Re: About ATI drivers and xorg.conf

2011-09-26 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:00:23 -0400, co...@esid.gecgr.co.cu wrote in message : > Hi > > a few days ago I'm trying to operate a card > Technologies Inc R200 BB [Radeon All in Wonder 8500DV] > > Use Debian squeeze > > I managed to run the ati-driver-installer-8.38.6-4 and generated > x86.x86_64.ru

About ATI drivers and xorg.conf

2011-09-26 Thread cosme
Hi a few days ago I'm trying to operate a card Technologies Inc R200 BB [Radeon All in Wonder 8500DV] Use Debian squeeze I managed to run the ati-driver-installer-8.38.6-4 and generated x86.x86_64.run packages. deb and dpkg install. After having generated this run but when I run glxinfo | grep

Re: ATI drivers

2010-02-18 Thread Jan Schuemann
Hi Nick, no plans for tonight yet, is Aki coming too? Should we prepare some dinner? And when do you want to come? Cheers Jan On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Nick Hastings wrote: > Hi, > > * Jan Schuemann [100218 20:22]: > > Sure, wanna come over for it again? i think we also should

[OT] How good are the new free ATI drivers?

2008-07-08 Thread Stephan Seitz
I would prefer open source drivers, I ask you, if you have any experience with one of the new free ATI drivers. I’m looking for a graphic card which can replace the old one mentioned above and has at least the same 3D capabilities and of course a working driver even if used in a XEN environment

Re: Ati Drivers, Xorg 7.2, Missing libfglrxdrm.a

2007-07-09 Thread Orestes leal
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:19:13 +0200 Jonathan Kaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Orestes leal wrote: > > > On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 08:19:55 -0400 > > Orestes leal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi folks, good day! > >> > >> Yesterday I've downloaded the latest drivers from ATI > >> (ati-driv

Re: Ati Drivers, Xorg 7.2, Missing libfglrxdrm.a

2007-07-09 Thread Jonathan Kaye
Orestes leal wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 08:19:55 -0400 > Orestes leal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Hi folks, good day! >> >> Yesterday I've downloaded the latest drivers from ATI >> (ati-driver-installer-8.37.6-x86.x86_64.run) for Xorg7.1 >> (I have Xorg 7.2) and greater, >> but after in

Re: Ati Drivers, Xorg 7.2, Missing libfglrxdrm.a

2007-07-09 Thread Orestes leal
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 08:19:55 -0400 Orestes leal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi folks, good day! > > Yesterday I've downloaded the latest drivers from ATI > (ati-driver-installer-8.37.6-x86.x86_64.run) for Xorg7.1 > (I have Xorg 7.2) and greater, > but after install it sucessfully and change m

Ati Drivers, Xorg 7.2, Missing libfglrxdrm.a

2007-07-09 Thread Orestes leal
Hi folks, good day! Yesterday I've downloaded the latest drivers from ATI (ati-driver-installer-8.37.6-x86.x86_64.run) for Xorg7.1 (I have Xorg 7.2) and greater, but after install it sucessfully and change my xorg.conf to use my new fglrx driver something freeze me, checking the log I found that

updating ati drivers

2006-03-26 Thread [od] eeman
ATI not an off brand)) is not supported by the drivers built into debian. I have looked for instructions on updating the ATI drivers in debian but they are all extremely complicated and way too time consuming for me. Can anybody please give me a brief explanation or a link to one that can be done in

Re: amd64: needed packages for ati drivers

2006-03-26 Thread Jonathan Kaye
Toshiro wrote: >> > Anybody know which packages should I need to install to be able to use >> > the ati drivers? I'm trying to use the ati installer >> > (ati-driver-installer-8.23.7-x86_64.run) in sid and I'm always getting >> > errors; I suspect

Re: amd64: needed packages for ati drivers

2006-03-26 Thread Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much)
Toshiro wrote: [...] the problem is that the 32bit packages that page mentions are for RedHat/SuSE, I don't know the names of the corresponding Debian packages; I've installed some packages with similar names, but obviously I'm missing something, that's why I'm asking for help :) Regards,

Re: amd64: needed packages for ati drivers

2006-03-26 Thread Toshiro
> > Anybody know which packages should I need to install to be able to use > > the ati drivers? I'm trying to use the ati installer > > (ati-driver-installer-8.23.7-x86_64.run) in sid and I'm always getting > > errors; I suspect I'm missing some packages.

Re: amd64: needed packages for ati drivers

2006-03-26 Thread Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much)
Toshiro wrote: Anybody know which packages should I need to install to be able to use the ati drivers? I'm trying to use the ati installer (ati-driver-installer-8.23.7-x86_64.run) in sid and I'm always getting errors; I suspect I'm missing some packages. Thanks in advan

amd64: needed packages for ati drivers

2006-03-25 Thread Toshiro
Anybody know which packages should I need to install to be able to use the ati drivers? I'm trying to use the ati installer (ati-driver-installer-8.23.7-x86_64.run) in sid and I'm always getting errors; I suspect I'm missing some packages. Thanks in advance. -- To UNSUBS

Ati drivers

2005-01-02 Thread Huston
I had heard people mention looking for ATI drivers for Linux.  I am in no way affiliated with this site, and I have not used these drivers.  I just stumbled across these and want to put them out for reference.  They are about a 1/4 of the way downmaybe less.   http://www.m3dzone.com

ATI drivers on Radeon 9600, again (fwd)

2004-07-20 Thread Marcus Lundblad
I finally got it working on kernel 2.4.26 I also had to make some cleaning up from the dri-trunk packages, so it might even work on 2.6.6 now, but if it ain't broken... But thanks anyway. //Marcus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Xvideo not working with ATI drivers under Debian

2004-05-28 Thread Alon Altman
Hi, I've attached my XFree configuration and log file. The problem is that my ATI 3D RAGE PRO AGP card does not work with Xvideo under X11 under Debian. The same card worked correctly under Mandrake. When I run "xvinfo" I get: X-Video Extension version 2.2 screen #0 no adaptors present I've

Re: Xvideo not working with ATI drivers under Debian

2004-05-28 Thread Micha Feigin
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 07:05:46AM +0300, Alon Altman wrote: > Hi, > I've attached my XFree configuration and log file. The problem is that my > ATI 3D RAGE PRO AGP card does not work with Xvideo under X11 under Debian. > The same card worked correctly under Mandrake. > > When I run "xvinfo" I g

Re: Xvideo not working with ATI drivers under Debian

2004-05-28 Thread Iain Mac Donald
On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 05:05, Alon Altman wrote: > Hi, > I've attached my XFree configuration and log file. The problem is that my > ATI 3D RAGE PRO AGP card does not work with Xvideo under X11 under Debian. > The same card worked correctly under Mandrake. > > When I run "xvinfo" I get: > X-Video

Xvideo not working with ATI drivers under Debian

2004-05-28 Thread Alon Altman
Hi, I've attached my XFree configuration and log file. The problem is that my ATI 3D RAGE PRO AGP card does not work with Xvideo under X11 under Debian. The same card worked correctly under Mandrake. When I run "xvinfo" I get: X-Video Extension version 2.2 screen #0 no adaptors present I've

RE: Xvideo not working with ATI drivers under Debian

2004-05-28 Thread David Baron
On Friday 28 May 2004 07:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Xvideo not working with ATI drivers under Debian Works great with xine, no DRI otherwize. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ATI drivers 3.7.0 for XFree 4.3 *just now* released?!?

2004-03-07 Thread Nicos Gollan
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 14:25:09 -0800 Number Six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh, and the upshot of the Slashdot post is these are the first > OFFICIAL ATI drivers for XFree 4.3.0 --- but that's not true. I swear > my memory is that there have been 4.3.0 drivers posted on ATI&#x

Re: ATI drivers 3.7.0 for XFree 4.3 *just now* released?!?

2004-03-06 Thread hanasaki
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 02:21:32PM -0800, Number Six wrote: >> Why does ATI claim they are just now released, and what does Slashdot >> think so as well? Oh, and the upshot of the Slashdot post is these are the first OFFICIAL ATI drivers for XFree 4.3.0 --- but that's not true.

Re: ATI drivers 3.7.0 for XFree 4.3 *just now* released?!?

2004-03-06 Thread Nick Lidakis
Number Six wrote: On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 05:38:52PM -0500, Nick Lidakis wrote: Thanks for the excellent information, adding the list back in as they would also like to know. One thing I just noticed is mplayer is using the "x11" -vo device even though in debconf I specified "xv". My Mpl

[Fwd: Re: ATI drivers 3.7.0 for XFree 4.3 *just now* released?!?]

2004-03-06 Thread Nick Lidakis
--- Begin Message --- Number Six wrote: What am I not getting? http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/06/1436223&mode=nested http://www.ati.com/support/drivers/linux/radeon-linux.html The release date for 3.7.0 on the ATI site is 3/2/04. But the fglrx-4.3.0-*_3.7.0-3_i386.deb .debs I download

Re: ATI drivers 3.7.0 for XFree 4.3 *just now* released?!?

2004-03-06 Thread Number Six
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 03:03:58PM -0800, Number Six wrote: > I'm pretty sure "xv" used to work on my 9700 but now I've switched to a > 9800XT. I'll probably have to search the forums for spomething this > specific but do you have any insight about xv support? in 9800? in the > latest drivers

Re: ATI drivers 3.7.0 for XFree 4.3 *just now* released?!?

2004-03-06 Thread Number Six
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 05:38:52PM -0500, Nick Lidakis wrote: > Number Six wrote: > >Why does ATI claim they are just now released, and what does Slashdot > >think so as well? > > Thanks for the excellent information, adding the list back in as they would also like to know. One thing I just not

Re: ATI drivers 3.7.0 for XFree 4.3 *just now* released?!?

2004-03-06 Thread Number Six
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 02:21:32PM -0800, Number Six wrote: > Why does ATI claim they are just now released, and what does Slashdot > think so as well? Oh, and the upshot of the Slashdot post is these are the first OFFICIAL ATI drivers for XFree 4.3.0 --- but that's not true. I swea

ATI drivers 3.7.0 for XFree 4.3 *just now* released?!?

2004-03-06 Thread Number Six
What am I not getting? http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/06/1436223&mode=nested http://www.ati.com/support/drivers/linux/radeon-linux.html The release date for 3.7.0 on the ATI site is 3/2/04. But the fglrx-4.3.0-*_3.7.0-3_i386.deb .debs I downloaded from: http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavi

Re: ATI drivers 3.2.5, kernel 2.6-test4 and modules

2003-09-19 Thread Nick Lidakis
Mental Patient wrote: Lots of stuff changed from 2.4 to 2.6 and the ati drivers arent' totally prepared for it. Zinx on #ati (freenode) has a port that I'm using with my ATI 9800 + 2.6.0-test5. You can get it here: http://zinx.xmms.org/misc/tmp/fglrx-module-3.2.5-for-2.6.0-test.tar.g

Re: ATI drivers 3.2.5, kernel 2.6-test4 and modules

2003-09-19 Thread Mental Patient
adme0325.txt Lots of stuff changed from 2.4 to 2.6 and the ati drivers arent' totally prepared for it. Zinx on #ati (freenode) has a port that I'm using with my ATI 9800 + 2.6.0-test5. You can get it here: http://zinx.xmms.org/misc/tmp/fglrx-module-3.2.5-for-2.6.0-test.tar.gz Nothi

ATI drivers 3.2.5, kernel 2.6-test4 and modules

2003-09-18 Thread Nick Lidakis
I have been trying my hardest to get ATI's 3.2.5 driver (the 3.2.5 are supposed to be kernel 2.6 compatible) module to compile with kernel 2.6-test4 on my Debian unstable box. I have read the kernel doc's concerning modules, but I can't seem to figure out what I am doing wrong. I don't have any

Re: Trouble with DRI (WAS: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ATI drivers available)

2003-09-09 Thread csj
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:57:36 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 07:49:21 +0800, > csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > Also I get my opensource radeon DRI drivers from a Debian > > maintainer's unofficial "site": > > > > http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk/ > > http:

Re: Trouble with DRI (WAS: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ATI drivers available)

2003-09-09 Thread Roberto Sanchez
--- Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > ..huh? :-) Any chance these work with these cards: > cat /proc/pci |tail -n 7 > Bus 1, device 0, function 0: > VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage IIC > AGP (rev 122). > IRQ 11. > Master Capable. La

Re: Trouble with DRI (WAS: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ATI drivers available)

2003-09-09 Thread Roberto Sanchez
--- csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > I added this line to sources.list: > > > > deb http://penguinppc.org/~daniels/sid/i386/ ./ > > I used to download my source from that site, when > Daniel-san. first took it upon himself to create XFree86 4.3 for > the terminally impatient. Now my 4.3 p

Re: Trouble with DRI (WAS: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ATI drivers available)

2003-09-09 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 07:49:21 +0800, csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > At Mon, 8 Sep 2003 05:20:28 +0200 (CEST), > Roberto Sanchez wrote: > > [...] > > > OK. I'm hoping that someone can help me out here. This > > morning I downloaded the new Knoppix CD that came

Re: Trouble with DRI (WAS: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ATI drivers available)

2003-09-08 Thread csj
At Mon, 8 Sep 2003 05:20:28 +0200 (CEST), Roberto Sanchez wrote: [...] > OK. I'm hoping that someone can help me out here. This > morning I downloaded the new Knoppix CD that came out on > Friday. I burned it and used it to boot my machine, and to my > surprise it recognized the nForce2 AGPGAR

Trouble with DRI (WAS: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ATI drivers available)

2003-09-07 Thread Roberto Sanchez
--- csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 03:08:11 +0200 (CEST), Roberto Sanchez wrote: > > > I just checked out the ATI website, and they have some new > > linux drivers. The new version is 3.2.5, with versions for > > Xfree86 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3. I just installed the drivers a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ATI drivers available

2003-09-07 Thread Roberto Sanchez
--- csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 03:08:11 +0200 (CEST), Roberto Sanchez wrote: > > > I just checked out the ATI website, and they have some new > > linux drivers. The new version is 3.2.5, with versions for > > Xfree86 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3. I just installed the drivers a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ATI drivers available

2003-09-07 Thread csj
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 03:08:11 +0200 (CEST), Roberto Sanchez wrote: > I just checked out the ATI website, and they have some new > linux drivers. The new version is 3.2.5, with versions for > Xfree86 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3. I just installed the drivers and > built the new kernel module, and I can alread

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ATI drivers available

2003-09-06 Thread TR
On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 20:57:59 -0500 "Scott C. Linnenbringer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 03:08:11 +0200 (CEST), Roberto Sanchez > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I just checked out the ATI website, and they have some new linux > > drivers. The new version is 3.2.5, with versi

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ATI drivers available

2003-09-06 Thread Roberto Sanchez
--- "Scott C. Linnenbringer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 03:08:11 +0200 (CEST), Roberto Sanchez > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I just checked out the ATI website, and they have some new linux > > drivers. The new version is 3.2.5, with versions for Xfree86 4.1, 4.2, >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ATI drivers available

2003-09-06 Thread Scott C. Linnenbringer
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 03:08:11 +0200 (CEST), Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just checked out the ATI website, and they have some new linux > drivers. The new version is 3.2.5, with versions for Xfree86 4.1, 4.2, > and 4.3. I just installed the drivers and built the new kernel > modu

[ANNOUNCE] New ATI drivers available

2003-09-06 Thread Roberto Sanchez
I just checked out the ATI website, and they have some new linux drivers. The new version is 3.2.5, with versions for Xfree86 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3. I just installed the drivers and built the new kernel module, and I can already see that things have improved (no more segfaults when running fgl_glxgear