a
> live CD, an
;
> But I thought I'd ask if there's anything close to this that would not
> require backing up everything and reformatting the hard disk.
> Wouldn't it be possible, for example, to boot the system up from a
> live CD, and reinstall the base system, leaving /home untouche
would not
require backing up everything and reformatting the hard disk.
Wouldn't it be possible, for example, to boot the system up from a
live CD, and reinstall the base system, leaving /home untouched? (I
should mention that the hard disk in question is just one big
partition, including /home
Herb Miller Jr. wrote:
> Where can I find a snapshot of the Debian base system to facilitate
> deployment in a chrooted environment? Is such a thing available?
Normally you would make your own using debootstrap or cdebootstrap.
$ sudo apt-get install debootstrap
$ sudo debootstrap sque
On 2011-07-11 18:35 +0200, Herb Miller Jr. wrote:
> Where can I find a snapshot of the Debian base system to facilitate
> deployment in a chrooted environment? Is such a thing available?
Yes. Do you want to have a current snapshot (i.e. what's in the base
system today) or a specifi
In article
you write:
>Where can I find a snapshot of the Debian base system to facilitate
>deployment in a chrooted environment? Is such a thing available?
We don't do things that way any more. Debootstrap is the tool you want
to use - it will create the contents of the chr
Where can I find a snapshot of the Debian base system to facilitate
deployment in a chrooted environment? Is such a thing available?
Thank you,
Herb
On Ma, 14 dec 10, 06:51:53, Geronimo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > The question is certainly in the installer, I checked the translation
> > files (.po), but it is probably shown only on expert installs.
>
> Ok, I tried several installations, but the question about utc settings is
Hello,
shawn wilson wrote:
> Gero wrote:
> > What I need most, is conversion between dec/hex/oct/binary - and that
> > conversion is very handy with KCalc.
>
> ... you mean like bc's hex(), oct(), dec(), bin() functions?
I'm sorry.
As I'm used to use vim and terminals - I have to confess, that
Hello,
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> I would even settle for a Linux version if properly packaged for Debian.
> ... Given the reasonable one-time
> licence fee I would even consider buying it!
Agree!
If I remember well, tc is able to have several directory shortcuts in one
panel too. So yes - would b
Hello,
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> The question is certainly in the installer, I checked the translation
> files (.po), but it is probably shown only on expert installs.
Ok, I tried several installations, but the question about utc settings is not
there. Not on normal installation, neither on expert
Hello,
John Hasler wrote:
> Geronimo writes:
> > No, I refer to the kde settings dialog, where all desktop-settings can
> > be changed. The same configuration page is accessible from the clock
> > in the destop-bar.
>
> These are per-user settings, then?
No - not at all.
To change time-settin
On Lu, 13 dec 10, 13:20:41, John Hasler wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Are you sure it isn't just setting the user's TZ variable? IMHO the
> > correct default for that should be null so that system time gets used.
>
> Andrei Popescu writes:
> > I don't agree. The default should be the default time zone f
I wrote:
> Are you sure it isn't just setting the user's TZ variable? IMHO the
> correct default for that should be null so that system time gets used.
Andrei Popescu writes:
> I don't agree. The default should be the default time zone for the
> system (which is usually based on the country/area
Geronimo writes:
> ...where after a gnome installation utc is set to true and after a kde
> installation utc is set to false.
IMHO neither package should touch /etc/default/rcS.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
On Lu, 13 dec 10, 11:35:41, John Hasler wrote:
> Geronimo writes:
> > No, I refer to the kde settings dialog, where all desktop-settings can
> > be changed. The same configuration page is accessible from the clock
> > in the destop-bar.
>
> These are per-user settings, then? Such a thing certainl
Geronimo writes:
> No, I refer to the kde settings dialog, where all desktop-settings can
> be changed. The same configuration page is accessible from the clock
> in the destop-bar.
These are per-user settings, then? Such a thing certainly should not be
touching the system configuration. Are you
On Lu, 13 dec 10, 18:14:48, Klistvud wrote:
> Dne, 13. 12. 2010 17:56:30 je Andrei Popescu napisal(a):
> >Every time I experimented with two-pane file managers I kept
> >coming back
> >to Tux Commander (package tuxcmd). While it does have it's quirks
> >it is
> >closest to the habits I acquired on
> @Carl Johnson:
>> I agree, but you might want to look into qalculate as a substitute.
>
> Ok, that's a really big calculator. But its no substitute for me.
> What I need most, is conversion between dec/hex/oct/binary - and that
> conversion is very handy with KCalc.
>
... you mean like bc's hex()
Am Montag, 13. Dezember 2010, 17:56:30 schrieb Andrei Popescu:
> Every time I experimented with two-pane file managers I kept coming ...
Two-panel ;>
I usually have about 20 panels (10 each side) and the most attractive feature:
every action works without touching the mouse - I'm very keyboard
Dne, 13. 12. 2010 17:56:30 je Andrei Popescu napisal(a):
Every time I experimented with two-pane file managers I kept coming
back
to Tux Commander (package tuxcmd). While it does have it's quirks it
is
closest to the habits I acquired on Windows using Windows/Total
Commander.
Oh, the woes o
Geronimo writes:
> Hi,
>
>> While I'm not familiar with Kalk
> Sorry, was my typo - I meant KCalc
>
> The gnome calculator is years away to be that usable.
I agree, but you might want to look into qalculate as a substitute.
--
Carl Johnsonca...@peak.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Monday, 13. Dec 2010, 17:51:17 Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Do you mean the mini-config done by KDE3 at first start? ... Or do you mean
> the old base-config program, back when the installation was done in two
> steps (sarge was the last release to use this IIRC)?
No, I refer to the kde settings dia
On Lu, 13 dec 10, 16:47:31, Klistvud wrote:
> Dne, 13. 12. 2010 16:34:58 je Geronimo napisal(a):
>
> >But i.e. I can't live without krusader, which is heavily bound to kde
> >internals. Or look at Kalk - there's no serious alternative on
> >gnome systems.
>
> While I'm not familiar with Kalk, I w
On Lu, 13 dec 10, 17:17:51, Geronimo wrote:
> On Monday, 13. Dec 2010, 16:51:02 Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Lu, 13 dec 10, 16:13:47, Geronimo wrote:
> > > > AFAIK this is only done when Windows is detected on that machine.
> > >
> > > Ok, that sounds reasonable.
> > >
> > > But then I miss an op
On Monday, 13. Dec 2010, 16:51:02 Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 13 dec 10, 16:13:47, Geronimo wrote:
> > > AFAIK this is only done when Windows is detected on that machine.
> >
> > Ok, that sounds reasonable.
> >
> > But then I miss an option, where I can overwrite that.
>
> For the installer?
Hi,
> While I'm not familiar with Kalk
Sorry, was my typo - I meant KCalc
The gnome calculator is years away to be that usable.
> I've since settled for gnome-commander because it's a
> native Gnome app.
I tried that commander, but it's an eternity away from krusader.
So I have to live with sm
On Lu, 13 dec 10, 16:13:47, Geronimo wrote:
> > AFAIK this is only done when Windows is detected on that machine.
>
> Ok, that sounds reasonable.
>
> But then I miss an option, where I can overwrite that.
For the installer?
> I always install my machines using UTC - and I was quite off socks
Dne, 13. 12. 2010 16:34:58 je Geronimo napisal(a):
But i.e. I can't live without krusader, which is heavily bound to kde
internals. Or look at Kalk - there's no serious alternative on gnome
systems.
While I'm not familiar with Kalk, I was a *huge* fan of Krusader too,
at the time. I've sin
On Monday, 13. Dec 2010, 16:18:08 Klistvud wrote:
> On the other hand, I'm thankful to KDE 4, because it prompted me to
> (re)discover and adopt Gnome.
ROFL
Yes, in this sense I say thank you too :)
I'm now using gnome for about half a year and it is quite attractive. Lean,
reasonable menues and
Dne, 13. 12. 2010 07:27:07 je Geronimo napisal(a):
The point is - I was a very emotional fan of kde in days before kde 4
- but
now I hate kde.
I can certainly relate to that, as can many other former KDE users. On
the other hand, I'm thankful to KDE 4, because it prompted me to
(re)dis
On Monday, 13. Dec 2010, 16:00:20 Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 13 dec 10, 15:00:16, Geronimo wrote:
> > The key is /etc/default/rcS - where after a gnome installation utc is set
> > to true and after a kde installation utc is set to false.
> >
> > May be this is an issue for the installer-crew.
On Lu, 13 dec 10, 15:00:16, Geronimo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday, 13. Dec 2010, 09:26:50 shawn wilson wrote:
> > ... easiest thing (since it's 03:23 here and i know off hand where to look)
> > is to 'cat /etc/timezone'
>
> that file isn't the key and was the same on both systems.
> Then I looked
Hi,
On Monday, 13. Dec 2010, 09:26:50 shawn wilson wrote:
> ... easiest thing (since it's 03:23 here and i know off hand where to look)
> is to 'cat /etc/timezone'
that file isn't the key and was the same on both systems.
Then I looked at /etc/adjtime and that told me the difference.
The key is
On 12/13/2010 03:26 AM, shawn wilson wrote:
Additionally: I need some time to enter BIOS and reorder boot sequence of
harddrives - so I suspect, that it's not a question of time skew but may be
wrong handling of hwclock - as the kde-system comes up with a wrong time
(wrong by one hour - not a few
> Additionally: I need some time to enter BIOS and reorder boot sequence of
> harddrives - so I suspect, that it's not a question of time skew but may be
> wrong handling of hwclock - as the kde-system comes up with a wrong time
> (wrong by one hour - not a few seconds).
>
> Is it possible, that kd
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 06:58:56, shawn wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Geronimo wrote:
> first, some side comments that aren't going to answer your questions:
> why not use a vm?
I already use virtualbox for testing. Few days after squeeze freeze I had a
crash of my s
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Geronimo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have two separate installations of debian squeeze, each on a different
> harddisk. More by accident, than by intention it happens, that each
> installation has its own grub entry in the mbr of its harddisk.
> Both systems use ext3 an
Hello,
I have two separate installations of debian squeeze, each on a different
harddisk. More by accident, than by intention it happens, that each
installation has its own grub entry in the mbr of its harddisk.
Both systems use ext3 and grub2 and hwclock runs at UTC.
1. On both installtions i
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 03:29:05 Ron Johnson wrote:
> Next time you attach such a file, I suggest that you add a ".txt" so
> that your email/webmail app knows that it is a text file, instead of
> base64 encoded application/octet-stream.
>
> (Iceweasel/Thunderbird seems to "peek" into it, probably
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:29:05PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-03-22 21:56, Mike Viau wrote:
>> Attached for you convenience!
>> sourced from: Debian Lenny
>
> Next time you attach such a file, I suggest that you add a ".txt" so
> that your email/webmail app knows that it is a text file,
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:29:05 -0500 wrote:
>
> On 2010-03-22 21:56, Mike Viau wrote:
> > Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:29:01 -0400 wrote:
> > >
> > > On 23:37 Fri 19 Mar , Mike Viau wrote:
> > > > > > My output with the suggestion above.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > debian:~# dpkg --dry-run --pu
On 2010-03-22 21:56, Mike Viau wrote:
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:29:01 -0400 wrote:
>
> On 23:37 Fri 19 Mar , Mike Viau wrote:
> > > > My output with the suggestion above.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > debian:~# dpkg --dry-run --purge $(join -v2 <(awk '{if
($2=="install")
> > > > print $1}' < debian-
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:29:01 -0400 wrote:
>
> On 23:37 Fri 19 Mar , Mike Viau wrote:
> > > > My output with the suggestion above.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > debian:~# dpkg --dry-run --purge $(join -v2 <(awk '{if ($2=="install")
> > > > print $1}' < debian-5.04-base-selections | sort) <(dpkg
> > >
On 23:37 Fri 19 Mar , Mike Viau wrote:
> > > My output with the suggestion above.
> > >
> > >
> > > debian:~# dpkg --dry-run --purge $(join -v2 <(awk '{if ($2=="install")
> > > print $1}' < debian-5.04-base-selections | sort) <(dpkg --get-selections |
> > > awk '{if ($2=="install") print $1}' |
On Fri,19.Mar.10, 17:28:20, Greg Madden wrote:
> I was refering to what Debian calls a 'base' intall and 'standard'. When you
> install Debian (net install) the base system is installed, then a reboot is
> done
> to install any 'tasksel' (gnome t
2010/3/20 Stefan Monnier
> > I suppose I can classify this as an experiment case, whereas I will
> > likely later on try out various (which may include Apache, Samba,
> > whatever really, etc) Debian packages on the system. This time I plan
> > to keep better track of what I have installed so tha
> I suppose I can classify this as an experiment case, whereas I will
> likely later on try out various (which may include Apache, Samba,
> whatever really, etc) Debian packages on the system. This time I plan
> to keep better track of what I have installed so that the packages can
> be purged easi
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:06:02 -0500 wrote:
> On 2010-03-19 21:26, Mike Viau wrote:
> >> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:13:49 -0500 wrote:
> [snip]
> >>
> >> I see no purpose, when you can do this at any time:
> >> COLUMNS=180 dpkg -l | grep ^i | \
> >> cut -c4-44 > installed.packages.`date +"%Y%M
to purge or remove all the packages that were
> > > > installed on a Debian system after the initial (bare bone) minimal
> > > > system installation. I have searched on Google for "How to reduce a
> > > > Debian system to a base system" but it seems like the topic
On 2010-03-19 21:26, Mike Viau wrote:
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:13:49 -0500 wrote:
[snip]
I see no purpose, when you can do this at any time:
COLUMNS=180 dpkg -l | grep ^i | \
cut -c4-44 > installed.packages.`date +"%Y%M%d-%H%m"`
Since that's obviously a pain to write, put it in an a
system after the initial (bare bone) minimal
> > > system installation. I have searched on Google for "How to reduce a
> > > Debian system to a base system" but it seems like the topic of interest
> > > was to reduce the memory consumption of the installed system, whi
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:28:20 -0900 wrote:
>
> On Friday 19 March 2010 03:52:44 pm Mike Viau wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:31:44 -0300 wrote:
> > >Ok the bigger problem you should have is "what is a base system"
> >
> > I agree, what a base system
On Friday 19 March 2010 03:52:44 pm Mike Viau wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:31:44 -0300 wrote:
> >Ok the bigger problem you should have is "what is a base system"
>
> I agree, what a base system means can be different among users.
I was refering to what Debian
> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:13:49 -0500 wrote:
>
> >> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:48:54 -0900 wrote:
> >>
> >> Would be nice to have a 'snapshot' feature to revert to. I have used
> >> aptitude
> >> (dselect) to get close to a standard install, base + standard is not that
> >> many
> >> package
. I have searched on Google for "How to reduce a Debian system
> > to a base system" but it seems like the topic of interest was to reduce the
> > memory consumption of the installed system, which is not my consern.
> >
> > In essence I would like to revert my syste
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:48:54 -0900 wrote:
Would be nice to have a 'snapshot' feature to revert to. I have used aptitude
(dselect) to get close to a standard install, base + standard is not that many
packages, no X.
Yes I agree it would be a very handy feature. What is the debian-user mail
> On Friday 19 March 2010 01:09:20 pm Mike Viau wrote:
> > > Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:31:40 +0100
> > > From: iod...@runbox.no
> > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > > Subject: Re: How to reduce a debian system to a base system
> > >
> >
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:31:44 -0300 wrote:
>Ok the bigger problem you should have is "what is a base system"
I agree, what a base system means can be different among users.
>You could run in another box a installation and get a list of the basic system
>packages, but what
Ok the bigger problem you should have is "what is a base system"
You could run in another box a installation and get a list of the basic
system packages, but what do you want the box for? give us a user case and
we would try to sort this mess out for you.
Definitely purging X is a mu
On Friday 19 March 2010 01:09:20 pm Mike Viau wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:31:40 +0100
> > From: iod...@runbox.no
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: How to reduce a debian system to a base system
> >
> > Mike Viau wrote:
> > >
On Fri March 19 2010 12:55:47 Mike Viau wrote:
> I was looking for a way to purge or remove all the packages that were
> installed on a Debian system after the initial (bare bone) minimal system
> installation. I have searched on Google for "How to reduce a Debian system
> to a ba
On 2010-03-19 15:21, Mike Viau wrote:
[snip]
I was hoping to find a solution for a currently running Debian system
rather then to create a bare bone baseline or image...
I did that once, for a little Debian-based router. Got it down to
250MB, even including Python and ssh. But that was m
> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:31:40 +0100
> From: iod...@runbox.no
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: How to reduce a debian system to a base system
>
> Mike Viau wrote:
> > In essence I would like to revert my system back to a freshly
> > install
Mike Viau wrote:
In essence I would like to revert my system back to a freshly
installed state, without reinstalling. Ultimatly is this possible?
-snip-
I was hoping to find a solution for a currently running Debian system
rather then to create a bare bone baseline or image...
Wouldn't the ea
> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:02:30 -0500
> From: rac...@makeworld.com
> CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: How to reduce a debian system to a base system
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
> Mike Viau wrote:
> > Hello Debian users,
> >
> &
Mike Viau wrote:
Hello Debian users,
I was looking for a way to purge or remove all the packages that were
installed on a Debian system _after_ the initial (bare bone) minimal
system installation. I have searched on Google for "How to reduce a
Debian system to a base system" bu
Hello Debian users,
I was looking for a way to purge or remove all the packages that were installed
on a Debian system after the initial (bare bone) minimal system installation. I
have searched on Google for "How to reduce a Debian system to a base system"
but it seems like th
don't want this to
> update just like that. Everything depends on it.
>
> If it's your local desktop, it doens't really matter. But then you don't
> have to automate it because you can do it at logon or whatever.
>
> Koen Linders
>
>
Thank you fo
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:33:53 +0100, Geek87 wrote:
> Do you have any idea? Is the technique I used bad and dirty?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Geek87
I don't think it's a good idea. Because if in your example sendmail is
replaced with postfix. Config files will not be magically filled it for
the
Hi all!
I'm new on the list so I hope my question is not stupid and I'm asking
it in the good list.
I have Sid installed on my computer and I would like to know how to keep
my base system (~prequired, ~pimportant, ~pstandard) always clean and up
to date automatically: if package A is
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:48:30AM -0400, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
> gcr...@vcn.bc.ca wrote:
>> Thing is, I ran memtest86+ last night but it the computer froze midway
>> through test #3 of the first pass. I assumed it was because I was running
>> a 32 bit version of memtest on a 64 bit architecture, b
gcr...@vcn.bc.ca wrote:
Thing is, I ran memtest86+ last night but it the computer froze midway
through test #3 of the first pass. I assumed it was because I was running
a 32 bit version of memtest on a 64 bit architecture, but lacking anything
better to try, I ran it again. Sure enough, there w
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:11:22AM -0500, Victor Padro wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:16 AM, wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to install 5.0.1, amd64 to an MSI motherboard with and Athlon 64
> > processor. I get as far as installing the base system, then
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:16 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install 5.0.1, amd64 to an MSI motherboard with and Athlon 64
> processor. I get as far as installing the base system, then at 27%,
> "extracting login" the system hangs. Any thoughts?
>
> Th
Hi,
I'm trying to install 5.0.1, amd64 to an MSI motherboard with and Athlon 64
processor. I get as far as installing the base system, then at 27%,
"extracting login" the system hangs. Any thoughts?
The iso image passed and md5 check sum, and I tried burning it three times,
so
John Pycroft wrote:
i am a new user and i'm trying to install your current version of debian
GNU/Linux 4.0r1 os on my GigaByte P4 desktop PC.
every time i run the base system installer, it spends a long time on
initamfs-tools or something like that, after it sits on that one file for
a
i am a new user and i'm trying to install your current version of debian
GNU/Linux 4.0r1 os on my GigaByte P4 desktop PC.
every time i run the base system installer, it spends a long time on
initamfs-tools or something like that, after it sits on that one file for
around 20mins, the inst
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 02:37:42PM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 11:28:36AM -0700, Redefined Horizons wrote:
> >
> > Do you have any idea if this is a bug, or just a problem I encountered
> > on my particular installation? (I got it working with your help by the
> > way.)
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 11:28:36AM -0700, Redefined Horizons wrote:
> On 4/21/07, Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Just a quick note, top-posting is generally frowned upon here (I purged
> >the rest of the topic from this message because it was becoming a
> >complicated mess, too much f
On 4/21/07, Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just a quick note, top-posting is generally frowned upon here (I purged
the rest of the topic from this message because it was becoming a
complicated mess, too much for me to fix).
> Scott Huey wrote:
> Michael,
>
> How do I restart the insta
Just a quick note, top-posting is generally frowned upon here (I purged
the rest of the topic from this message because it was becoming a
complicated mess, too much for me to fix).
> Scott Huey wrote:
> Michael,
>
> How do I restart the installation after I've made the changes you
> indicated?
>
rd drive, when the installation crashes.
> > >
> > > The error message I get is:
> > >
> > > Base System Installation Error The debootstra program exited with
> > > an error (return value 1)
> > >
> > > Failed to install the base system The base sys
;m not hooked to the internet just yet.) I
> > was running Debian Etch on the computer before.
> >
> > I get through the first portion of the installation, including the
> > partitioning of the hard drive, when the installation crashes.
> >
> > The error message I ge
ioning of the hard drive, when the installation crashes.
>
> The error message I get is:
>
> Base System Installation Error
> The debootstra program exited with an error (return value 1)
>
> Failed to install the base system
> The base system installatio into /target/ failed.
&
through the first portion of the installation, including the
> partitioning of the hard drive, when the installation crashes.
>
> The error message I get is:
>
> Base System Installation Error
> The debootstra program exited with an error (return value 1)
>
> Failed to inst
1 - 100 of 266 matches
Mail list logo
