Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 à 11:30 +0100, koen.n...@koca.be a écrit : > On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:33:53 +0100, Geek87 <gee...@gmx.com> wrote: > > > Do you have any idea? Is the technique I used bad and dirty? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Geek87 > > I don't think it's a good idea. Because if in your example sendmail is > replaced with postfix. Config files will not be magically filled it for > the > new system. Not that the above will happen often. The only thing you > should automate > is installing security updates every night, there is a package for this if > I remember correct. > > When security is a concern, and it should, configure IPTABLES after > install before plugging in your system. > > It depends on what you'll be using the system for. > I have Debian Samba PDC with DHCP and DNS: I really don't want this to > update just like that. Everything depends on it. > > If it's your local desktop, it doens't really matter. But then you don't > have to automate it because you can do it at logon or whatever. > > Koen Linders > >
Thank you for the answer. So this is a bad idea for the tasks I agree with you, I didn't see the things this way. But for the base system (~prequired, ~pimportant and ~pstandard) do you think it's a bad idea too? Why would it be bad idea to have the new packages (which now have one of the 3 priorities above) and old packages (which no longer have one of the 3 priorities) automatically proposed respectively for install or removal on updates? Geek87 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
